conferencing
-
Any reason for not using video conferencing or even tele-conference? Isn't that easier? I suppose you could always use Twitter...
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow
-
1 to 1 probably skype or one of the standard IM clients. 1 to many. I used to have an IM client on my laptop that did 1 to 3 or 1 to 5 conferencing depending if you paid for the subscription version of the product. I cannot for the life of me remember the name of it though. I think there might be a Cisco app/hardware suite specifically for the task but more than likely hugely expensive.
-
My company uses Lotus Sametime a lot.
"Old age is like a bank account. You withdraw later in life what you have deposited along the way." - Unknown
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
-
1 to 1 probably skype or one of the standard IM clients. 1 to many. I used to have an IM client on my laptop that did 1 to 3 or 1 to 5 conferencing depending if you paid for the subscription version of the product. I cannot for the life of me remember the name of it though. I think there might be a Cisco app/hardware suite specifically for the task but more than likely hugely expensive.
If you look for audio conferencing use Ventrilo or Teamspeak (usually MMO gamer tools, but very good).
I am fighting against the Universe... Reference-Rick Cook
-
1 to 1 probably skype or one of the standard IM clients. 1 to many. I used to have an IM client on my laptop that did 1 to 3 or 1 to 5 conferencing depending if you paid for the subscription version of the product. I cannot for the life of me remember the name of it though. I think there might be a Cisco app/hardware suite specifically for the task but more than likely hugely expensive.
If you just want 1:many chat, IRC is free and you can password your channel (chatroom) to keep unwanted visitors out. Unless your chatting with geeks though you'll probably need to configure a web client for them to use: I recommend mibbit[^]. Simple to use, ajaxy fast, no plugin required. (Previously the only fast web irc clients I'd seen used java applets.)
The latest nation. Procrastination.
-
My company uses Lotus Sametime a lot.
"Old age is like a bank account. You withdraw later in life what you have deposited along the way." - Unknown
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
-
You have my deepest sympathies. We also "use" Sametime, or at least we would, if it ever actually worked.
Hmmm, it's never failed to work for us. The screen sharing feature has been really helpful. Admittingly, we've only been using it for nine years so maybe our time is yet to come.
"Old age is like a bank account. You withdraw later in life what you have deposited along the way." - Unknown
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
-
If you mean off-line / on-line conferencing in the style of Live Journal et al, then I would recommend a small, unknown system that in its heyday was THE conferencing system, but which has almost been entirely forgotten, despite the fact that it knocks spots off anything else out there, be it LiveJournal, phpbbs, Facebook etc take a look at http://forums.cixonline.com and sign up for a free trial... Not only is this just about the best web-based conferencing system you are likely to come across, full members have an off-line reader (windows only at present) available that downloads activity to your machine and allows you to read and reply without being connected. (I have no links with the suppliers, other than having been a satisfied user for over 20 years!) I just - by invitation - joined Microsoft's Partner Forum. Even with the resources that MS can afford to throw at their system, it doesn't touch CIX for ease of use, speed etc Mike
-
GoToMeeting[^]works well if you want to pay. Excellent reliability, offer local numbers in most coutries for dial in and has good VOIP quality. I have recently been looking at FUZE[^] as a free alternative. This does not offer VOIP audio but looks competent although I do not have enough experience to comment on reliability. Personally I do not like WebEx or Live Meeting.
www.it-workplace.com
"If a man speaks in a forest where there is no woman to hear him, is he still wrong?" -
Personally I've found WebEx to be horrendous, very unreliable. I've only used it as an attendee but on the 4/5 occasions I've used WebEx it kept disconnecting. The UI is counter intuitive. From a company like Cisco, a really poor product. Never had an issue with GoToMeeting or Microsoft Live Meeting http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/livemeeting/FX101729061033.aspx[^]
-
My company tossed webex for ilink[^] a year or so ago; but one of their primary requirements was being able to host the meeting server internally instead of sending it (unencrypted???) via a 3rd party. If your paranoia levels aren't as high that's probably not a major concern. I've never actually used either so I'm not sure which works better.
The latest nation. Procrastination.
-
Interwise
-
I can't believe no one mentioned www.dimdim.com This free application is awesome. I've been using it for a group project nearly seemlessly. Meetings up to 20 for free; one limitation I found is only can share three (3) microphones.
-
We use Yugma www.yugma.com[^]. Its free and works
PlutoX