An important quality to have in a supreme court justice
-
Oakman wrote:
Do you get a tingle running up your leg whenever you listen to him?
Nope, merely a since of hope that all is not yet lost.
Oakman wrote:
And Obama became the most powerful man in the world arguing against just about everything that Limbaugh espouses. And he get laid more, too, I'll bet - without the use of Viagra.
True enough. And that is precisely why Limbaugh sould be there espousing it. BTW, how do you know he uses viagra?
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
Stan Shannon wrote:
BTW, how do you know he uses viagra?
Customs found it in his suitcase.[^] As is usual for old law-n-Order Rush, he didn't have a prescription.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
Oakman wrote:
Do you get a tingle running up your leg whenever you listen to him?
Nope, merely a since of hope that all is not yet lost.
Oakman wrote:
And Obama became the most powerful man in the world arguing against just about everything that Limbaugh espouses. And he get laid more, too, I'll bet - without the use of Viagra.
True enough. And that is precisely why Limbaugh sould be there espousing it. BTW, how do you know he uses viagra?
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
To sum up: You ask for an example of divisive rhetoric, I provide it, you utterly lose your shit. Honk honk honk honk honk!
- F
Well, sorry, but I don't consider that to be divisive. I consider it to be a rational, measured and eloquent response to divisiveness. The fact that you characterize it as divisive, is an example of more of the original divisiveness that motivated it.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
BTW, how do you know he uses viagra?
Customs found it in his suitcase.[^] As is usual for old law-n-Order Rush, he didn't have a prescription.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
Yeah, I well remember that. I just wanted you to post the article. Can you post one where CBS does an expose on government harrassment of prominant conservative citizens?
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Well, sorry, but I don't consider that to be divisive. I consider it to be a rational, measured and eloquent response to divisiveness. The fact that you characterize it as divisive, is an example of more of the original divisiveness that motivated it.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
Stan Shannon wrote:
I consider it to be a rational, measured and eloquent response to divisiveness.
Well, what a goddamned surprise that is. Maybe next time you can ask for "divisive rhetoric that I don't agree with or that wasn't deserved and that isn't REALLY divisive because THEY DID IT FIRST! See? Nothing!" Honk honk honk!
- F
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
I consider it to be a rational, measured and eloquent response to divisiveness.
Well, what a goddamned surprise that is. Maybe next time you can ask for "divisive rhetoric that I don't agree with or that wasn't deserved and that isn't REALLY divisive because THEY DID IT FIRST! See? Nothing!" Honk honk honk!
- F
Fisticuffs wrote:
Maybe next time you can ask for "divisive rhetoric that I don't agree with or that wasn't deserved or that isn't REALLY divisive because THEY DID IT FIRST!
He's got you nailed, Stan.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
I consider it to be a rational, measured and eloquent response to divisiveness.
Well, what a goddamned surprise that is. Maybe next time you can ask for "divisive rhetoric that I don't agree with or that wasn't deserved and that isn't REALLY divisive because THEY DID IT FIRST! See? Nothing!" Honk honk honk!
- F
Fisticuffs wrote:
Well, what a goddamned surprise that is. Maybe next time you can ask for "divisive rhetoric that I don't agree with or that wasn't deserved and that isn't REALLY divisive because THEY DID IT FIRST! See? Nothing!"
Well, sorry again, but if pointing out divisiveness is divisive, than Limbaugh is no more guilty of it than you are. The democrat party has cornered the market on divisiveness. That is their stock and trade. Every single word out of their mouths is divisive. I mean, hell, anything and everything they disagree with is immediately labeled 'right wing'. Entirely mainstream beliefs - marriage between a male and a female, legal considerations for human fetuses, christian traditions being publically promoted, all become twisted into 'right wing' fanaticism. How can we possibly have a civil debate that isn't divisive given a situation where any objection at all to anything promoted by the left is called 'divisive', but where any objection on their part to conservatism must go unchallanged as if it were some kind of goddamned holy writ?
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Yeah, I well remember that. I just wanted you to post the article. Can you post one where CBS does an expose on government harrassment of prominant conservative citizens?
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
Once again you try to change the subject because you find yourself in a corner. Do you ever argue something on the merits? I probably could have chosen an article from the Wall St. Journal or the Evening Standard. I simply grabbed the first one Google suggested. CBS isn't the issue at hand, Rush violating the terms of his probation after being convicted of drug abuse is.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
Once again you try to change the subject because you find yourself in a corner. Do you ever argue something on the merits? I probably could have chosen an article from the Wall St. Journal or the Evening Standard. I simply grabbed the first one Google suggested. CBS isn't the issue at hand, Rush violating the terms of his probation after being convicted of drug abuse is.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
Oakman wrote:
Once again you try to change the subject because you find yourself in a corner. Do you ever argue something on the merits?
Well, excuse me, sir, but you were responding to a question I asked. The subject is what ever I say it was. I claim the only reason you even know about Limbaugh's illegal, deadly and dangerous drug abuse, is probably because of his status and situation. I think he has many powerful and influencial enemies who would like nothing more than to destroy him. Yet, with all of that arrayed against him, all they have is some viagra and pain pills? Doctor shopping? If that is the worst thing the guy has done, I'm perfectly comfortable with it.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Fisticuffs wrote:
Maybe next time you can ask for "divisive rhetoric that I don't agree with or that wasn't deserved or that isn't REALLY divisive because THEY DID IT FIRST!
He's got you nailed, Stan.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
Sorry, Jon, but I'm the only one around here with a real hammer.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Fisticuffs wrote:
Well, what a goddamned surprise that is. Maybe next time you can ask for "divisive rhetoric that I don't agree with or that wasn't deserved and that isn't REALLY divisive because THEY DID IT FIRST! See? Nothing!"
Well, sorry again, but if pointing out divisiveness is divisive, than Limbaugh is no more guilty of it than you are. The democrat party has cornered the market on divisiveness. That is their stock and trade. Every single word out of their mouths is divisive. I mean, hell, anything and everything they disagree with is immediately labeled 'right wing'. Entirely mainstream beliefs - marriage between a male and a female, legal considerations for human fetuses, christian traditions being publically promoted, all become twisted into 'right wing' fanaticism. How can we possibly have a civil debate that isn't divisive given a situation where any objection at all to anything promoted by the left is called 'divisive', but where any objection on their part to conservatism must go unchallanged as if it were some kind of goddamned holy writ?
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Oakman wrote:
Once again you try to change the subject because you find yourself in a corner. Do you ever argue something on the merits?
Well, excuse me, sir, but you were responding to a question I asked. The subject is what ever I say it was. I claim the only reason you even know about Limbaugh's illegal, deadly and dangerous drug abuse, is probably because of his status and situation. I think he has many powerful and influencial enemies who would like nothing more than to destroy him. Yet, with all of that arrayed against him, all they have is some viagra and pain pills? Doctor shopping? If that is the worst thing the guy has done, I'm perfectly comfortable with it.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
Stan Shannon wrote:
The subject is what ever I say it was
If I'd known I was talking to the Red Queen, I would have reprioritized and sorted socks.
Stan Shannon wrote:
If that is the worst thing the guy has done, I'm perfectly comfortable with it.
Okay by me - you are the one who pisses and moans about drugs. I figure we take the controls off and let Rush take as many pain killers as he wants. It's called improving the breed.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
Sorry, Jon, but I'm the only one around here with a real hammer.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
Stan Shannon wrote:
Sorry, Jon, but I'm the only one around here with a real hammer.
Unfortunately, that's all you've got. The rest of us have a full toolbox. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
Well, sorry again, but if pointing out divisiveness is divisive, than Limbaugh is no more guilty of it than you are.
Tu quoque?
Stan Shannon wrote:
he democrat party has cornered the market on divisiveness.
Tu quoque?
- F
You can speak german all you like if that is all you've got. My point stands unchallanged.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
Sorry, Jon, but I'm the only one around here with a real hammer.
Unfortunately, that's all you've got. The rest of us have a full toolbox. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
Hardly. ALl you guys can do is dodge the truth with completely inane accusations.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
The subject is what ever I say it was
If I'd known I was talking to the Red Queen, I would have reprioritized and sorted socks.
Stan Shannon wrote:
If that is the worst thing the guy has done, I'm perfectly comfortable with it.
Okay by me - you are the one who pisses and moans about drugs. I figure we take the controls off and let Rush take as many pain killers as he wants. It's called improving the breed.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
Oakman wrote:
you are the one who pisses and moans about drugs
When?
Oakman wrote:
I figure we take the controls off and let Rush take as many pain killers as he wants.
I'm sure Rush would be fine.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
You can speak german all you like if that is all you've got. My point stands unchallanged.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
It's latin. And no, not really. Your point is that it's not really "divisive" because: 1) WELL ITS TRUE (hint: a statement as sweeping as DEMOCRATS WANT THE WAR TO FAIL has no genuine meaning in the real world outside of polemics) 2) THEY DO IT TOO (hint: tu quoque fallacy) 3) YOU DO IT TOO (hint: tu quoque fallacy) 4) THEY DID IT FIRST (hint: tu quoque fallacy) And other arguments that really have no bearing on anything whatsoever. Rush is a polemic, and you love it for all the reasons I've already stated. Honk honk honk!
- F
-
Hardly. ALl you guys can do is dodge the truth with completely inane accusations.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
Stan Shannon wrote:
ALl you guys can do is dodge the truth with completely inane accusations.
Keep up the good fight. Maybe someday you'll talk me into wearing a tinfoil beanie, just like yours.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
Oakman wrote:
you are the one who pisses and moans about drugs
When?
Oakman wrote:
I figure we take the controls off and let Rush take as many pain killers as he wants.
I'm sure Rush would be fine.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
Stan Shannon wrote:
When?
Something you yammered about watching some member of your family go down the tubes cause of marajuana. Now are you going to claim CBS is harrasing your family, too?
Stan Shannon wrote:
I'm sure Rush would be fine.
Let that druggie alone with all the dope he could possibly want and he'd OD inside of a week.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
It's latin. And no, not really. Your point is that it's not really "divisive" because: 1) WELL ITS TRUE (hint: a statement as sweeping as DEMOCRATS WANT THE WAR TO FAIL has no genuine meaning in the real world outside of polemics) 2) THEY DO IT TOO (hint: tu quoque fallacy) 3) YOU DO IT TOO (hint: tu quoque fallacy) 4) THEY DID IT FIRST (hint: tu quoque fallacy) And other arguments that really have no bearing on anything whatsoever. Rush is a polemic, and you love it for all the reasons I've already stated. Honk honk honk!
- F
Fisticuffs wrote:
It's latin
Latin, German, its all the same evasive gibberish... The simple fact is that you have no means of contending with the truth. You have no choice except to resort to a set of meaningless terms that you think make you sound intelligent. You have no real arguments of any kind. Your side willfully acts divisive, and is, in fact, the source of all divisiveness in our society. It does everything you illigitimately demonize others of doing. Limbaugh's point is completely sound and deserves to be forcefullly made. He is correct, you are wrong. tu quogue your ass off, you cannot refute that.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.