Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Obama's Speech

Obama's Speech

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
collaborationlearning
32 Posts 10 Posters 7 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Mike Gaskey

    Oakman wrote:

    I may disagree with the man quite often, but I just have to admire his political skills.

    which is to say, he is filled to the brim with bullshit. I watched the same speech and lost count of the number of times he referenced the Constituition, would just dandy if he actually followed it. I'm particularily interested to see where that particular document gives him the authority to take an automobile company from share holders and bond holders and hand it over to a union. Cheney's speech that followed was far, far better.

    Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

    W Offline
    W Offline
    wolfbinary
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Mike Gaskey wrote:

    Cheney's speech that followed was far, far better.

    And you don't think that he's filled with BS? I'm sure you can find just as many holes in his speech as Obama's if you wanted to. I've noticed how we've gone from 'we don't torture' to 'it worked on these high valued detainees'. Where in all of this did we admit that we torture or wasn't that the admittance of the memos? I thought we'd moved past that point and admitted that our government did. There's a particular interview of Cheney that comes to mind. He was asked 'why we didn't go all the way to Baghdad(sp?)' in the first gulf war. His response was what would we put in its place? That is would be chaos. After I saw that interview and then compared to the f**kups they caused, I can't help but wonder if he's telling the truth now.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Mike Gaskey

      Oakman wrote:

      I may disagree with the man quite often, but I just have to admire his political skills.

      which is to say, he is filled to the brim with bullshit. I watched the same speech and lost count of the number of times he referenced the Constituition, would just dandy if he actually followed it. I'm particularily interested to see where that particular document gives him the authority to take an automobile company from share holders and bond holders and hand it over to a union. Cheney's speech that followed was far, far better.

      Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Chris Austin
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Sycophant.

      Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Chris Austin

        Sycophant.

        Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Mike Gaskey
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        Brownshirt.

        Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • W wolfbinary

          Mike Gaskey wrote:

          Cheney's speech that followed was far, far better.

          And you don't think that he's filled with BS? I'm sure you can find just as many holes in his speech as Obama's if you wanted to. I've noticed how we've gone from 'we don't torture' to 'it worked on these high valued detainees'. Where in all of this did we admit that we torture or wasn't that the admittance of the memos? I thought we'd moved past that point and admitted that our government did. There's a particular interview of Cheney that comes to mind. He was asked 'why we didn't go all the way to Baghdad(sp?)' in the first gulf war. His response was what would we put in its place? That is would be chaos. After I saw that interview and then compared to the f**kups they caused, I can't help but wonder if he's telling the truth now.

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Mike Gaskey
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          wolfbinary wrote:

          I've noticed how we've gone from 'we don't torture' to 'it worked on these high valued detainees'.

          you notice absolutely zip. The Magic Negro has defined the techniques as torture, Cheney defined it as enhanced interrogation techniques, that saved lives. do pay attention.

          wolfbinary wrote:

          you don't think that he's filled with BS?

          Cheney? no I don't. he has nothing to lose.

          wolfbinary wrote:

          After I saw that interview and then compared to the f**kups they caused, I can't help but wonder if he's telling the truth now.

          yes, as misguided as it was there is now a Democracy where there had been a tyrant.

          Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

          W V 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • M Mike Gaskey

            Oakman wrote:

            I may disagree with the man quite often, but I just have to admire his political skills.

            which is to say, he is filled to the brim with bullshit. I watched the same speech and lost count of the number of times he referenced the Constituition, would just dandy if he actually followed it. I'm particularily interested to see where that particular document gives him the authority to take an automobile company from share holders and bond holders and hand it over to a union. Cheney's speech that followed was far, far better.

            Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

            O Offline
            O Offline
            Oakman
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Mike Gaskey wrote:

            which is to say, he is filled to the brim with bullsh*t

            As near as I can tell, they are all topped off with all the crap McDonalds' heards can supply - including the ex-VP. I especially like Cheney's "Now that I am not vice-president, I can speak in public." When I say political skills, I mean his timing, his delivery, his choice of locations, his diction, most importantly the tone of his speeches, but even what he has his wife doing. In each and every one of these areas, he beats Cheney hands down.

            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Mike Gaskey

              Oakman wrote:

              I may disagree with the man quite often, but I just have to admire his political skills.

              which is to say, he is filled to the brim with bullshit. I watched the same speech and lost count of the number of times he referenced the Constituition, would just dandy if he actually followed it. I'm particularily interested to see where that particular document gives him the authority to take an automobile company from share holders and bond holders and hand it over to a union. Cheney's speech that followed was far, far better.

              Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Le centriste
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Mike Gaskey wrote:

              I'm particularily interested to see where that particular document gives him the authority to take an automobile company from share holders and bond holders and hand it over to a union.

              I don't think automobile companies existed when that particular document was written.

              C M 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • M Mike Gaskey

                wolfbinary wrote:

                I've noticed how we've gone from 'we don't torture' to 'it worked on these high valued detainees'.

                you notice absolutely zip. The Magic Negro has defined the techniques as torture, Cheney defined it as enhanced interrogation techniques, that saved lives. do pay attention.

                wolfbinary wrote:

                you don't think that he's filled with BS?

                Cheney? no I don't. he has nothing to lose.

                wolfbinary wrote:

                After I saw that interview and then compared to the f**kups they caused, I can't help but wonder if he's telling the truth now.

                yes, as misguided as it was there is now a Democracy where there had been a tyrant.

                Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

                W Offline
                W Offline
                wolfbinary
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Mike Gaskey wrote:

                you notice absolutely zip.

                It's good to know you think so.

                Mike Gaskey wrote:

                Cheney defined it as enhanced

                Just because Cheney calls it so doesn't make it so. You can call it maple syrup that doesn't mean you an put it on pancakes.

                Mike Gaskey wrote:

                there is now a Democracy where there had been a tyrant.

                It's funny, not really, how we turn allies into enemies and then into allies after we make war with them. Tyrant or not at the time, we supported him, what does that make us? Enablers.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Le centriste

                  Mike Gaskey wrote:

                  I'm particularily interested to see where that particular document gives him the authority to take an automobile company from share holders and bond holders and hand it over to a union.

                  I don't think automobile companies existed when that particular document was written.

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Captain See Sharp
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  Le Centriste wrote:

                  I don't think automobile companies existed when that particular document was written.

                  He meant that there are no such powers granted to the government, it doesn't have to be specific to one company, Le Frenchy.

                  ENDGAME[^]

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • O Oakman

                    Mike Gaskey wrote:

                    which is to say, he is filled to the brim with bullsh*t

                    As near as I can tell, they are all topped off with all the crap McDonalds' heards can supply - including the ex-VP. I especially like Cheney's "Now that I am not vice-president, I can speak in public." When I say political skills, I mean his timing, his delivery, his choice of locations, his diction, most importantly the tone of his speeches, but even what he has his wife doing. In each and every one of these areas, he beats Cheney hands down.

                    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mike Gaskey
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    Oakman wrote:

                    I mean his timing, his delivery, his choice of locations, his diction, most importantly the tone of his speeches, but even what he has his wife doing. In each and every one of these areas, he beats Cheney hands down.

                    we agree, with one exception - I'd pit Cheney's wife against Obama's any day of the week. but again, Obama is a master. I do think it is funnier than all hell to see Democrats in the senate push back.

                    Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Captain See Sharp

                      Le Centriste wrote:

                      I don't think automobile companies existed when that particular document was written.

                      He meant that there are no such powers granted to the government, it doesn't have to be specific to one company, Le Frenchy.

                      ENDGAME[^]

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Le centriste
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Intel 4004 wrote:

                      Le Frenchy

                      That is the problem with people like you, using insults to make a point. Very clever.

                      C V 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • L Le centriste

                        Intel 4004 wrote:

                        Le Frenchy

                        That is the problem with people like you, using insults to make a point. Very clever.

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        Captain See Sharp
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        Le Centriste wrote:

                        That is the problem with people like you, using insults to make a point.

                        So you don't take pride in your French heritage?

                        ENDGAME[^]

                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C Captain See Sharp

                          Le Centriste wrote:

                          That is the problem with people like you, using insults to make a point.

                          So you don't take pride in your French heritage?

                          ENDGAME[^]

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Le centriste
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          Intel 4004 wrote:

                          So you don't take pride in your French heritage?

                          My point was your deliberate use of "Le Frenchy" as an insult. This is obvious from the fact that many of the Americans posting here, espcially the conservative kind to which you seem to belong, despise anything European, particularly French, as if it was written in the Constitution. It is your freedom to not like them, I couldn't care less. But your use of insults outlines your lack of hability to oppose a solid argument. In fact, you seem to be a dimwit, and you also seem to recognize it by choosing the name of a rather primitive processor as your nickname. Everybody posts something stupid from time to time, but in your case, it is a trademark.

                          C O O 3 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • L Le centriste

                            Intel 4004 wrote:

                            So you don't take pride in your French heritage?

                            My point was your deliberate use of "Le Frenchy" as an insult. This is obvious from the fact that many of the Americans posting here, espcially the conservative kind to which you seem to belong, despise anything European, particularly French, as if it was written in the Constitution. It is your freedom to not like them, I couldn't care less. But your use of insults outlines your lack of hability to oppose a solid argument. In fact, you seem to be a dimwit, and you also seem to recognize it by choosing the name of a rather primitive processor as your nickname. Everybody posts something stupid from time to time, but in your case, it is a trademark.

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            Captain See Sharp
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            Le Centriste wrote:

                            But your use of insults outlines your lack of hability ability (corrected it for you) to oppose a solid argument. In fact, you seem to be a dimwit

                            :((

                            Le Centriste wrote:

                            and you also seem to recognize it by choosing the name of a rather primitive processor as your nickname.

                            Well if I get banned I can upgrade to 4040, 8080, 8086, and so on.

                            ENDGAME[^]

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Le centriste

                              Mike Gaskey wrote:

                              I'm particularily interested to see where that particular document gives him the authority to take an automobile company from share holders and bond holders and hand it over to a union.

                              I don't think automobile companies existed when that particular document was written.

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Mike Gaskey
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              Le Centriste wrote:

                              I don't think automobile companies existed when that particular document was written.

                              we have a republic with the only powers available to the central, Federal government limited to those specifically enumerated in the Constituition. No where in the Constituition is there a power to decide winners and losers, which is what is happening in the auto industry. this limitation is further strengthened by the 10th amendment. all the preceding has been ignored since the time of Woodrow Wilson and individual states, the possessors of powers not enumerated in the Constituition as being those of the Federal government, some 21 thus far, have passed legislation or resolutions restating that fact. the net result is that we may be heading for some rough, very rough times as states begin to assert the above. there was one such resolution passed in the Indiana senate but ignored in the house, there will be legislation introduced in the 2010 session to reinforce the 10th amendment.

                              Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

                              I W L O 4 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • M Mike Gaskey

                                Le Centriste wrote:

                                I don't think automobile companies existed when that particular document was written.

                                we have a republic with the only powers available to the central, Federal government limited to those specifically enumerated in the Constituition. No where in the Constituition is there a power to decide winners and losers, which is what is happening in the auto industry. this limitation is further strengthened by the 10th amendment. all the preceding has been ignored since the time of Woodrow Wilson and individual states, the possessors of powers not enumerated in the Constituition as being those of the Federal government, some 21 thus far, have passed legislation or resolutions restating that fact. the net result is that we may be heading for some rough, very rough times as states begin to assert the above. there was one such resolution passed in the Indiana senate but ignored in the house, there will be legislation introduced in the 2010 session to reinforce the 10th amendment.

                                Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

                                I Offline
                                I Offline
                                Ilion
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                Mike Gaskey wrote:

                                all the preceding has been ignored since the time of Woodrow Wilson

                                The problem goes back at least to the time of Theodore Roosevelt ... and, further, to Lincoln.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Mike Gaskey

                                  Le Centriste wrote:

                                  I don't think automobile companies existed when that particular document was written.

                                  we have a republic with the only powers available to the central, Federal government limited to those specifically enumerated in the Constituition. No where in the Constituition is there a power to decide winners and losers, which is what is happening in the auto industry. this limitation is further strengthened by the 10th amendment. all the preceding has been ignored since the time of Woodrow Wilson and individual states, the possessors of powers not enumerated in the Constituition as being those of the Federal government, some 21 thus far, have passed legislation or resolutions restating that fact. the net result is that we may be heading for some rough, very rough times as states begin to assert the above. there was one such resolution passed in the Indiana senate but ignored in the house, there will be legislation introduced in the 2010 session to reinforce the 10th amendment.

                                  Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

                                  W Offline
                                  W Offline
                                  wolfbinary
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #18

                                  Mike Gaskey wrote:

                                  No where in the Constituition is there a power to decide winners and losers

                                  Hasn't the government bailed out the airline industry at least twice now?

                                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Le centriste

                                    Intel 4004 wrote:

                                    So you don't take pride in your French heritage?

                                    My point was your deliberate use of "Le Frenchy" as an insult. This is obvious from the fact that many of the Americans posting here, espcially the conservative kind to which you seem to belong, despise anything European, particularly French, as if it was written in the Constitution. It is your freedom to not like them, I couldn't care less. But your use of insults outlines your lack of hability to oppose a solid argument. In fact, you seem to be a dimwit, and you also seem to recognize it by choosing the name of a rather primitive processor as your nickname. Everybody posts something stupid from time to time, but in your case, it is a trademark.

                                    O Offline
                                    O Offline
                                    oilFactotum
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    Le Centriste wrote:

                                    This is obvious from the fact that many of the Americans posting here, espcially the conservative kind to which you seem to belong, despise anything European, particularly French

                                    Can't say I have ever understood that. [^] And I've always loved french fries!! :)

                                    W 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • O oilFactotum

                                      Le Centriste wrote:

                                      This is obvious from the fact that many of the Americans posting here, espcially the conservative kind to which you seem to belong, despise anything European, particularly French

                                      Can't say I have ever understood that. [^] And I've always loved french fries!! :)

                                      W Offline
                                      W Offline
                                      wolfbinary
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #20

                                      oilFactotum wrote:

                                      french fries

                                      What about freedom fries? :laugh:

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • W wolfbinary

                                        Mike Gaskey wrote:

                                        No where in the Constituition is there a power to decide winners and losers

                                        Hasn't the government bailed out the airline industry at least twice now?

                                        M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Mike Gaskey
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #21

                                        wolfbinary wrote:

                                        Hasn't the government bailed out the airline industry at least twice now?

                                        Chrysler once, way back in the way back. that was in the form of a loan that was repaid. I'm not sure I can recall anything similar for the airline industry, but my memory isn't what it once was.

                                        Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

                                        W 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Mike Gaskey

                                          wolfbinary wrote:

                                          Hasn't the government bailed out the airline industry at least twice now?

                                          Chrysler once, way back in the way back. that was in the form of a loan that was repaid. I'm not sure I can recall anything similar for the airline industry, but my memory isn't what it once was.

                                          Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

                                          W Offline
                                          W Offline
                                          wolfbinary
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #22

                                          I just found an interesting link about at least some of the bailouts that have been given. click here[^] Do any of these ring a bell? I wasn't even born for some of them. I was wrong about the airline industry being twice according to this site

                                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups