Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C#
  4. RegEx expression help

RegEx expression help

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C#
regexquestionhelptutorial
31 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N NavnathKale

    Dont worry my solution still works !!! I guess u don;t need name captured groups, so I have removed it n here is new one

    (\[{3}MyProperty4\]{3}[\s{1}])(.*?(?=\s{1}\[|$))

    Mark as anwser !!!! :-D

    F Offline
    F Offline
    Fayu
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    Works like a charm!!! Any way I can just have the value returned?

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N NavnathKale

      Dont worry my solution still works !!! I guess u don;t need name captured groups, so I have removed it n here is new one

      (\[{3}MyProperty4\]{3}[\s{1}])(.*?(?=\s{1}\[|$))

      Mark as anwser !!!! :-D

      F Offline
      F Offline
      Fayu
      wrote on last edited by
      #19

      I would LOVE an explanation on the logic behind this... (\[{3}Property2\]{3}[\s{1}])(.*?(?=\s{1}\[|$)) The only part I understand is (\[{3}Property2\]{3}[\s{1}])

      N 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Fayu

        Works like a charm!!! Any way I can just have the value returned?

        N Offline
        N Offline
        NavnathKale
        wrote on last edited by
        #20

        Now time to callback my initial post. :| Like I said use Named capturing groups. Using this you can just return the value of provided propertyname

        Regex regex = new Regex(@"(\[{3}MyProperty3\]{3}[\s{1}])(?<MyProperty3>.*?(?=\s{1}\[|$))");
        Match regexmatch = regex.Match(@"[[[MyProperty1]]] Value [[[MyProperty2]]] value2 [[[MyProperty3]]] value 3");
        string value = regexmatch.Groups["MyProperty3"].Value

        Above code will return value of property MyProperty3

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Fayu

          I would LOVE an explanation on the logic behind this... (\[{3}Property2\]{3}[\s{1}])(.*?(?=\s{1}\[|$)) The only part I understand is (\[{3}Property2\]{3}[\s{1}])

          N Offline
          N Offline
          NavnathKale
          wrote on last edited by
          #21

          Yeah!!! u ought to know everything thats going around on earth :wtf: Google will take you to right place if you search for positive lookahead in regex :-\

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P PIEBALDconsult

            I prefer the technique I showed. You then enumerate the Matches and fill a Dictionary with the Names and Values. Your requirements 1 -- 3 are then satisfied by the Dictionary and you only have to execute the RegEx once per group of properties.

            Fayu wrote:

            Use VBScript

            Then why post it in the C# forum? Or maybe you should give more information on the bigger picture of what you are trying to accomplish.

            N Offline
            N Offline
            NavnathKale
            wrote on last edited by
            #22

            Your solution will also give same result, but it will return all properties. As Fayu asked on his requirement, it wasnt he is looking for. Cheers !!!

            P 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N NavnathKale

              Your solution will also give same result, but it will return all properties. As Fayu asked on his requirement, it wasnt he is looking for. Cheers !!!

              P Offline
              P Offline
              PIEBALDconsult
              wrote on last edited by
              #23

              Navnath R. Kale wrote:

              it wasnt he is looking for

              It should be.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P PIEBALDconsult

                I prefer the technique I showed. You then enumerate the Matches and fill a Dictionary with the Names and Values. Your requirements 1 -- 3 are then satisfied by the Dictionary and you only have to execute the RegEx once per group of properties.

                Fayu wrote:

                Use VBScript

                Then why post it in the C# forum? Or maybe you should give more information on the bigger picture of what you are trying to accomplish.

                P Offline
                P Offline
                PIEBALDconsult
                wrote on last edited by
                #24

                Fayu wrote:

                I wish I can use the CLR but the requirements I have prevent me from using the CLR.

                ::Throws up hands::

                F 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P PIEBALDconsult

                  Fayu wrote:

                  I wish I can use the CLR but the requirements I have prevent me from using the CLR.

                  ::Throws up hands::

                  F Offline
                  F Offline
                  Fayu
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #25

                  Yea but I am not using the clr. The pattern he provided worked with all requirement, including not using CLR. I used his pattern using VBScript.RegexExp and it worked wonders. Thanks for your help as well.

                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Fayu

                    Yea but I am not using the clr. The pattern he provided worked with all requirement, including not using CLR. I used his pattern using VBScript.RegexExp and it worked wonders. Thanks for your help as well.

                    P Offline
                    P Offline
                    PIEBALDconsult
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #26

                    Mine works with perl: perl -e "print \"[[[MyProperty1]]] Value [[[MyProperty2]]] value2 [[[MyProperty3]]] value 3\" =~ m/(?:\[\[\[(?'Name'.*?)\]\]\](?'Value'[^\[]*))/g"

                    %stuff = $ARGV[0] =~ m/(?:\[\[\[(?'Name'.*?)\]\]\](?'Value'[^\[]*))/g ;

                    foreach $id ( sort ( keys ( %stuff ) ) )
                    {
                    print ( "$id = $stuff{$id}\n" ) ;
                    }

                    modified on Saturday, April 10, 2010 12:33 AM

                    N 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P PIEBALDconsult

                      Mine works with perl: perl -e "print \"[[[MyProperty1]]] Value [[[MyProperty2]]] value2 [[[MyProperty3]]] value 3\" =~ m/(?:\[\[\[(?'Name'.*?)\]\]\](?'Value'[^\[]*))/g"

                      %stuff = $ARGV[0] =~ m/(?:\[\[\[(?'Name'.*?)\]\]\](?'Value'[^\[]*))/g ;

                      foreach $id ( sort ( keys ( %stuff ) ) )
                      {
                      print ( "$id = $stuff{$id}\n" ) ;
                      }

                      modified on Saturday, April 10, 2010 12:33 AM

                      N Offline
                      N Offline
                      NavnathKale
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #27

                      Well i guess, all this confusion is because question is in wrong section. Perl supports Named capture groups but client scripts don't.

                      P 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N NavnathKale

                        Well i guess, all this confusion is because question is in wrong section. Perl supports Named capture groups but client scripts don't.

                        P Offline
                        P Offline
                        PIEBALDconsult
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #28

                        Navnath R. Kale wrote:

                        Named capture groups

                        You don't need to name them. The important thing is to have the engine return all the matches and enumerate them.

                        N 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • P PIEBALDconsult

                          Navnath R. Kale wrote:

                          Named capture groups

                          You don't need to name them. The important thing is to have the engine return all the matches and enumerate them.

                          N Offline
                          N Offline
                          NavnathKale
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #29

                          :doh: !!! Now the thread becomes the session. Actually (?'Name') and (?'Value') is equal to (?<Name>) and (?<Value>) and is nothing but Named capturing group. .Net supports it both way.

                          P 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • N NavnathKale

                            :doh: !!! Now the thread becomes the session. Actually (?'Name') and (?'Value') is equal to (?<Name>) and (?<Value>) and is nothing but Named capturing group. .Net supports it both way.

                            P Offline
                            P Offline
                            PIEBALDconsult
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #30

                            Yes. I prefer the apostrophes -- at least I don't need to escape them when I post them. :-D

                            N 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • P PIEBALDconsult

                              Yes. I prefer the apostrophes -- at least I don't need to escape them when I post them. :-D

                              N Offline
                              N Offline
                              NavnathKale
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #31

                              Yeah :laugh: On first post I was like " :doh: WTF happened to my pattern, it was correct when I typed"

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups