Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. This pretty much sums it up.

This pretty much sums it up.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
tutoriallearning
98 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C CaptainSeeSharp

    wolfbinary wrote:

    If you believe this then you must be in debt up to your eye balls. There are plenty of people who aren't wealthy who don't have debt or at least very little. If you know it's a black hole stay away from it. Duh!

    YOU ARE STUPID! Every single dollar in circulation came as a loan with interest from the federal reserve. I will keep it short and simple for your feeble mind.

    Fall of the Republic[^]

    B Offline
    B Offline
    Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
    wrote on last edited by
    #89

    how big was the loan and exactly how many dollars are in circulation give me actual data unless you wish to be the one looking stupid

    Go away and research the subject, analyze the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B Bergholt Stuttley Johnson

      how big was the loan and exactly how many dollars are in circulation give me actual data unless you wish to be the one looking stupid

      Go away and research the subject, analyze the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.

      C Offline
      C Offline
      CaptainSeeSharp
      wrote on last edited by
      #90

      Alex hogarth wrote:

      how big was the loan and exactly how many dollars are in circulation give me actual data unless you wish to be the one looking stupid

      It isn't A loan, its multiple loans over the period of its lifetime. The value of the dollar has decreased by 95% since the federal reserve was established. You can google for the data, the numbers are constantly increasing. I'm busy. You have a lot to learn, and I don't have the patience for you.

      Fall of the Republic[^]

      B 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C CaptainSeeSharp

        Alex hogarth wrote:

        how big was the loan and exactly how many dollars are in circulation give me actual data unless you wish to be the one looking stupid

        It isn't A loan, its multiple loans over the period of its lifetime. The value of the dollar has decreased by 95% since the federal reserve was established. You can google for the data, the numbers are constantly increasing. I'm busy. You have a lot to learn, and I don't have the patience for you.

        Fall of the Republic[^]

        B Offline
        B Offline
        Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
        wrote on last edited by
        #91

        but surely if you believe this you have the facts - you are contemptious to other that fail to bring evidence yet materially fail yourself, you claim to be busy but have sufficient time to troll obscure sites looking for any snippit that supports your ravings, I have, I admit a lot to learn, the problem is that the evidence you do bring is either a/ just plain wrong ie B17 and cancer cures b/ misleading - like fluoride and mercury c/ opinion with no evidence to support it or d/ opinion with a small minority support whilst a and b are your usual posts, c does occasionally crop up and you then go into your usual trick of demanding evidence against you, despite providing none in support. or d, when it pops up you treat any disagreement the way religion does, you decry it as the top of your voice and refuse to read any counter argument, often insultingly

        Go away and research the subject, analyze the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.

        C C 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • B Bergholt Stuttley Johnson

          but surely if you believe this you have the facts - you are contemptious to other that fail to bring evidence yet materially fail yourself, you claim to be busy but have sufficient time to troll obscure sites looking for any snippit that supports your ravings, I have, I admit a lot to learn, the problem is that the evidence you do bring is either a/ just plain wrong ie B17 and cancer cures b/ misleading - like fluoride and mercury c/ opinion with no evidence to support it or d/ opinion with a small minority support whilst a and b are your usual posts, c does occasionally crop up and you then go into your usual trick of demanding evidence against you, despite providing none in support. or d, when it pops up you treat any disagreement the way religion does, you decry it as the top of your voice and refuse to read any counter argument, often insultingly

          Go away and research the subject, analyze the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.

          C Offline
          C Offline
          CaptainSeeSharp
          wrote on last edited by
          #92

          Alex hogarth wrote:

          a/ just plain wrong ie B17 and cancer cures

          I don't know anything about b17, I didn't modify the original article, and quite frankly its piddly compared to the real meat and potatoes.

          Alex hogarth wrote:

          b/ misleading - like fluoride and mercury

          Mercury is a nerotoxin, and fluoride isn't good for you to ingest at all. Plain and simple.

          Fall of the Republic[^]

          B 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C CaptainSeeSharp

            Alex hogarth wrote:

            a/ just plain wrong ie B17 and cancer cures

            I don't know anything about b17, I didn't modify the original article, and quite frankly its piddly compared to the real meat and potatoes.

            Alex hogarth wrote:

            b/ misleading - like fluoride and mercury

            Mercury is a nerotoxin, and fluoride isn't good for you to ingest at all. Plain and simple.

            Fall of the Republic[^]

            B Offline
            B Offline
            Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
            wrote on last edited by
            #93

            but thats a majour part of one of the paragraphs, it its so badly wrong that a 3 second google can disprove it why should anybody take any of the article seriously? and its not the only point, the whole article is comprised of oppinions dressed as facts mercury in small doses can be a very effective cure for certain diseases so this idea that a single comment from you makes substance dangerous is a sure sign that yor are either deluded or malicious warfarin was developed as a rat poison yet has saved coutless lives since, by your argument it should be banned and the users left to die "because its a poison" fluoride is the same in small doses it is benifitial, you have yet to provide any evidence of your claims and there is edvidence that despite the prolonged use in many countries the cancer it causes has actually been reducing in the population. red meat isnt "good" for you to ingest, in fact there is more evidence that red meat has caused more deaths due to cancer than fluoride has. (oh and potatoes too are you aware that the green on potatoes are a neuro toxin?) in fact the meat and potatoes are far bigger threat to health than the fluoride

            Go away and research the subject, analyze the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • 0 0x3c0

              This person's spam is why the Soapbox 1.0 was set up

              OSDev

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #94

              So this is typical?! Yikes. Hadn't been around in a while. But hey, it's cheap entertainment. Now, where's my tinfoil hat... :-D

              0 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                So this is typical?! Yikes. Hadn't been around in a while. But hey, it's cheap entertainment. Now, where's my tinfoil hat... :-D

                0 Offline
                0 Offline
                0x3c0
                wrote on last edited by
                #95

                LunaticFringe wrote:

                So this is typical?! Yikes. Hadn't been around in a while.

                When the back room was hidden, CSS wasn't there. Unfortunately, after about a few weeks he returned, and has been posting his juvenile tripe ever since.

                OSDev

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B Bergholt Stuttley Johnson

                  but thats a majour part of one of the paragraphs, it its so badly wrong that a 3 second google can disprove it why should anybody take any of the article seriously? and its not the only point, the whole article is comprised of oppinions dressed as facts mercury in small doses can be a very effective cure for certain diseases so this idea that a single comment from you makes substance dangerous is a sure sign that yor are either deluded or malicious warfarin was developed as a rat poison yet has saved coutless lives since, by your argument it should be banned and the users left to die "because its a poison" fluoride is the same in small doses it is benifitial, you have yet to provide any evidence of your claims and there is edvidence that despite the prolonged use in many countries the cancer it causes has actually been reducing in the population. red meat isnt "good" for you to ingest, in fact there is more evidence that red meat has caused more deaths due to cancer than fluoride has. (oh and potatoes too are you aware that the green on potatoes are a neuro toxin?) in fact the meat and potatoes are far bigger threat to health than the fluoride

                  Go away and research the subject, analyze the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  CaptainSeeSharp
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #96

                  Alex hogarth wrote:

                  mercury in small doses can be a very effective cure for certain diseases so this idea that a single comment from you makes substance dangerous is a sure sign that yor are either deluded or malicious

                  Proof? Is that why its put in almost every single vaccine? You are a fucking moron.

                  Alex hogarth wrote:

                  fluoride is the same in small doses it is benifitial,

                  That is why its dumped into the water supply then? You are braindead.

                  Fall of the Republic[^]

                  B 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C CaptainSeeSharp

                    Alex hogarth wrote:

                    mercury in small doses can be a very effective cure for certain diseases so this idea that a single comment from you makes substance dangerous is a sure sign that yor are either deluded or malicious

                    Proof? Is that why its put in almost every single vaccine? You are a fucking moron.

                    Alex hogarth wrote:

                    fluoride is the same in small doses it is benifitial,

                    That is why its dumped into the water supply then? You are braindead.

                    Fall of the Republic[^]

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #97

                    CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                    Proof? Is that why its put in almost every single vaccine? You are a f***ing moron.

                    no, firstly it isnt, secondy its used as a preservative or an inactivation element http://www.immunisation.nhs.uk/Library/News/Mercury_thiomersal_and_Vaccines_Statement_16_01_03[^] thirdly no it you that is the moron, you take a fact think it means something it doesnt an that somehow this is being done to attack you and your way of life, sorry to inform you it would be simpler and easier just to make you disapear.

                    CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                    That is why its dumped into the water supply then? You are braindead.

                    yes thats exactly why its put in the water - to improve your teeth

                    Go away and research the subject, analyze the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B Bergholt Stuttley Johnson

                      but surely if you believe this you have the facts - you are contemptious to other that fail to bring evidence yet materially fail yourself, you claim to be busy but have sufficient time to troll obscure sites looking for any snippit that supports your ravings, I have, I admit a lot to learn, the problem is that the evidence you do bring is either a/ just plain wrong ie B17 and cancer cures b/ misleading - like fluoride and mercury c/ opinion with no evidence to support it or d/ opinion with a small minority support whilst a and b are your usual posts, c does occasionally crop up and you then go into your usual trick of demanding evidence against you, despite providing none in support. or d, when it pops up you treat any disagreement the way religion does, you decry it as the top of your voice and refuse to read any counter argument, often insultingly

                      Go away and research the subject, analyze the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Christian Graus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #98

                      Amusingly, he insisted I answer his points ( although that's redundant, he makes the claim, the onus of proof is on him ). So, I answered and then he realised he had nothing, so he insisted we talk about the fed instead. I refused unless he followed through and discussed the things he raised and asked me to. He ran like a little girl.

                      Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups