Web Service Method Call Fails
-
Visible? I have a
ClientAccessPolicy.xmlfile in my web services's folder:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<access-policy>
<cross-domain-access>
<policy>
<allow-from http-request-headers="*">
<domain uri ="*" />
</allow-from>
<grant-to>
<resource path="/" include-subpaths="true"/>
</grant-to>
</policy>
</cross-domain-access>
</access-policy>I also have a
CrossDomain.xml, but I'm not really sure where to put it, so I have it in a few places.<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<cross-domain-policy>
<allow-http-request-headers-from domain="*" headers="*"/>
<strong>
<allow-http-request-headers-from domain="*" headers="SOAPAction" />
</strong>
<allow-https-request-headers-from domain="*" headers="*"/>
<strong>
<allow-https-request-headers-from domain="*" headers="SOAPAction" />
</strong>
</cross-domain-policy>Where *should* I put it?
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
Visible? I have a
ClientAccessPolicy.xmlfile in my web services's folder:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<access-policy>
<cross-domain-access>
<policy>
<allow-from http-request-headers="*">
<domain uri ="*" />
</allow-from>
<grant-to>
<resource path="/" include-subpaths="true"/>
</grant-to>
</policy>
</cross-domain-access>
</access-policy>I also have a
CrossDomain.xml, but I'm not really sure where to put it, so I have it in a few places.<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<cross-domain-policy>
<allow-http-request-headers-from domain="*" headers="*"/>
<strong>
<allow-http-request-headers-from domain="*" headers="SOAPAction" />
</strong>
<allow-https-request-headers-from domain="*" headers="*"/>
<strong>
<allow-https-request-headers-from domain="*" headers="SOAPAction" />
</strong>
</cross-domain-policy>Where *should* I put it?
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001You only need the ClientAccessPolicy.xml file. I notice from the exception that you are using https - in the allow-from section, you need to add
<domain uri=”http://*” />
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
-
You only need the ClientAccessPolicy.xml file. I notice from the exception that you are using https - in the allow-from section, you need to add
<domain uri=”http://*” />
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
doesn't this accomplish the same thing: <domain uri=”*” />
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
doesn't this accomplish the same thing: <domain uri=”*” />
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001No.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
-
No.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
Ok then, but wouldn't it be more correct to do this?
<access-policy>
<cross-domain-access>
<policy>
<allow-from http-request-headers="*">
<domain uri ="http://*" />
</allow-from>
<grant-to>
<resource path="/" include-subpaths="true"/>
</grant-to>
</policy><policy> <allow-from https-request-headers="\*"> <domain uri ="https://\*" /> </allow-from> <grant-to> <resource path="/secure" include-subpaths="true"/> </grant-to> </policy> </cross-domain-access></access-policy>
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
Ok then, but wouldn't it be more correct to do this?
<access-policy>
<cross-domain-access>
<policy>
<allow-from http-request-headers="*">
<domain uri ="http://*" />
</allow-from>
<grant-to>
<resource path="/" include-subpaths="true"/>
</grant-to>
</policy><policy> <allow-from https-request-headers="\*"> <domain uri ="https://\*" /> </allow-from> <grant-to> <resource path="/secure" include-subpaths="true"/> </grant-to> </policy> </cross-domain-access></access-policy>
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001If this is the way your site is set up, then yes. Alternatively, you could put both the https://* and http://* in the first allow-from if you don't have to worry about the secure path. The reason you have to add the https://* is because SL requires that you explicitly opt-in to secure services.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
-
If this is the way your site is set up, then yes. Alternatively, you could put both the https://* and http://* in the first allow-from if you don't have to worry about the secure path. The reason you have to add the https://* is because SL requires that you explicitly opt-in to secure services.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
Well, I went ahead and made that change, and it still gives me the same exception. :/
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
Visible? I have a
ClientAccessPolicy.xmlfile in my web services's folder:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<access-policy>
<cross-domain-access>
<policy>
<allow-from http-request-headers="*">
<domain uri ="*" />
</allow-from>
<grant-to>
<resource path="/" include-subpaths="true"/>
</grant-to>
</policy>
</cross-domain-access>
</access-policy>I also have a
CrossDomain.xml, but I'm not really sure where to put it, so I have it in a few places.<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<cross-domain-policy>
<allow-http-request-headers-from domain="*" headers="*"/>
<strong>
<allow-http-request-headers-from domain="*" headers="SOAPAction" />
</strong>
<allow-https-request-headers-from domain="*" headers="*"/>
<strong>
<allow-https-request-headers-from domain="*" headers="SOAPAction" />
</strong>
</cross-domain-policy>Where *should* I put it?
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001I thought the crossdomain xml files had to be at the root of the site?
-
I thought the crossdomain xml files had to be at the root of the site?
I had it there, and in the silverlight app's folder (just in case). It didn't seem to make a difference.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
Well, I went ahead and made that change, and it still gives me the same exception. :/
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001I'd offer to test it for you but I'm running SL4 now.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
-
I'd offer to test it for you but I'm running SL4 now.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
I saw a comment on the web that stated moving to SL4 fixes this problem. I don't have that option. I'm going to try putting the SL app on the same server as the service and seeing if that will fix it. EDIT ======== Nope. In fact in some ways, it made it worse...
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001modified on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 2:59 PM
-
I saw a comment on the web that stated moving to SL4 fixes this problem. I don't have that option. I'm going to try putting the SL app on the same server as the service and seeing if that will fix it. EDIT ======== Nope. In fact in some ways, it made it worse...
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001modified on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 2:59 PM
What happens if you drop it out of https into http?
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
-
What happens if you drop it out of https into http?
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
I can't. It all has to stay https (DoD network).
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
I can't. It all has to stay https (DoD network).
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001Even for testing? Is there not an internal test rig that could be used for this?
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
-
Even for testing? Is there not an internal test rig that could be used for this?
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
Unfortunately no. I do know for a fact that the app/web service work fine on my dev box. However, we haven't been able to get it to work when deployed. Because we're on a DoD network, it all has to be through https.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
When I call a method in a WCF web service from a silverlight app, I get this:
An exception occurred during the operation, making the result invalid. Check InnerException for exception details. at System.ComponentModel.AsyncCompletedEventArgs.RaiseExceptionIfNecessary() at FMDashboard2.FMDashSvc3Ref.GetMetricDataCompletedEventArgs.get_Result() at FMDashboard2.Objects.DataRetrieval.service_GetMetricDataCompleted(Object sender, GetMetricDataCompletedEventArgs e)
Calling webService.OpenAsync() succeeds, but I can't call a method (which happens to be the one and only method in the service)..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001