Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. BBC BASIC strikes again

BBC BASIC strikes again

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questionsalesannouncementcareer
21 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Dalek Dave
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I watched a remarkable thing last night. During the Jon Pertwee era of Doctor Who many of the original tapes were wiped as a cost saving exercise. (The tapes themselves were £100's of pounds each, and the storage was expensive too). Many of the colour prints were recovered from overseas customers, or from the hands of private collectors and so eventually every JP episode exists in one format or another. Unfortunately there are 13 episodes that only exist in black and white. There was an effort back in the early 90's to 'recolorise', (American Spelling as it was an American firm that did this), a couple of the black and white episodes, and they did a good job, but there was a lot of colour clash. Sometimes it was due to scanning differences between NTSC and PAL systems, or there were timing differences between the 24fps of film and the 25fps of TV etc. Then, quite recently, when watching what is known as a TeleCine Transmission (Basically for some foreign sales they pointed a film camera at a TV Screen), one chap noticed that the TV picture kept trying to put colour into a black and white film. This guy is a genius, because he realised why. When the B&W film was being made from a colour image, it captured colour data in the image, even though there was only a black and white scale. Each pixel from the TV image was captured, and if they could be read, they could be interpreted and recombined into the original colour image. He designed a system that scanned each frame of the B&W film, and attached a corresponding value to each part of it and lo and behold, thence came colour! It took a while, (24 fps x 24m30s x 6eps = 211680 frames), but they did it. The year was 2009, the computer was an Archimedes and the language used to write this remarkable program? BBC BASIC! Seriously Cool that a 25 year old version of BASIC, on a 22 year old machine can do this. All Praise Be on old tech!

    ------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925

    T R H A T 7 Replies Last reply
    0
    • D Dalek Dave

      I watched a remarkable thing last night. During the Jon Pertwee era of Doctor Who many of the original tapes were wiped as a cost saving exercise. (The tapes themselves were £100's of pounds each, and the storage was expensive too). Many of the colour prints were recovered from overseas customers, or from the hands of private collectors and so eventually every JP episode exists in one format or another. Unfortunately there are 13 episodes that only exist in black and white. There was an effort back in the early 90's to 'recolorise', (American Spelling as it was an American firm that did this), a couple of the black and white episodes, and they did a good job, but there was a lot of colour clash. Sometimes it was due to scanning differences between NTSC and PAL systems, or there were timing differences between the 24fps of film and the 25fps of TV etc. Then, quite recently, when watching what is known as a TeleCine Transmission (Basically for some foreign sales they pointed a film camera at a TV Screen), one chap noticed that the TV picture kept trying to put colour into a black and white film. This guy is a genius, because he realised why. When the B&W film was being made from a colour image, it captured colour data in the image, even though there was only a black and white scale. Each pixel from the TV image was captured, and if they could be read, they could be interpreted and recombined into the original colour image. He designed a system that scanned each frame of the B&W film, and attached a corresponding value to each part of it and lo and behold, thence came colour! It took a while, (24 fps x 24m30s x 6eps = 211680 frames), but they did it. The year was 2009, the computer was an Archimedes and the language used to write this remarkable program? BBC BASIC! Seriously Cool that a 25 year old version of BASIC, on a 22 year old machine can do this. All Praise Be on old tech!

      ------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925

      T Offline
      T Offline
      Tom Deketelaere
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Dalek Dave wrote:

      Seriously Cool that a 25 year old version of BASIC, on a 22 year old machine can do this. All Praise Be on old tech!

      They just don't make them like they used to :) These days it's all throw away, my first cell phone lasted 3 years (and before me a couple more years, was second hand). Now I'm lucky if it lasts 1.5 years, and no I don't throw it against a wall or anything like that ;P

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T Tom Deketelaere

        Dalek Dave wrote:

        Seriously Cool that a 25 year old version of BASIC, on a 22 year old machine can do this. All Praise Be on old tech!

        They just don't make them like they used to :) These days it's all throw away, my first cell phone lasted 3 years (and before me a couple more years, was second hand). Now I'm lucky if it lasts 1.5 years, and no I don't throw it against a wall or anything like that ;P

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Dalek Dave
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        When I get my new phone (contractually obliged to take upgrade), I pass my old one on to friends and family. No point throwing away a perfectly good phone.

        ------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925

        T 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D Dalek Dave

          I watched a remarkable thing last night. During the Jon Pertwee era of Doctor Who many of the original tapes were wiped as a cost saving exercise. (The tapes themselves were £100's of pounds each, and the storage was expensive too). Many of the colour prints were recovered from overseas customers, or from the hands of private collectors and so eventually every JP episode exists in one format or another. Unfortunately there are 13 episodes that only exist in black and white. There was an effort back in the early 90's to 'recolorise', (American Spelling as it was an American firm that did this), a couple of the black and white episodes, and they did a good job, but there was a lot of colour clash. Sometimes it was due to scanning differences between NTSC and PAL systems, or there were timing differences between the 24fps of film and the 25fps of TV etc. Then, quite recently, when watching what is known as a TeleCine Transmission (Basically for some foreign sales they pointed a film camera at a TV Screen), one chap noticed that the TV picture kept trying to put colour into a black and white film. This guy is a genius, because he realised why. When the B&W film was being made from a colour image, it captured colour data in the image, even though there was only a black and white scale. Each pixel from the TV image was captured, and if they could be read, they could be interpreted and recombined into the original colour image. He designed a system that scanned each frame of the B&W film, and attached a corresponding value to each part of it and lo and behold, thence came colour! It took a while, (24 fps x 24m30s x 6eps = 211680 frames), but they did it. The year was 2009, the computer was an Archimedes and the language used to write this remarkable program? BBC BASIC! Seriously Cool that a 25 year old version of BASIC, on a 22 year old machine can do this. All Praise Be on old tech!

          ------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925

          R Offline
          R Offline
          R Giskard Reventlov
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Amazing. As an aside and many, many years ago I worked for the BBC and wrote an application that catalogued (bar codes) every video tape (blank or otherwise) as they had realised that they were losing something on the order of £100k worth of tapes every year (a large amount back then). Only a small percentage were being stolen: the rest were 'borrowed' and simpky not returned or accounted for in departmental budgets. Once people had to check out every tape and people were employed to walk around the various buildings scanning tapes at random losees trailed off to almost nothing. Have to say it was good place to work. ps Patrick Troughton was the best Doctor: Pertwee and Tom Baker were awful, camp characters.

          me, me, me

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Dalek Dave

            I watched a remarkable thing last night. During the Jon Pertwee era of Doctor Who many of the original tapes were wiped as a cost saving exercise. (The tapes themselves were £100's of pounds each, and the storage was expensive too). Many of the colour prints were recovered from overseas customers, or from the hands of private collectors and so eventually every JP episode exists in one format or another. Unfortunately there are 13 episodes that only exist in black and white. There was an effort back in the early 90's to 'recolorise', (American Spelling as it was an American firm that did this), a couple of the black and white episodes, and they did a good job, but there was a lot of colour clash. Sometimes it was due to scanning differences between NTSC and PAL systems, or there were timing differences between the 24fps of film and the 25fps of TV etc. Then, quite recently, when watching what is known as a TeleCine Transmission (Basically for some foreign sales they pointed a film camera at a TV Screen), one chap noticed that the TV picture kept trying to put colour into a black and white film. This guy is a genius, because he realised why. When the B&W film was being made from a colour image, it captured colour data in the image, even though there was only a black and white scale. Each pixel from the TV image was captured, and if they could be read, they could be interpreted and recombined into the original colour image. He designed a system that scanned each frame of the B&W film, and attached a corresponding value to each part of it and lo and behold, thence came colour! It took a while, (24 fps x 24m30s x 6eps = 211680 frames), but they did it. The year was 2009, the computer was an Archimedes and the language used to write this remarkable program? BBC BASIC! Seriously Cool that a 25 year old version of BASIC, on a 22 year old machine can do this. All Praise Be on old tech!

            ------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925

            H Offline
            H Offline
            hairy_hats
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Happy days....back when the Archimedes could pull data off an HDD far faster than a PC, and had a desktop with anti-aliased fonts....a real opportunity lost by Acorn. :(

            I hope you realise that hamsters are very creative when it comes to revenge. - Elaine

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Dalek Dave

              When I get my new phone (contractually obliged to take upgrade), I pass my old one on to friends and family. No point throwing away a perfectly good phone.

              ------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925

              T Offline
              T Offline
              Tom Deketelaere
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              I keep mine till they break, it's just an observation from me and friends that these days they break a lot faster than they used to. I'm all for going back to the days where a phone was a phone and not a tool for inane twatter on twitter ;P Basically for me all it has to do is call and send messages, but those days are over I guess, I think they call it progress ;P

              M 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R R Giskard Reventlov

                Amazing. As an aside and many, many years ago I worked for the BBC and wrote an application that catalogued (bar codes) every video tape (blank or otherwise) as they had realised that they were losing something on the order of £100k worth of tapes every year (a large amount back then). Only a small percentage were being stolen: the rest were 'borrowed' and simpky not returned or accounted for in departmental budgets. Once people had to check out every tape and people were employed to walk around the various buildings scanning tapes at random losees trailed off to almost nothing. Have to say it was good place to work. ps Patrick Troughton was the best Doctor: Pertwee and Tom Baker were awful, camp characters.

                me, me, me

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Mycroft Holmes
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Have 5 for the camp doctor comment, even worse than Blakes Seven.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T Tom Deketelaere

                  I keep mine till they break, it's just an observation from me and friends that these days they break a lot faster than they used to. I'm all for going back to the days where a phone was a phone and not a tool for inane twatter on twitter ;P Basically for me all it has to do is call and send messages, but those days are over I guess, I think they call it progress ;P

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  merridus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  But if your phone can only call people and send messages how will you make sure things are level? You'd then need to carry a separate spirit level round with you for your DIY jobs :D

                  - Rob

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D Dalek Dave

                    I watched a remarkable thing last night. During the Jon Pertwee era of Doctor Who many of the original tapes were wiped as a cost saving exercise. (The tapes themselves were £100's of pounds each, and the storage was expensive too). Many of the colour prints were recovered from overseas customers, or from the hands of private collectors and so eventually every JP episode exists in one format or another. Unfortunately there are 13 episodes that only exist in black and white. There was an effort back in the early 90's to 'recolorise', (American Spelling as it was an American firm that did this), a couple of the black and white episodes, and they did a good job, but there was a lot of colour clash. Sometimes it was due to scanning differences between NTSC and PAL systems, or there were timing differences between the 24fps of film and the 25fps of TV etc. Then, quite recently, when watching what is known as a TeleCine Transmission (Basically for some foreign sales they pointed a film camera at a TV Screen), one chap noticed that the TV picture kept trying to put colour into a black and white film. This guy is a genius, because he realised why. When the B&W film was being made from a colour image, it captured colour data in the image, even though there was only a black and white scale. Each pixel from the TV image was captured, and if they could be read, they could be interpreted and recombined into the original colour image. He designed a system that scanned each frame of the B&W film, and attached a corresponding value to each part of it and lo and behold, thence came colour! It took a while, (24 fps x 24m30s x 6eps = 211680 frames), but they did it. The year was 2009, the computer was an Archimedes and the language used to write this remarkable program? BBC BASIC! Seriously Cool that a 25 year old version of BASIC, on a 22 year old machine can do this. All Praise Be on old tech!

                    ------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925

                    A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Abu Mami
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Dalek Dave wrote:

                    'recolorise', (American Spelling as it was an American firm that did this)

                    A hybridized spelling really - British spelling would be "colourise", American would be "colorize". The hybridized spelling ends up with no "u", and an "s" (instead of the expected "z" for an American spelling).

                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D Dalek Dave

                      I watched a remarkable thing last night. During the Jon Pertwee era of Doctor Who many of the original tapes were wiped as a cost saving exercise. (The tapes themselves were £100's of pounds each, and the storage was expensive too). Many of the colour prints were recovered from overseas customers, or from the hands of private collectors and so eventually every JP episode exists in one format or another. Unfortunately there are 13 episodes that only exist in black and white. There was an effort back in the early 90's to 'recolorise', (American Spelling as it was an American firm that did this), a couple of the black and white episodes, and they did a good job, but there was a lot of colour clash. Sometimes it was due to scanning differences between NTSC and PAL systems, or there were timing differences between the 24fps of film and the 25fps of TV etc. Then, quite recently, when watching what is known as a TeleCine Transmission (Basically for some foreign sales they pointed a film camera at a TV Screen), one chap noticed that the TV picture kept trying to put colour into a black and white film. This guy is a genius, because he realised why. When the B&W film was being made from a colour image, it captured colour data in the image, even though there was only a black and white scale. Each pixel from the TV image was captured, and if they could be read, they could be interpreted and recombined into the original colour image. He designed a system that scanned each frame of the B&W film, and attached a corresponding value to each part of it and lo and behold, thence came colour! It took a while, (24 fps x 24m30s x 6eps = 211680 frames), but they did it. The year was 2009, the computer was an Archimedes and the language used to write this remarkable program? BBC BASIC! Seriously Cool that a 25 year old version of BASIC, on a 22 year old machine can do this. All Praise Be on old tech!

                      ------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925

                      T Offline
                      T Offline
                      tufkap
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Dalek Dave wrote:

                      'recolorise', (American Spelling as it was an American firm that did this)

                      Shouldn't that be 'recolorize'?

                      A D 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • T tufkap

                        Dalek Dave wrote:

                        'recolorise', (American Spelling as it was an American firm that did this)

                        Shouldn't that be 'recolorize'?

                        A Offline
                        A Offline
                        Abu Mami
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Great minds think alike - beat you by a minute :)

                        T 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Abu Mami

                          Dalek Dave wrote:

                          'recolorise', (American Spelling as it was an American firm that did this)

                          A hybridized spelling really - British spelling would be "colourise", American would be "colorize". The hybridized spelling ends up with no "u", and an "s" (instead of the expected "z" for an American spelling).

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Dalek Dave
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Read a dicitionary. The prefered spelling in English for soft sibilants is Z, S is an Americanism, so says the OED and Collins. I have had this argument before and won every time by the expediency of pulling out a dictionary and showing it to disbelievers! So I am right, Recolorise is the American way, Recolourize is the British (and therefore correct) way! :0

                          ------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925

                          A 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A Abu Mami

                            Great minds think alike - beat you by a minute :)

                            T Offline
                            T Offline
                            tufkap
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Oh Shoot! I should have refreshed the thread before posting. :)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • T tufkap

                              Dalek Dave wrote:

                              'recolorise', (American Spelling as it was an American firm that did this)

                              Shouldn't that be 'recolorize'?

                              D Offline
                              D Offline
                              Dalek Dave
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Go to bookcase. Remove Dictionary. Read. Z is prefered before S in English soft sibilants. Z is purer, coming from the Ancient Greek, whereas the S is the bastardized French Form.

                              ------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925

                              A 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • D Dalek Dave

                                Read a dicitionary. The prefered spelling in English for soft sibilants is Z, S is an Americanism, so says the OED and Collins. I have had this argument before and won every time by the expediency of pulling out a dictionary and showing it to disbelievers! So I am right, Recolorise is the American way, Recolourize is the British (and therefore correct) way! :0

                                ------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925

                                A Offline
                                A Offline
                                Abu Mami
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Dalek Dave wrote:

                                Read a dicitionary.

                                I'm an American - I don't read the dictionary. And I use a Z, not an S. Therefore - I am right. :)

                                D 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A Abu Mami

                                  Dalek Dave wrote:

                                  Read a dicitionary.

                                  I'm an American - I don't read the dictionary. And I use a Z, not an S. Therefore - I am right. :)

                                  D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  Dalek Dave
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  OK, we are both right, Z is correct, S is French and therefore automatically wrong :)

                                  ------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925

                                  A 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D Dalek Dave

                                    Go to bookcase. Remove Dictionary. Read. Z is prefered before S in English soft sibilants. Z is purer, coming from the Ancient Greek, whereas the S is the bastardized French Form.

                                    ------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925

                                    A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    Abu Mami
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    Did some more checking, and this isn't such a simple issue. Refer to this Wikipedia article [^] for more information (there are quite a few other sources as well). Seems that all British sources aren't consistent in their opinion on this.

                                    H 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • D Dalek Dave

                                      OK, we are both right, Z is correct, S is French and therefore automatically wrong :)

                                      ------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925

                                      A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      Abu Mami
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Dalek Dave wrote:

                                      S is French and therefore automatically wrong

                                      Just gave you a 5 for this - I'd give you a 10 if it was possible.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A Abu Mami

                                        Did some more checking, and this isn't such a simple issue. Refer to this Wikipedia article [^] for more information (there are quite a few other sources as well). Seems that all British sources aren't consistent in their opinion on this.

                                        H Offline
                                        H Offline
                                        Henry Minute
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        Endeavour agrees with DD. Therefore it is a fact! Indisputable.

                                        Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • D Dalek Dave

                                          I watched a remarkable thing last night. During the Jon Pertwee era of Doctor Who many of the original tapes were wiped as a cost saving exercise. (The tapes themselves were £100's of pounds each, and the storage was expensive too). Many of the colour prints were recovered from overseas customers, or from the hands of private collectors and so eventually every JP episode exists in one format or another. Unfortunately there are 13 episodes that only exist in black and white. There was an effort back in the early 90's to 'recolorise', (American Spelling as it was an American firm that did this), a couple of the black and white episodes, and they did a good job, but there was a lot of colour clash. Sometimes it was due to scanning differences between NTSC and PAL systems, or there were timing differences between the 24fps of film and the 25fps of TV etc. Then, quite recently, when watching what is known as a TeleCine Transmission (Basically for some foreign sales they pointed a film camera at a TV Screen), one chap noticed that the TV picture kept trying to put colour into a black and white film. This guy is a genius, because he realised why. When the B&W film was being made from a colour image, it captured colour data in the image, even though there was only a black and white scale. Each pixel from the TV image was captured, and if they could be read, they could be interpreted and recombined into the original colour image. He designed a system that scanned each frame of the B&W film, and attached a corresponding value to each part of it and lo and behold, thence came colour! It took a while, (24 fps x 24m30s x 6eps = 211680 frames), but they did it. The year was 2009, the computer was an Archimedes and the language used to write this remarkable program? BBC BASIC! Seriously Cool that a 25 year old version of BASIC, on a 22 year old machine can do this. All Praise Be on old tech!

                                          ------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925

                                          M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Mark_Wallace
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          Dalek Dave wrote:

                                          Seriously Cool that a 25 year old version of BASIC, on a 22 year old machine can do this.

                                          Not too surprising, though. It's a computer, and BASIC is a programming language that tells computers what to do. just 'cause something's old doesn't mean that we're any cleverer than the people who made it.

                                          I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups