Interesting code comments
-
Ha ha! Reminds me of a story from my school days. We had one English teacher we were sure never read our work, and just marked it based on who we were...the "good" students got good grades etc. So one guy eventually decided to test our theory by writing incongruous garbage mid-sentence. I don't remember what the exercise was, but he'd written stuff along the lines of "and the story is advanced by the cross-over between the cat sat on the mat theme and character" and numerous other such stupidities. Sure enough, she gave lots of red ticks and his "usual" mark.
I went one better. I submitted the same paper 10 times in one year - changing only the cover page and the last page (where the teacher wrote the mark). I got the same mark 10 times for ten totally different topics. Just call it "code reuse".
Paul Hooper If you spend your whole life looking over your shoulder, they will get you from the front instead.
-
:laugh: Some things never change, and people still don't read. When I worked for a large aerospace contractor thirty years ago, we shipped missile systems with maintenance documents that were hundreds of pages thick, printed on 'D' or 'E' size paper in blueprint form. There were no large-format laser printers then, nor any electronic documents. One engineer I worked with was certain that no one ever actually read the documents we wrote, and to prove it, he slipped 2 sheets of typed jokes into one of the manuals. The document went through the Navy review process, was approved, and deployed along with the rest of the missile system. In the five years I worked there, no word of its discovery ever reached me, and to the best of my knowledge, no one yet has ever found those jokes. :-D
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
-
Have you ever looked back through your code and seen some really odd or funny comments? I've coded while extremely tired two or three times, and when I looked at what I wrote in the morning, I laughed out loud. For example:
//Found in a process identification method which used an array:
//Process, I am your father. Search your table, you know it to be true//Found when rewriting a virtual memory manager:
//May illusions reign once more//Hangman game, when there are no more tries left:
//Kill him and dump the body outside townOSDev :)
StackOverflow has a thread talking about all kinds of different code comments. It's well worth a couple of minutes reading through some of them. :-D
-
Have you ever looked back through your code and seen some really odd or funny comments? I've coded while extremely tired two or three times, and when I looked at what I wrote in the morning, I laughed out loud. For example:
//Found in a process identification method which used an array:
//Process, I am your father. Search your table, you know it to be true//Found when rewriting a virtual memory manager:
//May illusions reign once more//Hangman game, when there are no more tries left:
//Kill him and dump the body outside townOSDev :)
The in the late 60's the source code for the Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) Time Sharing System for the PDP-8 processor (TSS-8) occasionally drifted off into mock German. In the 90's I was doing maintenance programming on a POS (and I DON'T mean Point of Sale) system written by consultants (until management finally got wise that they were being taken for a ride and brought evelopment in-house) that seemed to delight in framing their comment blocks so they looked like bi-wing airplanes. That is, when they deigned to write comments. One routine I had to go through was completely alphabet soup. Parameters were A, B, C, D, E, F, G. No one comment in the whole function. And the first thing we were taught in maintaining the code, was that names mean nothing. Just because the subroutine is named "Print", does not mean it ever gets around to doing any. Sorry to drift off subject a bit.
Psychosis at 10 Film at 11
-
Hits the pad on the full? Inside edge? Ball landing outside leg stump? Batsman offering no shot? Switch hit? I can easily see it running to 2.5 pages.
Regards Senthil _____________________________ My Home Page |My Blog | My Articles | My Flickr | WinMacro
S. Senthil Kumar wrote:
Hits the pad on the full?
Irrelevant.
S. Senthil Kumar wrote:
Inside edge?
Can be taken care of with a preamble, not specific to the four cases.
S. Senthil Kumar wrote:
Ball landing outside leg stump?
Part of the 'everything else' case.
S. Senthil Kumar wrote:
Batsman offering no shot?
Only matters when ball pitches outside off and hits outside off, so yeah, taken care of, just a sub-point.
S. Senthil Kumar wrote:
Switch hit?
I believe the rules of cricket are silent on that. I stand by what I said, there is no way it needs 2.5 pages.
Cheers, Vikram. (Got my troika of CCCs!)
-
Ha ha! Reminds me of a story from my school days. We had one English teacher we were sure never read our work, and just marked it based on who we were...the "good" students got good grades etc. So one guy eventually decided to test our theory by writing incongruous garbage mid-sentence. I don't remember what the exercise was, but he'd written stuff along the lines of "and the story is advanced by the cross-over between the cat sat on the mat theme and character" and numerous other such stupidities. Sure enough, she gave lots of red ticks and his "usual" mark.
My english teacher last year was talking to me about an essay I handed her. She was saying that it was waay beyond my level, a great essay, and obviously plagiarised. I told her it was my own work, and she checked by searching google. She concluded that yes, it was mine, but it was a rubbish essay anyway, full of faults, worst she'd ever seen.
-
S. Senthil Kumar wrote:
Hits the pad on the full?
Irrelevant.
S. Senthil Kumar wrote:
Inside edge?
Can be taken care of with a preamble, not specific to the four cases.
S. Senthil Kumar wrote:
Ball landing outside leg stump?
Part of the 'everything else' case.
S. Senthil Kumar wrote:
Batsman offering no shot?
Only matters when ball pitches outside off and hits outside off, so yeah, taken care of, just a sub-point.
S. Senthil Kumar wrote:
Switch hit?
I believe the rules of cricket are silent on that. I stand by what I said, there is no way it needs 2.5 pages.
Cheers, Vikram. (Got my troika of CCCs!)
Vikram A Punathambekar wrote:
Irrelevant.
Not really - when the ball hits the pad on the full, the umpire must assume that the ball would go straight on. This matters for spinners; the umpire should not assume that the ball would turn after pitching. If the ball hits the pad after pitching, the umpire must consider the degree of turn. I'd imagine there would also be rules about what exactly constitutes the "leg" part in LBW - thighpad, straps etc..
Vikram A Punathambekar wrote:
I stand by what I said, there is no way it needs 2.5 pages.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leg_before_[^]has a pretty long explanation of the rules. The Lord's[^] website states it much more tersely, though it would be hard to imagine a normal developer writing like that. And oh, both of them clearly mention the full toss impact use case - "irrespective of whether the ball might have pitched subsequently or not". I didn't know about this for a long time - I'd be furious at certain decisions, where it was clear that had the ball landed, it would have turned past the stumps.
Regards Senthil _____________________________ My Home Page |My Blog | My Articles | My Flickr | WinMacro
-
Have you ever looked back through your code and seen some really odd or funny comments? I've coded while extremely tired two or three times, and when I looked at what I wrote in the morning, I laughed out loud. For example:
//Found in a process identification method which used an array:
//Process, I am your father. Search your table, you know it to be true//Found when rewriting a virtual memory manager:
//May illusions reign once more//Hangman game, when there are no more tries left:
//Kill him and dump the body outside townOSDev :)
I think one of the best collections of comments I ever saw was in the primary window management module for the Emacs text editor, as implemented on Multics. This was one of the hairiest pieces of code you could ever imagine, written completely in Lisp. It was tight, it worked, and remained fairly bug-free for years, as its original implementor was a genius. Anyway, the entire piece of code was commented in Latin, on the grounds that if you needed the comments to help you understand what was going on, then you didn't belong here, and should leave well enough alone. If you knew what you were doing, and could follow the code as if it were written in your birth language, then you didn't need the comments. For my self, I have always believed in the Golden Rule of programming -- "Comment unto others as you would have them comment unto you." Norm
-
Have you ever looked back through your code and seen some really odd or funny comments? I've coded while extremely tired two or three times, and when I looked at what I wrote in the morning, I laughed out loud. For example:
//Found in a process identification method which used an array:
//Process, I am your father. Search your table, you know it to be true//Found when rewriting a virtual memory manager:
//May illusions reign once more//Hangman game, when there are no more tries left:
//Kill him and dump the body outside townOSDev :)
I put this in my error code not to long ago....took it from robocop 2 /* Lewis: Murphey! You're reading miranda rights to a corpse Robocop: I'm having...trouble. * * Goes to discipline the kids robbing the store... Robocop: And now a word on nutrition... Robocop: I'm not finished yet. */
Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber. - Aristotle
-
Have you ever looked back through your code and seen some really odd or funny comments? I've coded while extremely tired two or three times, and when I looked at what I wrote in the morning, I laughed out loud. For example:
//Found in a process identification method which used an array:
//Process, I am your father. Search your table, you know it to be true//Found when rewriting a virtual memory manager:
//May illusions reign once more//Hangman game, when there are no more tries left:
//Kill him and dump the body outside townOSDev :)
Came across this today...
// Begin 2.0.1 Hack: // The Template editor is more crappy than something which is entirely constructed of crap by Mr. and Mrs. Crap from CrapLand.... I think it's one of mine.
___________________________________________ .\\axxx (That's an 'M')
-
Vikram A Punathambekar wrote:
Irrelevant.
Not really - when the ball hits the pad on the full, the umpire must assume that the ball would go straight on. This matters for spinners; the umpire should not assume that the ball would turn after pitching. If the ball hits the pad after pitching, the umpire must consider the degree of turn. I'd imagine there would also be rules about what exactly constitutes the "leg" part in LBW - thighpad, straps etc..
Vikram A Punathambekar wrote:
I stand by what I said, there is no way it needs 2.5 pages.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leg_before_[^]has a pretty long explanation of the rules. The Lord's[^] website states it much more tersely, though it would be hard to imagine a normal developer writing like that. And oh, both of them clearly mention the full toss impact use case - "irrespective of whether the ball might have pitched subsequently or not". I didn't know about this for a long time - I'd be furious at certain decisions, where it was clear that had the ball landed, it would have turned past the stumps.
Regards Senthil _____________________________ My Home Page |My Blog | My Articles | My Flickr | WinMacro
Kinda silly, don't you think, the two of us arguing over how long the LBW rules would be, in a thread about code comments? :)
S. Senthil Kumar wrote:
Not really - when the ball hits the pad on the full, the umpire must assume that the ball would go straight on.
OK, that's kinda what I meant. The umpire must always assume the ball would have continued in its present trajectory, with the batsman not being present. Also, it's extremely rare for a ball to hit the batsman in line on the full, yet miss the stumps if it hadn't.
S. Senthil Kumar wrote:
I'd imagine there would also be rules about what exactly constitutes the "leg" part in LBW - thighpad, straps etc.
In fact, pretty much any part of the batsman's body and gear, except the bat itself and the glove if in contact with the bat. For all the brouhaha surrounding Tendulkar's dismissal in Australia some years ago, IMO he was out. Journalists in sports who know next to nothing about the rules are as stupid as the journalist who wrote a science article last week where he said the solar system was 16m years old. The wiki article you linked to[^] does it in 6 points.
Cheers, Vikram. (Got my troika of CCCs!)