Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Not sure what to think

Not sure what to think

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comquestionannouncement
43 Posts 17 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Dalek Dave

    This is true, however this process converts matter to energy, and there is a lot of energy in matter. E=mc^2, so even a small amount of matter produces a lot of energy because c^2 is a truly massive number.

    ------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave

    A Offline
    A Offline
    AspDotNetDev
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    Dalek Dave wrote:

    c^2 is a truly massive number

    Pft, it was pitted against the Planck constant and lost: Planck vs C. ;P

    [Forum Guidelines]

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A AspDotNetDev

      Dalek Dave wrote:

      c^2 is a truly massive number

      Pft, it was pitted against the Planck constant and lost: Planck vs C. ;P

      [Forum Guidelines]

      D Offline
      D Offline
      Dalek Dave
      wrote on last edited by
      #34

      Grahams Number is the biggest non infinite number so far.

      ------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave

      A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Jim Crafton

        Is this guy[^] brilliant or just a Darwin candidate in waiting? On the on handing, building a small fusion reactor has a serious cool factor, as well as bonus man points. On the other, doing this in Brooklyn, where a lot of people live, maybe not the best idea.

        ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #35

        Sounds like an interesting hobby. If I get it to work, I might install my doomsday device in my car. Hmm, perhaps I should get myself a DeLorean...

        A while ago he asked me what he should have printed on my business cards. I said 'Wizard'. I read books which nobody else understand. Then I do something which nobody understands. After that the computer does something which nobody understands. When asked, I say things about the results which nobody understand. But everybody expects miracles from me on a regular basis. Looks to me like the classical definition of a wizard.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • E El Corazon

          Jim Crafton wrote:

          Right but with some forms of fusion don't you need a boat load of energy to at least initiate the fusion? So the concern would be some sort of accident with the initial power source.

          So as long as the power source is say... the same as a utility power you are fine? Most of these systems merely take electricity. Whether powering lasers or other systems, you are simply powering the equipment. One of my friends in high school build a miniature nuclear accelerator, now that is a little more difficult, and a little more dangerous.... fusion? naw... about the only danger is drawing a little too much electricity than you can pay for. As long as he is paying his bills let him tinker. :) Most people don't know the difference between fission and fusion, or they think of fusion only as hydrogen to hydrogen fusion which does require lots of energy. What most of these guys are doing is trying to find fuel sources, usually hydrogen and some other element, that requires less energy to fuse, but still get enough energy out to make it effective. You aren't likely to get any extremely violent bursts of energy without getting a direct feed from Palo Verde, and I am not letting him touch mine. ;P In most cases these guys are dealing with the hope of getting say 10% more energy than they put in.... so put in a kilowatt and get out 1.1 kilowatt. And that is still only hope.

          _________________________ John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others." Shhhhh.... I am not really here. I am a figment of your imagination.... I am still in my cave so this must be an illusion....

          A Offline
          A Offline
          Andreas Mertens
          wrote on last edited by
          #36

          Actually from the BBC article it says that all he hopes to achieve right now is 1:1 power input/output, which would at least make it self-sustaining.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Chris Losinger

            Jim Crafton wrote:

            Right but with some forms of fusion don't you need a boat load of energy to at least initiate the fusion?

            no, that's funk. funk requires a lot of energy to get going, but once it does, anyone in the vicinity will be stimulated into releasing energy of their own. fusion (especially "jazz fusion" which takes the technicality of jazz and the volume from rock, combined with the noodling navel-gazing of prog), is just boring. it's like watching writers practice their typing skills.

            image processing toolkits | batch image processing

            B Offline
            B Offline
            Battlehammer
            wrote on last edited by
            #37

            What??? Are you saying Dave Weckl is boring?

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B Battlehammer

              What??? Are you saying Dave Weckl is boring?

              C Offline
              C Offline
              Chris Losinger
              wrote on last edited by
              #38

              don't know Dave Weckl. but if it's jazz fusion, then odds are good that it's boring. ;)

              image processing toolkits | batch image processing

              B 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Chris Losinger

                don't know Dave Weckl. but if it's jazz fusion, then odds are good that it's boring. ;)

                image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                B Offline
                B Offline
                Battlehammer
                wrote on last edited by
                #39

                You need to expand your mind and open your ears. It's a big world out there, why close it off?

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B Battlehammer

                  You need to expand your mind and open your ears. It's a big world out there, why close it off?

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Chris Losinger
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #40

                  my mind and ears are very open. it's not that i haven't given jazz fusion a chance - i just don't like it.

                  image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jim Crafton

                    Is this guy[^] brilliant or just a Darwin candidate in waiting? On the on handing, building a small fusion reactor has a serious cool factor, as well as bonus man points. On the other, doing this in Brooklyn, where a lot of people live, maybe not the best idea.

                    ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Snowman58
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #41

                    My adviser in college (~40 years ago) was working on the largest gov funded fusion energy projects at that time. He thought they were 15 yrs from a self sustaining system. Today, after billions of $$, researchers are still saying its only 15 yrs away!

                    Melting Away www.deals-house.com www.innovative--concepts.com

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D Dalek Dave

                      Grahams Number is the biggest non infinite number so far.

                      ------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave

                      A Offline
                      A Offline
                      arcb
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #42

                      Biggest non-infinite number used in a mathematical proof, that should be, as Grahams number^2 is clearly bigger.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J Jim Crafton

                        Is this guy[^] brilliant or just a Darwin candidate in waiting? On the on handing, building a small fusion reactor has a serious cool factor, as well as bonus man points. On the other, doing this in Brooklyn, where a lot of people live, maybe not the best idea.

                        ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow

                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Member 96
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #43

                        Dude it's FUSION, not FISSION, what he's doing is no more dangerous to anyone else than hula hooping.


                        Yesterday they said today was tomorrow but today they know better. - Poul Anderson

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups