Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Windows 7 search - you gotta be kidding me

Windows 7 search - you gotta be kidding me

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comregextutorialquestioncareer
52 Posts 28 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Christopher Duncan

    Nope. No results at all with the quotes.

    Christopher Duncan
    www.PracticalUSA.com
    Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
    Copywriting Services

    M Offline
    M Offline
    martin_hughes
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    Weird. Worked for me. Actually, it doesn't bloody work for me at all. That's having interpreted what you wrote and what you actually meant, of course.

    Books written by CP members

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Michel Godfroid

      Is your location indexed?

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Christopher Duncan
      wrote on last edited by
      #18

      Nope. Haven't cared for the overhead of the indexers in the past so I tend to avoid them. Of course, there's always the old standby: cmd. :)

      Christopher Duncan
      www.PracticalUSA.com
      Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
      Copywriting Services

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M martin_hughes

        Weird. Worked for me. Actually, it doesn't bloody work for me at all. That's having interpreted what you wrote and what you actually meant, of course.

        Books written by CP members

        C Offline
        C Offline
        Christopher Duncan
        wrote on last edited by
        #19

        Apparently it needs to be indexed. Leave it to MS to require jumping through a hoop that's been set on fire in order to do something as common as searching for files.

        Christopher Duncan
        www.PracticalUSA.com
        Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
        Copywriting Services

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Christian Graus

          Search was fundamentally broken in Vista. I guess they are incrementally fixing it, if it at least does SOMETHING again. In XP, I had some desktop search thing install with instant update. It breaks search, I have to go past it to the old one to search my HDD.

          Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Christopher Duncan
          wrote on last edited by
          #20

          Morons. Must... resist... trip... to... Mac... store... :)

          Christopher Duncan
          www.PracticalUSA.com
          Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
          Copywriting Services

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Christopher Duncan

            I'm a dinosaur. I admit it. I have large green scales and sharp teeth perfect for gnawing on anything that looks tasty. All of which is to say that like many others here, my initial MS experiences were with DOS. And I'm strangely at peace with that. Since olden times, the DOS based search parameters have been honored. Whether I type in a search box from Explorer in Windows or from the command line prompt, * is the wildcard for everything, ? is the wildcard for one character. And thus, *.ascx* will give you *.ascx, *.ascx.cs, *.ascx.designer.cs since the last * means "and everything else after this." Imagine my surprise when I do that search in Windows 7 and it gives me simply *.ascx. If I search for *.ascx.*, I get *.ascx.cs and *.ascx.designer.cs, but no .ascx files since they don't have the . at the end. Exclaiming WTF with some enthusiasm, I went to a command prompt where, sure enough, *.ascx* works just like it always did. Clearly, there's a moron at work here. Either I'm simply too stupid to understand how to use Search in the Explorer, or some rocket scientist at MS thought it would be good to have pattern matching work differently in the GUI than it does on the command line (and all previous versions of Windows). And so, I put it to the masses here (washed and otherwise) who know well my knack for personal stupidity: am I simply not smart enough to properly use search, or is MS as brain dead as I'm thinking to break something so fundamental to an OS as the ability to search for files? After all, given how long it took to do file copies in Vista, it's not like this kind of thing is unprecedented. Grrr. That's it. I'm gonna go find a lesser mammal and gnaw on it...

            Christopher Duncan
            www.PracticalUSA.com
            Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
            Copywriting Services

            N Offline
            N Offline
            Nemanja Trifunovic
            wrote on last edited by
            #21

            Have you tried leaving the star out, i.e.:

            .ascx

            utf8-cpp

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Christopher Duncan

              Not to appear dense (though that may be unavoidable), but I'm not seeing a solution in the FM.

              Christopher Duncan
              www.PracticalUSA.com
              Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
              Copywriting Services

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Michel Godfroid
              wrote on last edited by
              #22

              May I have misguided you a bit :-O (didn't read the FM myself). Syntax would be for example for finding all files with the (old dos syntax) *.bat* -> filename:*.bat* By the same token filename:???.bat will find all three-letter batch files. Quotes are not really needed, except when keywords would appear in the search string. I used to use name:, but filename: does not give me extraneous results. Works fine on my system!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Christopher Duncan

                That looks handy, though I'm philosophically opposed to installing a utility just so I can search the file system. I may get over that objection, but geez! And they wonder why everyone hated Vista, or anything that smelled like it!

                Christopher Duncan
                www.PracticalUSA.com
                Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
                Copywriting Services

                H Offline
                H Offline
                Hans Dietrich
                wrote on last edited by
                #23

                Once you dump Windows Explorer, the rest is easy.

                Best wishes, Hans


                [Hans Dietrich Software]

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Christopher Duncan

                  Not to appear dense (though that may be unavoidable), but I'm not seeing a solution in the FM.

                  Christopher Duncan
                  www.PracticalUSA.com
                  Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
                  Copywriting Services

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Douglas Troy
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #24

                  Obviously, you failed to enter the query properly. You need to use the new Microsoft Search dialect, that has been greatly improved, with more features and power through its simplified search syntax. So all you had to type was ... Kind:Any Subject:Any Contains:Everything Author:Christopher Duncan || Lord Vader Date:> Today - Yesterday + Tomorrow * 356 - 12 + 1 Folders: All I mean really. Get with the program. ;P


                  :..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
                  Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL

                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C Christopher Duncan

                    Not to appear dense (though that may be unavoidable), but I'm not seeing a solution in the FM.

                    Christopher Duncan
                    www.PracticalUSA.com
                    Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
                    Copywriting Services

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Luc Pattyn
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #25

                    did you use appropriate technology to search the FM? e.g. did you index it? :)

                    Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]


                    I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.


                    I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).


                    M C 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • D Douglas Troy

                      Obviously, you failed to enter the query properly. You need to use the new Microsoft Search dialect, that has been greatly improved, with more features and power through its simplified search syntax. So all you had to type was ... Kind:Any Subject:Any Contains:Everything Author:Christopher Duncan || Lord Vader Date:> Today - Yesterday + Tomorrow * 356 - 12 + 1 Folders: All I mean really. Get with the program. ;P


                      :..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
                      Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Christopher Duncan
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #26

                      :laugh: I've got blisters on my fingers!

                      Christopher Duncan
                      www.PracticalUSA.com
                      Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
                      Copywriting Services

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Luc Pattyn

                        did you use appropriate technology to search the FM? e.g. did you index it? :)

                        Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]


                        I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.


                        I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).


                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Michel Godfroid
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #27

                        A whole effing sparse B-Tree ;P

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C Christopher Duncan

                          Morons. Must... resist... trip... to... Mac... store... :)

                          Christopher Duncan
                          www.PracticalUSA.com
                          Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
                          Copywriting Services

                          C Offline
                          C Offline
                          Christian Graus
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #28

                          Loving my new iPad right now...

                          Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

                          C T G G 4 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • C Christian Graus

                            Loving my new iPad right now...

                            Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            Christopher Duncan
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #29

                            Normally I'd make some kind of snarky remark about you being a bunny hugger, but all things considered... :)

                            Christopher Duncan
                            www.PracticalUSA.com
                            Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
                            Copywriting Services

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Luc Pattyn

                              did you use appropriate technology to search the FM? e.g. did you index it? :)

                              Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]


                              I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.


                              I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).


                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              Christopher Duncan
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #30

                              I was thinking of borrowing Christian's iPad. Maybe that's a technology that would work. :)

                              Christopher Duncan
                              www.PracticalUSA.com
                              Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
                              Copywriting Services

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C Christian Graus

                                Loving my new iPad right now...

                                Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

                                T Offline
                                T Offline
                                Tom Delany
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #31

                                Christian Graus wrote:

                                Loving my new iPad right now...

                                Seriously, what is your take on that? It seemed to me like a glorified iPod Touch. I know the screen is a lot larger, but what other advantages are there? It seemed like it does a lot less than some Netbooks from some of the things that have read about it. I am not bashing you or it; I am seriously interested in why you like it... Peace :rose:

                                WE ARE DYSLEXIC OF BORG. Refutance is systile. Your a$$ will be laminated. There are 10 kinds of people in the world: People who know binary and people who don't.

                                L C 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • C Christian Graus

                                  Loving my new iPad right now...

                                  Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

                                  G Offline
                                  G Offline
                                  Garth J Lancaster
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #32

                                  hey - how did you get an iPad ? I didnt think they were avail in Aus yet (let alone the quiet backwaters of Hobart !) .. let me guess - had a recent trip to the states ? (If I had known that I would have asked you to get me one) [edit] just read your post below this ... ahhh - you're still there ! [/edit] 'g'

                                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • T Tom Delany

                                    Christian Graus wrote:

                                    Loving my new iPad right now...

                                    Seriously, what is your take on that? It seemed to me like a glorified iPod Touch. I know the screen is a lot larger, but what other advantages are there? It seemed like it does a lot less than some Netbooks from some of the things that have read about it. I am not bashing you or it; I am seriously interested in why you like it... Peace :rose:

                                    WE ARE DYSLEXIC OF BORG. Refutance is systile. Your a$$ will be laminated. There are 10 kinds of people in the world: People who know binary and people who don't.

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    Lost User
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #33

                                    Tom Delany wrote:

                                    It seemed like it does a lot less than some Netbooks from some of the things that have read about it.

                                    It's not a notebook replacement. Once people get past that, they can start to see the good things it can do. Cheers, Drew.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • G Garth J Lancaster

                                      hey - how did you get an iPad ? I didnt think they were avail in Aus yet (let alone the quiet backwaters of Hobart !) .. let me guess - had a recent trip to the states ? (If I had known that I would have asked you to get me one) [edit] just read your post below this ... ahhh - you're still there ! [/edit] 'g'

                                      L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      Luc Pattyn
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #34

                                      it was flown in by the QANTAS CEO himself, CG and he are buddies now. Happened shortly after the Telstra reconciliation. :)

                                      Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]


                                      I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.


                                      I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).


                                      modified on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 7:38 PM

                                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C Christopher Duncan

                                        I'm a dinosaur. I admit it. I have large green scales and sharp teeth perfect for gnawing on anything that looks tasty. All of which is to say that like many others here, my initial MS experiences were with DOS. And I'm strangely at peace with that. Since olden times, the DOS based search parameters have been honored. Whether I type in a search box from Explorer in Windows or from the command line prompt, * is the wildcard for everything, ? is the wildcard for one character. And thus, *.ascx* will give you *.ascx, *.ascx.cs, *.ascx.designer.cs since the last * means "and everything else after this." Imagine my surprise when I do that search in Windows 7 and it gives me simply *.ascx. If I search for *.ascx.*, I get *.ascx.cs and *.ascx.designer.cs, but no .ascx files since they don't have the . at the end. Exclaiming WTF with some enthusiasm, I went to a command prompt where, sure enough, *.ascx* works just like it always did. Clearly, there's a moron at work here. Either I'm simply too stupid to understand how to use Search in the Explorer, or some rocket scientist at MS thought it would be good to have pattern matching work differently in the GUI than it does on the command line (and all previous versions of Windows). And so, I put it to the masses here (washed and otherwise) who know well my knack for personal stupidity: am I simply not smart enough to properly use search, or is MS as brain dead as I'm thinking to break something so fundamental to an OS as the ability to search for files? After all, given how long it took to do file copies in Vista, it's not like this kind of thing is unprecedented. Grrr. That's it. I'm gonna go find a lesser mammal and gnaw on it...

                                        Christopher Duncan
                                        www.PracticalUSA.com
                                        Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
                                        Copywriting Services

                                        G Offline
                                        G Offline
                                        Glenn Dawson
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #35

                                        Try *.ascx*.*

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L Luc Pattyn

                                          it was flown in by the QANTAS CEO himself, CG and he are buddies now. Happened shortly after the Telstra reconciliation. :)

                                          Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]


                                          I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.


                                          I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).


                                          modified on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 7:38 PM

                                          G Offline
                                          G Offline
                                          Garth J Lancaster
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #36

                                          :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups