Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Can a society work democratically ?

Can a society work democratically ?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
htmlquestion
23 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Stan Shannon

    Capitalism privides the purest form of democracy that we can hope for. I'm not a real reverend, I just play one on CP.

    K Offline
    K Offline
    KaRl
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Funny, I'm not surprised of your answer, Reverend ;) From my point of view, capitalism may also provide the purest form of fascism that we can fear for. The one who isn't misanthropist when 40 years old never loved human kind Qui n'est pas misanthrope à 40 ans n'a jamais aimé les hommes Nicolas De Chamfort (1740-1793)

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • E Ed Gadziemski

      I hope some day you'll join us. :)

      K Offline
      K Offline
      KaRl
      wrote on last edited by
      #14

      And the world will be as one ? :-D The one who isn't misanthropist when 40 years old never loved human kind Qui n'est pas misanthrope à 40 ans n'a jamais aimé les hommes Nicolas De Chamfort (1740-1793)

      E 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Mike Nordell

        Karl wrote: We generally consider than politically democraty is the worst system except all others How can we tell, we've never seen it (real democracy) in action. but what about the economic world ? How can one draw a line between the "world" and the "economic world" (except that telling the latter is currently run by plain greed and is therefore a non-sustainable "lifeform")? Am I a dreamer or is it possible to change that ? Probably not without a revolution... (note: I'm not suggesting any such activities, I'm just telling you how bad I believe the system is -- that I think there is no way to change it to even try real democracy within the frames of the current system).

        B Offline
        B Offline
        Brit
        wrote on last edited by
        #15

        How can one draw a line between the "world" and the "economic world" (except that telling the latter is currently run by plain greed and is therefore a non-sustainable "lifeform")? The economic world occupies a space between need and greed. Case in point: do you work because you are greedy, or because you actually have legitimate needs (like food and shelter) to take care of? ------------------------------------------ "Isn't it funny how people say they'll never grow up to be their parents, then one day they look in the mirror and they're moving aircraft carriers into the Gulf region?" - The Onion

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K KaRl

          Funny, I'm not surprised of your answer, Reverend ;) From my point of view, capitalism may also provide the purest form of fascism that we can fear for. The one who isn't misanthropist when 40 years old never loved human kind Qui n'est pas misanthrope à 40 ans n'a jamais aimé les hommes Nicolas De Chamfort (1740-1793)

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Stan Shannon
          wrote on last edited by
          #16

          Well, not being a Marxist, I generally am not inclined to associate fasicsm with capitalism. ;) I'm not a real reverend, I just play one on CP.

          K 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Stan Shannon

            Well, not being a Marxist, I generally am not inclined to associate fasicsm with capitalism. ;) I'm not a real reverend, I just play one on CP.

            K Offline
            K Offline
            KaRl
            wrote on last edited by
            #17

            Being not marxist either ( ;P) , I base my thought on History. I look at the role played by big industries in the take of power by Adolf and Benito, or the role played by ITT in the establishment of Pinochet dictatorship in 73 (another 09/11[^]). The one who isn't misanthropist when 40 years old never loved human kind Qui n'est pas misanthrope à 40 ans n'a jamais aimé les hommes Nicolas De Chamfort (1740-1793)

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P Paul Riley

              You're a dreamer ;P Sorry Karl, but it's just not possible. Have you ever served on a committee of just a handful of people? Even that has trouble surviving democratically, different people interpretting opinions in different ways. I can't imagine a society based on this. Paul

              K Offline
              K Offline
              KaRl
              wrote on last edited by
              #18

              Paul Riley wrote: I can't imagine a society based on this. I think it would be fun to elect managers and boss. They may gain their function for one year, and after that, re-election. They would perhaps be more human :rolleyes: The one who isn't misanthropist when 40 years old never loved human kind Qui n'est pas misanthrope à 40 ans n'a jamais aimé les hommes Nicolas De Chamfort (1740-1793)

              P N 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • K KaRl

                Paul Riley wrote: I can't imagine a society based on this. I think it would be fun to elect managers and boss. They may gain their function for one year, and after that, re-election. They would perhaps be more human :rolleyes: The one who isn't misanthropist when 40 years old never loved human kind Qui n'est pas misanthrope à 40 ans n'a jamais aimé les hommes Nicolas De Chamfort (1740-1793)

                P Offline
                P Offline
                Paul Riley
                wrote on last edited by
                #19

                Sure, it'd be great fun, but I doubt it would be good for business. I'm damn sure that I'd vote for the person I could manipulate the most. Add to that the fact that as soon as you elected a nice guy, the strong manager would leave for a company that would respect his ability to manager because I'm pretty sure he wouldn't be too happy about the pay cut, among other things. All-in-all, very nice idea... for the employee... impractical and bad for business I'm afraid. Paul

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K KaRl

                  Paul Riley wrote: I can't imagine a society based on this. I think it would be fun to elect managers and boss. They may gain their function for one year, and after that, re-election. They would perhaps be more human :rolleyes: The one who isn't misanthropist when 40 years old never loved human kind Qui n'est pas misanthrope à 40 ans n'a jamais aimé les hommes Nicolas De Chamfort (1740-1793)

                  N Offline
                  N Offline
                  natalie morales
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #20

                  That just might be one of the best ideas I've ever heard.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • K KaRl

                    Being not marxist either ( ;P) , I base my thought on History. I look at the role played by big industries in the take of power by Adolf and Benito, or the role played by ITT in the establishment of Pinochet dictatorship in 73 (another 09/11[^]). The one who isn't misanthropist when 40 years old never loved human kind Qui n'est pas misanthrope à 40 ans n'a jamais aimé les hommes Nicolas De Chamfort (1740-1793)

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    ColinDavies
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #21

                    I agree with you, It's amazing how now, it is not now recognized that "the 3rd Reich was probably the most capitalist regime" in modern times. Regardz Colin J Davies

                    Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin

                    You are the intrepid one, always willing to leap into the fray! A serious character flaw, I might add, but entertaining. Said by Roger Wright about me.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • K KaRl

                      We generally consider than politically democraty is the worst system except all others, but what about the economic world ? I've never seen yet a society work democratically. On the contrary, it's more generally based on the "Führerprinzip"[^]. Am I a dreamer or is it possible to change that ? The one who isn't misanthropist when 40 years old never loved human kind Qui n'est pas misanthrope à 40 ans n'a jamais aimé les hommes Nicolas De Chamfort (1740-1793)

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      ColinDavies
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #22

                      Karl wrote: We generally consider than politically democraty is the worst system except all others, I cannot see why a system better than democracy cannot be invented. Everyone seems defeatist in believing that Democracy is the peak of systems. :confused: Karl wrote: but what about the economic world ? I think the economic world works in 3 different modes, 1. Short term profit, 2. Medium term profit, 3. Long term profit. Nothing apart from this matters. The communisim that we have seen in the world never got organized sufficiently to work, as too many paradoxes were left in the systems. Regardz Colin J Davies

                      Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin

                      You are the intrepid one, always willing to leap into the fray! A serious character flaw, I might add, but entertaining. Said by Roger Wright about me.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • K KaRl

                        And the world will be as one ? :-D The one who isn't misanthropist when 40 years old never loved human kind Qui n'est pas misanthrope à 40 ans n'a jamais aimé les hommes Nicolas De Chamfort (1740-1793)

                        E Offline
                        E Offline
                        Ed Gadziemski
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #23

                        Imagine! :cool:

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups