Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Favourite Mythbuster Moments [modified]

Favourite Mythbuster Moments [modified]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questioncom
23 Posts 15 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Garth Watkins

    [^]

    Cheers Garth I don't really care whether or not i really care or not.

    K Offline
    K Offline
    kinar
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    I hadn't seen that episode before...I might have to look it up :)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F fly904

      As, being a student, I have nothing else better to do all day than to watch a lot of Mythbusters. My favourite moment, so far, is the Exploding Cement Truck[^]. What is the all time greatest Mythbuster moment?

      My failometer has shot off the end of the scale! I seem to have misplaced my ban button.. no wait... found it!

      modified on Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:09 PM

      K Offline
      K Offline
      kinar
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      I was particularly fond of the fish in a barrel[^] (move ahead to the 1 min mark.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • E Ennis Ray Lynch Jr

        I don't think pseudo-science entertainment shows belong on the discovery channel.

        Need custom software developed? I do C# development and consulting all over the United States. A man said to the universe: "Sir I exist!" "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation." --Stephen Crane

        K Offline
        K Offline
        kinar
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        What the hell do you expect to be on the discovery channel if it isn't psuedo science. btw, the portion of science that is actually fun and/or entertaining is what exists on the discovery channel...99.99% of the rest of science is crap. If you start showing that stuff on TV, science will die due to lack of interest.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • E Ennis Ray Lynch Jr

          I don't think pseudo-science entertainment shows belong on the discovery channel.

          Need custom software developed? I do C# development and consulting all over the United States. A man said to the universe: "Sir I exist!" "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation." --Stephen Crane

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Shog9 0
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          Wait'll you see what else they put on that channel...

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F fly904

            As, being a student, I have nothing else better to do all day than to watch a lot of Mythbusters. My favourite moment, so far, is the Exploding Cement Truck[^]. What is the all time greatest Mythbuster moment?

            My failometer has shot off the end of the scale! I seem to have misplaced my ban button.. no wait... found it!

            modified on Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:09 PM

            T Offline
            T Offline
            Tim Carmichael
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            From my high school typing class: 'a lot' is two separate words, not one. Where is the spell checker when it’s really needed? Tim

            S F 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • T Tim Carmichael

              From my high school typing class: 'a lot' is two separate words, not one. Where is the spell checker when it’s really needed? Tim

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Shog9 0
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              Tim Carmichael wrote:

              Where is the spell checker when it’s really needed?

              Eye halve a spelling chequer It came with my pea sea, It plainly marques four my revue Miss steaks eye kin knot sea... ;)

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T Tim Carmichael

                From my high school typing class: 'a lot' is two separate words, not one. Where is the spell checker when it’s really needed? Tim

                F Offline
                F Offline
                fly904
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                Oops :-O

                My failometer has shot off the end of the scale! I seem to have misplaced my ban button.. no wait... found it!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Shog9 0

                  Tim Carmichael wrote:

                  Where is the spell checker when it’s really needed?

                  Eye halve a spelling chequer It came with my pea sea, It plainly marques four my revue Miss steaks eye kin knot sea... ;)

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Rajesh R Subramanian
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  goad won!

                  It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Rajesh R Subramanian

                    goad won!

                    It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Shog9 0
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    Gotta love that Google... :-O

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Anthony Mushrow

                      The cement truck was pretty awesome. But my favourite has to be this[^] Car? What car.

                      My current favourite word is: Delicious!

                      -SK Genius

                      Game Programming articles start -here[^]-

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mladen Jankovic
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      Yes, that is definitely one of the greatest moments of television :cool:

                      [Genetic Algorithm Library]

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • E Ennis Ray Lynch Jr

                        I don't think pseudo-science entertainment shows belong on the discovery channel.

                        Need custom software developed? I do C# development and consulting all over the United States. A man said to the universe: "Sir I exist!" "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation." --Stephen Crane

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        John M Drescher
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        Well at least they have not gone off topic as much as VH1, MTV, TLC... Is there any educational programming / learning (at all) left on TLC? Do I have to be awake at 3:00 AM to see a music video?

                        John

                        modified on Tuesday, June 23, 2009 5:57 PM

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F fly904

                          As, being a student, I have nothing else better to do all day than to watch a lot of Mythbusters. My favourite moment, so far, is the Exploding Cement Truck[^]. What is the all time greatest Mythbuster moment?

                          My failometer has shot off the end of the scale! I seem to have misplaced my ban button.. no wait... found it!

                          modified on Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:09 PM

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          Braniacs actually explains things better, Mythbusters is pretty poor. Oh, they could have done it much better with shaping.

                          Visit http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/[^] and do something special today.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • E Ennis Ray Lynch Jr

                            I don't think pseudo-science entertainment shows belong on the discovery channel.

                            Need custom software developed? I do C# development and consulting all over the United States. A man said to the universe: "Sir I exist!" "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation." --Stephen Crane

                            T Offline
                            T Offline
                            Thor Johnson
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #21

                            My only problem with them is the "binaryness" of their show - Busted / Plausible / Confirmed. I like that they test things, but to say something is Busted without really knowing the subject matter is a mistake. Then again, you get weird "Plausible" results as well... So, in particular, I have an issue with this concrete truck: If you want to split stone, you have to bore a hole in it and put the charge in the hole. You should know this from How It's Made or even Deep Impact. Putting a stick of dynamite on top of a concrete pad won't do anything except make noise. :doh: OTOH, I taugh my son the difference between a high explosive and a low-speed explosive from this episode, so it wasn't a total loss. Having to explain that to his 3rd grade teacher was awkward. :) But, there's a lot to be learned about test design, construction, and properties you wouldn't normally think about on the show. Where else would you try to walk on oobleck?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Single Step Debugger

                              I hope you don’t think that the pseudo-historical “documentaries” are better.

                              The narrow specialist in the broad sense of the word is a complete idiot in the narrow sense of the word. Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.

                              T Offline
                              T Offline
                              Thor Johnson
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #22

                              I haven't like those since Connections. At least with Connections, the story was a insight to the mind of those at the time. Some of the new "historical documentary" stuff is really bogus.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • E Ennis Ray Lynch Jr

                                I don't think pseudo-science entertainment shows belong on the discovery channel.

                                Need custom software developed? I do C# development and consulting all over the United States. A man said to the universe: "Sir I exist!" "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation." --Stephen Crane

                                J Offline
                                J Offline
                                James L Thomson
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #23

                                Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote:

                                I don't think pseudo-science entertainment shows belong on the discovery channel.

                                Being an entertainment show, they obviously don't go through the whole double-blind control group experiment with results verified by independent researchers, etc. thing that is the hallmark of "real" science, but I don't recall them ever pretending to be anything other than an entertainment show. So it's hardly fair to expect them to conduct their experiments in such a way as to pass peer review. Or should we also go around to elementary school science fairs and find a student to verbally eviscerate because his experiment on growing bean sprouts at various light levels has an insufficient p-value? The label of "pseudo-science" belongs to dishonest scams like Ghost Hunters and John Edward, not those shows legitimately try to popularize simplified, but still quite real, science.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups