[Cricket] Sachin Tendulkar highest ODI
-
First time by a man. Awesome. Simply awesome. (Belinda Clarke made a double hundred more than a decade ago.)
Cheers, Vikram. (Got my troika of CCCs!)
200!
Wow, that's really a big big number... :rolleyes:If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
200!
Wow, that's really a big big number... :rolleyes:If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles]I agree. Especially, when you look at it from the perspective of smaller numbers like 3, 4, or even 5.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
-
I agree. Especially, when you look at it from the perspective of smaller numbers like 3, 4, or even 5.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:
I agree. Especially, when you look at it from the perspective of smaller numbers like 3, 4, or even 5.
Nah, 5 is odd.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:
I agree. Especially, when you look at it from the perspective of smaller numbers like 3, 4, or even 5.
Nah, 5 is odd.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles]:laugh:
Viral My Site
Save Our Tigers -
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:
I agree. Especially, when you look at it from the perspective of smaller numbers like 3, 4, or even 5.
Nah, 5 is odd.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
First time by a man. Awesome. Simply awesome. (Belinda Clarke made a double hundred more than a decade ago.)
Cheers, Vikram. (Got my troika of CCCs!)
Whta kills me is that Dhoni tried hard to stop Tendulkar from getting 200. If not for Dhoni Tendulkar would have had 200 at least 2 overs earlier.
-
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:
I agree. Especially, when you look at it from the perspective of smaller numbers like 3, 4, or even 5.
Nah, 5 is odd.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
Are you primed for some nyumerical punning?
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
Nope, that doesn't interest me. :)
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
Nope, that doesn't interest me. :)
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
Whta kills me is that Dhoni tried hard to stop Tendulkar from getting 200. If not for Dhoni Tendulkar would have had 200 at least 2 overs earlier.
I haven't seen any of the match - what was Dhoni doing exactly?
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" ~ Albert Einstein "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." ~ Paul Neal "Red" Adair
-
I haven't seen any of the match - what was Dhoni doing exactly?
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" ~ Albert Einstein "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." ~ Paul Neal "Red" Adair
Not giving Tendulkar the strike.
-
Not giving Tendulkar the strike.
Ohh, I shall have to catch the highlights. Fancy doing that when a 200 is in sights eh? Glad the little guy got it anyway. :)
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" ~ Albert Einstein "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." ~ Paul Neal "Red" Adair
-
You have to be rational here or there will be a real problem!
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
Yeah, my imaginary friend told me that irrational men often face complex problems. :)
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:
I agree. Especially, when you look at it from the perspective of smaller numbers like 3, 4, or even 5.
Nah, 5 is odd.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles]CPallini wrote:
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: I agree. Especially, when you look at it from the perspective of smaller numbers like 3, 4, or even 5. Nah, 5 is odd.
It certainly would be odd if it were even.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
Not giving Tendulkar the strike.
-
Whta kills me is that Dhoni tried hard to stop Tendulkar from getting 200. If not for Dhoni Tendulkar would have had 200 at least 2 overs earlier.
Yes! :wtf: I only followed it on Cricbuzz but it certainly looked like that to me. You should thank Amla though - he converted a 4 to a 1, giving Sachin the strike. :)
Cheers, Vikram. (Got my troika of CCCs!)
-
Yeah, my imaginary friend told me that irrational men often face complex problems. :)
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
Yes! :wtf: I only followed it on Cricbuzz but it certainly looked like that to me. You should thank Amla though - he converted a 4 to a 1, giving Sachin the strike. :)
Cheers, Vikram. (Got my troika of CCCs!)
Perhaps MSD worried that SRT may slow down for a 200 thus costing India a few slogs in the end? The captain has to put the team first I guess.
Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link -
I do agree with you. What was Dhoni doing?
Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest.
Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for... -
Take a bow for Sachin Tendulkar who has hit 195 and claimed the highest individual ODI total. And he is still going. I don't mind seeing such greatness even against my own team.
cheers, Paul M. Watson.
I didn't saw a single ball from his innings. Dying to see highlights now. Sachin is simply great. I guess great is small word for him. He still can be as powerful and destructive as he was in the 90s. And no matter who is in the team, the he retires, Indian batting will look weak. No one can give as much confidence as his presence can give. And where are those who had written him off a couple of years back? When Sachin reached 195, all our entire team was doing is Ctrl + F5. And as he reached 200, there was a huge applause. Everyone was geared for a party after office. :)
