TI calculator/Z80 Hobby
-
Thanks. There are actually some good resources for those translations online. The trouble I run into is when I attempt to wing it myself and then realize that the "ld" command does not work with every combination of registers that exists like the one I had happened to type. My real beef is with the ancient IDE I am using and weak debug tools.
Z80 assembly developers use no IDE, the debugger is their brain. ;)
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
I've taken up assembly programming as a hobby that I do at night time for the TI-83/84 calculators which has a Z80 processor. I did some assembly in college years back and have some interest in it again. However, this stuff just does not roll off the fingers like the high level languages I use at work. Does anyone here swim in assembly? Do you have any Jedi mind tricks in use while you code? I have all the needed resources/documentation, so I can figure out how to do anything I need. It is just the molasses between the keyboard and coder that is the problem.
Start with a character output routine, that prints a character to a serial port, or to the display. Expand that to a string print, then add hex numbers. Now you can add debug statements, without having to single step anonymous code... It's the way I always started with new hardware!
You should never use standby on an elephant. It always crashes when you lift the ears. - Mark Wallace C/C++ (I dont see a huge difference between them, and the 'benefits' of C++ are questionable, who needs inheritance when you have copy and paste) - fat_boy
-
puromtec1 wrote:
assembly programming as a hobby
Why don't you pick up a hobby which has something to do with the outdoors instead? Wait a minute, I spend most of my time on the internet.... :)
Abhinav S wrote:
puromtec1 wrote: assembly programming as a hobby Why don't you pick up a hobby which has something to do with the outdoors instead?
Extreme assembly half way up a mountain?
Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit! Buzzwords!
-
I've taken up assembly programming as a hobby that I do at night time for the TI-83/84 calculators which has a Z80 processor. I did some assembly in college years back and have some interest in it again. However, this stuff just does not roll off the fingers like the high level languages I use at work. Does anyone here swim in assembly? Do you have any Jedi mind tricks in use while you code? I have all the needed resources/documentation, so I can figure out how to do anything I need. It is just the molasses between the keyboard and coder that is the problem.
-
I like the idea. The main issues revolve around the craptastic Zilog Developer Studio not letting my wheel scroll the page and also, when debugging in the TI-83 emulator, i really don't know where the !@#$ I am a lot of times while I step through the instructions, since my nice labels are removed at compilation time.
You use a mouse to program Z80? When I were lad we used switches and we were grateful...
-
Wow,
Z80assembly is wonderful, IMHO far better than6502derivatives! Enjoy yourself programming it. :)If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles]I hope you're not trying to spark a religious war! My BBC is most certainly better than your Spectrum :-P
-
I hope you're not trying to spark a religious war! My BBC is most certainly better than your Spectrum :-P
Russell Jones wrote:
I hope you're not trying to spark a religious war!
We don't need. War is over. We've won it. ;P
Russell Jones wrote:
My BBC is most certainly better than your Spectrum :-P
Maybe. However the ZX made me a Klingon Developer. :-D
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
Wow,
Z80assembly is wonderful, IMHO far better than6502derivatives! Enjoy yourself programming it. :)If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
I've taken up assembly programming as a hobby that I do at night time for the TI-83/84 calculators which has a Z80 processor. I did some assembly in college years back and have some interest in it again. However, this stuff just does not roll off the fingers like the high level languages I use at work. Does anyone here swim in assembly? Do you have any Jedi mind tricks in use while you code? I have all the needed resources/documentation, so I can figure out how to do anything I need. It is just the molasses between the keyboard and coder that is the problem.
After BASIC, I lived in 6502 and 8086 assembly language for years, in addition to a smattering of embedded system processors, one of which was a cool extension to the Z80 but I can't remember which one. Even in assembly language though, I never did anything with the Motorola CPU's, 6800, 68000, etc. Contrary to what Robert said, throw away everything you've learned about high level languages. Think in terms of 4 (or is it 2?) puny little variables, a pointer or two, and a whole lot of little cells to put stuff into and grab it out of. Forget structure, if-then-else, switches, loops, etc, and think in terms of signed compares, equality compares, and increments and decrements. Oh, and create a consistent "interface" for subroutines. What registers are the input registers, what registers are the output registers? Personally, I would love to toss out all this object oriented crap and, with enough little subroutines, I imagine I could code just as quickly in assembly. Marc
-
Thanks. There are actually some good resources for those translations online. The trouble I run into is when I attempt to wing it myself and then realize that the "ld" command does not work with every combination of registers that exists like the one I had happened to type. My real beef is with the ancient IDE I am using and weak debug tools.
puromtec1 wrote:
IDE
puromtec1 wrote:
debug tools
You've been spoilt by these modern nancy boy tools and languages!
Dave
If this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn) -
Start with a character output routine, that prints a character to a serial port, or to the display. Expand that to a string print, then add hex numbers. Now you can add debug statements, without having to single step anonymous code... It's the way I always started with new hardware!
You should never use standby on an elephant. It always crashes when you lift the ears. - Mark Wallace C/C++ (I dont see a huge difference between them, and the 'benefits' of C++ are questionable, who needs inheritance when you have copy and paste) - fat_boy
-
After BASIC, I lived in 6502 and 8086 assembly language for years, in addition to a smattering of embedded system processors, one of which was a cool extension to the Z80 but I can't remember which one. Even in assembly language though, I never did anything with the Motorola CPU's, 6800, 68000, etc. Contrary to what Robert said, throw away everything you've learned about high level languages. Think in terms of 4 (or is it 2?) puny little variables, a pointer or two, and a whole lot of little cells to put stuff into and grab it out of. Forget structure, if-then-else, switches, loops, etc, and think in terms of signed compares, equality compares, and increments and decrements. Oh, and create a consistent "interface" for subroutines. What registers are the input registers, what registers are the output registers? Personally, I would love to toss out all this object oriented crap and, with enough little subroutines, I imagine I could code just as quickly in assembly. Marc
Marc Clifton wrote:
Motorola CPU's, 6800
Believe it or not, that realization was made two weeks into the endeavor. I also wagered that someone without knowledge of any high-level language could maybe do better at assembly.
Marc Clifton wrote:
Motorola CPU's, 6800
I did some 6800 in college in a random mechanical engineering class I took just for the heck of it. That was fun. Controlled stepper motors, interpreted sensors, etc. Thanks for the guidance. This CP crowd has delivered for sure on this topic.
-
Put on your state machine hat and be prepared to use a lot of state transition diagrams. Pencil and paper are definitely required tools. I started by writing an assembler and O/S for the Intel 8080, and thought the Z-80 was God's gift to programmers. It was a generational advance over what I learned on. Draw a register map, and copy it many times. Ditto for a memory map. Do your initial designs in RTN (Register Transfer Notation) and make copious notes about each step on separate pages. Insert highlighted memory and register map pages as needed to see what you're doing to each. On each sheet, write notes to yourself about what you are trying to do, because you'll forget tomorrow. It's tedious, but far more rewarding intellectually than drawing cute pictures with the Windows APIs. Have fun! You're about to enjoy your profession far more than your peers will ever know... :-D
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
Roger Wright wrote:
You're about to enjoy your profession far more than your peers will ever know...
Roger, you're such a perv :laugh:.
Software Zen:
delete this; -
I've taken up assembly programming as a hobby that I do at night time for the TI-83/84 calculators which has a Z80 processor. I did some assembly in college years back and have some interest in it again. However, this stuff just does not roll off the fingers like the high level languages I use at work. Does anyone here swim in assembly? Do you have any Jedi mind tricks in use while you code? I have all the needed resources/documentation, so I can figure out how to do anything I need. It is just the molasses between the keyboard and coder that is the problem.
I've taken up assembly programming as a livelihood. No, really! Anyway, to help lure young men, er I mean new engineers, to my project I use a reverse polish notation calculator (insert Polish joke here) to show how easy fun possible! Try going to Computer Science Lab they have some nice resources for you: http://www.computersciencelab.com/index.htm[^]
-
I've taken up assembly programming as a hobby that I do at night time for the TI-83/84 calculators which has a Z80 processor. I did some assembly in college years back and have some interest in it again. However, this stuff just does not roll off the fingers like the high level languages I use at work. Does anyone here swim in assembly? Do you have any Jedi mind tricks in use while you code? I have all the needed resources/documentation, so I can figure out how to do anything I need. It is just the molasses between the keyboard and coder that is the problem.
-
I've taken up assembly programming as a hobby that I do at night time for the TI-83/84 calculators which has a Z80 processor. I did some assembly in college years back and have some interest in it again. However, this stuff just does not roll off the fingers like the high level languages I use at work. Does anyone here swim in assembly? Do you have any Jedi mind tricks in use while you code? I have all the needed resources/documentation, so I can figure out how to do anything I need. It is just the molasses between the keyboard and coder that is the problem.
-
I've taken up assembly programming as a hobby that I do at night time for the TI-83/84 calculators which has a Z80 processor. I did some assembly in college years back and have some interest in it again. However, this stuff just does not roll off the fingers like the high level languages I use at work. Does anyone here swim in assembly? Do you have any Jedi mind tricks in use while you code? I have all the needed resources/documentation, so I can figure out how to do anything I need. It is just the molasses between the keyboard and coder that is the problem.
Unlike all of you here I guess, being deprived to get genuine high language software, I had no choice but to write my every firmware (starting from Z80 up to IAP Flash MCUs like SST89E58RD) on a text editor. Lately I was fortunate to use "Crimson Editor" and its DOS shell to launch the command line of my very old TASM.exe. Before it, I was using, as a text editor, the last software package I had the right to buy which is the BorlandC 3.1 (which also helps me write DOS programs now to transfer data between PCs and my designed boards via COM or LPT... so now my customers need to drag and drop files on my DOS program icons to update their boards). In brief, you may say, the history of most of you is actually alive on our dear planet... Earth. Kerim
-
I've taken up assembly programming as a hobby that I do at night time for the TI-83/84 calculators which has a Z80 processor. I did some assembly in college years back and have some interest in it again. However, this stuff just does not roll off the fingers like the high level languages I use at work. Does anyone here swim in assembly? Do you have any Jedi mind tricks in use while you code? I have all the needed resources/documentation, so I can figure out how to do anything I need. It is just the molasses between the keyboard and coder that is the problem.
I found when learning FORTRAN 40 years ago, that most of the struggles that people had in learning the language was that they could not break down their ideas into small enough steps. The problem with assembly languages is the same, but maginified even more. A line of code that you might write in a modern computer language may take a page of assmebly instructions. The "trick" for writing assembly was to get very comfortable with what the CPU actually does. Once one begins to think about the capabilities of the CPU and how it really accomplishes the tasks we programmers set it to, assembly becomes easier. Higher computer languages remove us from considering the capabilities of the CPU and have lead to bloat of the operating systems and of our programs.
Clayton
-
Abhinav S wrote:
puromtec1 wrote: assembly programming as a hobby Why don't you pick up a hobby which has something to do with the outdoors instead?
Extreme assembly half way up a mountain?
Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit! Buzzwords!
-
Abhinav S wrote:
puromtec1 wrote: assembly programming as a hobby Why don't you pick up a hobby which has something to do with the outdoors instead?
Extreme assembly half way up a mountain?
Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit! Buzzwords!
