Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. The new decade

The new decade

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
learning
148 Posts 45 Posters 98 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Richard Andrew x64R Offline
    Richard Andrew x64R Offline
    Richard Andrew x64
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Since so many otherwise intelligent people made snarky remarks about my assertion that the decade begins in 2011, not 2010, I will explain it quite simply as follows: Premise: There are TEN years in a decade Year 1 is the FIRST year of the decade Year 2 is the SECOND year of the decade Year 3 is the THIRD year of the decade . . . Year 9 is the NINTH year of the decade and here's the important part: Year 10 is the TENTH year of the decade, meaning that the new decade doesn't begin until Year 11. That means that 2010 is the TENTH year of the FIRST decade of the 2000's. The second decade will not begin until 2011. Arthur C. Clarke knew the truth, and that is why he named his book 2001 A Space Odyssey, not 2000 A Space Odyssey

    N D L L D 28 Replies Last reply
    0
    • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

      Since so many otherwise intelligent people made snarky remarks about my assertion that the decade begins in 2011, not 2010, I will explain it quite simply as follows: Premise: There are TEN years in a decade Year 1 is the FIRST year of the decade Year 2 is the SECOND year of the decade Year 3 is the THIRD year of the decade . . . Year 9 is the NINTH year of the decade and here's the important part: Year 10 is the TENTH year of the decade, meaning that the new decade doesn't begin until Year 11. That means that 2010 is the TENTH year of the FIRST decade of the 2000's. The second decade will not begin until 2011. Arthur C. Clarke knew the truth, and that is why he named his book 2001 A Space Odyssey, not 2000 A Space Odyssey

      N Offline
      N Offline
      Nemanja Trifunovic
      wrote on last edited by
      #2
      1. You are right. 2) It does not matter because most people think the decade ends in 2009. Happy new decade ;P

      utf8-cpp

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

        Since so many otherwise intelligent people made snarky remarks about my assertion that the decade begins in 2011, not 2010, I will explain it quite simply as follows: Premise: There are TEN years in a decade Year 1 is the FIRST year of the decade Year 2 is the SECOND year of the decade Year 3 is the THIRD year of the decade . . . Year 9 is the NINTH year of the decade and here's the important part: Year 10 is the TENTH year of the decade, meaning that the new decade doesn't begin until Year 11. That means that 2010 is the TENTH year of the FIRST decade of the 2000's. The second decade will not begin until 2011. Arthur C. Clarke knew the truth, and that is why he named his book 2001 A Space Odyssey, not 2000 A Space Odyssey

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Dirk Higbee
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        No, decade rules follow century rules. New centuries started in 1800, 1900, etc, therefore a new decade begins with 0 not 1. (This is true in binary also as the basic beginning point is 0.) So, the new decade began in 2000 and then will again in 2010, with the 1 and 0 being the determining factor. For example, the new decade began in 1980 and again in 1990 because of the 8 and the 9, i.e. the 80's and 90's. So, in conclusion 2010 starts the beginning of a new decade just as 2020 will in the future. :)

        My reality check bounced.

        Richard Andrew x64R S K 4 Replies Last reply
        0
        • D Dirk Higbee

          No, decade rules follow century rules. New centuries started in 1800, 1900, etc, therefore a new decade begins with 0 not 1. (This is true in binary also as the basic beginning point is 0.) So, the new decade began in 2000 and then will again in 2010, with the 1 and 0 being the determining factor. For example, the new decade began in 1980 and again in 1990 because of the 8 and the 9, i.e. the 80's and 90's. So, in conclusion 2010 starts the beginning of a new decade just as 2020 will in the future. :)

          My reality check bounced.

          Richard Andrew x64R Offline
          Richard Andrew x64R Offline
          Richard Andrew x64
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Dirk Higbee wrote:

          New centuries started in 1800, 1900

          Says whom? The only people say that the century begins with 0 are wrong. How many years are in a decade? Answer: 10 What number is the last year belonging to any decade? Answer: 10

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Dirk Higbee

            No, decade rules follow century rules. New centuries started in 1800, 1900, etc, therefore a new decade begins with 0 not 1. (This is true in binary also as the basic beginning point is 0.) So, the new decade began in 2000 and then will again in 2010, with the 1 and 0 being the determining factor. For example, the new decade began in 1980 and again in 1990 because of the 8 and the 9, i.e. the 80's and 90's. So, in conclusion 2010 starts the beginning of a new decade just as 2020 will in the future. :)

            My reality check bounced.

            Richard Andrew x64R Offline
            Richard Andrew x64R Offline
            Richard Andrew x64
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Dirk Higbee wrote:

            New centuries started in 1800, 1900

            By this logic, the very first century began with the year 0. And we all know that the calendar began with year 1, not 0.

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

              Dirk Higbee wrote:

              New centuries started in 1800, 1900

              By this logic, the very first century began with the year 0. And we all know that the calendar began with year 1, not 0.

              D Offline
              D Offline
              Dirk Higbee
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              You weren't born 1 year old were you?

              My reality check bounced.

              Richard Andrew x64R S S 3 Replies Last reply
              0
              • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

                Since so many otherwise intelligent people made snarky remarks about my assertion that the decade begins in 2011, not 2010, I will explain it quite simply as follows: Premise: There are TEN years in a decade Year 1 is the FIRST year of the decade Year 2 is the SECOND year of the decade Year 3 is the THIRD year of the decade . . . Year 9 is the NINTH year of the decade and here's the important part: Year 10 is the TENTH year of the decade, meaning that the new decade doesn't begin until Year 11. That means that 2010 is the TENTH year of the FIRST decade of the 2000's. The second decade will not begin until 2011. Arthur C. Clarke knew the truth, and that is why he named his book 2001 A Space Odyssey, not 2000 A Space Odyssey

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Richard Andrew x64 wrote:

                Year 1 is the FIRST year of the decade

                Prophets are programmers (different target-cpu) and by that logic, they started counting at index 0. Hence, year (1)0 is the "first" year, and year 1 (or 11) the "second".

                Richard Andrew x64 wrote:

                Arthur C. Clarke knew the truth

                There is no truth, just a different offset :)

                I are Troll :suss:

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Dirk Higbee

                  You weren't born 1 year old were you?

                  My reality check bounced.

                  Richard Andrew x64R Offline
                  Richard Andrew x64R Offline
                  Richard Andrew x64
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Non-sequitor and red-herring. I dare you to show how that statement disproves what I said.

                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

                    Dirk Higbee wrote:

                    New centuries started in 1800, 1900

                    Says whom? The only people say that the century begins with 0 are wrong. How many years are in a decade? Answer: 10 What number is the last year belonging to any decade? Answer: 10

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    Dirk Higbee
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Decades are determined by their time periods, i.e. the 30's. 40's and 50's. Certainly 1970 is not part of the 60's or it wouldn't have a seven in it. And by the way, the beginning of time did start at zero or we wouldn't count time the way we do today. The beginning of time was the first year but it was not a whole year until a year had past. At six months it would have been year .5. :-D

                    My reality check bounced.

                    N R N J 4 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

                      Non-sequitor and red-herring. I dare you to show how that statement disproves what I said.

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Dirk Higbee
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Ok, try this. If 1 is our starting point and zero is our ending point then why does 10 come before 11? :) And if that's the case why doesn't the decade end at 4 or 5? ( As long as we're tossing out arbitray values)

                      My reality check bounced.

                      Richard Andrew x64R 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

                        Since so many otherwise intelligent people made snarky remarks about my assertion that the decade begins in 2011, not 2010, I will explain it quite simply as follows: Premise: There are TEN years in a decade Year 1 is the FIRST year of the decade Year 2 is the SECOND year of the decade Year 3 is the THIRD year of the decade . . . Year 9 is the NINTH year of the decade and here's the important part: Year 10 is the TENTH year of the decade, meaning that the new decade doesn't begin until Year 11. That means that 2010 is the TENTH year of the FIRST decade of the 2000's. The second decade will not begin until 2011. Arthur C. Clarke knew the truth, and that is why he named his book 2001 A Space Odyssey, not 2000 A Space Odyssey

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Luc Pattyn
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decade[^] :)

                        Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]


                        Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all.


                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

                          Since so many otherwise intelligent people made snarky remarks about my assertion that the decade begins in 2011, not 2010, I will explain it quite simply as follows: Premise: There are TEN years in a decade Year 1 is the FIRST year of the decade Year 2 is the SECOND year of the decade Year 3 is the THIRD year of the decade . . . Year 9 is the NINTH year of the decade and here's the important part: Year 10 is the TENTH year of the decade, meaning that the new decade doesn't begin until Year 11. That means that 2010 is the TENTH year of the FIRST decade of the 2000's. The second decade will not begin until 2011. Arthur C. Clarke knew the truth, and that is why he named his book 2001 A Space Odyssey, not 2000 A Space Odyssey

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Dr Walt Fair PE
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          You can count as you wish. The rest of the world counts differently, but being individualistic is great. And I'm especially thankful that arguing about which year a decade starts or ends is the most important thing we have to worry about. I hope the next decade doesn't bring any worse worries! ;P

                          From Wikipedia:

                          The 2000s is the decade that started on January 1, 2000 and will end on December 31, 2009. It is the current decade, and the decade in which the 21st century and 3rd millennium began.

                          From dictionary.com:

                          a period of ten years beginning with a year whose last digit is zero: the decade of the 1980s.

                          CQ de W5ALT

                          Walt Fair, Jr., P. E. Comport Computing Specializing in Technical Engineering Software

                          Richard Andrew x64R 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D Dirk Higbee

                            Decades are determined by their time periods, i.e. the 30's. 40's and 50's. Certainly 1970 is not part of the 60's or it wouldn't have a seven in it. And by the way, the beginning of time did start at zero or we wouldn't count time the way we do today. The beginning of time was the first year but it was not a whole year until a year had past. At six months it would have been year .5. :-D

                            My reality check bounced.

                            N Offline
                            N Offline
                            Nemanja Trifunovic
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Dirk Higbee wrote:

                            And by the way, the beginning of time did start at zero or we wouldn't count time the way we do today.

                            There was 1 BC, and after that 1 AD. No zeroes there :) However, as I said, no-one really cares. My general manager showed the "last slide of the decade" during our all hands meeting last week and I was ceirtanly not in a mood to stand up and ask whether this means there will be no meetings next year :)

                            utf8-cpp

                            C 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Dirk Higbee

                              Ok, try this. If 1 is our starting point and zero is our ending point then why does 10 come before 11? :) And if that's the case why doesn't the decade end at 4 or 5? ( As long as we're tossing out arbitray values)

                              My reality check bounced.

                              Richard Andrew x64R Offline
                              Richard Andrew x64R Offline
                              Richard Andrew x64
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Look, open your mind instead of just defending your position: Here's a bunch of years: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30 You'll notice that there are TEN years in each group. That means each group is a decade. Now what year begins the second decade that I have listed above? Notice that at the beginning of my "calendar" is year 1 because the calendar we use today began at year 1.

                              D J S 3 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

                                Since so many otherwise intelligent people made snarky remarks about my assertion that the decade begins in 2011, not 2010, I will explain it quite simply as follows: Premise: There are TEN years in a decade Year 1 is the FIRST year of the decade Year 2 is the SECOND year of the decade Year 3 is the THIRD year of the decade . . . Year 9 is the NINTH year of the decade and here's the important part: Year 10 is the TENTH year of the decade, meaning that the new decade doesn't begin until Year 11. That means that 2010 is the TENTH year of the FIRST decade of the 2000's. The second decade will not begin until 2011. Arthur C. Clarke knew the truth, and that is why he named his book 2001 A Space Odyssey, not 2000 A Space Odyssey

                                D Offline
                                D Offline
                                Dirk Higbee
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Richard Andrew x64 wrote:

                                Arthur C. Clarke knew the truth, and that is why he named his book 2001 A Space Odyssey, not 2000 A Space Odyssey

                                Then why was the sequel called 2010 and not 2011?

                                My reality check bounced.

                                Richard Andrew x64R 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • D Dr Walt Fair PE

                                  You can count as you wish. The rest of the world counts differently, but being individualistic is great. And I'm especially thankful that arguing about which year a decade starts or ends is the most important thing we have to worry about. I hope the next decade doesn't bring any worse worries! ;P

                                  From Wikipedia:

                                  The 2000s is the decade that started on January 1, 2000 and will end on December 31, 2009. It is the current decade, and the decade in which the 21st century and 3rd millennium began.

                                  From dictionary.com:

                                  a period of ten years beginning with a year whose last digit is zero: the decade of the 1980s.

                                  CQ de W5ALT

                                  Walt Fair, Jr., P. E. Comport Computing Specializing in Technical Engineering Software

                                  Richard Andrew x64R Offline
                                  Richard Andrew x64R Offline
                                  Richard Andrew x64
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  There is only one way which is correct. When you say, "the rest of the world," you're not referring to that same group of people who think the world will end in 2012, are you? Or maybe you're referring to that large group of people who never finished high school, or maybe.....

                                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D Dirk Higbee

                                    No, decade rules follow century rules. New centuries started in 1800, 1900, etc, therefore a new decade begins with 0 not 1. (This is true in binary also as the basic beginning point is 0.) So, the new decade began in 2000 and then will again in 2010, with the 1 and 0 being the determining factor. For example, the new decade began in 1980 and again in 1990 because of the 8 and the 9, i.e. the 80's and 90's. So, in conclusion 2010 starts the beginning of a new decade just as 2020 will in the future. :)

                                    My reality check bounced.

                                    S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Sean Cundiff
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    You have constructed a direct proof. The logic is correct, however your initial assumption that centuries start with xx00 is incorrect. Therefore your result is not proven. Centuries start with xx01. There was no Year 0. Years are 1-based. At some point in history we had a zero event, after which we started the first year (Year 1 AD, or Year 1 CE, your choice, unless you're Muslim, Jewish or anyone else who uses a different Zero Event). At the END of that year, we started Year 2. Eventually we get to Year 10 at the END of which we've completed 10 years. The NEXT decade starts at Year 11. The 1st century (1 - 100) The 2nd century (101 - 200) ... The 20th century (1901 - 2000) The 21st century (2001 - 2100) In other words, we're using Z+, the set of positive integers. It's no wonder that so many people have problems with this. It took mankind centuries to come to grips with the concept of 0. In fact, it wasn't until fairly recent in human history that 0 was accepted as a number at all. Maybe it will help if you use the clock. In English 2:30 AM is 2:30 AM. In German I could say that the time was halb drei == half of three. Why? because 12:00 AM to 12:59 AM is the FIRST hour. The END of the first hour/start of the second hour is 1:00 AM, etc.

                                    -Sean ---- Fire Nuts

                                    D C 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • D Dirk Higbee

                                      Richard Andrew x64 wrote:

                                      Arthur C. Clarke knew the truth, and that is why he named his book 2001 A Space Odyssey, not 2000 A Space Odyssey

                                      Then why was the sequel called 2010 and not 2011?

                                      My reality check bounced.

                                      Richard Andrew x64R Offline
                                      Richard Andrew x64R Offline
                                      Richard Andrew x64
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      How the heck should I know? But Clarke is quoted as saying that is the reason.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

                                        There is only one way which is correct. When you say, "the rest of the world," you're not referring to that same group of people who think the world will end in 2012, are you? Or maybe you're referring to that large group of people who never finished high school, or maybe.....

                                        D Offline
                                        D Offline
                                        Distind
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        You're arguing against the dictionary definition at this point, do you care to take another swing or can we just accept that it makes a lot more sense to start counting from 0 rather than claiming the 90s went from 91-2000?

                                        Richard Andrew x64R K 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

                                          Look, open your mind instead of just defending your position: Here's a bunch of years: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30 You'll notice that there are TEN years in each group. That means each group is a decade. Now what year begins the second decade that I have listed above? Notice that at the beginning of my "calendar" is year 1 because the calendar we use today began at year 1.

                                          D Offline
                                          D Offline
                                          Dirk Higbee
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          Richard Andrew x64 wrote:

                                          the calendar we use today began at year 1.

                                          I'd like to see that calendar.

                                          My reality check bounced.

                                          Richard Andrew x64R 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups