Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Is it just me...

Is it just me...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
javavisual-studiocomquestion
43 Posts 20 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Chris Losinger

    is this your first day in the Lounge ?

    image processing toolkits | batch image processing

    X Offline
    X Offline
    Xmen Real
    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    I think that was a joke

    TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L %^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2 W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN% R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-i’TV.C\y<pŠjxsg-b$f4ia>

    ----------------------------------------------- 128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C Chris Losinger

      or does the VS2010 IDE look and feel like some crappy Java IDE from 1996 ?

      image processing toolkits | batch image processing

      A Offline
      A Offline
      Anna Jayne Metcalfe
      wrote on last edited by
      #33

      Yep. We're skipping this one for that and other reasons.

      Anna :rose: Tech Blog | Visual Lint "Why would anyone prefer to wield a weapon that takes both hands at once, when they could use a lighter (and obviously superior) weapon that allows you to wield multiple ones at a time, and thus supports multi-paradigm carnage?"

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Chris Losinger

        or does the VS2010 IDE look and feel like some crappy Java IDE from 1996 ?

        image processing toolkits | batch image processing

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Rocky Moore
        wrote on last edited by
        #34

        The editor now has adjustable scale.. Tired eyes, 150% view... WONDERFUL!

        Rocky <>< Recent Blog Post: The Arrogant Apple!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Chris Losinger

          Luc Pattyn wrote:

          VS2010 is way better than every Java IDE I've ever used including Eclipse

          i closed a solution (the first solution i ever opened), and the entire IDE went white, except for a non-functioning ghost view of the search/replace dialog - a dialog which had suddenly docked itself to the right side of the IDE. not. ready. for. release.

          image processing toolkits | batch image processing

          T Offline
          T Offline
          TheGreatAndPowerfulOz
          wrote on last edited by
          #35

          When I read your name, I first read it as Chris Loslinger. Which caused me to do a double-take. It must be that sunburn I got yesterday. But, perhaps that was your mental energy projecting your self-image through the internet.

          Fight Big Government:
          http://obamacareclassaction.com/
          http://obamacaretruth.org/

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Chris Losinger

            nope, this is the first time i've installed it. it's a clean install of the "trial" version that i downloaded Wednesday. here's some fun. i'm building a library. it's all C/C++, no MFC or ATL. some STL. so, same source code, same build options, 5 different VC++ versions. this is a static lib, linking against the debug multi-threaded CRT. watch the library size grow! VC6: 8,400K VS03: 19,000K VS05: 33,000K VS08: 36,000K VS10: 60,000K again, same source, same options. as if the 4x bloat from VC6 to VS08 wasn't bad enough, the nearly 8x bloat to VS10 is absurd. and why ? well, it probably has something to do with the fact that you can no longer omit debugging info from a library ! (Properties, C/C++, General, Debug Info Format). another fine choice, MS. as was getting rid of the MDI interface!

            image processing toolkits | batch image processing

            E Offline
            E Offline
            Erik Funkenbusch
            wrote on last edited by
            #36

            Uhh.. so what? It's debug. They've added more debug code most likely. And, as you say, you can't strip debug info.. Why do you want to build a debug build but not have any debugging info? Seems odd to me. Now, what are the release build sizes? THAT would be important.

            -- Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket?

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Chris Losinger

              or does the VS2010 IDE look and feel like some crappy Java IDE from 1996 ?

              image processing toolkits | batch image processing

              E Offline
              E Offline
              Erik Funkenbusch
              wrote on last edited by
              #37

              It's probably not just you, but it's certainly not me. It seems some people just hate change. Whenever anything changes, all they can do is complain about it. They hate the ribbon, they hate the new Windows 7 toolbar. They hate the new XP Start Menu. These people configure their systems to look as much like Windows 2000 (or even 9x) as possible. If you work in technology, you have got to be prepared for change. That's what it does. All the time. You can't expect that things will stay the same, and more importantly, you have to learn to embrace it. Every change may not be to our liking, but you're going to be flattened by the steamroller of time if you don't learn to roll with it.

              -- Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket?

              C 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E Erik Funkenbusch

                Uhh.. so what? It's debug. They've added more debug code most likely. And, as you say, you can't strip debug info.. Why do you want to build a debug build but not have any debugging info? Seems odd to me. Now, what are the release build sizes? THAT would be important.

                -- Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket?

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Chris Losinger
                wrote on last edited by
                #38

                Erik Funkenbusch wrote:

                . And, as you say, you can't strip debug info..

                in every version of Visual Studio / Visual C++ before 2010, you could.

                Erik Funkenbusch wrote:

                Why do you want to build a debug build but not have any debugging info? Seems odd to me.

                some of our products are delivered as static libraries, and you can't link an app which uses the debug CRT to a static lib that uses the release CRT.

                Erik Funkenbusch wrote:

                Now, what are the release build sizes?

                VC6 : 11,000K VS03 : 19,000K VS05 : 23,000K VS08 : 25,000K VS10 : 39,600K

                image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • E Erik Funkenbusch

                  It's probably not just you, but it's certainly not me. It seems some people just hate change. Whenever anything changes, all they can do is complain about it. They hate the ribbon, they hate the new Windows 7 toolbar. They hate the new XP Start Menu. These people configure their systems to look as much like Windows 2000 (or even 9x) as possible. If you work in technology, you have got to be prepared for change. That's what it does. All the time. You can't expect that things will stay the same, and more importantly, you have to learn to embrace it. Every change may not be to our liking, but you're going to be flattened by the steamroller of time if you don't learn to roll with it.

                  -- Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket?

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Chris Losinger
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #39

                  i don't hate change. but i do dislike changes which reduce functionality.

                  image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                  E 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C Chris Losinger

                    i don't hate change. but i do dislike changes which reduce functionality.

                    image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                    E Offline
                    E Offline
                    Erik Funkenbusch
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #40

                    What functionality is reduced in 2010?

                    -- Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket?

                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • E Erik Funkenbusch

                      What functionality is reduced in 2010?

                      -- Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket?

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Chris Losinger
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #41

                      can't disable the inclusion of debug info from a build. doesn't do a proper MDI interface.

                      image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                      E 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C Chris Losinger

                        can't disable the inclusion of debug info from a build. doesn't do a proper MDI interface.

                        image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                        E Offline
                        E Offline
                        Erik Funkenbusch
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #42

                        Ok, but the first is the compiler tools, not the IDE. The second is the change to support multiple monitors. You lose some while gaining the other.

                        -- Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket?

                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E Erik Funkenbusch

                          Ok, but the first is the compiler tools, not the IDE. The second is the change to support multiple monitors. You lose some while gaining the other.

                          -- Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket?

                          C Offline
                          C Offline
                          Chris Losinger
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #43

                          whatever the reason: lost functionality

                          image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups