Types of Developers
-
Dalek Dave wrote:
JSOP - Hardcore Geek
"Very much an introvert" Yup that's JSOP.
Dalek Dave wrote:
POH - Type 4
"He tries his best to explain to clients why using state-of-the-art technology is so important" - change that to read "He tries his best to explain to clients why paying his company on time is so important". Apart from that, spot on.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: "He tries his best to explain to clients why paying his company on time at all is so important" FTFY ------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
-
Huh? (Huhses? Huhseses?)
Agh! Reality! My Archnemesis![^]
| FoldWithUs! | sighist | µLaunch - program launcher for server core and hyper-v server.> types of developers who > types of developer who Spot the difference. A data-type error like that would break code rather badly.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
> types of developers who > types of developer who Spot the difference. A data-type error like that would break code rather badly.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
I prefer this: typeof(developer)
A while ago he asked me what he should have printed on my business cards. I said 'Wizard'. I read books which nobody else understand. Then I do something which nobody understands. After that the computer does something which nobody understands. When asked, I say things about the results which nobody understand. But everybody expects miracles from me on a regular basis. Looks to me like the classical definition of a wizard.
-
I see myself as a Type 1. Henry is the Old Man of the C++ JSOP - Hardcore Geek POH - Type 4 I leave others to decide who else fills the gaps.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
I see my self a mix of "The Old Man" and "The Hardcore Geek".
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
I prefer this: typeof(developer)
A while ago he asked me what he should have printed on my business cards. I said 'Wizard'. I read books which nobody else understand. Then I do something which nobody understands. After that the computer does something which nobody understands. When asked, I say things about the results which nobody understand. But everybody expects miracles from me on a regular basis. Looks to me like the classical definition of a wizard.
Not: typo(devoloper)?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
Not: typo(devoloper)?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
It might be adequate, but compilers usually have no humor.
A while ago he asked me what he should have printed on my business cards. I said 'Wizard'. I read books which nobody else understand. Then I do something which nobody understands. After that the computer does something which nobody understands. When asked, I say things about the results which nobody understand. But everybody expects miracles from me on a regular basis. Looks to me like the classical definition of a wizard.
-
Well, I thought I was 2 (str.replace("man", "woman")) but then I saw 7. It made me laugh the most partly out of discomfort. :-O So I'd say I'm 60%-2 and 40%-7.
It’s not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it’s because we do not dare that things are difficult. ~Seneca
-
We all know that there are actually ten types of programmers/[^]. P.S. Other than the ridiculous part about recursion, I find that I'm primarily the Know-it-all or Theoretician.
At least my type is in this list : #8: The Paratrooper
-
I'm #2, the "Experienced Old Man" :sigh:. "But I'm writing it in C#! I'm using WPF!" he screams as he's dragged off to the old programmer's home...
Software Zen:
delete this; -
Far more ordinary, I'm afraid; in fact I AM CONTRACTOR. The greatest compliment I got was when I was called 'an arrogant, aggressive and utterly mercenary bastard'. Course I think I'm really very nice... :)
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me
When I'm doing contracting work, I prefer the following description: "I may be a whore, but at least I ain't cheap."
Software Zen:
delete this; -
We all know that there are actually ten types of programmers/[^]. P.S. Other than the ridiculous part about recursion, I find that I'm primarily the Know-it-all or Theoretician.
Interesting. A couple of entries in the '10 list' were quoted almost literally in the '7 list'.
Software Zen:
delete this; -
It might be adequate, but compilers usually have no humor.
A while ago he asked me what he should have printed on my business cards. I said 'Wizard'. I read books which nobody else understand. Then I do something which nobody understands. After that the computer does something which nobody understands. When asked, I say things about the results which nobody understand. But everybody expects miracles from me on a regular basis. Looks to me like the classical definition of a wizard.
You never used the Microsoft C 6.0 compiler then, with optimization turned on. Its idea of hysterically funny was to move references to variables declared
volatilearound willy-nilly if they appeared to be loop-invariant. I was not amused :suss:.Software Zen:
delete this; -
You never used the Microsoft C 6.0 compiler then, with optimization turned on. Its idea of hysterically funny was to move references to variables declared
volatilearound willy-nilly if they appeared to be loop-invariant. I was not amused :suss:.Software Zen:
delete this;I used to work with Visual C++ very much, but it has more and more been replaced by C#. Your problem is the result of a mislead optimization. The code probably would have worked with optimizing turned off and doing it yourself where needed. At the moment I'm writing a little 3D engine and would have loved to do it in good old unsafe C++ once again. But the rest of the project is managed code, so I guess a C# graphics engine fits in better.
A while ago he asked me what he should have printed on my business cards. I said 'Wizard'. I read books which nobody else understand. Then I do something which nobody understands. After that the computer does something which nobody understands. When asked, I say things about the results which nobody understand. But everybody expects miracles from me on a regular basis. Looks to me like the classical definition of a wizard.
-
I used to work with Visual C++ very much, but it has more and more been replaced by C#. Your problem is the result of a mislead optimization. The code probably would have worked with optimizing turned off and doing it yourself where needed. At the moment I'm writing a little 3D engine and would have loved to do it in good old unsafe C++ once again. But the rest of the project is managed code, so I guess a C# graphics engine fits in better.
A while ago he asked me what he should have printed on my business cards. I said 'Wizard'. I read books which nobody else understand. Then I do something which nobody understands. After that the computer does something which nobody understands. When asked, I say things about the results which nobody understand. But everybody expects miracles from me on a regular basis. Looks to me like the classical definition of a wizard.
CDP1802 wrote:
The code probably would have worked with optimizing turned off and doing it yourself where needed.
That was the solution. The not-so-amusing part was detecting the problem, which started out with anomalous retries in serial communications and ended with several days of pouring over machine language listings of the code.
Software Zen:
delete this; -
CDP1802 wrote:
The code probably would have worked with optimizing turned off and doing it yourself where needed.
That was the solution. The not-so-amusing part was detecting the problem, which started out with anomalous retries in serial communications and ended with several days of pouring over machine language listings of the code.
Software Zen:
delete this;Actually that's why I stll love to program on my very first computer. Just type in machine code with the hex keypad. No compiler, no operating system and no framework to interfere. But it seems to be a lost art.
A while ago he asked me what he should have printed on my business cards. I said 'Wizard'. I read books which nobody else understand. Then I do something which nobody understands. After that the computer does something which nobody understands. When asked, I say things about the results which nobody understand. But everybody expects miracles from me on a regular basis. Looks to me like the classical definition of a wizard.
-
Actually that's why I stll love to program on my very first computer. Just type in machine code with the hex keypad. No compiler, no operating system and no framework to interfere. But it seems to be a lost art.
A while ago he asked me what he should have printed on my business cards. I said 'Wizard'. I read books which nobody else understand. Then I do something which nobody understands. After that the computer does something which nobody understands. When asked, I say things about the results which nobody understand. But everybody expects miracles from me on a regular basis. Looks to me like the classical definition of a wizard.
CDP1802 wrote:
it seems to be a lost art
Look for projects in process control or data acquisition using microcontrollers. It's amazing how much fun you can have with an 8-bit processor that has 1K of program space, 256 bytes of RAM, and an 8 byte stack.
Software Zen:
delete this; -
CDP1802 wrote:
it seems to be a lost art
Look for projects in process control or data acquisition using microcontrollers. It's amazing how much fun you can have with an 8-bit processor that has 1K of program space, 256 bytes of RAM, and an 8 byte stack.
Software Zen:
delete this;I know, at least as a hobby I still have my first computer and it still works. Here is one like mine (without the case): Netronics Elf II
A while ago he asked me what he should have printed on my business cards. I said 'Wizard'. I read books which nobody else understand. Then I do something which nobody understands. After that the computer does something which nobody understands. When asked, I say things about the results which nobody understand. But everybody expects miracles from me on a regular basis. Looks to me like the classical definition of a wizard.
-
They left off “80% Rob” (named after a former co-(non)-worker). A variant of #6 – The Ambassador, 80% Rob will do 80% of the work, declare victory and move on. Always dresses like a manager, thinks of himself as one, and is usually considered to be on the fast track to success because of his corner cutting. Willing to throw others under the bus to cover his own deficiencies. Takes on jobs that will polish his resume so that he may bolt when the going gets tough.
Psychosis at 10 Film at 11
-
We all know that there are actually ten types of programmers/[^]. P.S. Other than the ridiculous part about recursion, I find that I'm primarily the Know-it-all or Theoretician.
Oh no, I think I fall into the #4 (Vince Neil) category. Worse yet, my boss is #1 Gandalf.
