Climate chief, recent warming not statisticaly significant.
-
Ohhh, so tetchy! I would guess that you either like the lounge to be sanitised, in which case your insult is, in your own judgement, 'illegal', or that you are a true believer in the socialist scam that is AGW and are unprepared to countenance any criticism of it. In which case you are a self deluded fool. So in both cases you do yourself a diservice by responding in such a way.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
No, you are a boring fanatic.
Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]
Trollslayer wrote:
No, you are a boring fanatic.
You've hit on the only adjective that should ever be used to modify the word "fanatic".
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
The problem is that this is pretty much ALL you want to talk about. Aren't there any climate-related blogs/forums that you can participate in. You haven't seemed to get the hint that this is an unpopular topic (least when you keep trying to start a thread on it in the lounge). Get a clue, dude.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
The problem is that this is pretty much ALL you want to talk about.
Yeah, I am a bit obsessed with it. I think it is because I like criticising, especially government bodies, or organisations that purport to 'lead' us. And yes, there are GW groups, and I use them a lot. But I feel like I know people on CP at a more personal level, since we do discuss so much, and so discussing it here is kind of more like a good discussion down the pub with my mates if ou know what I mean.
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
You haven't seemed to get the hint that this is an unpopular topic
Well, I am think skinned and stubborn, and there are some who are interested in GW and want to discuss it in the lounge. It is just that a few are deciding for the rest by deleting my posts. Instead they shold justy ignore them if they arent interested.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
I did read about it (one of your earlier threads, linking to the content). But thanks, I don't want to talk about it now and here. My point is - if you feel that your posts are being removed in an unjustified manner, take it up with Chris.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
If you want to pick up on what is happening in the GW world then alt.global_warming is a good forum. There are a lot of developments right now, and it looks like AGW is coming under a lot of criticism. So much in fact that it looks like it might die soon.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
digital man wrote:
Doesn't sound that way or you would have ignored it.
Bah, same with you too!
digital man wrote:
Again, I would agree but I can't see how a post on GW could be considered abusive.
I think that he's upset the majority of people (or enough number of people to remove his GW posts off), so there's an immediate knee-jerk reaction when there's a post about GW and is from fatboy, within no time it gets trashed. While I would agree with the fact that he isn't posting something abusive, the fact remains that what is 'abusive' is subjective to the opinion of the majority. I think that his repeated posts on GW is taken as an abuse of the board, because he was asked not to start threads on this, many many times. But again, that's not my personal opinion, I'm just stating what I have observed. He also behaved like a child, creating threads multiple times on the same day, while the crowd went after removing his threads one after the other! This could have added to the temper.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:
He also behaved like a child, creating threads multiple times on the same day, while the crowd went after removing his threads one after the other! This could have added to the temper
Well, it wasnt childish but it was ammusing taunting the 'abuse voters'! In fact I havent posted much about AGW in the lounge. In total only a few posts. Most have been in the SB, untill it died. The fact is that some people have formed an opinion about me due to my pseudonym, actually chosen to generate strong responses (no one likes to argue more than with what they assume to be a fat 13 year old!). Combine that with attacking a belief held strongly by many on CP and and you can see why I am generate strong responses. The fact that I am now effectively censored in the Lounge only says to me that my attacks on AGW have been effective. Otherwise I would either be argued with, or ignored. The fact I raise so much passion merely tells me I am onto something and should continue with renewed vigour! :)
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
Your peak frequency was, like, several new threads a day. I'm surprised that you're surprised at this, if indeed you are.
Yes but that peak frequency ojnly matched the speed at which AGW is falling apart. It only looks extreme in the SB for example where no one posts for days. In the lounge three a day would hardly be noticed. They would certainly not be on the same page. And in any case, we are actually talking about one or two posts a week. Is that really too much for the Lounge to bear? I think not. The reason AGW posts are tolerated by ME in the lounge, others get away with it, is because I criticise it more effectively than others and so cause those who hold AGW as a belief such pain they resort to censorship. The pain being, inability to argue with the truth when its presented even when it goes against theior belief system. DemiDego did this. It got so bad for him he put a filter on any of my posts. Imagine how threatened and weak he must be to have to do this.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
No, you are a boring fanatic.
Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]
I can see that Mentor status being revoked.
-
No, you are a boring fanatic.
Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]
If what I write is of so little interest please feel free to move along and look at something more interesting! In the mean time leave those who want to discuss a topic of interest to them alone without polluting their thread with personal insults and abuse votes.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
If you want to pick up on what is happening in the GW world then alt.global_warming is a good forum. There are a lot of developments right now, and it looks like AGW is coming under a lot of criticism. So much in fact that it looks like it might die soon.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:
He also behaved like a child, creating threads multiple times on the same day, while the crowd went after removing his threads one after the other! This could have added to the temper
Well, it wasnt childish but it was ammusing taunting the 'abuse voters'! In fact I havent posted much about AGW in the lounge. In total only a few posts. Most have been in the SB, untill it died. The fact is that some people have formed an opinion about me due to my pseudonym, actually chosen to generate strong responses (no one likes to argue more than with what they assume to be a fat 13 year old!). Combine that with attacking a belief held strongly by many on CP and and you can see why I am generate strong responses. The fact that I am now effectively censored in the Lounge only says to me that my attacks on AGW have been effective. Otherwise I would either be argued with, or ignored. The fact I raise so much passion merely tells me I am onto something and should continue with renewed vigour! :)
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
fat_boy wrote:
The fact is that some people have formed an opinion about me due to my pseudonym, actually chosen to generate strong responses (no one likes to argue more than with what they assume to be a fat 13 year old!). Combine that with attacking a belief held strongly by many on CP and and you can see why I am generate strong responses.
Have you considered the fact that this thought of yours is just a delusion and that people are just completely bored with this topic and that therefore they don't want to participate in it?
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
-
Pub. Boring drunk.
Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]
-
fat_boy wrote:
The fact is that some people have formed an opinion about me due to my pseudonym, actually chosen to generate strong responses (no one likes to argue more than with what they assume to be a fat 13 year old!). Combine that with attacking a belief held strongly by many on CP and and you can see why I am generate strong responses.
Have you considered the fact that this thought of yours is just a delusion and that people are just completely bored with this topic and that therefore they don't want to participate in it?
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
-
If that idiot hasn't figured out yet that noone wants to see this shit in the lounge, he needs to have his head kicked in.
L u n a t i c F r i n g e
LunaticFringe wrote:
he needs to have his head kicked in.
I am 6 foot 4 and weigh 115 kgs. Anytime you fancy your chances just take a trip over and I'll gladly oblige you. Oh, and I bench press 110, and squat 140, thats kgs. So bring your best attitude, you will need it.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
