Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. A Big Win for Obama - but what's the prize?

A Big Win for Obama - but what's the prize?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
57 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Stan Shannon

    The problem is that Obama is implying that someone said we were at war with Islam. Who (aside form me) has ever said that we are. Bush didn't, he bent over backwards to avoid associating Islam with terrorism (even though it obviously is) So why is it such an applause line now for Obama?

    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

    R Offline
    R Offline
    Rob Graham
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    I've come to accept that most of the media are hypocrites whose political persuasion colors their reporting (on both sides of the fence, Fox is no better, it just takes the opposite political position from the others). Other nation in general (not just the NATO bunch) hated Bush because he went to war in Iraq without their blessing. Because of that hatred, nothing Bush did was applauded, even when it was the proper thing. Obama benefits from simply being "Not Bush", and is applauded for things Bush was scorned for. Most of our so-called allies have become appeasers in the grand tradition of Neville Chamberlin, preferring endless talk to any concrete action; willing to let problems fester while offering at most polite scoldings. Obviously 911 wasn't enough, it will take a Pearl Harbor event to convince most that we face an implacable enemy that wants us dead. Our erstwhile allies don't believe this, nor do they believe themselves in the line of fire. In some respects, most would like to see us "get our comeuppance". We are viewed as the bully on the schoolyard.

    S B O 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • S Stan Shannon

      Rob Graham wrote:

      by any realistic standards an abject failure.

      You just don't seem to get it. Obama is a success. He has always been successful in the past, and he always will be in the future. The same people who told us Bush was a moronic failure say so, and they are never wrong. In the end, you will believe them about Obama just as you did about Bush. Stop fighting it.

      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Rob Graham
      wrote on last edited by
      #26

      Oh, I get it Stan. I did say "by any realistic standards" the trip was a failure. That in no way means Obama is being judged by such. The media will not allow him to fail.

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Rob Graham

        Oh, I get it Stan. I did say "by any realistic standards" the trip was a failure. That in no way means Obama is being judged by such. The media will not allow him to fail.

        S Offline
        S Offline
        Stan Shannon
        wrote on last edited by
        #27

        Rob Graham wrote:

        Oh, I get it Stan.

        I know. But most will not. If the media says he is successful, he is successful. It is 1984. Now and forever, until enough people finally do get it.

        Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

        O 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • O Oakman

          According to David Axelrod, senior advisor to the President, the President's eight-day sojourn in Europe was "enormously productive." Now that is good to hear, but I am a little confused as to what, exactly, it produced. Apparently, hearing Obama apologize for winning WWII produced enormous good will towards America. And that's great. Everybody likes to be liked. Certainly we saw one European leader after another fall over each other to get photographed standing next to Obama - although I think Sarkozy wanted to stand by Michelle. And that's wonderful, too. If all these political leaders jump on his bandwagon, it can't help but mean a new era of cooperation and friendship - right? But - Obama said that one of the goals of going to the G20 was to convince other countries to do their share in stimulating the global economy. It turns out that all those leaders that think he's photogenic, think he's full of shit when it comes to this issue. And - Obama said that one of the goals of going to the NATO summit was to convince our good buddies to contribute more than a pittance to the war in Afghanistan. He walked away with a total commitment from the 20 odd countries of an extra 5,000 men - most of who aren't combat soldiers and won't have combat missions. And - while he was in Europe, he got a chance to talk to Russia's and China's leaders and reach a greater depth of regard and understanding with them. Unfortunately they both turned around and ordered their UN ambassadors to make sure that when North Korea launched a missile and Obama said there had to be be consequences -- there weren't. It's not even clear that the UN will write them an angry letter. But that's okay, because Obama showed our true American mettle. When faced with the launch by a crazy Stalinist dictator of a rocket capable of having a nuclear warhead and hitting the extreme western parts of the US - he said, proudly and forthrightly, that this would be a great time to start getting rid of our missiles. Wow. It sure was productive, Mr. Axelrod. Like a fleet enema. And I can smell the bullshit from here.

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

          B Offline
          B Offline
          bulg
          wrote on last edited by
          #28

          Are you talking about.. this[^] missile?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Rob Graham

            I've come to accept that most of the media are hypocrites whose political persuasion colors their reporting (on both sides of the fence, Fox is no better, it just takes the opposite political position from the others). Other nation in general (not just the NATO bunch) hated Bush because he went to war in Iraq without their blessing. Because of that hatred, nothing Bush did was applauded, even when it was the proper thing. Obama benefits from simply being "Not Bush", and is applauded for things Bush was scorned for. Most of our so-called allies have become appeasers in the grand tradition of Neville Chamberlin, preferring endless talk to any concrete action; willing to let problems fester while offering at most polite scoldings. Obviously 911 wasn't enough, it will take a Pearl Harbor event to convince most that we face an implacable enemy that wants us dead. Our erstwhile allies don't believe this, nor do they believe themselves in the line of fire. In some respects, most would like to see us "get our comeuppance". We are viewed as the bully on the schoolyard.

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Stan Shannon
            wrote on last edited by
            #29

            Rob Graham wrote:

            hated Bush because he went to war in Iraq without their blessing

            The only thing I disagree with is that. They hated him because he was a conservative. Iraq merely provided an easy means of focusing that latent hostility. Europeans view traditional American conservatism as a dangerous form of poliltical radicalism. They are far more concerned about it than they are any other possible threat from any other source. Obama represents an America moving sharply towards a Euro-centric political perspective, and that makes them happy.

            Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

            B 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Rob Graham

              I've come to accept that most of the media are hypocrites whose political persuasion colors their reporting (on both sides of the fence, Fox is no better, it just takes the opposite political position from the others). Other nation in general (not just the NATO bunch) hated Bush because he went to war in Iraq without their blessing. Because of that hatred, nothing Bush did was applauded, even when it was the proper thing. Obama benefits from simply being "Not Bush", and is applauded for things Bush was scorned for. Most of our so-called allies have become appeasers in the grand tradition of Neville Chamberlin, preferring endless talk to any concrete action; willing to let problems fester while offering at most polite scoldings. Obviously 911 wasn't enough, it will take a Pearl Harbor event to convince most that we face an implacable enemy that wants us dead. Our erstwhile allies don't believe this, nor do they believe themselves in the line of fire. In some respects, most would like to see us "get our comeuppance". We are viewed as the bully on the schoolyard.

              B Offline
              B Offline
              Bassam Saoud
              wrote on last edited by
              #30

              The truth of the matter is that everyone knows what the problem is and what is needed to get rid of the problem. The thing is the American people made it clear (in the last elections) that their top priority is the economy and that means cutting expenses. "War on terror" is now just another expense. Mr. Obama is just executing what the people want. God bless democracy.

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Stan Shannon

                Rob Graham wrote:

                hated Bush because he went to war in Iraq without their blessing

                The only thing I disagree with is that. They hated him because he was a conservative. Iraq merely provided an easy means of focusing that latent hostility. Europeans view traditional American conservatism as a dangerous form of poliltical radicalism. They are far more concerned about it than they are any other possible threat from any other source. Obama represents an America moving sharply towards a Euro-centric political perspective, and that makes them happy.

                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                B Offline
                B Offline
                Bassam Saoud
                wrote on last edited by
                #31

                I disagree with you - Europeans want to seperate themseles from US. Doesnt matter who is presisent or what is the american policy, Europe wants loose.

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B Bassam Saoud

                  The truth of the matter is that everyone knows what the problem is and what is needed to get rid of the problem. The thing is the American people made it clear (in the last elections) that their top priority is the economy and that means cutting expenses. "War on terror" is now just another expense. Mr. Obama is just executing what the people want. God bless democracy.

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Rob Graham
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #32

                  Bassam Saoud wrote:

                  top priority is the economy and that means cutting expenses.

                  The Obama administration is most certainty not doing that. They are cutting Military expenses, but are spending on social welfare like they just won a lottery. That, combined with increasing taxes won't help the economy for long. Wait until the carbon tax passes, followed by making all employer paid health insurance taxable. That's going to leave folks wondering who picked their pocket.

                  B 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Rob Graham

                    Bassam Saoud wrote:

                    top priority is the economy and that means cutting expenses.

                    The Obama administration is most certainty not doing that. They are cutting Military expenses, but are spending on social welfare like they just won a lottery. That, combined with increasing taxes won't help the economy for long. Wait until the carbon tax passes, followed by making all employer paid health insurance taxable. That's going to leave folks wondering who picked their pocket.

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    Bassam Saoud
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #33

                    Rob Graham wrote:

                    The Obama administration is most certainty not doing that. They are cutting Military expenses, but are spending on social welfare like they just won a lottery

                    and People love it (atleast the folks I know)... there was a poll on CNN that basically says more than 60% approve his job but less then 40% approved the Treasury like he works on his own.

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J John Carson

                      Mike Gaskey wrote:

                      and it works until you look in the sky and say, "oh sh*t!". we've been doing the diplomatic dance on the issues of N. Korea and Iran for longer than I can remember. It has resulted in ???

                      It is a non sequitur to think that limited success with one approach necessarily mean that it is the wrong approach. Some problems are intractable and won't respond quickly or well to any approach. Other problems are more readily soluble. So far noone has died as a result of North Korea's missiles or Iran's nuclear program. The cold war took a while, but victory was eventually achieved without going to war with the Soviet Union.

                      John Carson

                      B Offline
                      B Offline
                      Bassam Saoud
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #34

                      John Carson wrote:

                      So far noone has died as a result of North Korea's missiles or Iran's nuclear program

                      I beg to differ Sir !

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • B Bassam Saoud

                        Rob Graham wrote:

                        The Obama administration is most certainty not doing that. They are cutting Military expenses, but are spending on social welfare like they just won a lottery

                        and People love it (atleast the folks I know)... there was a poll on CNN that basically says more than 60% approve his job but less then 40% approved the Treasury like he works on his own.

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Stan Shannon
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #35

                        Bassam Saoud wrote:

                        People love it (atleast the folks I know)... there was a poll on CNN that basically says more than 60% approve

                        Thats because they don't know how badly they are being lied to yet.

                        Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B Bassam Saoud

                          I disagree with you - Europeans want to seperate themseles from US. Doesnt matter who is presisent or what is the american policy, Europe wants loose.

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          Stan Shannon
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #36

                          Bassam Saoud wrote:

                          Europe wants loose.

                          Loose from what? Being rescued from themselves? I think most Americans would be more than happy to do that.

                          Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J John Carson

                            I think the attitude that success constitutes America speaking and the rest of the world jumping into line is what was wrong with the Bush foreign policy. That sort of thing doesn't happen in the modern world. Successful diplomacy takes years, not a week. Obama got off to a good start building relationships. Give it a couple of years to see if those relationships can deliver something concrete.

                            John Carson

                            O Offline
                            O Offline
                            Oakman
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #37

                            John Carson wrote:

                            I think the attitude that success constitutes America speaking and the rest of the world jumping into line is what was wrong with the Bush foreign policy

                            Perhaps so, but if the alternative is Europe speaking and America jumping in line, I know which one I'd prefer. But your comment has me wondering - why when Russia or China acts in a way that can be considered detrimental to world harmony, are they not expected to apologize and spend two years crawling back into France's good graces?

                            John Carson wrote:

                            Give it a couple of years to see if those relationships can deliver something concrete.

                            i.e no help in Afghanistan; no help on the economy, but lots and lots of photo ops during the next two years?

                            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                            J 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R Rob Graham

                              I've come to accept that most of the media are hypocrites whose political persuasion colors their reporting (on both sides of the fence, Fox is no better, it just takes the opposite political position from the others). Other nation in general (not just the NATO bunch) hated Bush because he went to war in Iraq without their blessing. Because of that hatred, nothing Bush did was applauded, even when it was the proper thing. Obama benefits from simply being "Not Bush", and is applauded for things Bush was scorned for. Most of our so-called allies have become appeasers in the grand tradition of Neville Chamberlin, preferring endless talk to any concrete action; willing to let problems fester while offering at most polite scoldings. Obviously 911 wasn't enough, it will take a Pearl Harbor event to convince most that we face an implacable enemy that wants us dead. Our erstwhile allies don't believe this, nor do they believe themselves in the line of fire. In some respects, most would like to see us "get our comeuppance". We are viewed as the bully on the schoolyard.

                              O Offline
                              O Offline
                              Oakman
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #38

                              Rob Graham wrote:

                              In some respects, most would like to see us "get our comeuppance". We are viewed as the bully on the schoolyard.

                              I think you are spot on, again. Our "allies" were, on some level, content to see us mired down in a foolish war that once we did not win in six months, we could never win.

                              Rob Graham wrote:

                              it will take a Pearl Harbor event to convince most that we face an implacable enemy that wants us dead.

                              Which one?

                              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                              T R 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • J John Carson

                                Mike Gaskey wrote:

                                and it works until you look in the sky and say, "oh sh*t!". we've been doing the diplomatic dance on the issues of N. Korea and Iran for longer than I can remember. It has resulted in ???

                                It is a non sequitur to think that limited success with one approach necessarily mean that it is the wrong approach. Some problems are intractable and won't respond quickly or well to any approach. Other problems are more readily soluble. So far noone has died as a result of North Korea's missiles or Iran's nuclear program. The cold war took a while, but victory was eventually achieved without going to war with the Soviet Union.

                                John Carson

                                O Offline
                                O Offline
                                Oakman
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #39

                                John Carson wrote:

                                So far noone has died as a result of North Korea's missiles or Iran's nuclear program

                                And the man who fell out of a fiftieth floor window was heard to remark on the way down -"Well that was forty floors and no problem yet."

                                John Carson wrote:

                                The cold war took a while, but victory was eventually achieved without going to war with the Soviet Union.

                                And, with the exception of the Iron Lady, the man who did it was vilified by the European press and leaders as "Ronnie Raygun," and everyone on "the" continent mourned the untimely retirment of Jimmy Carter.

                                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                J 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Stan Shannon

                                  Rob Graham wrote:

                                  Oh, I get it Stan.

                                  I know. But most will not. If the media says he is successful, he is successful. It is 1984. Now and forever, until enough people finally do get it.

                                  Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                  O Offline
                                  O Offline
                                  Oakman
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #40

                                  I wonder how many people under the age of forty have read 1984 - or even seen the movie.

                                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                  _ 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • O Oakman

                                    I wonder how many people under the age of forty have read 1984 - or even seen the movie.

                                    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                    _ Offline
                                    _ Offline
                                    _Damian S_
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #41

                                    I've done both. As always, the book is better. (Of course, I'm not that far under 40 either.)

                                    Knowledge is knowing that the tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is not putting it in fruit salad!! Booger Mobile - Camp Quality esCarpade 2010

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • O Oakman

                                      Rob Graham wrote:

                                      In some respects, most would like to see us "get our comeuppance". We are viewed as the bully on the schoolyard.

                                      I think you are spot on, again. Our "allies" were, on some level, content to see us mired down in a foolish war that once we did not win in six months, we could never win.

                                      Rob Graham wrote:

                                      it will take a Pearl Harbor event to convince most that we face an implacable enemy that wants us dead.

                                      Which one?

                                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                      T Offline
                                      T Offline
                                      Tim Craig
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #42

                                      Oakman wrote:

                                      Which one?

                                      Stan? :suss:

                                      "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

                                      I'm a proud denizen of the Real Soapbox[^]
                                      ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!!!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • O Oakman

                                        John Carson wrote:

                                        So far noone has died as a result of North Korea's missiles or Iran's nuclear program

                                        And the man who fell out of a fiftieth floor window was heard to remark on the way down -"Well that was forty floors and no problem yet."

                                        John Carson wrote:

                                        The cold war took a while, but victory was eventually achieved without going to war with the Soviet Union.

                                        And, with the exception of the Iron Lady, the man who did it was vilified by the European press and leaders as "Ronnie Raygun," and everyone on "the" continent mourned the untimely retirment of Jimmy Carter.

                                        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                        J Offline
                                        J Offline
                                        John Carson
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #43

                                        Oakman wrote:

                                        And, with the exception of the Iron Lady, the man who did it was vilified by the European press and leaders as "Ronnie Raygun," and everyone on "the" continent mourned the untimely retirment of Jimmy Carter.

                                        The Soviet Union collapsed under the weight of its economic failures. Reagan happened to be president at the time.

                                        John Carson

                                        O 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Stan Shannon

                                          John Carson wrote:

                                          think the attitude that success constitutes America speaking and the rest of the world jumping into line is what was wrong with the Bush foreign policy. That sort of thing doesn't happen in the modern world. Successful diplomacy takes years, not a week.

                                          Obama's policies are indistinquishable from what we were doing before 9/11 - except for being even more timidly subservient. All that got us was 9/11. It will do so again. And the blood, once again, will be on the hands of people like you, John.

                                          Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                          J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          John Carson
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #44

                                          Stan Shannon wrote:

                                          Obama's policies are indistinquishable from what we were doing before 9/11 - except for being even more timidly subservient.

                                          Of course, in your other posts you will claim that Obama's policies are indistinguishable from Bush's but the left is giving him a free pass.

                                          Stan Shannon wrote:

                                          All that got us was 9/11. It will do so again. And the blood, once again, will be on the hands of people like you, John.

                                          Blood is not completely avoidable. There has been some spilled in Iraq I believe.

                                          John Carson

                                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups