"Bad"
-
http://www.codeproject.com/Tips/75299/Using-Extension-Methods-To-Avoid-XML-Problems.aspx?msg=3452549#xx3452549xx[^] I've already reported the user it bugs/suggestions.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
http://www.codeproject.com/Tips/75299/Using-Extension-Methods-To-Avoid-XML-Problems.aspx?msg=3452549#xx3452549xx[^] I've already reported the user it bugs/suggestions.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001Oh, JSOP, posting so we'll 1-vote for you again؟
There really needs to be a punctuation mark for a rhetorical question. :rolleyes:
EDIT: There IS a punctuation mark for rhetorical questions. Who knew؟
modified on Monday, April 26, 2010 5:59 PM
-
http://www.codeproject.com/Tips/75299/Using-Extension-Methods-To-Avoid-XML-Problems.aspx?msg=3452549#xx3452549xx[^] I've already reported the user it bugs/suggestions.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
http://www.codeproject.com/Tips/75299/Using-Extension-Methods-To-Avoid-XML-Problems.aspx?msg=3452549#xx3452549xx[^] I've already reported the user it bugs/suggestions.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 20015. The reasons are many: 0) You posted a programming link in the lounge => should be posted in the Links forum 1) The subject => "Bad" is not KSS(I have no ideea what that means but... trust me it's not) 2)
John Simmons / outlaw programmer's signauture says:
45. ACP - because shooting
You should post that in the Shoouting Forum. 3)
John Simmons / outlaw programmer's signauture says:
kerosene
John Simmons / outlaw programmer's signauture says:
obscenity
These last two should go to the NATO forum Peace :)
-
Take a look at the voting on his/her article, I guess it's the only way to hit back at the community.
It's time for a new signature.
That's one of the first things I did. I thought, "maybe I voted one of his articles a 1 and he's lashing out". That wasn't the case, and his own overall voting history is rife with 1 votes. In any case, the message was removed along with the associated vote, and I've put away my .45 (although I don't know how I would have gotten it on the plane, much less, into Jordan itself.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
http://www.codeproject.com/Tips/75299/Using-Extension-Methods-To-Avoid-XML-Problems.aspx?msg=3452549#xx3452549xx[^] I've already reported the user it bugs/suggestions.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
I couldn't see the video because it's "blocked in my country on copyright grounds".
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
I couldn't see the video because it's "blocked in my country on copyright grounds".
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001FFS. When "Bad" by Michael Jackson can't be viewed in the US via a US website you know Cthulhu is at work. -10 to sanity. I'll see you at the asylum.
-
http://www.codeproject.com/Tips/75299/Using-Extension-Methods-To-Avoid-XML-Problems.aspx?msg=3452549#xx3452549xx[^] I've already reported the user it bugs/suggestions.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001If you look at his CV[^] you will notice that, just below where it says "Personal Information's", and just above where he has written "My hoppy are reading, investigating, searching and team leading." you will find that he has graded himself as English Language: Reading, Writing, Speaking, Listening - All Excellent. So, having contradicted himself on the first few pages of his own CV, it is clear to me that his opinion, given for anything ever, is nullified by his obvious lack of intelligence, and his overwhelming idiocy. LB
-
Oh, JSOP, posting so we'll 1-vote for you again؟
There really needs to be a punctuation mark for a rhetorical question. :rolleyes:
EDIT: There IS a punctuation mark for rhetorical questions. Who knew؟
modified on Monday, April 26, 2010 5:59 PM
aspdotnetdev wrote:
EDIT: There IS a punctuation mark for rhetorical questions. Who knew
I did, but I wasn't telling. ;P
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!