This pretty much sums it up.
-
If fluoride is an issue use baking soda tooth pastes. There aren't many but they do exist. Is this you're handy work? http://www.forumgarden.com/forums/general-chit-chat/47552-world-wide-wake-up-call.html[^] For what purpose is the atmosphere being spraying for? What are they saying it's for?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
They have created a debt black-hole from which we cannot escape.
If you believe this then you must be in debt up to your eye balls. There are plenty of people who aren't wealthy who don't have debt or at least very little. If you know it's a black hole stay away from it. Duh!
wolfbinary wrote:
If you believe this then you must be in debt up to your eye balls. There are plenty of people who aren't wealthy who don't have debt or at least very little. If you know it's a black hole stay away from it. Duh!
YOU ARE STUPID! Every single dollar in circulation came as a loan with interest from the federal reserve. I will keep it short and simple for your feeble mind.
-
wolfbinary wrote:
If you believe this then you must be in debt up to your eye balls. There are plenty of people who aren't wealthy who don't have debt or at least very little. If you know it's a black hole stay away from it. Duh!
YOU ARE STUPID! Every single dollar in circulation came as a loan with interest from the federal reserve. I will keep it short and simple for your feeble mind.
how big was the loan and exactly how many dollars are in circulation give me actual data unless you wish to be the one looking stupid
Go away and research the subject, analyze the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.
-
how big was the loan and exactly how many dollars are in circulation give me actual data unless you wish to be the one looking stupid
Go away and research the subject, analyze the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.
Alex hogarth wrote:
how big was the loan and exactly how many dollars are in circulation give me actual data unless you wish to be the one looking stupid
It isn't A loan, its multiple loans over the period of its lifetime. The value of the dollar has decreased by 95% since the federal reserve was established. You can google for the data, the numbers are constantly increasing. I'm busy. You have a lot to learn, and I don't have the patience for you.
-
Alex hogarth wrote:
how big was the loan and exactly how many dollars are in circulation give me actual data unless you wish to be the one looking stupid
It isn't A loan, its multiple loans over the period of its lifetime. The value of the dollar has decreased by 95% since the federal reserve was established. You can google for the data, the numbers are constantly increasing. I'm busy. You have a lot to learn, and I don't have the patience for you.
but surely if you believe this you have the facts - you are contemptious to other that fail to bring evidence yet materially fail yourself, you claim to be busy but have sufficient time to troll obscure sites looking for any snippit that supports your ravings, I have, I admit a lot to learn, the problem is that the evidence you do bring is either a/ just plain wrong ie B17 and cancer cures b/ misleading - like fluoride and mercury c/ opinion with no evidence to support it or d/ opinion with a small minority support whilst a and b are your usual posts, c does occasionally crop up and you then go into your usual trick of demanding evidence against you, despite providing none in support. or d, when it pops up you treat any disagreement the way religion does, you decry it as the top of your voice and refuse to read any counter argument, often insultingly
Go away and research the subject, analyze the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.
-
but surely if you believe this you have the facts - you are contemptious to other that fail to bring evidence yet materially fail yourself, you claim to be busy but have sufficient time to troll obscure sites looking for any snippit that supports your ravings, I have, I admit a lot to learn, the problem is that the evidence you do bring is either a/ just plain wrong ie B17 and cancer cures b/ misleading - like fluoride and mercury c/ opinion with no evidence to support it or d/ opinion with a small minority support whilst a and b are your usual posts, c does occasionally crop up and you then go into your usual trick of demanding evidence against you, despite providing none in support. or d, when it pops up you treat any disagreement the way religion does, you decry it as the top of your voice and refuse to read any counter argument, often insultingly
Go away and research the subject, analyze the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.
Alex hogarth wrote:
a/ just plain wrong ie B17 and cancer cures
I don't know anything about b17, I didn't modify the original article, and quite frankly its piddly compared to the real meat and potatoes.
Alex hogarth wrote:
b/ misleading - like fluoride and mercury
Mercury is a nerotoxin, and fluoride isn't good for you to ingest at all. Plain and simple.
-
Alex hogarth wrote:
a/ just plain wrong ie B17 and cancer cures
I don't know anything about b17, I didn't modify the original article, and quite frankly its piddly compared to the real meat and potatoes.
Alex hogarth wrote:
b/ misleading - like fluoride and mercury
Mercury is a nerotoxin, and fluoride isn't good for you to ingest at all. Plain and simple.
but thats a majour part of one of the paragraphs, it its so badly wrong that a 3 second google can disprove it why should anybody take any of the article seriously? and its not the only point, the whole article is comprised of oppinions dressed as facts mercury in small doses can be a very effective cure for certain diseases so this idea that a single comment from you makes substance dangerous is a sure sign that yor are either deluded or malicious warfarin was developed as a rat poison yet has saved coutless lives since, by your argument it should be banned and the users left to die "because its a poison" fluoride is the same in small doses it is benifitial, you have yet to provide any evidence of your claims and there is edvidence that despite the prolonged use in many countries the cancer it causes has actually been reducing in the population. red meat isnt "good" for you to ingest, in fact there is more evidence that red meat has caused more deaths due to cancer than fluoride has. (oh and potatoes too are you aware that the green on potatoes are a neuro toxin?) in fact the meat and potatoes are far bigger threat to health than the fluoride
Go away and research the subject, analyze the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.
-
So this is typical?! Yikes. Hadn't been around in a while. But hey, it's cheap entertainment. Now, where's my tinfoil hat... :-D
-
but thats a majour part of one of the paragraphs, it its so badly wrong that a 3 second google can disprove it why should anybody take any of the article seriously? and its not the only point, the whole article is comprised of oppinions dressed as facts mercury in small doses can be a very effective cure for certain diseases so this idea that a single comment from you makes substance dangerous is a sure sign that yor are either deluded or malicious warfarin was developed as a rat poison yet has saved coutless lives since, by your argument it should be banned and the users left to die "because its a poison" fluoride is the same in small doses it is benifitial, you have yet to provide any evidence of your claims and there is edvidence that despite the prolonged use in many countries the cancer it causes has actually been reducing in the population. red meat isnt "good" for you to ingest, in fact there is more evidence that red meat has caused more deaths due to cancer than fluoride has. (oh and potatoes too are you aware that the green on potatoes are a neuro toxin?) in fact the meat and potatoes are far bigger threat to health than the fluoride
Go away and research the subject, analyze the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.
Alex hogarth wrote:
mercury in small doses can be a very effective cure for certain diseases so this idea that a single comment from you makes substance dangerous is a sure sign that yor are either deluded or malicious
Proof? Is that why its put in almost every single vaccine? You are a fucking moron.
Alex hogarth wrote:
fluoride is the same in small doses it is benifitial,
That is why its dumped into the water supply then? You are braindead.
-
Alex hogarth wrote:
mercury in small doses can be a very effective cure for certain diseases so this idea that a single comment from you makes substance dangerous is a sure sign that yor are either deluded or malicious
Proof? Is that why its put in almost every single vaccine? You are a fucking moron.
Alex hogarth wrote:
fluoride is the same in small doses it is benifitial,
That is why its dumped into the water supply then? You are braindead.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Proof? Is that why its put in almost every single vaccine? You are a f***ing moron.
no, firstly it isnt, secondy its used as a preservative or an inactivation element http://www.immunisation.nhs.uk/Library/News/Mercury_thiomersal_and_Vaccines_Statement_16_01_03[^] thirdly no it you that is the moron, you take a fact think it means something it doesnt an that somehow this is being done to attack you and your way of life, sorry to inform you it would be simpler and easier just to make you disapear.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
That is why its dumped into the water supply then? You are braindead.
yes thats exactly why its put in the water - to improve your teeth
Go away and research the subject, analyze the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.
-
but surely if you believe this you have the facts - you are contemptious to other that fail to bring evidence yet materially fail yourself, you claim to be busy but have sufficient time to troll obscure sites looking for any snippit that supports your ravings, I have, I admit a lot to learn, the problem is that the evidence you do bring is either a/ just plain wrong ie B17 and cancer cures b/ misleading - like fluoride and mercury c/ opinion with no evidence to support it or d/ opinion with a small minority support whilst a and b are your usual posts, c does occasionally crop up and you then go into your usual trick of demanding evidence against you, despite providing none in support. or d, when it pops up you treat any disagreement the way religion does, you decry it as the top of your voice and refuse to read any counter argument, often insultingly
Go away and research the subject, analyze the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.
Amusingly, he insisted I answer his points ( although that's redundant, he makes the claim, the onus of proof is on him ). So, I answered and then he realised he had nothing, so he insisted we talk about the fed instead. I refused unless he followed through and discussed the things he raised and asked me to. He ran like a little girl.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.