Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Contemplating being a stay at home mom

Contemplating being a stay at home mom

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
c++comquestiondiscussion
23 Posts 16 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lilian Chan Grant

    I just wanted some opinions from people in my field. I will hopefully be giving birth in April of next year. The grand plan is to have two children within 4 years and return to the workforce sometime in 2007. I know this is a long time in SW years, but do you think it's realistic to be welcomed back? I JUST got into somewhat current stuff (my first 4 yrs was spent on Ada on a Unix system, and I now do Visual C++ on 2000 with COM). Any input appreciated, Lilian

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Michael Dunn
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Lilian Chan-Grant wrote: do you think it's realistic to be welcomed back? Short answer: yes. Long ranting answer: As long as you keep your skills up, yes. You're a woman. When someone asks you why you haven't worked in X years, you just say "oh, I had kids" and that's the end of that. Feel fortunate. When I took 6 months off between jobs because I was overstressed and needed the time off, lots of people looked at me funny, assuming that because I'm male, I must be working every single day of my life, and if not, then there's something wrong with me. Then some of them made the leap of "logic" and assumed that I was lying about taking vacation, and that I was actually incapable of getting a job because I was either unskilled or a jerk. Well, I became a jerk to those people in the end. ;) --Mike-- Just released - RightClick-Encrypt v1.4 - Adds fast & easy file encryption to Explorer My really out-of-date homepage Sonork-100.19012 Acid_Helm

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lilian Chan Grant

      I just wanted some opinions from people in my field. I will hopefully be giving birth in April of next year. The grand plan is to have two children within 4 years and return to the workforce sometime in 2007. I know this is a long time in SW years, but do you think it's realistic to be welcomed back? I JUST got into somewhat current stuff (my first 4 yrs was spent on Ada on a Unix system, and I now do Visual C++ on 2000 with COM). Any input appreciated, Lilian

      C Offline
      C Offline
      CSharpDavid
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      It cracks me up to hear people think that they can work at home with children running around. I have a 3 and a 5 year old, and I stopped even trying, its so much more fun to play with the kids. My wife was a big corprate monkey type, now she stays at home with the kids, and never want to return. 4 years I a long time, stop planning , have fun. Wouldn't be American would you ??? viva AMIGA

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lilian Chan Grant

        I just wanted some opinions from people in my field. I will hopefully be giving birth in April of next year. The grand plan is to have two children within 4 years and return to the workforce sometime in 2007. I know this is a long time in SW years, but do you think it's realistic to be welcomed back? I JUST got into somewhat current stuff (my first 4 yrs was spent on Ada on a Unix system, and I now do Visual C++ on 2000 with COM). Any input appreciated, Lilian

        C Offline
        C Offline
        Christopher Duncan
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        Congrats! My perspective isn't very politically correct, but I believe that if you're going to have children, one of the parents should dedicate their full days to raising them. Traditionally, that's been the mother, although there's no reason it can't be the father. In the post feminist movement America, there's a curious hypocrocy prevelent in our culture. On the one hand, you can't take a deep breath without hearing someone rambling on about how "the children" should be the highest priority, or how important "family values" are. And yet, women are now raised to believe that it's demeaning for them to have to "just" be a housewife and homemaker. Consequently, they choose to spend their time trying to "have it all", meaning they want to have children and a full career, too. As any parent will attest, there simply aren't enough hours in the day to give full attention to both, and one of the two has to suffer. It usually ends up being the children, raised by day care facilities while the moms go out and enjoy a "less demeaning" life as a career woman. Pick a side, folks. You can't have it both ways. If children truly are the most important thing, then being a housewife and homemaker is not demeaning. It is a position of honor. Any noise to the contrary is pure selfishness, for which the kids pay the price. So, if you're gonna have kids, forget the career. Raise them, and enjoy the experience! There is no amount of money that can equal the benefit your children will receive by having the love and full time attention of their mother. Now, if you'll excuse me, I've got to slip on my asbestos underwear before I'm toasted by the feminists and the politically correct... :-D Chistopher Duncan Author - The Career Programmer: Guerilla Tactics for an Imperfect World (Apress)

        S J M L 4 Replies Last reply
        0
        • L Lilian Chan Grant

          I just wanted some opinions from people in my field. I will hopefully be giving birth in April of next year. The grand plan is to have two children within 4 years and return to the workforce sometime in 2007. I know this is a long time in SW years, but do you think it's realistic to be welcomed back? I JUST got into somewhat current stuff (my first 4 yrs was spent on Ada on a Unix system, and I now do Visual C++ on 2000 with COM). Any input appreciated, Lilian

          N Offline
          N Offline
          natalie morales
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          Do what makes you happy. If you are in a situation where you can be home with your kids, and it's what you want, then I say go for it. There are many ways you can still keep up with programming even if you aren't going to an office every day. Code at home on your own time, maybe create applications at home you would find useful... Good luck and congratulations!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C CSharpDavid

            It cracks me up to hear people think that they can work at home with children running around. I have a 3 and a 5 year old, and I stopped even trying, its so much more fun to play with the kids. My wife was a big corprate monkey type, now she stays at home with the kids, and never want to return. 4 years I a long time, stop planning , have fun. Wouldn't be American would you ??? viva AMIGA

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lilian Chan Grant
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            Good guess on my nationality, David. Telling me not to plan is like telling me not to breathe. Well, Mike, I think that is the first time I've ever heard that being pregnant was favorable in the workplace. Never thought of that double standard. Thanks for the input, y'all. I figured this site will help me stay informed of the newest "new thing".

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lilian Chan Grant

              I just wanted some opinions from people in my field. I will hopefully be giving birth in April of next year. The grand plan is to have two children within 4 years and return to the workforce sometime in 2007. I know this is a long time in SW years, but do you think it's realistic to be welcomed back? I JUST got into somewhat current stuff (my first 4 yrs was spent on Ada on a Unix system, and I now do Visual C++ on 2000 with COM). Any input appreciated, Lilian

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Shog9 0
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              First, Congratulations! Second, the nice thing about programming is, you can actually do it part-time, at weird hours. When it's 2:00am, and you're rocking a baby that won't sleep quietly unless it's in your arms, some small coding problem could provide a welcome diversion. Don't think you have to be doing it 9-5 to stay in practice. Third, don't worry too much about staying current with the Latest and Greatest. In four years time, either .NET will be firmly in place, and we can all ignore COM finally, or .NET will be an ugly, smoking hole in the ground, and we'll all be learning New Visual Assembler.ORG. Either way, you should be able to pick up whatever the latest fad is within a short time. Finally, don't forget to watch for other options - one of my coworkers works part-time from her home in Northern Minnesota, and while we are all sitting in uncomfortable chairs in an ugly meeting room, she's sitting in her pajamas watching wildlife wander through her back yard after seeing her kids off to school.

              [Shog9]

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Christopher Duncan

                Congrats! My perspective isn't very politically correct, but I believe that if you're going to have children, one of the parents should dedicate their full days to raising them. Traditionally, that's been the mother, although there's no reason it can't be the father. In the post feminist movement America, there's a curious hypocrocy prevelent in our culture. On the one hand, you can't take a deep breath without hearing someone rambling on about how "the children" should be the highest priority, or how important "family values" are. And yet, women are now raised to believe that it's demeaning for them to have to "just" be a housewife and homemaker. Consequently, they choose to spend their time trying to "have it all", meaning they want to have children and a full career, too. As any parent will attest, there simply aren't enough hours in the day to give full attention to both, and one of the two has to suffer. It usually ends up being the children, raised by day care facilities while the moms go out and enjoy a "less demeaning" life as a career woman. Pick a side, folks. You can't have it both ways. If children truly are the most important thing, then being a housewife and homemaker is not demeaning. It is a position of honor. Any noise to the contrary is pure selfishness, for which the kids pay the price. So, if you're gonna have kids, forget the career. Raise them, and enjoy the experience! There is no amount of money that can equal the benefit your children will receive by having the love and full time attention of their mother. Now, if you'll excuse me, I've got to slip on my asbestos underwear before I'm toasted by the feminists and the politically correct... :-D Chistopher Duncan Author - The Career Programmer: Guerilla Tactics for an Imperfect World (Apress)

                S Offline
                S Offline
                Shog9 0
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                Good post, Christopher! You are quite right too.

                [Shog9]

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Christopher Duncan

                  Congrats! My perspective isn't very politically correct, but I believe that if you're going to have children, one of the parents should dedicate their full days to raising them. Traditionally, that's been the mother, although there's no reason it can't be the father. In the post feminist movement America, there's a curious hypocrocy prevelent in our culture. On the one hand, you can't take a deep breath without hearing someone rambling on about how "the children" should be the highest priority, or how important "family values" are. And yet, women are now raised to believe that it's demeaning for them to have to "just" be a housewife and homemaker. Consequently, they choose to spend their time trying to "have it all", meaning they want to have children and a full career, too. As any parent will attest, there simply aren't enough hours in the day to give full attention to both, and one of the two has to suffer. It usually ends up being the children, raised by day care facilities while the moms go out and enjoy a "less demeaning" life as a career woman. Pick a side, folks. You can't have it both ways. If children truly are the most important thing, then being a housewife and homemaker is not demeaning. It is a position of honor. Any noise to the contrary is pure selfishness, for which the kids pay the price. So, if you're gonna have kids, forget the career. Raise them, and enjoy the experience! There is no amount of money that can equal the benefit your children will receive by having the love and full time attention of their mother. Now, if you'll excuse me, I've got to slip on my asbestos underwear before I'm toasted by the feminists and the politically correct... :-D Chistopher Duncan Author - The Career Programmer: Guerilla Tactics for an Imperfect World (Apress)

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  John Fisher
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Sounds like something my Pastor might say... Is there something you're not telling us? ;P John

                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lilian Chan Grant

                    Good guess on my nationality, David. Telling me not to plan is like telling me not to breathe. Well, Mike, I think that is the first time I've ever heard that being pregnant was favorable in the workplace. Never thought of that double standard. Thanks for the input, y'all. I figured this site will help me stay informed of the newest "new thing".

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Michael Dunn
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    Lilian Chan-Grant wrote: Well, Mike, I think that is the first time I've ever heard that being pregnant was favorable in the workplace. That's not what I said. --Mike-- Just released - RightClick-Encrypt v1.4 - Adds fast & easy file encryption to Explorer My really out-of-date homepage Sonork-100.19012 Acid_Helm

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Christopher Duncan

                      Congrats! My perspective isn't very politically correct, but I believe that if you're going to have children, one of the parents should dedicate their full days to raising them. Traditionally, that's been the mother, although there's no reason it can't be the father. In the post feminist movement America, there's a curious hypocrocy prevelent in our culture. On the one hand, you can't take a deep breath without hearing someone rambling on about how "the children" should be the highest priority, or how important "family values" are. And yet, women are now raised to believe that it's demeaning for them to have to "just" be a housewife and homemaker. Consequently, they choose to spend their time trying to "have it all", meaning they want to have children and a full career, too. As any parent will attest, there simply aren't enough hours in the day to give full attention to both, and one of the two has to suffer. It usually ends up being the children, raised by day care facilities while the moms go out and enjoy a "less demeaning" life as a career woman. Pick a side, folks. You can't have it both ways. If children truly are the most important thing, then being a housewife and homemaker is not demeaning. It is a position of honor. Any noise to the contrary is pure selfishness, for which the kids pay the price. So, if you're gonna have kids, forget the career. Raise them, and enjoy the experience! There is no amount of money that can equal the benefit your children will receive by having the love and full time attention of their mother. Now, if you'll excuse me, I've got to slip on my asbestos underwear before I'm toasted by the feminists and the politically correct... :-D Chistopher Duncan Author - The Career Programmer: Guerilla Tactics for an Imperfect World (Apress)

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Michael Dunn
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      Christopher Duncan wrote: Now, if you'll excuse me, I've got to slip on my asbestos underwear before I'm toasted by the feminists and the politically correct... F that noise, you are 100% correct. Saying that people should actually care for and raise their children is not something you should ever be attacked for. --Mike-- Just released - RightClick-Encrypt v1.4 - Adds fast & easy file encryption to Explorer My really out-of-date homepage Sonork-100.19012 Acid_Helm

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lilian Chan Grant

                        I just wanted some opinions from people in my field. I will hopefully be giving birth in April of next year. The grand plan is to have two children within 4 years and return to the workforce sometime in 2007. I know this is a long time in SW years, but do you think it's realistic to be welcomed back? I JUST got into somewhat current stuff (my first 4 yrs was spent on Ada on a Unix system, and I now do Visual C++ on 2000 with COM). Any input appreciated, Lilian

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        leppie
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        Congrats :) Stay at home, teach your kids to program, then you wont have to go back to work :)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J John Fisher

                          Sounds like something my Pastor might say... Is there something you're not telling us? ;P John

                          C Offline
                          C Offline
                          Christopher Duncan
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          John Fisher wrote: Sounds like something my Pastor might say... Is there something you're not telling us? I ain't tellin'... :-D Chistopher Duncan Author - The Career Programmer: Guerilla Tactics for an Imperfect World (Apress)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lilian Chan Grant

                            I just wanted some opinions from people in my field. I will hopefully be giving birth in April of next year. The grand plan is to have two children within 4 years and return to the workforce sometime in 2007. I know this is a long time in SW years, but do you think it's realistic to be welcomed back? I JUST got into somewhat current stuff (my first 4 yrs was spent on Ada on a Unix system, and I now do Visual C++ on 2000 with COM). Any input appreciated, Lilian

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            Chris Hambleton
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            Congratulations! My wife and I are expecting our 2nd one in mid-January. She worked as a web developer until our 2 year-old was born. She misses developing sometimes, but doesn't miss working at the office very much ;P She'll be the first to tell you that it's 24-7 caring for the first 6 months or so (especially if it's your first), then things settle down... a bit :) I usually have side projects going regardless of whether I'm able to program or not, and I ended up spec'ing out a couple during the first few months our first baby arrived. Later, I got into a mode of planning out the code on scrap paper and then later typing it up after the baby was asleep. Beware!! You'll be showered with all sorts of 'advice' about your baby, but in the end, you'll end up doing what works best for you and the baby... regardless of what the experts say (many of whom don't have their own kids!!) Congratulations again! Chris "Our contest is not only whether we ourselves shall be free, but whether there shall be left to mankind an asylum on earth for civil and religious liberty." --Samuel Adams

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C Christopher Duncan

                              Congrats! My perspective isn't very politically correct, but I believe that if you're going to have children, one of the parents should dedicate their full days to raising them. Traditionally, that's been the mother, although there's no reason it can't be the father. In the post feminist movement America, there's a curious hypocrocy prevelent in our culture. On the one hand, you can't take a deep breath without hearing someone rambling on about how "the children" should be the highest priority, or how important "family values" are. And yet, women are now raised to believe that it's demeaning for them to have to "just" be a housewife and homemaker. Consequently, they choose to spend their time trying to "have it all", meaning they want to have children and a full career, too. As any parent will attest, there simply aren't enough hours in the day to give full attention to both, and one of the two has to suffer. It usually ends up being the children, raised by day care facilities while the moms go out and enjoy a "less demeaning" life as a career woman. Pick a side, folks. You can't have it both ways. If children truly are the most important thing, then being a housewife and homemaker is not demeaning. It is a position of honor. Any noise to the contrary is pure selfishness, for which the kids pay the price. So, if you're gonna have kids, forget the career. Raise them, and enjoy the experience! There is no amount of money that can equal the benefit your children will receive by having the love and full time attention of their mother. Now, if you'll excuse me, I've got to slip on my asbestos underwear before I'm toasted by the feminists and the politically correct... :-D Chistopher Duncan Author - The Career Programmer: Guerilla Tactics for an Imperfect World (Apress)

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Lost User
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              Isn't it nice when everything is black and white ? I find the real world a little more complex at times. Would you like to meet my teddy bear ?

                              C 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                Isn't it nice when everything is black and white ? I find the real world a little more complex at times. Would you like to meet my teddy bear ?

                                C Offline
                                C Offline
                                Christopher Duncan
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                Single moms, of course, are exempt from my previous statements. Children are rather fond of eating on a regular basis. Chistopher Duncan Author - The Career Programmer: Guerilla Tactics for an Imperfect World (Apress)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lilian Chan Grant

                                  I just wanted some opinions from people in my field. I will hopefully be giving birth in April of next year. The grand plan is to have two children within 4 years and return to the workforce sometime in 2007. I know this is a long time in SW years, but do you think it's realistic to be welcomed back? I JUST got into somewhat current stuff (my first 4 yrs was spent on Ada on a Unix system, and I now do Visual C++ on 2000 with COM). Any input appreciated, Lilian

                                  J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  Jason Henderson
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  My wife decided to stay home with our first child and she hasn't regretted it. She's not a programmer, but she loved her job just the same (she just happens to love her son more). Just remember, your child is more important than money and all of your personal needs.

                                  Jason Henderson
                                  start page
                                  articles
                                  "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchill

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lilian Chan Grant

                                    I just wanted some opinions from people in my field. I will hopefully be giving birth in April of next year. The grand plan is to have two children within 4 years and return to the workforce sometime in 2007. I know this is a long time in SW years, but do you think it's realistic to be welcomed back? I JUST got into somewhat current stuff (my first 4 yrs was spent on Ada on a Unix system, and I now do Visual C++ on 2000 with COM). Any input appreciated, Lilian

                                    S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Stuart van Weele
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #23

                                    Congradulations! We took a different path, and got my wives parents to live with us. After the initial bit of adjustment this has worked like a charm. My wife spent 6 months at home after having each of our kids, then went back to work full time. If you can get either set of parents over to help out, by all means do so. Trust me, you will really want a second set of hands around. As for loosing your skill set, if you don't program for 5 years, then yes you will become quite rusty. I would take consulting jobs as they come along just to keep my hand in. It will take some effort, because small children are a full time job by themselves.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • World
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups