Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. the american-iraq-taliban-thing...

the american-iraq-taliban-thing...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comdiscussion
41 Posts 19 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Megan Forbes

    I've found Americans to be the most wonderful people, when in America. I really mean that - they are hospitable to the point of making the guest need to pinch themselves to remember that it is not all a dream. Unfortunately (I've worked with kids there, in my crazy backpacking days) the majority of the population learn very little about the rest of the world - thus they are a nightmare when on holiday elsewhere, and a lot of them are quite ignorant of the world outside (no reason to start flaming - as I said, I like Americans). If more of their kids were taught to pick out the USA on a world map, they might become more compasionate to people living in all the other areas on the globe . The following statement about your geekness is true.
    The previous statement about your geekness is false.

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    Megan Forbes wrote: I've found Americans to be the most wonderful people, when in America. Agreed! ;P Megan Forbes wrote: Unfortunately (I've worked with kids there, in my crazy backpacking days) the majority of the population learn very little about the rest of the world... Also true, but this is changing slowly. Maybe due to more travel and the internet, etc... Hopefully the current world conflicts and growing anti-American sentiments don't stifle this completely. Wouldn't it be ironic if intolerance of American's intolerance eventually caused Americans to be less tolerant? :-D On the other side of the coin for anybody that has never been to the US... - Hollywood and American TV is NOT representative of the "real" US. - We are a nation of 270+ million people. Every single race, creed, color, religion and political persuasion is represented to some degree. - Our press is no better or no worse than the media in any other country. It does NOT typically represent any national beliefs. We don't believe them, so neither should you. :suss:

    Mike Mullikin :beer: You can't really dust for vomit. Nigel Tufnel - Spinal Tap

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L l a u r e n

      i had this discussion with a guy recently where he was bleating on at how badly the poor taliban fighters were being treated in cuba by the americans ... having to wear hoods and being handcuffed etc ... like duh! whether its fair or not its a simple fact that everyone should know by now ... if you play soldier boy with the americans you will lose and get f**ked up in the process ... if you cant figure that out by now you really shouldnt be playing with guns and bombs and besides if you do play with guns and bombs you deserve whatever you get in return


      "... and so i said to him ... if it don't dance (or code) and you can't eat it either f**k it or throw it away"
      biz stuff   about me

      B Offline
      B Offline
      Brian Delahunty
      wrote on last edited by
      #26

      lauren wrote: if you play soldier boy with the americans you will lose and get f**ked up in the process I think I'll change my sig to that. It's very true though lauren. lauren wrote: besides if you do play with guns and bombs you deserve whatever you get in return Poor Dave W and his air guns... we better warn him :-) Regards, Brian Dela :-)

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Paul Watson

        Tim Smith wrote: and had them over for tea. No, no, no. Americans don't have people around for tea, thats the Brits. Americans have people round for a brewsky or some wife swa... I mean a bbq. p.s. I still find you devilishly attractive Timothy... (Hey if you don't stop posting after this at least we know you really are a man and not a female programmer.)

        Paul Watson
        Bluegrass
        Cape Town, South Africa

        B Offline
        B Offline
        Brian Delahunty
        wrote on last edited by
        #27

        Paul Watson wrote: I still find you devilishly attractive Timothy... (Hey if you don't stop posting after this at least we know you really are a man and not a female programmer.) I'm getting worried about you now paul. Whats the gf's email address again... I think somebody shoudl tell her about this ;-) ;-P Regards, Brian Dela :-)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          Let us first get hold of what we are talking about here. Justice, Liberty, rights and democracy are the stuff that the western countries claims to be supporting. Just drop the claims and I have nothing to say. All those are just crap. They do not support anything other than their own business interests. So what do you think, how we should handle Israel in 48? No one handled Kashmir. Why should anyone handle Israel, other than Israel and Palestine? Leave it to the people to figure out. But, Britain had a responsibility. They created the mess. Why is US in the middle of this stuff? Let UN or a truly neutral party give mediation. Do not supply military equipment from one side and talk about peace on the other. Britain has caused mess everywhere they left after second world war. The should have been more discussions about transfer of power, borders, binding agreements etc., before they removed themselves from that place. Israel/Palestine and Kashmir are examples of the mess that Britain created and UN ratified. There should have been a UN ban on weapon supply to the region. UN was till fresh and people must have believed in it then. tstih wrote: So should Americans let Iranians under Khomeini defeat Iraq? Iraq attacked Iran for territory to start the war!! They deserved to be defeated. I do not belive that Iran would have run over Iraq. They would have got their territory, after they won the war. tstih wrote: Would you prefer to have unstable Saudi Arabia and pay double for gasoline? Paying double for gas is a business issue. Nothing would crumble as a result. If oil costs twice, the economy will still reach an equilibrium. Everything would be costlier, but then pay will also rise. No one would suffer that much because of a double-priced gas. And, it is certainly not sufficient reason to overthrow a democratic govt. in Iran. If that government was supported, we would have had (high priced or not) oil from a democratic country, rather than autocrats and kings. But, the western countries do not want to pay higher and make arabs economically stronger. The people who own resources have the right to price it. As GWB said, get oil from Alaska. That is better than all this manipulation stuff in the middle-east.

          L Offline
          L Offline
          l a u r e n
          wrote on last edited by
          #28

          Thomas George wrote: Britain has caused mess everywhere they left after second world war. actually the british have messed up everything they ever did if you look back far enough ... their biggest problem (and why i wish i could lose my uk passport) is that they still havent quite figured that they dont rule half the world anymore


          "... and so i said to him ... if it don't dance (or code) and you can't eat it either f**k it or throw it away"
          biz stuff   about me

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            Felix Gartsman wrote: 1. supporting creation of Israel against Arab wishes. The beloved UN did that UN is US/Britain/Russia/France/China - No one took the no Israel stand of the Arabs. I am not a great fan of UN and its resolutions and their enforcement (which never takes place, unless there is some other agenda for one of the big five - usually the US). Felix Gartsman wrote: 2. supporting Israel with military equipment. Blame USSR for starting this, USA shipped weapons only in response. I will never blame Israel or Palestine for anything they do. For gods sakes, they are the ones fighting for survival. Others are just making money out of it. But, cant the UN prohibit sale of weapons to Israel and Palestine by its members? But, then how will Russia and US make money out of this? I do not believe this issue will ever be settled. There is some one or the other who will always feel victimized. I BELIEVE that Arabs would take out Israel as a whole, if they could. But, I would expect a mediator to be totally neutral without interest in either side. (like Norway mediating between SriLanka govenment and LTTE). Felix Gartsman wrote: 3. overthrowing a democratic Iranian president and replace him with Shah. When? His name was Dr. Mohammad Mossadegh. He was ELECTED Prime Minister of Iran. He nationalized Iranian oil and wanted foreign oil companies out (which would have been in Iranian interests, though not of US and Britain. but then nationalization is communist). So in a CIA and British intelligence supported coup, Shah of Iran was established as a puppet ruler in 1953. Oil in return for local power. This puppetry made a return of the Islamic regime possible (and all of us would have to live with that). How come the US believes that a democratic country run by a democratically elected communist party is worse than a capitalist autocrat? They did it in Iran in 53; in Chile in 73 (ironically on 11 September) etc. Felix Gartsman wrote: 4. support Saddam to fight Khomeini The arabs mostly supported Saddam since he is suna muslim. I am talking about US and the top five. When the Iran-Iraq war was on, Saddam was using chemical weapons and US (a signatory to the chemical weapons ban treaty) was openly supporting Iraq. Now, when he is no longer a friend, the chemical and biological weapons gain significance. US and other members of the UN is party to a treaty (from 1971, I guess

            C Offline
            C Offline
            ColinDavies
            wrote on last edited by
            #29

            Thomas George wrote: How come the US believes that a democratic country run by a democratically elected communist party is worse than a capitalist autocrat? They did it in Iran in 53; in Chile in 73 (ironically on 11 September) etc. Off Topic. But thats something that I always wonder about. Most people don't seem to believe democracy and communism can co-exist for some reason as well. :confused: Regardz Colin J Davies

            Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin

            You are the intrepid one, always willing to leap into the fray! A serious character flaw, I might add, but entertaining. Said by Roger Wright about me.

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C ColinDavies

              Thomas George wrote: How come the US believes that a democratic country run by a democratically elected communist party is worse than a capitalist autocrat? They did it in Iran in 53; in Chile in 73 (ironically on 11 September) etc. Off Topic. But thats something that I always wonder about. Most people don't seem to believe democracy and communism can co-exist for some reason as well. :confused: Regardz Colin J Davies

              Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin

              You are the intrepid one, always willing to leap into the fray! A serious character flaw, I might add, but entertaining. Said by Roger Wright about me.

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #30

              Actually, it can. Democracy means that people choose, right. What if people chose communists in an election? Seems to have happened many times around the world.

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                Actually, it can. Democracy means that people choose, right. What if people chose communists in an election? Seems to have happened many times around the world.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #31

                Thomas George wrote: Seems to have happened many times around the world. I know it's happened but... many times?

                Mike Mullikin :beer: You can't really dust for vomit. Nigel Tufnel - Spinal Tap

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  Thomas George wrote: Seems to have happened many times around the world. I know it's happened but... many times?

                  Mike Mullikin :beer: You can't really dust for vomit. Nigel Tufnel - Spinal Tap

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #32

                  I am from India. There are many states in India, which are ruled by democratically elected communist parties.

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B Brian Delahunty

                    lauren wrote: if you play soldier boy with the americans you will lose and get f**ked up in the process I think I'll change my sig to that. It's very true though lauren. lauren wrote: besides if you do play with guns and bombs you deserve whatever you get in return Poor Dave W and his air guns... we better warn him :-) Regards, Brian Dela :-)

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    David Wulff
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #33

                    Brian Delahunty wrote: Poor Dave W and his air guns... we better warn him Send 'em over and I'll send 'em back with a stiff upper lip and a limp in both legs... :rolleyes:


                    David Wulff http://www.davidwulff.co.uk

                    Pro wrestling is entertainment for the unentertained unentertainable.

                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D David Wulff

                      Brian Delahunty wrote: Poor Dave W and his air guns... we better warn him Send 'em over and I'll send 'em back with a stiff upper lip and a limp in both legs... :rolleyes:


                      David Wulff http://www.davidwulff.co.uk

                      Pro wrestling is entertainment for the unentertained unentertainable.

                      B Offline
                      B Offline
                      Brian Delahunty
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #34

                      David Wulff wrote: Send 'em over and I'll send 'em back with a stiff upper lip and a limp in both legs... :-D.. remind me not to cross you... :cool: Regards, Brian Dela :-)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        I am from India. There are many states in India, which are ruled by democratically elected communist parties.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #35

                        Thomas George wrote: There are many states in India, which are ruled by democratically elected communist parties. Your original statement was "many times around the world". :confused:

                        Mike Mullikin :beer: You can't really dust for vomit. Nigel Tufnel - Spinal Tap

                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Thomas George wrote: There are many states in India, which are ruled by democratically elected communist parties. Your original statement was "many times around the world". :confused:

                          Mike Mullikin :beer: You can't really dust for vomit. Nigel Tufnel - Spinal Tap

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #36

                          oh, to start with - in Iran, Afghanistan, Chile - four countries fro starters. All three were de-stabilised in 2 or 3 years (the cold war did bin all three).

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            RodLima wrote: people just remember the bad ones. Most arabs in middle-east never saw the [good] americans (i mean, americans who were good to them)! They just see US policies. 1. supporting creation of Israel against Arab wishes. 2. supporting Israel with military equipment. 3. overthrowing a democratic Iranian president and replace him with Shah. 4. support Saddam to fight Khomeini 5. supporting Saudis for oil, even though most 9/11 guys were Saudi (no option, I guess) - other than get a fovaouable govt. in Iraq. etc ..... These are the things that remain in memory, because they change lives. The good deeds most often are not in the same league. I can think of Russians probably loving Gorbachev for freeing them from the communist party autocracy.

                            P Offline
                            P Offline
                            peterchen
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #37

                            Thomas George wrote: I can think of Russians probably loving Gorbachev for freeing them from the communist party autocracy. Actually the russians are not very happy about Gorbatchov - he broke their empire apart. (At least that's the common attitude towards him)


                            Auch den Schatten will ich lieben weil ich manchmal lieber frier'  Rosenstolz   [sighist]

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L l a u r e n

                              i had this discussion with a guy recently where he was bleating on at how badly the poor taliban fighters were being treated in cuba by the americans ... having to wear hoods and being handcuffed etc ... like duh! whether its fair or not its a simple fact that everyone should know by now ... if you play soldier boy with the americans you will lose and get f**ked up in the process ... if you cant figure that out by now you really shouldnt be playing with guns and bombs and besides if you do play with guns and bombs you deserve whatever you get in return


                              "... and so i said to him ... if it don't dance (or code) and you can't eat it either f**k it or throw it away"
                              biz stuff   about me

                              G Offline
                              G Offline
                              Gaul
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #38

                              Does this equally apply when an American soldier gets captured by the other side. There is something called the Geneva convention that prescribes how prisoners of war should be treated. There are less than 300 million Americans compared with more than 5 bilion of the rest of the world. That is something the average American needs to keep in mind as they push around american-style wisdom on the rest of the world. In your own case, just keep in mind that an american soldier will eventually get captured by somebody somewhere, and how you will like to have them treated. Empires come and go, and American is only the most recent of the empires in history. Britain was one not too long ago, as was the Soviet Union, China, Japan, Greece, Roman, Egyptian, Mali, Timboku. The American military might today does not come anything close to that of the Egyptians at the time they built the great pyramids, or that of the Romans at the height of their power.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • G George

                                lauren wrote: i had this discussion with a guy recently where he was bleating on at how badly the poor taliban fighters were being treated in cuba by the americans ... having to wear hoods and being handcuffed etc ... like duh! I think that your friend is right to some respect... The treatment that Taliban fighters received is far from the standards they are used to. I guess a bullet in the head (preferably at some sports stadium) would have been much closer to the traditional way they might consider much more apropriate.

                                /* I C++, therefore I am... */

                                G Offline
                                G Offline
                                Gaul
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #39

                                Have you ever visited Afghanistan? Did you ever go there during the Taliban era. Is this another one of those American media inspired views about the rest of the world. No, I am not making a case for the Taliban fighters. But someone fighting for his government or a cause they believe in considers themselves in the same manner that an American soldier or marine views himself/herself. If we invested only $10 billion out of the more than $25+ billion so far spent bombing Afganistan on education, even during the Taliban, we would have achieved a more lasting and sustainable peace, and there would probably have been no Al Queda in Afghanistan.

                                L 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • G Gaul

                                  Have you ever visited Afghanistan? Did you ever go there during the Taliban era. Is this another one of those American media inspired views about the rest of the world. No, I am not making a case for the Taliban fighters. But someone fighting for his government or a cause they believe in considers themselves in the same manner that an American soldier or marine views himself/herself. If we invested only $10 billion out of the more than $25+ billion so far spent bombing Afganistan on education, even during the Taliban, we would have achieved a more lasting and sustainable peace, and there would probably have been no Al Queda in Afghanistan.

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #40

                                  Gaul wrote: If we invested only $10 billion out of the more than $25+ billion so far spent bombing Afganistan on education, even during the Taliban, we would have achieved a more lasting and sustainable peace, and there would probably have been no Al Queda in Afghanistan. *If* is an awfully big word. If the Taliban government hadn't supported a group that attacked civilians in the US and instead spent it's resources on it's own people none of this would have happened.

                                  Mike Mullikin :beer: You can't really dust for vomit. Nigel Tufnel - Spinal Tap

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L l a u r e n

                                    i had this discussion with a guy recently where he was bleating on at how badly the poor taliban fighters were being treated in cuba by the americans ... having to wear hoods and being handcuffed etc ... like duh! whether its fair or not its a simple fact that everyone should know by now ... if you play soldier boy with the americans you will lose and get f**ked up in the process ... if you cant figure that out by now you really shouldnt be playing with guns and bombs and besides if you do play with guns and bombs you deserve whatever you get in return


                                    "... and so i said to him ... if it don't dance (or code) and you can't eat it either f**k it or throw it away"
                                    biz stuff   about me

                                    V Offline
                                    V Offline
                                    Vuemme
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #41

                                    lauren wrote: if you play soldier boy with the americans you will lose and get f**ked up in the process If also human right get f**ked in the process, everybody lose something, not only those talibans. lauren wrote: and besides if you do play with guns and bombs you deserve whatever you get in return And innocent people will be killed on both sides... it's what they deserve? Today's wars are a bit different from action movies with only bad and good guys involved and good side always winning... -- Looking for a new screen-saver? Try FOYD: http://digilander.iol.it/FOYD

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • World
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups