Global Government
-
http://infowars.net/articles/april2010/120410Document.htm[^] A confidential U.S. government document obtained by the London Guardian highlights the ongoing agenda to create a structure of global governance in the name of combating climate change. "Titled Strategic communications objectives and dated 11 March 2010, it outlines the key messages that the Obama administration wants to convey to its critics and to the world media in the run-up to the vital UN climate talks in Cancun, Mexico in November." The Guardian reports. The newspaper says that the document (full text below) was "accidentally left on a European hotel computer" before it was passed to their editors. The number one item on the itinerary is to "Reinforce the perception that the US is constructively engaged in UN negotiations in an effort to produce a global regime to combat climate change." The news comes on the back of revelations that rich countries have threatened to cut vital aid to developing nations if they do not back the deal agreed at the UN climate summit in Copenhagen last year. Elsewhere, the leaked document pinpoints the need to continue "driving the climate change story" in the mainstream media, but also identifies the need to "disarm" critics and to bypass traditional media outlets to do so, focusing more on "new media". http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/apr/12/us-document-strategy-climate-talks[^] A document accidentally left on a European hotel computer and passed to the Guardian reveals the US government's increasingly controversial strategy in the global UN climate talks. Titled Strategic communications objectives and dated 11 March 2010, it outlines the key messages that the Obama administration wants to convey to its critics and to the world media in the run-up to the vital UN climate talks in Cancun, Mexico in November. (You can read the document text below). Top of the list of objectives is to: "Reinforce the perception that the US is constructively engaged in UN negotiations in an effort to produce a global regime to combat climate change." It also talks of
-
Note to self, write a number of conflicting documents that feed various conspiracy theories and leave them in hotel rooms. The results should amuse.
I will have to show you a new documentary that is coming out in a few days. It will replace Fall of the Republic in my signature.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album[^] The True Soapbox is the Truthbox[^]
-
I will have to show you a new documentary that is coming out in a few days. It will replace Fall of the Republic in my signature.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album[^] The True Soapbox is the Truthbox[^]
-
Here's one of the problems, you assume I'd consider a global government a bad thing. Not that I think it would work, but the more likely merger between various western nations may give them leverage on against china in trade.
A global government would work by nations surrendering much of their monetary power and military might over to a world body, which then would be used against the individual nations if they didn't cooperate.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album[^] The True Soapbox is the Truthbox[^]
-
http://infowars.net/articles/april2010/120410Document.htm[^] A confidential U.S. government document obtained by the London Guardian highlights the ongoing agenda to create a structure of global governance in the name of combating climate change. "Titled Strategic communications objectives and dated 11 March 2010, it outlines the key messages that the Obama administration wants to convey to its critics and to the world media in the run-up to the vital UN climate talks in Cancun, Mexico in November." The Guardian reports. The newspaper says that the document (full text below) was "accidentally left on a European hotel computer" before it was passed to their editors. The number one item on the itinerary is to "Reinforce the perception that the US is constructively engaged in UN negotiations in an effort to produce a global regime to combat climate change." The news comes on the back of revelations that rich countries have threatened to cut vital aid to developing nations if they do not back the deal agreed at the UN climate summit in Copenhagen last year. Elsewhere, the leaked document pinpoints the need to continue "driving the climate change story" in the mainstream media, but also identifies the need to "disarm" critics and to bypass traditional media outlets to do so, focusing more on "new media". http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/apr/12/us-document-strategy-climate-talks[^] A document accidentally left on a European hotel computer and passed to the Guardian reveals the US government's increasingly controversial strategy in the global UN climate talks. Titled Strategic communications objectives and dated 11 March 2010, it outlines the key messages that the Obama administration wants to convey to its critics and to the world media in the run-up to the vital UN climate talks in Cancun, Mexico in November. (You can read the document text below). Top of the list of objectives is to: "Reinforce the perception that the US is constructively engaged in UN negotiations in an effort to produce a global regime to combat climate change." It also talks of
Wow, you don't even read your own quotes...
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
"Reinforce the perception that the US is constructively engaged in UN negotiations in an effort to produce a global regime to combat climate change."
The perception... As in, make people think that the US is... etc etc. In layman's terms, "Convince people that we're actually trying to accomplish something." If you read the actual text, instead of Alex Jones' opinions, it's a to-do list for marketing and public relations. It's even titled "Strategic Communications Objectives." Public relations.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
A global government would work by nations surrendering much of their monetary power and military might over to a world body, which then would be used against the individual nations if they didn't cooperate.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album[^] The True Soapbox is the Truthbox[^]
And I bet you want your home state to secede from the US, right? That's all a global government would be... One more layer on top of what we already have. We have a Federal government that presides over a bunch of State governments. This would be a World government presiding over a bunch of National governments. Granted, I don't see a world government happening unless we find some aliens to dislike (Standard Us vs Them mentality), but it's a nice idea.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
And I bet you want your home state to secede from the US, right? That's all a global government would be... One more layer on top of what we already have. We have a Federal government that presides over a bunch of State governments. This would be a World government presiding over a bunch of National governments. Granted, I don't see a world government happening unless we find some aliens to dislike (Standard Us vs Them mentality), but it's a nice idea.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)Ian Shlasko wrote:
I don't see a world government happening unless we find some aliens to dislike
Climate change was supposed to be the "enemy of humanity" which would be humans themselves, and one of the objectives would be to depopulate the earth. We all know that climate change is an absolute fraud, so you are pretty right in saying that it is unlikely to happen, but they are still going to try.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album[^] The True Soapbox is the Truthbox[^]
-
A global government would work by nations surrendering much of their monetary power and military might over to a world body, which then would be used against the individual nations if they didn't cooperate.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album[^] The True Soapbox is the Truthbox[^]
-
Ian Shlasko wrote:
I don't see a world government happening unless we find some aliens to dislike
Climate change was supposed to be the "enemy of humanity" which would be humans themselves, and one of the objectives would be to depopulate the earth. We all know that climate change is an absolute fraud, so you are pretty right in saying that it is unlikely to happen, but they are still going to try.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album[^] The True Soapbox is the Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
We all know that climate change is an absolute fraud
Really, must have missed that memo. Last I knew all of the hubub over the annoyed emails of a few scientists didn't actually show anything to be a fraud except the claims of idiots who never read the damn things.
-
Ian Shlasko wrote:
I don't see a world government happening unless we find some aliens to dislike
Climate change was supposed to be the "enemy of humanity" which would be humans themselves, and one of the objectives would be to depopulate the earth. We all know that climate change is an absolute fraud, so you are pretty right in saying that it is unlikely to happen, but they are still going to try.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album[^] The True Soapbox is the Truthbox[^]
*sigh*... Here we go again...
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Climate change was supposed to be the "enemy of humanity" which would be humans themselves
The humans aren't the enemy. Their current activities are the enemy. In the same way as people with cars are not the enemy, but the act of drinking copious amounts of alcohol before driving a car IS the enemy.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
and one of the objectives would be to depopulate the earth.
You just can't get off this, can you? No matter how many times people call you on this garbage, you just keep repeating it. Show some actual evidence before you make this claim.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
We all know that climate change is an absolute fraud
In this case "We all" refers to you, right? Because saying that "All" of the people on this forum, let alone elsewhere in the world, think it's fraud, is pretty trivial to disprove.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
so you are pretty right in saying that it is unlikely to happen, but they are still going to try.
I hope they do try, and I hope they succeed. A world government would necessarily have to be decentralized, which I think would be ideal. Basically take the UN and give it some claws.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
http://infowars.net/articles/april2010/120410Document.htm[^] A confidential U.S. government document obtained by the London Guardian highlights the ongoing agenda to create a structure of global governance in the name of combating climate change. "Titled Strategic communications objectives and dated 11 March 2010, it outlines the key messages that the Obama administration wants to convey to its critics and to the world media in the run-up to the vital UN climate talks in Cancun, Mexico in November." The Guardian reports. The newspaper says that the document (full text below) was "accidentally left on a European hotel computer" before it was passed to their editors. The number one item on the itinerary is to "Reinforce the perception that the US is constructively engaged in UN negotiations in an effort to produce a global regime to combat climate change." The news comes on the back of revelations that rich countries have threatened to cut vital aid to developing nations if they do not back the deal agreed at the UN climate summit in Copenhagen last year. Elsewhere, the leaked document pinpoints the need to continue "driving the climate change story" in the mainstream media, but also identifies the need to "disarm" critics and to bypass traditional media outlets to do so, focusing more on "new media". http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/apr/12/us-document-strategy-climate-talks[^] A document accidentally left on a European hotel computer and passed to the Guardian reveals the US government's increasingly controversial strategy in the global UN climate talks. Titled Strategic communications objectives and dated 11 March 2010, it outlines the key messages that the Obama administration wants to convey to its critics and to the world media in the run-up to the vital UN climate talks in Cancun, Mexico in November. (You can read the document text below). Top of the list of objectives is to: "Reinforce the perception that the US is constructively engaged in UN negotiations in an effort to produce a global regime to combat climate change." It also talks of
government != governance They are different; honestly.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
-
http://infowars.net/articles/april2010/120410Document.htm[^] A confidential U.S. government document obtained by the London Guardian highlights the ongoing agenda to create a structure of global governance in the name of combating climate change. "Titled Strategic communications objectives and dated 11 March 2010, it outlines the key messages that the Obama administration wants to convey to its critics and to the world media in the run-up to the vital UN climate talks in Cancun, Mexico in November." The Guardian reports. The newspaper says that the document (full text below) was "accidentally left on a European hotel computer" before it was passed to their editors. The number one item on the itinerary is to "Reinforce the perception that the US is constructively engaged in UN negotiations in an effort to produce a global regime to combat climate change." The news comes on the back of revelations that rich countries have threatened to cut vital aid to developing nations if they do not back the deal agreed at the UN climate summit in Copenhagen last year. Elsewhere, the leaked document pinpoints the need to continue "driving the climate change story" in the mainstream media, but also identifies the need to "disarm" critics and to bypass traditional media outlets to do so, focusing more on "new media". http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/apr/12/us-document-strategy-climate-talks[^] A document accidentally left on a European hotel computer and passed to the Guardian reveals the US government's increasingly controversial strategy in the global UN climate talks. Titled Strategic communications objectives and dated 11 March 2010, it outlines the key messages that the Obama administration wants to convey to its critics and to the world media in the run-up to the vital UN climate talks in Cancun, Mexico in November. (You can read the document text below). Top of the list of objectives is to: "Reinforce the perception that the US is constructively engaged in UN negotiations in an effort to produce a global regime to combat climate change." It also talks of
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
A document accidentally left on a European hotel computer and passed to the Guardian reveals the US government's increasingly controversial strategy in the global UN climate talks
Of course, otherwise dear old Uncle Alex would be utterly speechless, and that won't do, would it CSS, and, by extension, you. Then we would be missing our daily humour extravaganza. :laugh: :laugh:
-
'The facts' means what a tabloid printed based on a file it claims it found on a hotel computer ? You'd have to be pretty weak minded to buy that wholesale.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Ian Shlasko wrote:
I don't see a world government happening unless we find some aliens to dislike
Climate change was supposed to be the "enemy of humanity" which would be humans themselves, and one of the objectives would be to depopulate the earth. We all know that climate change is an absolute fraud, so you are pretty right in saying that it is unlikely to happen, but they are still going to try.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album[^] The True Soapbox is the Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
We all know that climate change is an absolute fraud
now wait there Mr Conspiracy... you´re now acting like the government, trying to put ideas in my head and words I didn´t say, you're taking away my freedom you socialist scum, go away with your socialist ideas to other place
I want to die like my grandfather- asleep, not like the passengers in his car, screaming!
-
*sigh*... Here we go again...
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Climate change was supposed to be the "enemy of humanity" which would be humans themselves
The humans aren't the enemy. Their current activities are the enemy. In the same way as people with cars are not the enemy, but the act of drinking copious amounts of alcohol before driving a car IS the enemy.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
and one of the objectives would be to depopulate the earth.
You just can't get off this, can you? No matter how many times people call you on this garbage, you just keep repeating it. Show some actual evidence before you make this claim.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
We all know that climate change is an absolute fraud
In this case "We all" refers to you, right? Because saying that "All" of the people on this forum, let alone elsewhere in the world, think it's fraud, is pretty trivial to disprove.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
so you are pretty right in saying that it is unlikely to happen, but they are still going to try.
I hope they do try, and I hope they succeed. A world government would necessarily have to be decentralized, which I think would be ideal. Basically take the UN and give it some claws.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)Ian Shlasko wrote:
You just can't get off this, can you? No matter how many times people call you on this garbage, you just keep repeating it. Show some actual evidence before you make this claim.
He has all the proof he needs, his inability to get laid, this is obviously not his fault so it must be a govenment plot to depopulate the world
Smile and the world smiles withyou, laugh and they think you are a nutter