Linux?
-
With or without the GUI Rama?
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?
Without!
-
so what would you recommend for a home desktop, or a dev desktop? server? (some here say centos) what's your recommendation?
Fight Big Government:
http://obamacareclassaction.com/
http://obamacaretruth.org/I haven't done the Linux thing in a couple years, so my opinion is a bit out of date, but I found Ubuntu, Fedora, and Mandrake to all be pretty good home desktop OSes (Haven't done much *nix dev in recent years). I remember Mandrake being a little more user-friendly, but that was a while back. For servers, I've always gone with Debian, but I'm not that experienced in that department.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
Or you could be a real man and use Unix. ;P
Jeremy Falcon
-
Hans, I'll throw my two cents into the Linux ring here: First off, as many others have already said, you need to know what it is you want out of it, really, since they're all kinda of different; of course, that doesn't stop you from adding to any of the distros. I run both Ubuntu and openSUSE and I like them both. I have found that GNOME is far more stable and user friendly than KDE, plus I don't care for the whole KDE Widget interface thing. Both Ubuntu and openSUSE provide a Software library, where you can go easily find Linux software to install. They are well organized and maintained. I have run both of them in VirtualBox without any problems, and for the most part, they perform well. Although they do seem to have issues with mounting external drives "quickly", but that could be a VirtualBox thing. Regardless of what you choose, I highly recommended grabbing a copy of VirtualBox, and loading your distros in there, to play around, decide what you like, then deploy on a machine "for real". Also - if you're looking for "tiny" try Small Damn Linux (50mb foot print). Have fun.
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL -
Without!
-
Or you could be a real man and use Unix. ;P
Jeremy Falcon
Yes but that costs money. Plus you need some sort of inoculation :)
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow
-
Yes but that costs money. Plus you need some sort of inoculation :)
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow
Jim Crafton wrote:
Plus you need some sort of inoculation
That's true. I believe the medical term for it, is lobotomy.
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL -
Hans, I'll throw my two cents into the Linux ring here: First off, as many others have already said, you need to know what it is you want out of it, really, since they're all kinda of different; of course, that doesn't stop you from adding to any of the distros. I run both Ubuntu and openSUSE and I like them both. I have found that GNOME is far more stable and user friendly than KDE, plus I don't care for the whole KDE Widget interface thing. Both Ubuntu and openSUSE provide a Software library, where you can go easily find Linux software to install. They are well organized and maintained. I have run both of them in VirtualBox without any problems, and for the most part, they perform well. Although they do seem to have issues with mounting external drives "quickly", but that could be a VirtualBox thing. Regardless of what you choose, I highly recommended grabbing a copy of VirtualBox, and loading your distros in there, to play around, decide what you like, then deploy on a machine "for real". Also - if you're looking for "tiny" try Small Damn Linux (50mb foot print). Have fun.
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTLDouglas Troy wrote:
50mb foot print
That is MASSIVE! I recommend MenuetOS. :rolleyes:
-
Or you could be a real man and use Unix. ;P
Jeremy Falcon
Why would I want to get my nuts chopped-off?
Fight Big Government:
http://obamacareclassaction.com/
http://obamacaretruth.org/ -
Hans Dietrich wrote:
What's the best free Linux distro these days?
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album[^] The True Soapbox is the Truthbox[^]
-
I am using a highly customized version of Arch linux and a kernel compiled from source. It is a pain to configure everything by hand. But if you enjoy doing it, Arch is worth trying.
Best wishes, Navaneeth
-
I am using a highly customized version of Arch linux and a kernel compiled from source. It is a pain to configure everything by hand. But if you enjoy doing it, Arch is worth trying.
Best wishes, Navaneeth
Navaneeth, I've been meaning to email you for a while now. You once mentioned customizing Emacs with CEDET and other stuff to suit your C++ coding IDE needs. Would you be interested in making an article out of that?
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?
-
Personally I'm using Ubuntu, although I'm thinking of setting up a proper dev environment for which I'm thinking I'll use Fedora. Arch is good if you want to play around more as you need to do everything. Mint is great if you're a new user and want everything to just work Really just try a few and see what works for you :-D
-
Personally, I prefer Gentoo Linux. I use it as my main development PC at work. We also are starting to use CentOS for more servers (slowly migrating away from Solaris). I use Gentoo at home as a desktop OS, and on other PCs for media (with MythTV). Another distribution that I have been using for years is ClarkConnect (they recently changed their name to ClearOS). It is a great little gateway/firewall distro that is based on CentOS. And one more ... Xubuntu Linux is nice for an older machine. If all you need is basic internet/email/office applications, this will work just fine. Lots of choices out there ...
-
desktop: linux mint, ubuntu, fedora server: debian, centos, ubuntu server
-
I have been using fedora since it was redhat 6. It is very stable and well supported through its community. I have been using it in a production environment in a multi-server role and have never regretted going down this road. I do like what I hear about CentOS but wonder how it might differ from fedora (really) Word on the street is ubuntu is probably the friendlier entry point into linux. The important thing is to get and learn Linux of any flavor and discover how to make a computer work for you. Linux - "set it and forget it" I have a fedora system that I shipped 500 miles away for a branch office to plug into their network. They plugged in the cat5 and power and - i just checked - it has been running 399 days now without rebooting. (of course now that I said something...) Long Live Linux!
-
-
I've been using Debian everyday for over a year. I try to only use free (as in free speech) software. It is a pain when it comes to Flash. I haven't downloaded any Adobe Flash drivers. I use an open source version. Debian is very reliable. If I must watch some videos, I boot into Windows.
-
I have been using Linux for about 15 years now. I believe the best Distros out right now are; OpenSUSE 11.2 and Ubuntu 9.10 (Note: Ubuntu is about to release ver. 10.04 around the end of the month) Both versions have a strong Linux Kernel and structure with an enormous amount of support. But if you are new to linux or just prefer an easy to manage GUI version, then I would recommend Ubuntu.
-
Depends on what it is intended to do, but for server I use CentOS the most and regarding to desktops I use mainly Fedora and Ubuntu. There are also distro's that have a specific task like BackTrack and Astaro.