9/11 truth
-
His reasoning has been my most favorite. If the CIA is so bad, how come so few people who complain about it die?
Opacity, the new Transparency.
That is such a lame argument. They are smarter than that. They are obviously smarter than you. “Propaganda Techniques” is based upon “Appendix I: PSYOP Techniques” from “Psychological Operations Field Manual No.33-1″ published by Headquarters; Department of the Army, in Washington DC, on 31 August 1979 Link[^]
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
That is such a lame argument. They are smarter than that. They are obviously smarter than you. “Propaganda Techniques” is based upon “Appendix I: PSYOP Techniques” from “Psychological Operations Field Manual No.33-1″ published by Headquarters; Department of the Army, in Washington DC, on 31 August 1979 Link[^]
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
That's a pathetic argument. Like the guy says, sure, you can claim that now, but the CIA could co-ordinate all of this, but couldn't find this guy and kill him before everyone knew about his videos and his story. The 9/11 truth movement is in every way analogous to a room full of retarded children, poking themselves in the eye with a stick. It's pathetic, and laughable. As I've often said, Time did a story where they talked about how people who believe this drivel, do so out of fear. Believing the government is this powerful is easier than believing that sometimes life is random, and sometimes, no government can stop bad things from happening. The core issue is your insecurity, not any actual proof of any conspiracy.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
No it is not. It is a very serious issue of a dangerously corrupt government. Throughout history people in power have committed acts of violence against their own citizenry in order to seize more power and launch unlawful wars. False flag operations are a classic tool of deception and espionage. Intelligence agencies are usually linked to most false flag terrorism. Probably the most basic motive for a false flag incident would be to frame the enemy for an act of aggression or barbarism in order to justify a supposed “defensive” response. It is essentially a way of making it appear that the other side “threw the first punch.”
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
I worked as a contractor in TS+ projects for 20+ years. Except for two, every project ended up in the Washington Post or Aviation Week. Those two were small peaces of other stuff. Everything else. Everything. Technical, operational, people don't care. Some butt wipe congressional aide wants to shows how powerful he is. He tells some never-known-anything-but-US-freedoms reporter. Reporter thinks it's ok to put people lives in danger, to get a story. We can't keep a secret to save our lives, and you think we orchestrated something that complex and wide reaching, and not a single f'ing person involved hasn't spilled their guts? Or do you really think the CIA offed them, but wouldn't off you for spreading it? I won't even go into insulting the movement or people. Who told us about Operation Northwood? Was it the KGB? Oh. Right. It was the CIA. I'm sure it was to keep our eyes off something else.
Opacity, the new Transparency.
-
I worked as a contractor in TS+ projects for 20+ years. Except for two, every project ended up in the Washington Post or Aviation Week. Those two were small peaces of other stuff. Everything else. Everything. Technical, operational, people don't care. Some butt wipe congressional aide wants to shows how powerful he is. He tells some never-known-anything-but-US-freedoms reporter. Reporter thinks it's ok to put people lives in danger, to get a story. We can't keep a secret to save our lives, and you think we orchestrated something that complex and wide reaching, and not a single f'ing person involved hasn't spilled their guts? Or do you really think the CIA offed them, but wouldn't off you for spreading it? I won't even go into insulting the movement or people. Who told us about Operation Northwood? Was it the KGB? Oh. Right. It was the CIA. I'm sure it was to keep our eyes off something else.
Opacity, the new Transparency.
RichardM1 wrote:
Or do you really think the CIA offed them, but wouldn't off you for spreading it?
He thinks the CIA killed several planes full of people, so why not ? It's obviously extreme delusion, but, that's what he thinks.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
I worked as a contractor in TS+ projects for 20+ years. Except for two, every project ended up in the Washington Post or Aviation Week. Those two were small peaces of other stuff. Everything else. Everything. Technical, operational, people don't care. Some butt wipe congressional aide wants to shows how powerful he is. He tells some never-known-anything-but-US-freedoms reporter. Reporter thinks it's ok to put people lives in danger, to get a story. We can't keep a secret to save our lives, and you think we orchestrated something that complex and wide reaching, and not a single f'ing person involved hasn't spilled their guts? Or do you really think the CIA offed them, but wouldn't off you for spreading it? I won't even go into insulting the movement or people. Who told us about Operation Northwood? Was it the KGB? Oh. Right. It was the CIA. I'm sure it was to keep our eyes off something else.
Opacity, the new Transparency.
Again, as I said, it isn't strategically profitable to "off" millions of Americans who speak up. It is obvious that committing genocide would be a failed strategy. How would they justify it? Now, I am sure that there are a few would be whistle-blowers that have been "offed", it happens all the time I'm sure. However, as you said, they can't keep everything a secret. For things that they can't keep a secret, they engage is psychological warfare instead. “Propaganda Techniques” is based upon “Appendix I: PSYOP Techniques” from “Psychological Operations Field Manual No.33-1″ published by Headquarters; Department of the Army, in Washington DC, on 31 August 1979 “Truther” came out of the CIA Handbook on Psychological Guerrilla Warfare[^]
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
Again, as I said, it isn't strategically profitable to "off" millions of Americans who speak up. It is obvious that committing genocide would be a failed strategy. How would they justify it? Now, I am sure that there are a few would be whistle-blowers that have been "offed", it happens all the time I'm sure. However, as you said, they can't keep everything a secret. For things that they can't keep a secret, they engage is psychological warfare instead. “Propaganda Techniques” is based upon “Appendix I: PSYOP Techniques” from “Psychological Operations Field Manual No.33-1″ published by Headquarters; Department of the Army, in Washington DC, on 31 August 1979 “Truther” came out of the CIA Handbook on Psychological Guerrilla Warfare[^]
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Now I am sure there are a few would be whistle blowers that have been "offed", it happens all the time I'm sure.
And this is another example of the elaborate fantasy you're building for yourself.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Again, as I said, it isn't strategically profitable to "off" millions of Americans who speak up. It is obvious that committing genocide would be a failed strategy. How would they justify it? Now, I am sure that there are a few would be whistle-blowers that have been "offed", it happens all the time I'm sure. However, as you said, they can't keep everything a secret. For things that they can't keep a secret, they engage is psychological warfare instead. “Propaganda Techniques” is based upon “Appendix I: PSYOP Techniques” from “Psychological Operations Field Manual No.33-1″ published by Headquarters; Department of the Army, in Washington DC, on 31 August 1979 “Truther” came out of the CIA Handbook on Psychological Guerrilla Warfare[^]
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
See, the CIA does not need to kill you all. It just has to get you to the point where you shoot each other. That should be simple for them, as smart as they are. I bet they even talk about how to do it in that book you are shrilling.
Opacity, the new Transparency.
-
RichardM1 wrote:
Or do you really think the CIA offed them, but wouldn't off you for spreading it?
He thinks the CIA killed several planes full of people, so why not ? It's obviously extreme delusion, but, that's what he thinks.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Christian Graus wrote:
He thinks the CIA killed several planes full of people, so why not ? It's obviously extreme delusion, but, that's what he thinks.
I thought they actually had those planes fly under radar and be substituted with a cruise missile. Then they flew the planes, under radar, to some unknown location and ... let them go? kill them? bus them to the towers in time for the big event?
Opacity, the new Transparency.
-
That is such a lame argument. They are smarter than that. They are obviously smarter than you. “Propaganda Techniques” is based upon “Appendix I: PSYOP Techniques” from “Psychological Operations Field Manual No.33-1″ published by Headquarters; Department of the Army, in Washington DC, on 31 August 1979 Link[^]
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
I know some of them are smarter than me, I worked with some of them. And I know some are stupider, even then me. And, Gosh, it even sounds like they are smarter than you. Yet you are able to figure out exactly what happened. Piece it together from bad photos and coincidences. If you knew what I was doing on 911, you would be shocked, I'm sure. Sitting on a gov boat, watching TV, just like the rest of you. Do you know the old says: "It would be a real coincidence if there were no coincidences"
Opacity, the new Transparency.
-
Christian Graus wrote:
He thinks the CIA killed several planes full of people, so why not ? It's obviously extreme delusion, but, that's what he thinks.
I thought they actually had those planes fly under radar and be substituted with a cruise missile. Then they flew the planes, under radar, to some unknown location and ... let them go? kill them? bus them to the towers in time for the big event?
Opacity, the new Transparency.
Exactly. I've heard that story, too, there was no plane, but then the question becomes, what did they do with the people ? How did they fake the calls from the plane that crashed ? It doesn't make any sense at all.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Exactly. I've heard that story, too, there was no plane, but then the question becomes, what did they do with the people ? How did they fake the calls from the plane that crashed ? It doesn't make any sense at all.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
If these things made sense then the people writing them would be writing hollywood plots! the all seem to be based on the same idea, that nothing can happen(or not happen) without organisation, so the fact that the powers that be didnt stop the attack means that they must have planned it, because clearly they control everything otherwise people like CSS would be successfull, rich and have stunningly beautiful wifes and/or girlfriends(or boy friends as iam still unsure about css)
Smile and the world smiles withyou, laugh and they think you are a nutter
-
See, I can take a dog turd, and I can bronze it, put it on a little stand, and make it so a fanfare is played every time someone looks at it. It will still be a dog turd. The 9/11 truth movement is astonishingly ignorant. Did you read the links at the bottom that debunk the claims made by most 'truthers' ? Does this video contain any astonishing claims not proven to be BS by those links ? I did a lot of reading, I listened to both sides of the story, the passage of time is only going to muddy the waters more, unless you can show me a guy who claims, and can prove, that he set off the bombs, or anything else that these idiots claim happens, I'm not interested. It's weak minded drivel, it's rubbish, it's totally inaccurate, and so based on lies that the claim of being a 'truth' movement is both ironic and hilarious.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Christian Graus wrote:
See, I can take a dog turd, and I can bronze it, put it on a little stand, and make it so a fanfare is played every time someone looks at it. It will still be a dog turd.
That's so funny you said that. You can believe what you want about 9/11... but how about money? Yes, I'm talking about the fiat dollar again. Your analogy could be said accordingly: "See, I can take a piece of paper, and I can write numbers on it, put it in different colors, and make it so people, by law, have to use it. It will still be a piece of paper.
-
Christian Graus wrote:
See, I can take a dog turd, and I can bronze it, put it on a little stand, and make it so a fanfare is played every time someone looks at it. It will still be a dog turd.
That's so funny you said that. You can believe what you want about 9/11... but how about money? Yes, I'm talking about the fiat dollar again. Your analogy could be said accordingly: "See, I can take a piece of paper, and I can write numbers on it, put it in different colors, and make it so people, by law, have to use it. It will still be a piece of paper.
or even I take a chunk of metal, I say its valuable, I keep locked up, I create a market for it, but its still a chunk of metal. the whole system is barter by proxy, I will give you x if you give my y, becomes i will give you x for a someone else will give you a for y all else is connivance
Smile and the world smiles withyou, laugh and they think you are a nutter
modified on Monday, March 1, 2010 10:00 AM