C drive space
-
Is this question too insensible? Too dumb? I know not. I think one must have an attitude to learn from anyone, and that "there is no stupid question". One must have the humility to learn from even an ant.
I could have phrased it better. I wanted to convey that you've written some pretty good articles, but don't participate in the discussions as such. May be you should get involved into our discussions more, and you'll know what kind of rubbish we are into a barbaric herd of community we are fetishes we have stuff we like to talk about here? :)
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
-
My C drive has a paltry 1.3 GB free; out of 50 GB allocated for C. Not sure where space is getting eaten up. Did a disk cleanup, with no spectacular results. I just have Windows XP, Vis Studio 2008 and Office 2003; all data is on D drive. Are the periodic Windows Updates eating up precious space? All ideas are welcome.
-
My C drive has a paltry 1.3 GB free; out of 50 GB allocated for C. Not sure where space is getting eaten up. Did a disk cleanup, with no spectacular results. I just have Windows XP, Vis Studio 2008 and Office 2003; all data is on D drive. Are the periodic Windows Updates eating up precious space? All ideas are welcome.
-
There's a little known utility included with all versions of Windows designed just for this purpose - it's called Windows Explorer, you can click on each directory, check the properties and see which is using all the space - it's amazing!!
Yes - Windows Explorer is a great tool, and that's what told me that I have less space. Unfortunately, I need to visit each folder - subfolder - subsubfolder - ... to know where exactly space is being consumed; and that's what I needed a tool for...
-
My C drive has a paltry 1.3 GB free; out of 50 GB allocated for C. Not sure where space is getting eaten up. Did a disk cleanup, with no spectacular results. I just have Windows XP, Vis Studio 2008 and Office 2003; all data is on D drive. Are the periodic Windows Updates eating up precious space? All ideas are welcome.
Not sure if it is the same on XP, but on Vista and W7, the Windows/Winsxs directory can eat up some space. Anymore though, with drive storage so cheap (I just bought a 500 GB drive for around $60), I would not run less that 120GB for my primary C partition (mine is actually 133). There are too many temp things that get thrown in there and not deleted and also the parts of programs that get installed on C even though you install on another drive. Too cheap of cost for more storage to bother spending time trying to keep the size down :)
Rocky <>< Recent Blog Post: Chocolate Chip Cookies!
-
My C drive has a paltry 1.3 GB free; out of 50 GB allocated for C. Not sure where space is getting eaten up. Did a disk cleanup, with no spectacular results. I just have Windows XP, Vis Studio 2008 and Office 2003; all data is on D drive. Are the periodic Windows Updates eating up precious space? All ideas are welcome.
Check your System Restore settings.
Cheers, Vikram. (Proud to have finally cracked a CCC!)
-
DO NOT DELETE THEM..... pagefile.sys is your memory swap file Hiberfil.sys is the hibernation file To adjust the pagefile, go to System then Advanced then virtual memory. To remove hiberfil.sys, switch off hibernation under Power Options.
I don't have ADHD, I have ADOS... Attention Deficit oooh SHINY!! Booger Mobile (n) - A bright green 1964 Ford Falcon - our entry into the Camp Quality esCarpade!! Do something wonderful - make a donation to Camp Quality today!!
_Damian S_ wrote:
DO NOT DELETE THEM.....
I doubt he can, anyway. :suss: Unless, of course, he boots with a CD version of Linux or something.... [EDIT]That reminds me of the n00b (US Marine?) many years back who wanted to delete kernel32.dll :laugh: [/EDIT]
Cheers, Vikram. (Proud to have finally cracked a CCC!)
-
Amarnath S wrote:
Are the periodic Windows Updates eating up precious space?
Yes. Each time you update, Windows saves information to allow you to recover from a disaster, which often happens after Windows updates. If you survive an update (rare) you can delete the recovery file. By the way, next time Windows kills your system I'd consider putting all your Visual Studio and Office programs on the D: drive and try to save C: for the OS itself. You won't see a performance hit if the drives are physically in the same machine, but you might experience an improvement. The swap file is on the root drive, by default, and it helps a lot to give it as much space as you can.
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
Roger Wright wrote:
The swap file is on the root drive, by default, and it helps a lot to give it as much space as you can.
My understanding was if you have more than one drive on different channels then put the swap drive on a different drive to the system would give a performance advantage (albeit minimal) If a disk has been partioned to C:/D:/ etc, there is no benefit to be gained. clarity on channel bit: in the old master / slave ide arrangement no performance gain by having the drives on the same channel No Benefit Master : Drive 1 /OS Slave : Drive 2 / swap file Benefit Primary Master: Drive 1 / OS Secondary Master: Drive 2/ Swap file SATA - Benefit Channel 1: Drive 1 OS Channel 2: Drive 2 Swap file Thats why in days gone bay, i alway put a HDD and a CD/DVD on Primary and a HDD and CD/DVD Writer on Secondary, give you the performance boost on swap arrangement and improves CD/DVD direct copy without having to cache to HDD first. Dave
Dave Who am I?: http://www.bebo.com/daveauld/ or http://www.dave-auld.net/
-
DO NOT DELETE THEM..... pagefile.sys is your memory swap file Hiberfil.sys is the hibernation file To adjust the pagefile, go to System then Advanced then virtual memory. To remove hiberfil.sys, switch off hibernation under Power Options.
I don't have ADHD, I have ADOS... Attention Deficit oooh SHINY!! Booger Mobile (n) - A bright green 1964 Ford Falcon - our entry into the Camp Quality esCarpade!! Do something wonderful - make a donation to Camp Quality today!!
If you do not use system hibernation feature, disable it and you can delete the related file.
Dave Who am I?: http://www.bebo.com/daveauld/ or http://www.dave-auld.net/
-
Get hold of SequioaView[^], one of the best tools around that can show you exactly how your drive space is being used up. Cheers, Brett
I find WinDirStat[^] a bit easier to handle, and "fresher".
Personally, I love the idea that Raymond spends his nights posting bad regexs to mailing lists under the pseudonym of Jane Smith. He'd be like a super hero, only more nerdy and less useful. [Trevel]
| FoldWithUs! | sighist -
Amarnath S wrote:
Are the periodic Windows Updates eating up precious space?
Yes. Each time you update, Windows saves information to allow you to recover from a disaster, which often happens after Windows updates. If you survive an update (rare) you can delete the recovery file. By the way, next time Windows kills your system I'd consider putting all your Visual Studio and Office programs on the D: drive and try to save C: for the OS itself. You won't see a performance hit if the drives are physically in the same machine, but you might experience an improvement. The swap file is on the root drive, by default, and it helps a lot to give it as much space as you can.
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
Roger Wright wrote:
If you survive an update (rare)
That's a bit of a ridiculous thing to say. I have Windows update running constantly on five machines that are never powered down (except when updates need them to), and have never had to roll back an update to "survive". But if you want to make yourself look like an idiot, I suppose it's up to you. Linux, is it? Only Linux-fanatics make such stupid statements. But isn't Linux the OS where, every time you power up the machine, there are 5,000-odd updates, all from people who you don't know anything about -- e.g. should you trust them to install software on your machine, and what guarantee is there that they have a clue how to program effectively and securely?
Roger Wright wrote:
I'd consider putting all your Visual Studio and Office programs on the D: drive and try to save C: for the OS itself.
That won't help; they're both on the same physical drive, so moving the swap file further away from the system files may even cause a negative performance hit.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
Roger Wright wrote:
If you survive an update (rare)
That's a bit of a ridiculous thing to say. I have Windows update running constantly on five machines that are never powered down (except when updates need them to), and have never had to roll back an update to "survive". But if you want to make yourself look like an idiot, I suppose it's up to you. Linux, is it? Only Linux-fanatics make such stupid statements. But isn't Linux the OS where, every time you power up the machine, there are 5,000-odd updates, all from people who you don't know anything about -- e.g. should you trust them to install software on your machine, and what guarantee is there that they have a clue how to program effectively and securely?
Roger Wright wrote:
I'd consider putting all your Visual Studio and Office programs on the D: drive and try to save C: for the OS itself.
That won't help; they're both on the same physical drive, so moving the swap file further away from the system files may even cause a negative performance hit.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
It's also a bit of a factual thing to say. It's rare when an update doesn't kill or cripple a machine, in my experience. True, they've got a lot better at this, but it still happens often enough to make me cautious. The nicest thing about XP is the Restore function, as it's allowed me to recover use of this machine several times in the past 6 months. As for Linux, I give it a try every 5 years or so on a spare machine, but I'm still not impressed. The poster makes no mention of C: and D: being the same physical drive, and separating the applications from the system swap file does improve performance, so long as both drives are masters on separate channels.
Mark Wallace wrote:
Only Linux-fanatics make such stupid statements.
I'll have to take your word for that. You seem to be an expert when it comes to making stupid statements.
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
-
Not sure if it is the same on XP, but on Vista and W7, the Windows/Winsxs directory can eat up some space. Anymore though, with drive storage so cheap (I just bought a 500 GB drive for around $60), I would not run less that 120GB for my primary C partition (mine is actually 133). There are too many temp things that get thrown in there and not deleted and also the parts of programs that get installed on C even though you install on another drive. Too cheap of cost for more storage to bother spending time trying to keep the size down :)
Rocky <>< Recent Blog Post: Chocolate Chip Cookies!
Rocky Moore wrote:
nymore though, with drive storage so cheap (I just bought a 500 GB drive for around $60), I would not run less that 120GB for my primary C partition (mine is actually 133).
My C: is 50GB at work, The reason is that I am using a 300 GB velociraptor and I setup my code in a separate partition so I did not have 80+ percent fragmentation after a few months on my system partition.. I also have a 750GB drive in that machine.
John
-
My C drive has a paltry 1.3 GB free; out of 50 GB allocated for C. Not sure where space is getting eaten up. Did a disk cleanup, with no spectacular results. I just have Windows XP, Vis Studio 2008 and Office 2003; all data is on D drive. Are the periodic Windows Updates eating up precious space? All ideas are welcome.
Check out System Restore. Go to System Properties, System Restore tab and click (set) the Check box "Turn off System Restore" then click Apply button. This will take a few minutes and will clear out all the space wated by System Restore. Now click the Check box again to turn on System Restore. Now click the Settings button and move the slider down to about 1%, click OK and Apply, then OK again and all sould be good, you will have some free space back and System Restore is still running but not taking up retarded amounts of space.
Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
-
It's also a bit of a factual thing to say. It's rare when an update doesn't kill or cripple a machine, in my experience. True, they've got a lot better at this, but it still happens often enough to make me cautious. The nicest thing about XP is the Restore function, as it's allowed me to recover use of this machine several times in the past 6 months. As for Linux, I give it a try every 5 years or so on a spare machine, but I'm still not impressed. The poster makes no mention of C: and D: being the same physical drive, and separating the applications from the system swap file does improve performance, so long as both drives are masters on separate channels.
Mark Wallace wrote:
Only Linux-fanatics make such stupid statements.
I'll have to take your word for that. You seem to be an expert when it comes to making stupid statements.
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
If you have such a hard time keeping a computer alive, perhaps you should consider sticking to teddy-bears. I've never heard such bollocks, to be honest. I do so enjoy the company of people who make huge statements that can never, in any way, be justified or proven. And it's pretty obvious from the OP's OP that his C and D drives are logical, and, because they are C and D (!) it's extremely safe to assume that they're on the same physical unit.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
My C drive has a paltry 1.3 GB free; out of 50 GB allocated for C. Not sure where space is getting eaten up. Did a disk cleanup, with no spectacular results. I just have Windows XP, Vis Studio 2008 and Office 2003; all data is on D drive. Are the periodic Windows Updates eating up precious space? All ideas are welcome.