Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Weird and The Wonderful
  4. Who is teaching these people?

Who is teaching these people?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Weird and The Wonderful
csharpquestioncomhelp
19 Posts 16 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

    From the C# questions forum of this very site, I give you: "Why does the compiler complain about falling through the code blocks?" http://www.codeproject.com/Forums/1649/Csharp.aspx?fid=1649&select=3038975#xx3038975xx[^]

    hi
    I have these code . What could cause above error ? Thanks

    state=1
    switch (state)
    {
    case 1:
    //do something

    goto case 2;

    case 2:

    //do something

    goto case 3;

    case 3:
    //do something
    goto case 4;

    ............

    case 100:

    //do something

    }

    OOP language; Fortran programmer.

    V Offline
    V Offline
    VentsyV
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    Well I have very good idea what happened. The programmer tried to implement fall-through switch, which is not allowed in C#. When he discovered that, he decided to work around it with those goto calls. He was either rusty on his goto or he could not figure how to "declare" a label or maybe the language he was using before did allow something similar... That's what happens when you switch languages. For a while you keep thinking in terms of the old language thus producing such jems.

    I F 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • V VentsyV

      Well I have very good idea what happened. The programmer tried to implement fall-through switch, which is not allowed in C#. When he discovered that, he decided to work around it with those goto calls. He was either rusty on his goto or he could not figure how to "declare" a label or maybe the language he was using before did allow something similar... That's what happens when you switch languages. For a while you keep thinking in terms of the old language thus producing such jems.

      I Offline
      I Offline
      I am BATMAN
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      He shoulda written it recursively :laugh:

      R 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • 0 0x3c0

        I think a part of me just died. I counted at least 8 things wrong with that snippet

        OriginalGriffO Offline
        OriginalGriffO Offline
        OriginalGriff
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        You missed a couple: 9) Undocumented 10) 100 numeric states. How do you keep track of which one does what...

        No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced. This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones

        "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
        "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

          From the C# questions forum of this very site, I give you: "Why does the compiler complain about falling through the code blocks?" http://www.codeproject.com/Forums/1649/Csharp.aspx?fid=1649&select=3038975#xx3038975xx[^]

          hi
          I have these code . What could cause above error ? Thanks

          state=1
          switch (state)
          {
          case 1:
          //do something

          goto case 2;

          case 2:

          //do something

          goto case 3;

          case 3:
          //do something
          goto case 4;

          ............

          case 100:

          //do something

          }

          OOP language; Fortran programmer.

          S Offline
          S Offline
          SalarSoft
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          OriginalGriff wrote:

          Fortran programmer.

          Hehe, he is still alive! :)

          www.softprojects.org

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • V VentsyV

            Well I have very good idea what happened. The programmer tried to implement fall-through switch, which is not allowed in C#. When he discovered that, he decided to work around it with those goto calls. He was either rusty on his goto or he could not figure how to "declare" a label or maybe the language he was using before did allow something similar... That's what happens when you switch languages. For a while you keep thinking in terms of the old language thus producing such jems.

            F Offline
            F Offline
            Fatbuddha 1
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            Could easily be c++ -> C# :). But still, this isn't nice in C++ as well.

            You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • I I am BATMAN

              He shoulda written it recursively :laugh:

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Russell Jones
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              He should have used the for- case pattern ;-)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                From the C# questions forum of this very site, I give you: "Why does the compiler complain about falling through the code blocks?" http://www.codeproject.com/Forums/1649/Csharp.aspx?fid=1649&select=3038975#xx3038975xx[^]

                hi
                I have these code . What could cause above error ? Thanks

                state=1
                switch (state)
                {
                case 1:
                //do something

                goto case 2;

                case 2:

                //do something

                goto case 3;

                case 3:
                //do something
                goto case 4;

                ............

                case 100:

                //do something

                }

                OOP language; Fortran programmer.

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Russell Jones
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                state=1 for (int n = state; n<101;n++) { switch (n) { case 1: //do something case 2: //do something case 3: //do something ............ case 100: //do something } } What could be easier than that ;-)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                  From the C# questions forum of this very site, I give you: "Why does the compiler complain about falling through the code blocks?" http://www.codeproject.com/Forums/1649/Csharp.aspx?fid=1649&select=3038975#xx3038975xx[^]

                  hi
                  I have these code . What could cause above error ? Thanks

                  state=1
                  switch (state)
                  {
                  case 1:
                  //do something

                  goto case 2;

                  case 2:

                  //do something

                  goto case 3;

                  case 3:
                  //do something
                  goto case 4;

                  ............

                  case 100:

                  //do something

                  }

                  OOP language; Fortran programmer.

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  johannesnestler
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  If the syntax is correctet, the compiler doesn't complain... :laugh: thank you for teaching me that - ;P

                          int state=1;
                          switch (state)
                          {
                              case 1:
                              //do something
                              goto case 2;
                              
                              case 2:
                              //do something
                              goto case 3;
                              
                              case 3: 
                              //do something
                              goto case 4;
                              
                              case 4://do something
                              break; // !!!
                          }
                  
                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J johannesnestler

                    If the syntax is correctet, the compiler doesn't complain... :laugh: thank you for teaching me that - ;P

                            int state=1;
                            switch (state)
                            {
                                case 1:
                                //do something
                                goto case 2;
                                
                                case 2:
                                //do something
                                goto case 3;
                                
                                case 3: 
                                //do something
                                goto case 4;
                                
                                case 4://do something
                                break; // !!!
                            }
                    
                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Luc Pattyn
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    I'm still in favor of

                      //do something #1
                      //do something #2
                      //do something #3
                      //do something #4
                    

                    which compiles just fine. :)

                    Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]


                    The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Show formatted code inside PRE tags, and give clear symptoms when describing a problem.


                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                      From the C# questions forum of this very site, I give you: "Why does the compiler complain about falling through the code blocks?" http://www.codeproject.com/Forums/1649/Csharp.aspx?fid=1649&select=3038975#xx3038975xx[^]

                      hi
                      I have these code . What could cause above error ? Thanks

                      state=1
                      switch (state)
                      {
                      case 1:
                      //do something

                      goto case 2;

                      case 2:

                      //do something

                      goto case 3;

                      case 3:
                      //do something
                      goto case 4;

                      ............

                      case 100:

                      //do something

                      }

                      OOP language; Fortran programmer.

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Jeroen De Dauw
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      looooool - OMFG, took me a few minutes before I could type again after reading this - ROFL!!!

                      GSoC 2009 student for SMW! --- My little forums: http://code.bn2vs.com --- 70 72 6F 67 72 61 6D 6D 69 6E 67 20 34 20 6C 69 66 65!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Luc Pattyn

                        I'm still in favor of

                          //do something #1
                          //do something #2
                          //do something #3
                          //do something #4
                        

                        which compiles just fine. :)

                        Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]


                        The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Show formatted code inside PRE tags, and give clear symptoms when describing a problem.


                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Som Shekhar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        Whatever he was trying to do, It results in what Luc has written. Ultimately, he ended up getting the same result with extra lines of code.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                          From the C# questions forum of this very site, I give you: "Why does the compiler complain about falling through the code blocks?" http://www.codeproject.com/Forums/1649/Csharp.aspx?fid=1649&select=3038975#xx3038975xx[^]

                          hi
                          I have these code . What could cause above error ? Thanks

                          state=1
                          switch (state)
                          {
                          case 1:
                          //do something

                          goto case 2;

                          case 2:

                          //do something

                          goto case 3;

                          case 3:
                          //do something
                          goto case 4;

                          ............

                          case 100:

                          //do something

                          }

                          OOP language; Fortran programmer.

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Rajesh R Subramanian
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          Shite! :~ X| Sometimes while reading the programming forums, I just feel like jabbing a fork into my eyes.

                          It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups