Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. High CPU usage for long periods of time

High CPU usage for long periods of time

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
asp-netcomquestioncareer
38 Posts 19 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Jim Crafton

    Has anyone had any problems with running a job for more than an hour that pushes most of the CPU cores to 100% usage? I'm planning on making some animation, and with each frame taking about 5-7 minutes each, a single second of animation is going to come in around 2 hours 20 minutes or worse. For a 10 to 20 second clip that could easily cause the CPU to run at 100% for almost 12 hours or more. I've never had anything run that long on any system I've owned and I'm not sure if it's going to overheat the box, or if it's hard on the CPU to run that long. Anyone have any experience with this on a desktop system (for the record it's an 8 core MacPro)?

    ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow

    M Offline
    M Offline
    MatrixDud
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    Heating and cooling cycles will wreck a CPU over time. Too much heat will too but most systems have safeguards in place to stop that from happening (unless disabled). I have run scientific apps that hit all cores at 100% for days and haven't had any problems. I'm not sure about Macs, but they're Intel now anyways and are basically PCs with a MAC OS and proprietary drivers. Just make sure that there is adequate ventilation around the computer so that it's not sucking in hot air. The internal temp should plateau at a certain level and stay there for the duration of the run (+/- a degree or two).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L leppie

      Jim Crafton wrote:

      Has anyone had any problems with running a job for more than an hour that pushes most of the CPU cores to 100% usage?

      Nope, but then again I have water-cooling[^] :cool: I think the 8core macs are the same as the i7 900 series, so your CPU can handle temps up to 99 deg C (not that you want it that high, just saying). Running continuously, I would not feel happy if it was over 80 deg.

      xacc.ide
      IronScheme - 1.0 RC 1 - out now!
      ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x))) The Scheme Programming Language – Fourth Edition

      D Offline
      D Offline
      Dan Neely
      wrote on last edited by
      #26

      leppie wrote:

      Nope, but then again I have water-cooling[^] Cool

      so do I. Sadly the gap between top end air cooling and water cooling with a 2x120 rad has been shrinking rapidly. My next upgrade is probably going to be a 3x120 rad and a bigger case; currently I'm thinking a mountain mods u2-ufo[^].

      3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Dan Neely

        leppie wrote:

        Nope, but then again I have water-cooling[^] Cool

        so do I. Sadly the gap between top end air cooling and water cooling with a 2x120 rad has been shrinking rapidly. My next upgrade is probably going to be a 3x120 rad and a bigger case; currently I'm thinking a mountain mods u2-ufo[^].

        3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

        L Offline
        L Offline
        leppie
        wrote on last edited by
        #27

        That case is a monster :) I also feel a 2x120 rad is just a little too small for an i7. At least I can make space to add another 2x120. Anything larger, and I would need to buy something bigger too. I really like that Silverstone TJ07 though, but it is not available locally, and shipping would be a killer from anywhere else.

        xacc.ide
        IronScheme - 1.0 RC 1 - out now!
        ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x))) The Scheme Programming Language – Fourth Edition

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Steve McLenithan

          I've been running Folding/SETI/MilkyWay@Home for years straight now. 100% all the time

          // Steve McLenithan

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Doug Perreault
          wrote on last edited by
          #28

          I too have been running SETI@Home for years, so 100% all the time here too. I did have my fan turned down too low for a while and I was getting some unexpected freezes every now and again, but after turning up the fan speed it has been fine ever since.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L leppie

            That case is a monster :) I also feel a 2x120 rad is just a little too small for an i7. At least I can make space to add another 2x120. Anything larger, and I would need to buy something bigger too. I really like that Silverstone TJ07 though, but it is not available locally, and shipping would be a killer from anywhere else.

            xacc.ide
            IronScheme - 1.0 RC 1 - out now!
            ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x))) The Scheme Programming Language – Fourth Edition

            D Offline
            D Offline
            Dan Neely
            wrote on last edited by
            #29

            leppie wrote:

            That case is a monster

            My current case[^] is a monster as well. Unfortunately its becoming a victim of the ever growing GPU length. It's only 12" front to back; after subtracting the thickness of the front panel and the fans it only just has room for a 10.5" card. ATI's 5890 card won't fit, and the more common 10.5" cards are very difficult to install. Actaully it's one of the smaller mountain mod cube cases. The extended version is bigger front to back, while the Asecendency is taller. OTOH MM sells a 12" tall expansion box to install underneath their cases if you find yourself needing more space. :omg: If I ever decide to watercool my GPUs that would give me the space to do so without needing a new case for the extra rads. OTOH the pedestal box costs as much as a normal premium case. :doh: My only disappointment is that they don't have any back panel options that would let me have a horizontal mobo (better heat dissipation with 2 aircooled cards) with exhaust fans placed above the GPUs.

            leppie wrote:

            I also feel a 2x120 rad is just a little too small for an i7. At least I can make space to add another 2x120.

            I thought I did as well; but because my rad extends slightly beyond the edge of the fans I'd need to make new screw holes at a minimum to install it. The only rad that will fit double in the case is thermaltake's; and their watercooling products have a poor reputation both for leak resistance and performance.

            3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Dan Neely

              leppie wrote:

              That case is a monster

              My current case[^] is a monster as well. Unfortunately its becoming a victim of the ever growing GPU length. It's only 12" front to back; after subtracting the thickness of the front panel and the fans it only just has room for a 10.5" card. ATI's 5890 card won't fit, and the more common 10.5" cards are very difficult to install. Actaully it's one of the smaller mountain mod cube cases. The extended version is bigger front to back, while the Asecendency is taller. OTOH MM sells a 12" tall expansion box to install underneath their cases if you find yourself needing more space. :omg: If I ever decide to watercool my GPUs that would give me the space to do so without needing a new case for the extra rads. OTOH the pedestal box costs as much as a normal premium case. :doh: My only disappointment is that they don't have any back panel options that would let me have a horizontal mobo (better heat dissipation with 2 aircooled cards) with exhaust fans placed above the GPUs.

              leppie wrote:

              I also feel a 2x120 rad is just a little too small for an i7. At least I can make space to add another 2x120.

              I thought I did as well; but because my rad extends slightly beyond the edge of the fans I'd need to make new screw holes at a minimum to install it. The only rad that will fit double in the case is thermaltake's; and their watercooling products have a poor reputation both for leak resistance and performance.

              3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

              L Offline
              L Offline
              leppie
              wrote on last edited by
              #30

              Dan Neely wrote:

              My current case[^] is a monster as well.

              That is an interesting case :)

              xacc.ide
              IronScheme - 1.0 RC 1 - out now!
              ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x))) The Scheme Programming Language – Fourth Edition

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Jim Crafton

                Has anyone had any problems with running a job for more than an hour that pushes most of the CPU cores to 100% usage? I'm planning on making some animation, and with each frame taking about 5-7 minutes each, a single second of animation is going to come in around 2 hours 20 minutes or worse. For a 10 to 20 second clip that could easily cause the CPU to run at 100% for almost 12 hours or more. I've never had anything run that long on any system I've owned and I'm not sure if it's going to overheat the box, or if it's hard on the CPU to run that long. Anyone have any experience with this on a desktop system (for the record it's an 8 core MacPro)?

                ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow

                E Offline
                E Offline
                englebart
                wrote on last edited by
                #31

                Sounds like a perfect fit for the Amazon EC2. If you have a couple of dollars to spend you could render all of your frames across a large farm pretty cheap. http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/#pricing[^]

                J 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • E englebart

                  Sounds like a perfect fit for the Amazon EC2. If you have a couple of dollars to spend you could render all of your frames across a large farm pretty cheap. http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/#pricing[^]

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jim Crafton
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #32

                  Actually Houdini has a service for this (on Amazon EC2) which I'm hoping to use. However if I can't get that to work (which I can't at the moment), then I'll have to render the frames at home.

                  ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow

                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L leppie

                    Dan Neely wrote:

                    My current case[^] is a monster as well.

                    That is an interesting case :)

                    xacc.ide
                    IronScheme - 1.0 RC 1 - out now!
                    ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x))) The Scheme Programming Language – Fourth Edition

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    Dan Neely
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #33

                    Yeah, interesting if some of the ideas were a bit silly. I'd be shocked if 5% of the buyers bought any of the accesories intended for the 2nd PC. I ended up using the miniItx are to mount my pump and res. It's got a few spots where the otherwise excellent cable management (route everything behind the mobo and just pop it up at the appropriate edge hole) flopped as well. The front panel USB, etc are attached to the removable front panel, not the chassis. IF you slop the cables loosely through the HDD cage this isn't an issue; if you take advantage of the fact that there is *barely* enough space between the drive cages to route the cables it becomes a major PITA. An extra 1/4" of width would have done wonders there. That was rather frustrating considering how polished everything else was; right down to the tapped holes in the floor of the case and back of the mobo case to facilitate screwing down misc parts. :sigh:

                    3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D Dan Neely

                      Yeah, interesting if some of the ideas were a bit silly. I'd be shocked if 5% of the buyers bought any of the accesories intended for the 2nd PC. I ended up using the miniItx are to mount my pump and res. It's got a few spots where the otherwise excellent cable management (route everything behind the mobo and just pop it up at the appropriate edge hole) flopped as well. The front panel USB, etc are attached to the removable front panel, not the chassis. IF you slop the cables loosely through the HDD cage this isn't an issue; if you take advantage of the fact that there is *barely* enough space between the drive cages to route the cables it becomes a major PITA. An extra 1/4" of width would have done wonders there. That was rather frustrating considering how polished everything else was; right down to the tapped holes in the floor of the case and back of the mobo case to facilitate screwing down misc parts. :sigh:

                      3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      leppie
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #34

                      Pretty much sums up what you should expect from hardware. Never more than 80% of what you hope for. :) Like my silly case's top fan mounting holes. Nice, but dont work on a radiator, had to drill more holes. Also, the top space is just to small. Even an extra 10mm would have made a world of difference... I had to mutilate that one fan 'touching' the CPU power connector. Lucky, I had 1mm clearance on the RAM levers.

                      xacc.ide
                      IronScheme - 1.0 RC 1 - out now!
                      ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x))) The Scheme Programming Language – Fourth Edition

                      D 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L leppie

                        Pretty much sums up what you should expect from hardware. Never more than 80% of what you hope for. :) Like my silly case's top fan mounting holes. Nice, but dont work on a radiator, had to drill more holes. Also, the top space is just to small. Even an extra 10mm would have made a world of difference... I had to mutilate that one fan 'touching' the CPU power connector. Lucky, I had 1mm clearance on the RAM levers.

                        xacc.ide
                        IronScheme - 1.0 RC 1 - out now!
                        ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x))) The Scheme Programming Language – Fourth Edition

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        Dan Neely
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #35

                        They might have been sized for some other vendors rad. Mountain mods offers 2 different spacings 15 or 25mm for its fan cutouts to support different vendors rads.

                        3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Jim Crafton

                          Actually Houdini has a service for this (on Amazon EC2) which I'm hoping to use. However if I can't get that to work (which I can't at the moment), then I'll have to render the frames at home.

                          ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Dan Neely
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #36

                          How many servers does it split the load over concurrently? Since amazon's using commodity servers you'd probably need at least a dozen to match your systems raw throughput. For that matter how expensive will rendering that way turn out to be; when you're potentially buying over a server-day per render the costs could add up fast.

                          3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                          J 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D Dan Neely

                            They might have been sized for some other vendors rad. Mountain mods offers 2 different spacings 15 or 25mm for its fan cutouts to support different vendors rads.

                            3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            leppie
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #37

                            Mine was off by about 4mm :(

                            xacc.ide
                            IronScheme - 1.0 RC 1 - out now!
                            ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x))) The Scheme Programming Language – Fourth Edition

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Dan Neely

                              How many servers does it split the load over concurrently? Since amazon's using commodity servers you'd probably need at least a dozen to match your systems raw throughput. For that matter how expensive will rendering that way turn out to be; when you're potentially buying over a server-day per render the costs could add up fast.

                              3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                              J Offline
                              J Offline
                              Jim Crafton
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #38

                              I don't recall. I'm trying to set up a small test to see how well it works. Even if I could offload small parts of the whole, it would be really helpful. If I get it to work I'll definitely post something here about it.

                              ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups