Irritating forum change
-
AFAIK this never used to happen... When I open a forum it takes a few seconds to load, (slow connection at work) I see the threads and replies appear one by one. Usually I'll start reading before the page is finished loading... Lately when I click a message while the page is still loading it opens up as expected, but then the whole page gets loaded again, from scratch. Its quite irritating, was there any changes made that would have caused this?
Harvey Saayman - South Africa Software Developer .Net, C#, SQL
you.suck = (you.Occupation == jobTitles.Programmer && you.Passion != Programming)
1000100 1101111 1100101 1110011 100000 1110100 1101000 1101001 1110011 100000 1101101 1100101 1100001 1101110 100000 1101001 1101101 100000 1100001 100000 1100111 1100101 1100101 1101011 111111 -
AFAIK this never used to happen... When I open a forum it takes a few seconds to load, (slow connection at work) I see the threads and replies appear one by one. Usually I'll start reading before the page is finished loading... Lately when I click a message while the page is still loading it opens up as expected, but then the whole page gets loaded again, from scratch. Its quite irritating, was there any changes made that would have caused this?
Harvey Saayman - South Africa Software Developer .Net, C#, SQL
you.suck = (you.Occupation == jobTitles.Programmer && you.Passion != Programming)
1000100 1101111 1100101 1110011 100000 1110100 1101000 1101001 1110011 100000 1101101 1100101 1100001 1101110 100000 1101001 1101101 100000 1100001 100000 1100111 1100101 1100101 1101011 111111I reported this issue, something like a week ago: Clicking on a message reloads the whole page[^] This is very irritating indeed, and I'll be glad if this gets fixed.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
-
AFAIK this never used to happen... When I open a forum it takes a few seconds to load, (slow connection at work) I see the threads and replies appear one by one. Usually I'll start reading before the page is finished loading... Lately when I click a message while the page is still loading it opens up as expected, but then the whole page gets loaded again, from scratch. Its quite irritating, was there any changes made that would have caused this?
Harvey Saayman - South Africa Software Developer .Net, C#, SQL
you.suck = (you.Occupation == jobTitles.Programmer && you.Passion != Programming)
1000100 1101111 1100101 1110011 100000 1110100 1101000 1101001 1110011 100000 1101101 1100101 1100001 1101110 100000 1101001 1101101 100000 1100001 100000 1100111 1100101 1100101 1101011 111111I noticed it too. Quite disappointing. :)
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
I noticed it too. Quite disappointing. :)
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles]Wow! Chris almost convinced me that it's a caching issue at my side OR that this issue exists only in my imagination. Now we have this reported from India, SA and Italy. Where is he now? :)
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
-
Wow! Chris almost convinced me that it's a caching issue at my side OR that this issue exists only in my imagination. Now we have this reported from India, SA and Italy. Where is he now? :)
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:
Now we have this reported from India, SA and Italy. Where is he now?
Racking up frequent flyer points trying to purge the caches of people in India, SA and Italy.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
-
I reported this issue, something like a week ago: Clicking on a message reloads the whole page[^] This is very irritating indeed, and I'll be glad if this gets fixed.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:
I reported this issue, something like a week ago
Oops, I apparently missed it :P
Harvey Saayman - South Africa Software Developer .Net, C#, SQL
you.suck = (you.Occupation == jobTitles.Programmer && you.Passion != Programming)
1000100 1101111 1100101 1110011 100000 1110100 1101000 1101001 1110011 100000 1101101 1100101 1100001 1101110 100000 1101001 1101101 100000 1100001 100000 1100111 1100101 1100101 1101011 111111 -
Wow! Chris almost convinced me that it's a caching issue at my side OR that this issue exists only in my imagination. Now we have this reported from India, SA and Italy. Where is he now? :)
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
Wow, idea for Chris amusement: let's invent a fictitious bug and signal it from Italy, India,... :-D
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
I noticed it too. Quite disappointing. :)
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles]Disappointing? That's a new term for a bug. 'Annoying' I can understand. 'Unnecessary', yes. 'Fix it NOW or I will post the Badger song link' - sure. But 'disappointing' makes me feel like I'v introduced a bug and it's a bug that isn't living up to its potential. A failed bug. A bug that grew up trying, that worked hard, that was never able to achieve the lofty, destructive heights of its peers - that may have even had a lonely loveless childhood - and now that it's out in the world in its first big production the results are...disappointing. :sigh: I'll have a word with it. (We know the change that caused it, but in rolling back those changs the bug is still here, meaning it's a little trickier than we thought. We may actually have to debug or something crazy like that. I'll go get some gloves)
cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP
-
Disappointing? That's a new term for a bug. 'Annoying' I can understand. 'Unnecessary', yes. 'Fix it NOW or I will post the Badger song link' - sure. But 'disappointing' makes me feel like I'v introduced a bug and it's a bug that isn't living up to its potential. A failed bug. A bug that grew up trying, that worked hard, that was never able to achieve the lofty, destructive heights of its peers - that may have even had a lonely loveless childhood - and now that it's out in the world in its first big production the results are...disappointing. :sigh: I'll have a word with it. (We know the change that caused it, but in rolling back those changs the bug is still here, meaning it's a little trickier than we thought. We may actually have to debug or something crazy like that. I'll go get some gloves)
cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP
Fix it NOW or I'll post the badger song link.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
-
Disappointing? That's a new term for a bug. 'Annoying' I can understand. 'Unnecessary', yes. 'Fix it NOW or I will post the Badger song link' - sure. But 'disappointing' makes me feel like I'v introduced a bug and it's a bug that isn't living up to its potential. A failed bug. A bug that grew up trying, that worked hard, that was never able to achieve the lofty, destructive heights of its peers - that may have even had a lonely loveless childhood - and now that it's out in the world in its first big production the results are...disappointing. :sigh: I'll have a word with it. (We know the change that caused it, but in rolling back those changs the bug is still here, meaning it's a little trickier than we thought. We may actually have to debug or something crazy like that. I'll go get some gloves)
cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP
Chris Maunder wrote:
But 'disappointing' makes me feel like I'v introduced a bug and it's a bug that isn't living up to its potential. A failed bug. A bug that grew up trying, that worked hard, that was never able to achieve the lofty, destructive heights of its peers - that may have even had a lonely loveless childhood - and now that it's out in the world in its first big production the results are...disappointing.
You need a break. Have a :beer: Actually, I did intend 'annoying', that was my bad English... :-O
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
Disappointing? That's a new term for a bug. 'Annoying' I can understand. 'Unnecessary', yes. 'Fix it NOW or I will post the Badger song link' - sure. But 'disappointing' makes me feel like I'v introduced a bug and it's a bug that isn't living up to its potential. A failed bug. A bug that grew up trying, that worked hard, that was never able to achieve the lofty, destructive heights of its peers - that may have even had a lonely loveless childhood - and now that it's out in the world in its first big production the results are...disappointing. :sigh: I'll have a word with it. (We know the change that caused it, but in rolling back those changs the bug is still here, meaning it's a little trickier than we thought. We may actually have to debug or something crazy like that. I'll go get some gloves)
cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP
Luckily I was not drinking anything while reading this. My co-workers are trying to figure out why I had a fit of laughter though.
That's a new term for a bug. 'Annoying' I can understand. 'Unnecessary', yes. 'Fix it NOW or I will post the Badger song link' - sure. But 'disappointing' makes me feel like I'v introduced a bug and it's a bug that isn't living up to its potential. A failed bug. A bug that grew up trying, that worked hard, that was never able to achieve the lofty, destructive heights of its peers - that may have even had a lonely loveless childhood - and now that it's out in the world in its first big production the results are...disappointing. -Chris Maunder