Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Weird and The Wonderful
  4. WTF Was This Guy Thinking!!! [modified]

WTF Was This Guy Thinking!!! [modified]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Weird and The Wonderful
databasecsharpsql-serversysadminhelp
16 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Kevin Marois

    I'm converting an MS Access app to C# & SQL Server. Here's part of an Access query I just came across:

    IIf(TX.TX_TYPE="R",
    IIf(TX.TX_MOSTYPE="P",
    IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","PO Receipt",
    IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","PO Receipt Hold","Other")),
    IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","WIP Receipt",
    IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","WIP Hold","Other"))),
    IIf(TX.TX_TYPE="I",IIf(ISNULL(RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)) Or RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)="","Shipment Return","Reverse Issue"),
    IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS=TX.TX_DEST_STATUS,"Loc Transfer",
    IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN="SCRAPPED","Reverse Scrap",
    IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="J","Count Adj Up",
    IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="D","PN Change To",
    IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="I","Reverse Unplanned Issue",
    IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="A" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","Hold",
    IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="U" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","Off Hold","Other"))))))))) AS [Transaction Type]

    You'll notice that

    TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A"

    is being evaluated more than once. Go figure

    Everything makes sense in someone's mind

    moved on Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:54 AM

    A Offline
    A Offline
    Andrew Rissing
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    With a bit of formatting, it makes 'more' sense:

    IIf
    (TX.TX_TYPE="R",
    IIf
    (TX.TX_MOSTYPE="P",
    IIf
    (TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A",
    "PO Receipt",
    IIf
    (TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U",
    "PO Receipt Hold",
    "Other"
    )
    ),
    IIf
    (TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A",
    "WIP Receipt",
    IIf
    (TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U",
    "WIP Hold",
    "Other"
    )
    )
    ),
    IIf
    (TX.TX_TYPE="I",
    IIf
    (ISNULL(RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)) Or RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)="",
    "Shipment Return",
    "Reverse Issue"
    ),
    IIf
    (TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS=TX.TX_DEST_STATUS,
    "Loc Transfer",
    IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN="SCRAPPED",
    "Reverse Scrap",
    IIf
    (TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="J",
    "Count Adj Up",
    IIf
    (TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="D",
    "PN Change To",
    IIf
    (TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="I",
    "Reverse Unplanned Issue",
    IIf
    (TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="A" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U",
    "Hold",
    IIf
    (TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="U" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A",
    "Off Hold",
    "Other"
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    ) AS [Transaction Type]

    Granted, nesting like this just makes it impossible to read without a gratuitous use of formatting. The original query was just not very consistent in its usage of formatting it. The above was the best I could come up with to be able to read it effectively....

    A K 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • A Andrew Rissing

      With a bit of formatting, it makes 'more' sense:

      IIf
      (TX.TX_TYPE="R",
      IIf
      (TX.TX_MOSTYPE="P",
      IIf
      (TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A",
      "PO Receipt",
      IIf
      (TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U",
      "PO Receipt Hold",
      "Other"
      )
      ),
      IIf
      (TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A",
      "WIP Receipt",
      IIf
      (TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U",
      "WIP Hold",
      "Other"
      )
      )
      ),
      IIf
      (TX.TX_TYPE="I",
      IIf
      (ISNULL(RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)) Or RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)="",
      "Shipment Return",
      "Reverse Issue"
      ),
      IIf
      (TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS=TX.TX_DEST_STATUS,
      "Loc Transfer",
      IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN="SCRAPPED",
      "Reverse Scrap",
      IIf
      (TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="J",
      "Count Adj Up",
      IIf
      (TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="D",
      "PN Change To",
      IIf
      (TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="I",
      "Reverse Unplanned Issue",
      IIf
      (TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="A" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U",
      "Hold",
      IIf
      (TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="U" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A",
      "Off Hold",
      "Other"
      )
      )
      )
      )
      )
      )
      )
      )
      ) AS [Transaction Type]

      Granted, nesting like this just makes it impossible to read without a gratuitous use of formatting. The original query was just not very consistent in its usage of formatting it. The above was the best I could come up with to be able to read it effectively....

      A Offline
      A Offline
      Andrew Rissing
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Btw, this looks more like a coding horror than 'wicked code'. ;P

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Andrew Rissing

        With a bit of formatting, it makes 'more' sense:

        IIf
        (TX.TX_TYPE="R",
        IIf
        (TX.TX_MOSTYPE="P",
        IIf
        (TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A",
        "PO Receipt",
        IIf
        (TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U",
        "PO Receipt Hold",
        "Other"
        )
        ),
        IIf
        (TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A",
        "WIP Receipt",
        IIf
        (TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U",
        "WIP Hold",
        "Other"
        )
        )
        ),
        IIf
        (TX.TX_TYPE="I",
        IIf
        (ISNULL(RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)) Or RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)="",
        "Shipment Return",
        "Reverse Issue"
        ),
        IIf
        (TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS=TX.TX_DEST_STATUS,
        "Loc Transfer",
        IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN="SCRAPPED",
        "Reverse Scrap",
        IIf
        (TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="J",
        "Count Adj Up",
        IIf
        (TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="D",
        "PN Change To",
        IIf
        (TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="I",
        "Reverse Unplanned Issue",
        IIf
        (TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="A" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U",
        "Hold",
        IIf
        (TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="U" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A",
        "Off Hold",
        "Other"
        )
        )
        )
        )
        )
        )
        )
        )
        ) AS [Transaction Type]

        Granted, nesting like this just makes it impossible to read without a gratuitous use of formatting. The original query was just not very consistent in its usage of formatting it. The above was the best I could come up with to be able to read it effectively....

        K Offline
        K Offline
        Kevin Marois
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        I was able to clean it up a bit more, although it took awhile.

        CASE WHEN TX.TX_TYPE = 'R' AND TX.TX_MOSTYPE = 'P' AND TX.TX_DEST_STATUS = 'A' THEN 'PO Receipt'
        WHEN TX.TX_TYPE = 'R' AND TX.TX_MOSTYPE = 'P' AND TX.TX_DEST_STATUS = 'U' THEN 'PO Receipt Hold'
        WHEN TX.TX_TYPE = 'R' AND TX.TX_MOSTYPE = 'P' THEN 'Other'
        WHEN TX.TX_TYPE = 'R' AND TX.TX_DEST_STATUS = 'A' THEN 'WIP Receipt'
        WHEN TX.TX_TYPE = 'R' AND TX.TX_DEST_STATUS = 'U' THEN 'WIP Hold'
        WHEN TX.TX_TYPE = 'R' THEN 'Other'
        WHEN TX.TX_TYPE = 'I' AND ISNULL(RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB),'') = '' THEN 'Shipment Return'
        WHEN TX.TX_TYPE = 'I' THEN 'Reverse Issue'
        WHEN TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS = TX.TX_DEST_STATUS THEN 'Loc Transfer'
        WHEN TX.TX_ORIGIN = 'SCRAPPED' THEN 'Reverse Scrap'
        WHEN TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS = 'J' THEN 'Count Adj Up'
        WHEN TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS = 'D' THEN 'PN Change To'
        WHEN TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS = 'I' THEN 'Reverse Unplanned Issue'
        WHEN TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS = 'A' AND TX.TX_DEST_STATUS = 'U' THEN 'Hold'
        WHEN TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS = 'U' AND TX.TX_DEST_STATUS = 'A' THEN 'Off Hold' ELSE 'Other'
        END AS Transaction_Type

        Everything makes sense in someone's mind

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Kevin Marois

          I'm converting an MS Access app to C# & SQL Server. Here's part of an Access query I just came across:

          IIf(TX.TX_TYPE="R",
          IIf(TX.TX_MOSTYPE="P",
          IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","PO Receipt",
          IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","PO Receipt Hold","Other")),
          IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","WIP Receipt",
          IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","WIP Hold","Other"))),
          IIf(TX.TX_TYPE="I",IIf(ISNULL(RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)) Or RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)="","Shipment Return","Reverse Issue"),
          IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS=TX.TX_DEST_STATUS,"Loc Transfer",
          IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN="SCRAPPED","Reverse Scrap",
          IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="J","Count Adj Up",
          IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="D","PN Change To",
          IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="I","Reverse Unplanned Issue",
          IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="A" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","Hold",
          IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="U" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","Off Hold","Other"))))))))) AS [Transaction Type]

          You'll notice that

          TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A"

          is being evaluated more than once. Go figure

          Everything makes sense in someone's mind

          moved on Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:54 AM

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Marc Clifton
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          It looks like Linq, pre-Linq. ;) Marc

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K Kevin Marois

            I'm converting an MS Access app to C# & SQL Server. Here's part of an Access query I just came across:

            IIf(TX.TX_TYPE="R",
            IIf(TX.TX_MOSTYPE="P",
            IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","PO Receipt",
            IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","PO Receipt Hold","Other")),
            IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","WIP Receipt",
            IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","WIP Hold","Other"))),
            IIf(TX.TX_TYPE="I",IIf(ISNULL(RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)) Or RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)="","Shipment Return","Reverse Issue"),
            IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS=TX.TX_DEST_STATUS,"Loc Transfer",
            IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN="SCRAPPED","Reverse Scrap",
            IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="J","Count Adj Up",
            IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="D","PN Change To",
            IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="I","Reverse Unplanned Issue",
            IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="A" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","Hold",
            IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="U" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","Off Hold","Other"))))))))) AS [Transaction Type]

            You'll notice that

            TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A"

            is being evaluated more than once. Go figure

            Everything makes sense in someone's mind

            moved on Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:54 AM

            P Offline
            P Offline
            pawelchooch
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            I've seen Garbage like this before, it usually happens when engineers pretend to be programmers... I laugh at inappropriate times

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K Kevin Marois

              I'm converting an MS Access app to C# & SQL Server. Here's part of an Access query I just came across:

              IIf(TX.TX_TYPE="R",
              IIf(TX.TX_MOSTYPE="P",
              IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","PO Receipt",
              IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","PO Receipt Hold","Other")),
              IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","WIP Receipt",
              IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","WIP Hold","Other"))),
              IIf(TX.TX_TYPE="I",IIf(ISNULL(RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)) Or RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)="","Shipment Return","Reverse Issue"),
              IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS=TX.TX_DEST_STATUS,"Loc Transfer",
              IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN="SCRAPPED","Reverse Scrap",
              IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="J","Count Adj Up",
              IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="D","PN Change To",
              IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="I","Reverse Unplanned Issue",
              IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="A" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","Hold",
              IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="U" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","Off Hold","Other"))))))))) AS [Transaction Type]

              You'll notice that

              TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A"

              is being evaluated more than once. Go figure

              Everything makes sense in someone's mind

              moved on Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:54 AM

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Muneeb R Baig
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              As you wrote:

              Everything makes sense in someone's mind

              -muneeb A thing of beauty is the joy forever.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K Kevin Marois

                I'm converting an MS Access app to C# & SQL Server. Here's part of an Access query I just came across:

                IIf(TX.TX_TYPE="R",
                IIf(TX.TX_MOSTYPE="P",
                IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","PO Receipt",
                IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","PO Receipt Hold","Other")),
                IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","WIP Receipt",
                IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","WIP Hold","Other"))),
                IIf(TX.TX_TYPE="I",IIf(ISNULL(RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)) Or RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)="","Shipment Return","Reverse Issue"),
                IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS=TX.TX_DEST_STATUS,"Loc Transfer",
                IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN="SCRAPPED","Reverse Scrap",
                IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="J","Count Adj Up",
                IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="D","PN Change To",
                IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="I","Reverse Unplanned Issue",
                IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="A" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","Hold",
                IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="U" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","Off Hold","Other"))))))))) AS [Transaction Type]

                You'll notice that

                TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A"

                is being evaluated more than once. Go figure

                Everything makes sense in someone's mind

                moved on Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:54 AM

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Jorgen Andersson
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Looks to me like a repeated event of technically challenged boss entering the room of a stressed halfwit programmer shouting: We need to add this NOW!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T thrakazog

                  I think step 1 is to delete it and then ask what the original intention was.

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  GibbleCH
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  This is where you write a bank of unit tests, based on the input/output of this clause. Then refactor ensuring all tests keep passing.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • K Kevin Marois

                    I'm converting an MS Access app to C# & SQL Server. Here's part of an Access query I just came across:

                    IIf(TX.TX_TYPE="R",
                    IIf(TX.TX_MOSTYPE="P",
                    IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","PO Receipt",
                    IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","PO Receipt Hold","Other")),
                    IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","WIP Receipt",
                    IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","WIP Hold","Other"))),
                    IIf(TX.TX_TYPE="I",IIf(ISNULL(RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)) Or RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)="","Shipment Return","Reverse Issue"),
                    IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS=TX.TX_DEST_STATUS,"Loc Transfer",
                    IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN="SCRAPPED","Reverse Scrap",
                    IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="J","Count Adj Up",
                    IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="D","PN Change To",
                    IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="I","Reverse Unplanned Issue",
                    IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="A" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","Hold",
                    IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="U" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","Off Hold","Other"))))))))) AS [Transaction Type]

                    You'll notice that

                    TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A"

                    is being evaluated more than once. Go figure

                    Everything makes sense in someone's mind

                    moved on Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:54 AM

                    I Offline
                    I Offline
                    IT_Guy 1
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    Holy sh*t...thats just horrific man. :) as long as I don't encounter that ever! :laugh:

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • K Kevin Marois

                      I was able to clean it up a bit more, although it took awhile.

                      CASE WHEN TX.TX_TYPE = 'R' AND TX.TX_MOSTYPE = 'P' AND TX.TX_DEST_STATUS = 'A' THEN 'PO Receipt'
                      WHEN TX.TX_TYPE = 'R' AND TX.TX_MOSTYPE = 'P' AND TX.TX_DEST_STATUS = 'U' THEN 'PO Receipt Hold'
                      WHEN TX.TX_TYPE = 'R' AND TX.TX_MOSTYPE = 'P' THEN 'Other'
                      WHEN TX.TX_TYPE = 'R' AND TX.TX_DEST_STATUS = 'A' THEN 'WIP Receipt'
                      WHEN TX.TX_TYPE = 'R' AND TX.TX_DEST_STATUS = 'U' THEN 'WIP Hold'
                      WHEN TX.TX_TYPE = 'R' THEN 'Other'
                      WHEN TX.TX_TYPE = 'I' AND ISNULL(RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB),'') = '' THEN 'Shipment Return'
                      WHEN TX.TX_TYPE = 'I' THEN 'Reverse Issue'
                      WHEN TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS = TX.TX_DEST_STATUS THEN 'Loc Transfer'
                      WHEN TX.TX_ORIGIN = 'SCRAPPED' THEN 'Reverse Scrap'
                      WHEN TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS = 'J' THEN 'Count Adj Up'
                      WHEN TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS = 'D' THEN 'PN Change To'
                      WHEN TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS = 'I' THEN 'Reverse Unplanned Issue'
                      WHEN TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS = 'A' AND TX.TX_DEST_STATUS = 'U' THEN 'Hold'
                      WHEN TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS = 'U' AND TX.TX_DEST_STATUS = 'A' THEN 'Off Hold' ELSE 'Other'
                      END AS Transaction_Type

                      Everything makes sense in someone's mind

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      ddecoy
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Nice to see people with some extra time on their hands :-\

                      Learning without thought is labor lost; thought without learning is perilous. (Confucius)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • K Kevin Marois

                        I'm converting an MS Access app to C# & SQL Server. Here's part of an Access query I just came across:

                        IIf(TX.TX_TYPE="R",
                        IIf(TX.TX_MOSTYPE="P",
                        IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","PO Receipt",
                        IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","PO Receipt Hold","Other")),
                        IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","WIP Receipt",
                        IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","WIP Hold","Other"))),
                        IIf(TX.TX_TYPE="I",IIf(ISNULL(RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)) Or RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)="","Shipment Return","Reverse Issue"),
                        IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS=TX.TX_DEST_STATUS,"Loc Transfer",
                        IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN="SCRAPPED","Reverse Scrap",
                        IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="J","Count Adj Up",
                        IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="D","PN Change To",
                        IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="I","Reverse Unplanned Issue",
                        IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="A" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","Hold",
                        IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="U" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","Off Hold","Other"))))))))) AS [Transaction Type]

                        You'll notice that

                        TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A"

                        is being evaluated more than once. Go figure

                        Everything makes sense in someone's mind

                        moved on Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:54 AM

                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        megaadam
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        This dude is clearly a Lisp-genius, stuck with the wrong programming languge. What a pity!

                        ........................ Life is too shor

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Andrew Rissing

                          Btw, this looks more like a coding horror than 'wicked code'. ;P

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          sashoalm
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          It's in the coding horrors section. Or was the topic moved later with all the replies? I didn't think it was possible to do so in codeproject.

                          There is sufficient light for those who desire to see, and there is sufficient darkness for those of a contrary disposition. Blaise Pascal

                          A 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S sashoalm

                            It's in the coding horrors section. Or was the topic moved later with all the replies? I didn't think it was possible to do so in codeproject.

                            There is sufficient light for those who desire to see, and there is sufficient darkness for those of a contrary disposition. Blaise Pascal

                            A Offline
                            A Offline
                            Andrew Rissing
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            It was moved.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • K Kevin Marois

                              I'm converting an MS Access app to C# & SQL Server. Here's part of an Access query I just came across:

                              IIf(TX.TX_TYPE="R",
                              IIf(TX.TX_MOSTYPE="P",
                              IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","PO Receipt",
                              IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","PO Receipt Hold","Other")),
                              IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","WIP Receipt",
                              IIf(TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","WIP Hold","Other"))),
                              IIf(TX.TX_TYPE="I",IIf(ISNULL(RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)) Or RTRIM(TX.TX_MOSJOB)="","Shipment Return","Reverse Issue"),
                              IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS=TX.TX_DEST_STATUS,"Loc Transfer",
                              IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN="SCRAPPED","Reverse Scrap",
                              IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="J","Count Adj Up",
                              IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="D","PN Change To",
                              IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="I","Reverse Unplanned Issue",
                              IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="A" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="U","Hold",
                              IIf(TX.TX_ORIGIN_STATUS="U" And TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A","Off Hold","Other"))))))))) AS [Transaction Type]

                              You'll notice that

                              TX.TX_DEST_STATUS="A"

                              is being evaluated more than once. Go figure

                              Everything makes sense in someone's mind

                              moved on Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:54 AM

                              W Offline
                              W Offline
                              Wamuti
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              I think he meant to make a Ladder; Only that it's lying on the wrong wall :laugh:

                              Wamuti: Any man can be an island, but islands to need water around them! Edmund Burke: No one could make a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups