Bookmark an article = vote(5)
-
I suggest that if a member bookmarks an article, it automatically counts as a vote of 5 for that article. Or at least it requires voting prior bookmarking What do you see ?
foreach(Minute m in MyLife) myExperience++;
-
I suggest that if a member bookmarks an article, it automatically counts as a vote of 5 for that article. Or at least it requires voting prior bookmarking What do you see ?
foreach(Minute m in MyLife) myExperience++;
1. Bookmarking does not automatically mean "5". Contrary to popular bewlief, there are other numbers available between 1 and 5, some yet to be discovered. 2. "Before bookmarking, please vote" sucks. If I can't be bothered to vote, what is my vote worth?
Agh! Reality! My Archnemesis![^]
| FoldWithUs! | sighist | µLaunch - program launcher for server core and hyper-v server. -
I suggest that if a member bookmarks an article, it automatically counts as a vote of 5 for that article. Or at least it requires voting prior bookmarking What do you see ?
foreach(Minute m in MyLife) myExperience++;
-
No. Bookmarking means I might find the article useful. It does not mean it's a good article. Cheers, Drew.
Drew Stainton wrote:
Bookmarking means I might find the article useful. It does not mean it's a good article.
What do you mean by "good" ? I think useful = good = 4, very useful = very good = 5, useless = bad = 1 or 2, etc
foreach(Minute m in MyLife) myExperience++;
-
I suggest that if a member bookmarks an article, it automatically counts as a vote of 5 for that article. Or at least it requires voting prior bookmarking What do you see ?
foreach(Minute m in MyLife) myExperience++;
I bookmark an article so I can find it later as the subject is interesting for whatever reason. At that point I may not have even read the article fully and have most probably not downloaded the code and studied it. Therefore I am in no position to cast a valid vote at that point.
Dave
If this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn) -
I suggest that if a member bookmarks an article, it automatically counts as a vote of 5 for that article. Or at least it requires voting prior bookmarking What do you see ?
foreach(Minute m in MyLife) myExperience++;
-
Drew Stainton wrote:
Bookmarking means I might find the article useful. It does not mean it's a good article.
What do you mean by "good" ? I think useful = good = 4, very useful = very good = 5, useless = bad = 1 or 2, etc
foreach(Minute m in MyLife) myExperience++;
-
1. Bookmarking does not automatically mean "5". Contrary to popular bewlief, there are other numbers available between 1 and 5, some yet to be discovered. 2. "Before bookmarking, please vote" sucks. If I can't be bothered to vote, what is my vote worth?
Agh! Reality! My Archnemesis![^]
| FoldWithUs! | sighist | µLaunch - program launcher for server core and hyper-v server.peterchen wrote:
Bookmarking does not automatically mean "5"
I know,
peterchen wrote:
there are other numbers available between 1 and 5
Do you rank an article with 1 then bookmark it ?
peterchen wrote:
some yet to be discovered.
:laugh: :laugh:
peterchen wrote:
"Before bookmarking, please vote" sucks
You do not bookmark every article you read. And if I interrested in an article to the level made me bookmark it, I will not get bored when being asked for voting.
peterchen wrote:
If I can't be bothered to vote, what is my vote worth?
You already exited with the article so, you decided to bookmark to get benefits from it But voting will benefit the author rather than you, so you may do not care about it. I see it like, paying for none free articles, here you pay your vote rather than money.
foreach(Minute m in MyLife) myExperience++;
-
OK, let me rephrase that. Bookmarking means I might find the article useful. It does not mean it's a well written article. My vote for articles is based on the quality of the article. Whether or not it's useful depends on the individual. Cheers, Drew.
em .. makes sense :^)
foreach(Minute m in MyLife) myExperience++;
-
I bookmark an article so I can find it later as the subject is interesting for whatever reason. At that point I may not have even read the article fully and have most probably not downloaded the code and studied it. Therefore I am in no position to cast a valid vote at that point.
Dave
If this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)Logic.. I did not take this in account because all my bookmarks are well read and voted Totally agree now :)
foreach(Minute m in MyLife) myExperience++;
-
I suggest that if a member bookmarks an article, it automatically counts as a vote of 5 for that article. Or at least it requires voting prior bookmarking What do you see ?
foreach(Minute m in MyLife) myExperience++;
I frequently bookmark articles after reading just the title and first paragraph or so - I may not have time to go through the whole thing and the code at that moment, but I want to be able to come back to it later when I have more time. I wouldn't want that to be considered an automatic 5.
-
I bookmark an article so I can find it later as the subject is interesting for whatever reason. At that point I may not have even read the article fully and have most probably not downloaded the code and studied it. Therefore I am in no position to cast a valid vote at that point.
Dave
If this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)I also think the same thing after reading the original post. :thumbsup:
-
I suggest that if a member bookmarks an article, it automatically counts as a vote of 5 for that article. Or at least it requires voting prior bookmarking What do you see ?
foreach(Minute m in MyLife) myExperience++;
No way. I bookmark an article for one of two reasons. One that I read and I find completely awesome and needs to be within my quick reach or one that is there for me to read within the next few days because there is something about it that caught my eye. Its only the article that I read and find to be both informative and well written that gets a 5. However, with some writers (like Sacha Barber[^], Nishant Sivakumar[^] and Marc Clifton[^] [and believe me, this list is outrageously short, there are some proper geniuses here]) its almost a given that their article is both VERY informative and VERY well written.
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?
-
em .. makes sense :^)
foreach(Minute m in MyLife) myExperience++;
To me it does... Perhaps the article itself is poorly written, but contains some valid concepts or code that I want to keep track of. I can bookmark just to keep track of some of the content but I am not committing that the overall quality of the article is anywhere near a 5, or even a 2 or a 3.
-
To me it does... Perhaps the article itself is poorly written, but contains some valid concepts or code that I want to keep track of. I can bookmark just to keep track of some of the content but I am not committing that the overall quality of the article is anywhere near a 5, or even a 2 or a 3.
Ray Cassick wrote:
To me it does...
That what I said :zzz:
foreach(Minute m in MyLife) myExperience++;
-
I suggest that if a member bookmarks an article, it automatically counts as a vote of 5 for that article. Or at least it requires voting prior bookmarking What do you see ?
foreach(Minute m in MyLife) myExperience++;
Heck no! I bookmark articles that are utter rubbish (other than my own) so that I can: 0) Go back and add ridicule later. 1) Maybe do some research to support my point of view. 2) Perhaps develop a "better" solution and provide that to the author. 3) Occasionally take a look to see if the article improved. And sometimes I hit "bookmark" accidently. :doh: Actually, I just bookmarked an old article by Marc Clifton that showed up as the Featured Article because I don't have time to read it now.
-
No way. I bookmark an article for one of two reasons. One that I read and I find completely awesome and needs to be within my quick reach or one that is there for me to read within the next few days because there is something about it that caught my eye. Its only the article that I read and find to be both informative and well written that gets a 5. However, with some writers (like Sacha Barber[^], Nishant Sivakumar[^] and Marc Clifton[^] [and believe me, this list is outrageously short, there are some proper geniuses here]) its almost a given that their article is both VERY informative and VERY well written.
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?
Mustafa Ismail Mustafa wrote:
Marc Clifton
I like him very much. One funny reason is his similarity to Rubeus Hagrid in harry potter. :-\
-
Heck no! I bookmark articles that are utter rubbish (other than my own) so that I can: 0) Go back and add ridicule later. 1) Maybe do some research to support my point of view. 2) Perhaps develop a "better" solution and provide that to the author. 3) Occasionally take a look to see if the article improved. And sometimes I hit "bookmark" accidently. :doh: Actually, I just bookmarked an old article by Marc Clifton that showed up as the Featured Article because I don't have time to read it now.
Good points :thumbsup: I have completely gave up, man By the way, nice pic :)
foreach(Minute m in MyLife) myExperience++;
-
No way. I bookmark an article for one of two reasons. One that I read and I find completely awesome and needs to be within my quick reach or one that is there for me to read within the next few days because there is something about it that caught my eye. Its only the article that I read and find to be both informative and well written that gets a 5. However, with some writers (like Sacha Barber[^], Nishant Sivakumar[^] and Marc Clifton[^] [and believe me, this list is outrageously short, there are some proper geniuses here]) its almost a given that their article is both VERY informative and VERY well written.
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?
Mustafa Ismail Mustafa wrote:
However, with some writers (like Sacha Barber[^], Nishant Sivakumar[^]
These members are bookmarked themselves rather than their articles Also, have a look at this guy Omar Al Zabir
foreach(Minute m in MyLife) myExperience++;
-
Mustafa Ismail Mustafa wrote:
However, with some writers (like Sacha Barber[^], Nishant Sivakumar[^]
These members are bookmarked themselves rather than their articles Also, have a look at this guy Omar Al Zabir
foreach(Minute m in MyLife) myExperience++;
Like I said, that list is pathetically inadequate.
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?