Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. Site Bugs / Suggestions
  4. Filter preference

Filter preference

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Site Bugs / Suggestions
csharpc++cssalgorithms
5 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anthony Mushrow
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    If your searching for an article and you filter your results with C++ for example, when you next visit Quick Answers that is the filter that will be set. Slightly less inconveniently (for me at least) when you look at the latest articles the same filter will be set. If the filter is going to persist then why is it set when I do a quick search for an article, rather than some setting from my profile? I didn't think many questions had been posted in QA today, but it turns out that the filter was set to VB.NET because I went to check an article for somebody earlier on. It's not so bad that the filter persists when I set from QA itself, but I wouldn't expect my searching for articles to affect it.

    My current favourite quote is: Punch them in the face, see what happens!

    -SK Genius

    T 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Anthony Mushrow

      If your searching for an article and you filter your results with C++ for example, when you next visit Quick Answers that is the filter that will be set. Slightly less inconveniently (for me at least) when you look at the latest articles the same filter will be set. If the filter is going to persist then why is it set when I do a quick search for an article, rather than some setting from my profile? I didn't think many questions had been posted in QA today, but it turns out that the filter was set to VB.NET because I went to check an article for somebody earlier on. It's not so bad that the filter persists when I set from QA itself, but I wouldn't expect my searching for articles to affect it.

      My current favourite quote is: Punch them in the face, see what happens!

      -SK Genius

      T Offline
      T Offline
      Thiru Thirunavukarasu
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      This has been brought up quite a few times. We have a task (but not one of our higher priorities ATM) to rework this so that filters are not automatically saved. You can still save but it will be an explicit option on the relevant page and in your member profile.

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T Thiru Thirunavukarasu

        This has been brought up quite a few times. We have a task (but not one of our higher priorities ATM) to rework this so that filters are not automatically saved. You can still save but it will be an explicit option on the relevant page and in your member profile.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Luc Pattyn
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        sounds good. I have three additional suggestions: 1. when some filters are in effect, always show them. Do not hide them behind a "show advanced search" widget. Whatever choice is not visible should not be in effect. Case in point is the "Search Message Boards" page. 2. the default values for dates (from and to) are fixed to "stone age" and "today". I seldom search old stuff, most of the time I'm searching for a message I know is less than 1 week old, and then I must adjust the from date: select this year from the combobox, select this month from another combobox, then click some day. Please simplify its use. My preference would be: adding another combobox with the choices: - last week (i.e. no older than 7 days) - last month - last year - between from and to And then the choice should be persisted (and probably visible on the settings page if other search settings are also made available there). 3. You offer a choice between posts, replies, posts and replies; which is good. I would also like a checkbox saying "subject line only" :)

        Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]


        I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.


        I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).


        T 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Luc Pattyn

          sounds good. I have three additional suggestions: 1. when some filters are in effect, always show them. Do not hide them behind a "show advanced search" widget. Whatever choice is not visible should not be in effect. Case in point is the "Search Message Boards" page. 2. the default values for dates (from and to) are fixed to "stone age" and "today". I seldom search old stuff, most of the time I'm searching for a message I know is less than 1 week old, and then I must adjust the from date: select this year from the combobox, select this month from another combobox, then click some day. Please simplify its use. My preference would be: adding another combobox with the choices: - last week (i.e. no older than 7 days) - last month - last year - between from and to And then the choice should be persisted (and probably visible on the settings page if other search settings are also made available there). 3. You offer a choice between posts, replies, posts and replies; which is good. I would also like a checkbox saying "subject line only" :)

          Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]


          I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.


          I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).


          T Offline
          T Offline
          Thiru Thirunavukarasu
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          1. Agree 2. I think that sounds good. This would be another task with a lower priority however. 3. I'll suggest this to the team. Thanks for the comments.

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T Thiru Thirunavukarasu

            1. Agree 2. I think that sounds good. This would be another task with a lower priority however. 3. I'll suggest this to the team. Thanks for the comments.

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Luc Pattyn
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            :thumbsup:

            Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]


            I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.


            I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).


            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups