Cost of a tetanus shot in the US
-
How much does a tetonis shot cost in Canada? Don't say free because it is not free. Again, how much does it cost?
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
That's because you're too damn old like me. BTW, saw on your profile that you lived in Venezuela. I lived in Puerto Ordaz (now Ciudad Guayana), Caracas and Valencia in the early 80s. A good friend lived in Maracaibo in the late 90s. We both agreed it was a crazy place, but great in other respects and that it's a real shame what's happened to that country.
Joe Woodbury wrote:
That's because you're too damn old like me.
Yeah, but 5 more years before I can get Medicare. Actually, I have 5 things that all the insurance companies run scared from: aneurysm on the aorta, diverticulosis, prostate infection, bad disk in the back, and injured hand. All are under control and my doctors say that none are anything to be concerned about. I haven't been in a hospital for over 39 years except to visit people. Yet, I can't get insurance without going to work for a company or getting into the state's high risk pool.
Joe Woodbury wrote:
BTW, saw on your profile that you lived in Venezuela.
Yep, lived there, mostly in Maracaibo, for about 12 years. We loved it there and sure hated to leave, but the economics and politics just got to be too much. We certainly would go back if the politics were bearable and the cost of living was commensurate with the salary.
CQ de W5ALT
Walt Fair, Jr., P. E. Comport Computing Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
-
I have no idea. Sure, I have to pay taxes, but if I needed a tetanus shot I'd walk in, receive it, walk out, and not receive any bills for it. I'm sure you are asking a trick question though, so go ahead and let me have it.
The fact of the matter is that it is probably more expensive because of bureaucracy and the fact that you don't have any choice in the matter, they will have your money whether you like it or not. Remember that the insurance companies in our "health care" bill will receive guaranteed funding through taxpayers and through a law mandating that everyone buy insurance. At the same time they will ration out care to reduce costs, it is another grand robbery.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
Health care systems are never free, the method or payment varies from country to country and in Canada's case payment is remitted from the public purse through various programs, which means it is funded by taxation. There do seem to be bizzare beliefs here in the US however that only two systems exist in the world, either a completely free market private yet caring and world beating system or complete soviet style state control. The earlier doesn't exist here, and the latter hasn't actually been considered of course.
062142174041062102
Yep, that is a major problem, and it pretty much means that because of this, we never have any substantial discussion of the issues at hand or how to fix them, we just get into a shouting match over nothing.
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow
-
The fact of the matter is that it is probably more expensive because of bureaucracy and the fact that you don't have any choice in the matter, they will have your money whether you like it or not. Remember that the insurance companies in our "health care" bill will receive guaranteed funding through taxpayers and through a law mandating that everyone buy insurance. At the same time they will ration out care to reduce costs, it is another grand robbery.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
As I understand it, costs are generally cheaper in Canada due to Federal regulation. For example, prescription drugs are substantially lower in Canada than the US. Cross-border purchasing has been estimated at $1 billion annually. (http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/170/6/945?etoc[^])
-
gleat wrote:
The "public option" clause which allows the government to be one of the choices John Q. Public will have when selecting an insurance provider has raised the hackles of many big private insurance companies
It's also raised the hackles of many of us who have seen how well government programs are run. I live in a place with an excellent medical system and cost effective insurance program. We are genuinely worried that the distortions the government will put into the system will destroy what we have. (One of the issues that is being avoided are the various coverage mandates government impose on insurance companies.) When people criticize the private sector or free enterprise as failing, they often fail to see that it isn't free enterprise; the government heavy hand is in the mix, preventing the free market from operating efficiently. (In medicine, most insurance isn't insurance at all, but prepaid medical care, which distorts the free market even more. However, even some of this is due to nanny government believing individuals are incapable of making rational decisions--hence, for example, the absurd war on narcotics.) I hasten to also point out that many of the big insurance companies are actually on Obama's side in this! When the government starts handing out money, they want to be first in line.
Joe Woodbury wrote:
absurd war on narcotics.
The war on other drugs is pretty absurd as well. :laugh:
-
A few weeks back I had a close personal encounter with centrifugal physics when I swung my tennis racquet rather unnecessarily hard and found it not only completely missing the ball but also hurtling straight for my face side-on. A resounding thwack later I found myself spitting pieces of one of my teeth out. As it turned out I had broken one of my front teeth clean in half. Friends insisted that I go to the ER and go I did. They took one look at it and said, well, you've got to go see a dentist. After 1.5 hours of thumb twiddling they gave me a tetanus shot and sent me on my way after depriving me of $100. I walked away thinking, "$100 for a tetanus shot?! Outrageous!". Fast forward a week or two when I find myself staring at a bill in the mail in disbelief. Cost of the treatment is given as $1,087.20 :omg:. I am thinking, this is surely a typo! I log on to the insurance website to see what was submitted for the claim and there I find another claim for $294 apart from the other thousand. The hospital submitted a claim for $1,381.20 and the insurance company actually paid $664.00. Add the $100 I paid and you arrive at a grand total of $764 for one measly injection! While my personal liability was only $100, I find the idea that the hospital thought that the service was worth $1,481.20 a bit mind-boggling. When I did a little googling about this, I found articles where the rationale appears to be that ERs run 24/7 all 365 days of the year and are required by law to treat all patients regardless of whether they have insurance or not and that a good chunk of the service they provide goes uncompensated and are therefore forced to distribute that cost among other patients who do happen to be insured. I am not sure that I find that completely convincing. Does anyone else think there's something broken with this system?
-- gleat http://blogorama.nerdworks.in[^] --
-
And that's what people don't seem to understand. Doing nothing here isn't an option. If you like you current coverage, if the government does nothing, it will keep getting more and more expensive until you lose it anyway. So all the wailing about a government take-over doesn't seem to grasp the fact that the current system is unsustainable.
Wjousts wrote:
Doing nothing here isn't an option.
Yes it is and not a bad one. Economic reality is that health care will never become unaffordable. Government acting won't bring down costs without cutting benefits because government isn't run on magic fairy dust. I'm continually surprised that people think politicians have the answers. Since when? These are the same idiots that came up with the current tax code.
-
It is nothing but a bailout to the insurance companies and they ration out care to reduce costs.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
and they ration out care to reduce costs.
If you think the government will ration out care less, I have a bridge to sell you. (You need to make up your mind, dude. One moment you're Mr. Anti-communist, next moment you're Mr. Socialist.)
-
gleat wrote:
Does anyone else think there's something broken with this system?
Of course the system is broken. It doesn't help when people go to the EMERGENCY ROOM for chipped teeth. :rolleyes: Seriously dude...
Well, if you're in pain, and you may have to wait hours before a clinic doctor can examine you, then maybe the ER is the way to go. On the other hand, a busy day at the ER can force you to wait quite some time if you're not a prioritized case...
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
-
As I understand it, costs are generally cheaper in Canada due to Federal regulation. For example, prescription drugs are substantially lower in Canada than the US. Cross-border purchasing has been estimated at $1 billion annually. (http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/170/6/945?etoc[^])
zievo wrote:
costs are generally cheaper in Canada due to Federal regulation. For example, prescription drugs are substantially lower in Canada than the US. Cross-border purchasing has been estimated at $1 billion annually.
Costs are cheaper because they are subsidized by taxpayers. You probably end up paying more do to bureaucracy and lack of choice. They get your money no matter what, and you have no say in how it is spent.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
I'd need to find my benefits statement for an exact value, but I'm in my late 20's and my employer is paying ~$3k/year for a high deductible plan: I pay the first $1500/year (any and all expense types) and the insurance company pays 100% above that.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
and they ration out care to reduce costs.
If you think the government will ration out care less, I have a bridge to sell you. (You need to make up your mind, dude. One moment you're Mr. Anti-communist, next moment you're Mr. Socialist.)
Joe Woodbury wrote:
If you think the government will ration out care less
With a 12 trillion dollar national debt, I highly doubt that.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
zievo wrote:
costs are generally cheaper in Canada due to Federal regulation. For example, prescription drugs are substantially lower in Canada than the US. Cross-border purchasing has been estimated at $1 billion annually.
Costs are cheaper because they are subsidized by taxpayers. You probably end up paying more do to bureaucracy and lack of choice. They get your money no matter what, and you have no say in how it is spent.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
gleat wrote:
Does anyone else think there's something broken with this system?
Of course the system is broken. It doesn't help when people go to the EMERGENCY ROOM for chipped teeth. :rolleyes: Seriously dude...
Well, the only reason I went was because my tennis friends thought it was a good idea and it was past 9 PM. I wasn't experiencing pain and was told that that's probably because of the adrenalin and that once that goes down I'd be in excruciating pain and will probably need some prescription medication for that. Well, as it turned out the only time I felt any pain was after the dentist did a root canal 3 days later and that was nothing more than mild annoying pain. Also, it wasn't "chipped" teeth - half of it was just gone and after the dentist got done with his grinding there's almost no tooth left! Oh well, that's that!
-- gleat http://blogorama.nerdworks.in[^] --
-
This is right on the money. And it happens at doctor's offices as well. A few years ago I had a cat scan done in my doctors office. Almost 2 years later I got a bill for an unpaid balance. I called them up to find out what's going on. They said it was a computer glitch - just ignore it. Another doctor confirmed that they just needed to show an unpaid bill that they could write off as a loss on their taxes. This is the kind of stuff that happens every day in the USA.
Brent
dbrenth wrote:
Another doctor confirmed that they just needed to show an unpaid bill that they could write off as a loss on their taxes.
The really crazy part is why they need to do that. The feds mandated that everyone must be billed the same amount for a procedure. Then medicare and your insurance companies negotiate to only pay ~60c on the dollar as a volume discount (the allowable amount). Since 80-90% of the population is insured the docs need to break even after the discounts they raise the sticker prices by about ~65%; and write the difference off as a business loss. A friend of mine's a doctor and says that even if you're uninsured for anything non-trivial you can end up paying about the same rate as the insurance companies do (+ the hospitals interest rate if you pay it on an installment plan), if you call the billing dept to negotiate a smaller payment. IOW the cost for everyone remains the same but accountants skim off a small fraction for their book keeping games and our taxes pay for a bunch of burrocrats who are supposed to make sure it's fair. :rolleyes:
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
-
Well, if you're in pain, and you may have to wait hours before a clinic doctor can examine you, then maybe the ER is the way to go. On the other hand, a busy day at the ER can force you to wait quite some time if you're not a prioritized case...
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
Well, if you're in pain
Man up! Pop an aspirin or a shot of whiskey and make an appointment with a dentist. ERs that have to schedule staff to handle chipped teeth and people with the sniffles waste a lot of money. Since some (many?) of the people that use the ER as their GP (or dentist in this case) don't pay - the cost is higher for everyone else. Don't get me wrong. Our system is far from perfect. Changes are definitely needed. But at the end of the day people need to take responsibility for themselves and stop expecting society to pay for their own dumb decisions.
-
A few weeks back I had a close personal encounter with centrifugal physics when I swung my tennis racquet rather unnecessarily hard and found it not only completely missing the ball but also hurtling straight for my face side-on. A resounding thwack later I found myself spitting pieces of one of my teeth out. As it turned out I had broken one of my front teeth clean in half. Friends insisted that I go to the ER and go I did. They took one look at it and said, well, you've got to go see a dentist. After 1.5 hours of thumb twiddling they gave me a tetanus shot and sent me on my way after depriving me of $100. I walked away thinking, "$100 for a tetanus shot?! Outrageous!". Fast forward a week or two when I find myself staring at a bill in the mail in disbelief. Cost of the treatment is given as $1,087.20 :omg:. I am thinking, this is surely a typo! I log on to the insurance website to see what was submitted for the claim and there I find another claim for $294 apart from the other thousand. The hospital submitted a claim for $1,381.20 and the insurance company actually paid $664.00. Add the $100 I paid and you arrive at a grand total of $764 for one measly injection! While my personal liability was only $100, I find the idea that the hospital thought that the service was worth $1,481.20 a bit mind-boggling. When I did a little googling about this, I found articles where the rationale appears to be that ERs run 24/7 all 365 days of the year and are required by law to treat all patients regardless of whether they have insurance or not and that a good chunk of the service they provide goes uncompensated and are therefore forced to distribute that cost among other patients who do happen to be insured. I am not sure that I find that completely convincing. Does anyone else think there's something broken with this system?
-- gleat http://blogorama.nerdworks.in[^] --
What your insurance company and you paid for had almost nothing to do with the tetanus shot. What it did constitute was the time you supposedly tied up ER facilities and personnel, plus your share of the transfer cost of treating all the people who had no insurance and could not pay for ER. Sadly, neither the House nor senate bill will do much for this, except move a small part to everyone's tax bill, and increase the price charged (by enacting a 15% tax on the cost of medical devices, which will get passed on to the hospitals which will amortize it across everything they can, and by reducing medicare payments 21% by mandate - already happened today Btw).
-
A few weeks back I had a close personal encounter with centrifugal physics when I swung my tennis racquet rather unnecessarily hard and found it not only completely missing the ball but also hurtling straight for my face side-on. A resounding thwack later I found myself spitting pieces of one of my teeth out. As it turned out I had broken one of my front teeth clean in half. Friends insisted that I go to the ER and go I did. They took one look at it and said, well, you've got to go see a dentist. After 1.5 hours of thumb twiddling they gave me a tetanus shot and sent me on my way after depriving me of $100. I walked away thinking, "$100 for a tetanus shot?! Outrageous!". Fast forward a week or two when I find myself staring at a bill in the mail in disbelief. Cost of the treatment is given as $1,087.20 :omg:. I am thinking, this is surely a typo! I log on to the insurance website to see what was submitted for the claim and there I find another claim for $294 apart from the other thousand. The hospital submitted a claim for $1,381.20 and the insurance company actually paid $664.00. Add the $100 I paid and you arrive at a grand total of $764 for one measly injection! While my personal liability was only $100, I find the idea that the hospital thought that the service was worth $1,481.20 a bit mind-boggling. When I did a little googling about this, I found articles where the rationale appears to be that ERs run 24/7 all 365 days of the year and are required by law to treat all patients regardless of whether they have insurance or not and that a good chunk of the service they provide goes uncompensated and are therefore forced to distribute that cost among other patients who do happen to be insured. I am not sure that I find that completely convincing. Does anyone else think there's something broken with this system?
-- gleat http://blogorama.nerdworks.in[^] --
Pay cash then file a reimbursement form with your insurance. Significantly cheaper. Plus, don't go to the emergency room for non-emergencies. Urgent care would have been more appropriate for your injury (and dentist from life experience). Everyone with an ingrown toe nail goes to the emergency room. Seems like a bigger problem than the emergency room having to justify it's fee. Lets see: 4 nurses, 1 doctor, a triage nurse, a bed and an exam, and a multi-million dollar state of the art facility, all for $1,000 dollars? Sounds like a steal!
Need custom software developed? I do custom programming based primarily on MS tools with an emphasis on C# development and consulting. A man said to the universe: "Sir I exist!" "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation." --Stephen Crane
-
A few weeks back I had a close personal encounter with centrifugal physics when I swung my tennis racquet rather unnecessarily hard and found it not only completely missing the ball but also hurtling straight for my face side-on. A resounding thwack later I found myself spitting pieces of one of my teeth out. As it turned out I had broken one of my front teeth clean in half. Friends insisted that I go to the ER and go I did. They took one look at it and said, well, you've got to go see a dentist. After 1.5 hours of thumb twiddling they gave me a tetanus shot and sent me on my way after depriving me of $100. I walked away thinking, "$100 for a tetanus shot?! Outrageous!". Fast forward a week or two when I find myself staring at a bill in the mail in disbelief. Cost of the treatment is given as $1,087.20 :omg:. I am thinking, this is surely a typo! I log on to the insurance website to see what was submitted for the claim and there I find another claim for $294 apart from the other thousand. The hospital submitted a claim for $1,381.20 and the insurance company actually paid $664.00. Add the $100 I paid and you arrive at a grand total of $764 for one measly injection! While my personal liability was only $100, I find the idea that the hospital thought that the service was worth $1,481.20 a bit mind-boggling. When I did a little googling about this, I found articles where the rationale appears to be that ERs run 24/7 all 365 days of the year and are required by law to treat all patients regardless of whether they have insurance or not and that a good chunk of the service they provide goes uncompensated and are therefore forced to distribute that cost among other patients who do happen to be insured. I am not sure that I find that completely convincing. Does anyone else think there's something broken with this system?
-- gleat http://blogorama.nerdworks.in[^] --