Pun Thread Guidelines
-
I've observed that some of the pun threads really push the edge of correctness, and I'd like to establish some guidelines before it gets too far out of hand. 0) All pun terms must be presented in bold text. 1) A pun term, once used, cannot be use again in the same message branch. 2) More credit is given to pun terms that are not part of another word. 3) This guideline intentionally left blank. 4) Messages that are not part of the pun thread (or branch), should not be posted within that thread/branch.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
I've observed that some of the pun threads really push the edge of correctness, and I'd like to establish some guidelines before it gets too far out of hand. 0) All pun terms must be presented in bold text. 1) A pun term, once used, cannot be use again in the same message branch. 2) More credit is given to pun terms that are not part of another word. 3) This guideline intentionally left blank. 4) Messages that are not part of the pun thread (or branch), should not be posted within that thread/branch.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001You seem to have those Pun Thread Guidelines sewn up! ;)
Ali
-
You seem to have those Pun Thread Guidelines sewn up! ;)
Ali
Wow: you've really stitched him up.
-
I've observed that some of the pun threads really push the edge of correctness, and I'd like to establish some guidelines before it gets too far out of hand. 0) All pun terms must be presented in bold text. 1) A pun term, once used, cannot be use again in the same message branch. 2) More credit is given to pun terms that are not part of another word. 3) This guideline intentionally left blank. 4) Messages that are not part of the pun thread (or branch), should not be posted within that thread/branch.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
- All pun terms must be presented in bold text.
Aw, but I suppose it makes 'scoring' easier. :-\
-
You seem to have those Pun Thread Guidelines sewn up! ;)
Ali
Good answer, all I could come up with was something about a shrubbery, and here's Monty Python with the Business News.
///////////////// Groucho Marx Those are my principals, if you don't like them… I have others.
-
Wow: you've really stitched him up.
His heddle is in the right place.
-
I've observed that some of the pun threads really push the edge of correctness, and I'd like to establish some guidelines before it gets too far out of hand. 0) All pun terms must be presented in bold text. 1) A pun term, once used, cannot be use again in the same message branch. 2) More credit is given to pun terms that are not part of another word. 3) This guideline intentionally left blank. 4) Messages that are not part of the pun thread (or branch), should not be posted within that thread/branch.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001that is not funny. :|
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all.
-
Good answer, all I could come up with was something about a shrubbery, and here's Monty Python with the Business News.
///////////////// Groucho Marx Those are my principals, if you don't like them… I have others.
I didn't expect the bloody Spanish Inquisition...
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
I've observed that some of the pun threads really push the edge of correctness, and I'd like to establish some guidelines before it gets too far out of hand. 0) All pun terms must be presented in bold text. 1) A pun term, once used, cannot be use again in the same message branch. 2) More credit is given to pun terms that are not part of another word. 3) This guideline intentionally left blank. 4) Messages that are not part of the pun thread (or branch), should not be posted within that thread/branch.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
- All pun terms must be presented in bold text.
Why? If you can't spot the pun in the first place, perhaps you shouldn't be playing... 4) Messages that are not part of the pun thread (or branch), should not be posted within that thread/branch. True, but that applies to all posts, surely?
-
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
- All pun terms must be presented in bold text.
Why? If you can't spot the pun in the first place, perhaps you shouldn't be playing... 4) Messages that are not part of the pun thread (or branch), should not be posted within that thread/branch. True, but that applies to all posts, surely?
Electron Shepherd wrote:
Why?
Because they're MY guidelines.
Electron Shepherd wrote:
If you can't spot the pun in the first place, perhaps you shouldn't be playing...
I was more concerned with our international (and quite often) clueless audience.
Electron Shepherd wrote:
- Messages that are not part of the pun thread (or branch), should not be posted within that thread/branch. True, but that applies to all posts, surely?
No, and don't call me Shirley...
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
Good answer, all I could come up with was something about a shrubbery, and here's Monty Python with the Business News.
///////////////// Groucho Marx Those are my principals, if you don't like them… I have others.
You still haven't fixed the typo in your signature.
-
You still haven't fixed the typo in your signature.
Michael Schubert wrote:
You still haven't fixed the typo in your signature.
He's tired of fixing it every time when he posts a message. :laugh:
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
-
I didn't expect the bloody Spanish Inquisition...
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
expect the bloody Spanish Inquisition
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
-
I've observed that some of the pun threads really push the edge of correctness, and I'd like to establish some guidelines before it gets too far out of hand. 0) All pun terms must be presented in bold text. 1) A pun term, once used, cannot be use again in the same message branch. 2) More credit is given to pun terms that are not part of another word. 3) This guideline intentionally left blank. 4) Messages that are not part of the pun thread (or branch), should not be posted within that thread/branch.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
- Messages that are not part of the pun thread (or branch), should not be posted within that thread/branch.
So if we want to make a comment without a pun do not post?:confused: Yes I am truly confused, this is a serious question. Thanks.
-
Electron Shepherd wrote:
Why?
Because they're MY guidelines.
Electron Shepherd wrote:
If you can't spot the pun in the first place, perhaps you shouldn't be playing...
I was more concerned with our international (and quite often) clueless audience.
Electron Shepherd wrote:
- Messages that are not part of the pun thread (or branch), should not be posted within that thread/branch. True, but that applies to all posts, surely?
No, and don't call me Shirley...
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
Michael Schubert wrote:
You still haven't fixed the typo in your signature.
He's tired of fixing it every time when he posts a message. :laugh:
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:
Michael Schubert wrote: You still haven't fixed the typo in your signature. He's tired of fixing it every time when he posts a message.
Actualy, this was the first time I've hard it mentioned. Resolved. :D too many Principals, not enough schools.
///////////////// Groucho Marx Those are my principles, if you don't like them… I have others.
-
Electron Shepherd wrote:
Why?
Because they're MY guidelines.
Electron Shepherd wrote:
If you can't spot the pun in the first place, perhaps you shouldn't be playing...
I was more concerned with our international (and quite often) clueless audience.
Electron Shepherd wrote:
- Messages that are not part of the pun thread (or branch), should not be posted within that thread/branch. True, but that applies to all posts, surely?
No, and don't call me Shirley...
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
No, and don't call me Shirley...
ummm.... you forgot to bold Shirley...
____________________________________________________ I'd rather have a frontal lobotomy than a bottle in front of me... Bill W
-
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:
Michael Schubert wrote: You still haven't fixed the typo in your signature. He's tired of fixing it every time when he posts a message.
Actualy, this was the first time I've hard it mentioned. Resolved. :D too many Principals, not enough schools.
///////////////// Groucho Marx Those are my principles, if you don't like them… I have others.
-
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
No, and don't call me Shirley...
ummm.... you forgot to bold Shirley...
____________________________________________________ I'd rather have a frontal lobotomy than a bottle in front of me... Bill W
-
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
expect the bloody Spanish Inquisition
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
"\S\p\a\n\i\s\h\ \I\n\q\u\i\s\i\t\i\o\n" Escaping the Spanish Inquisition