Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Funny interview answers

Funny interview answers

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
c++questioncareer
66 Posts 37 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Dalek Dave

    You work with computers and do not recognise a perfectly acceptable answer? Shame on you.

    Q: Would you like tea or coffee?

    A: Yes

    Is also perfectly cromulent.

    ------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    My cofee with sugar and cream, the tea only with sugar please :)

    I are Troll :suss:

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Rajesh R Subramanian

      So, my lead was correcting these written test papers and he burst out in laughter suddenly. I went there to see what was it about and found this answer written by a candidate:

      Q: Can you identify and define the C++ casting operators?
      A: yes.

      :laugh: :laugh: Yes?! I also reckon a telephonic interview in which a candidate defined function overloading as "stuffing in too much of code in any given function". I muted the phone and laughed like mad before telling him I'm done with the call. :laugh: Have you ever been given such funny answers by any candidates? :)

      It's time for a new sig. Seriously.

      P Offline
      P Offline
      PSK_
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Q: How do you handle change?
      A: I deal with it every day, unless I'm out of clean underwear.

      WWW, WCF, WWF, WPF, WFC .... WTF

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Dalek Dave

        You work with computers and do not recognise a perfectly acceptable answer? Shame on you.

        Q: Would you like tea or coffee?

        A: Yes

        Is also perfectly cromulent.

        ------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Johnny J
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        OK, I'm at a loss again:

        Dalek Dave wrote:

        cromulent

        Why can't you guys just use words that are in the dictionary? ;P

        B G 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • J Johnny J

          OK, I'm at a loss again:

          Dalek Dave wrote:

          cromulent

          Why can't you guys just use words that are in the dictionary? ;P

          B Offline
          B Offline
          Bassam Abdul Baki
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          It's a Simpsons (TV cartoon) word that is making it's way into the American language. It means fine or appropriate.

          J 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B Bassam Abdul Baki

            It's a Simpsons (TV cartoon) word that is making it's way into the American language. It means fine or appropriate.

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Johnny J
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Is there any special background that makes that logic?

            B M R 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • J Johnny J

              Is there any special background that makes that logic?

              B Offline
              B Offline
              Bassam Abdul Baki
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Like I said, it was used in The Simpsons and has made its way into culture.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Johnny J

                Is there any special background that makes that logic?

                M Offline
                M Offline
                moon_stick
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Cromulent[^] as defined by the Urban dictionary. References an inherent Simpsons reference[^] (item 3).

                Sarchasm : The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Rajesh R Subramanian

                  So, my lead was correcting these written test papers and he burst out in laughter suddenly. I went there to see what was it about and found this answer written by a candidate:

                  Q: Can you identify and define the C++ casting operators?
                  A: yes.

                  :laugh: :laugh: Yes?! I also reckon a telephonic interview in which a candidate defined function overloading as "stuffing in too much of code in any given function". I muted the phone and laughed like mad before telling him I'm done with the call. :laugh: Have you ever been given such funny answers by any candidates? :)

                  It's time for a new sig. Seriously.

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  R Giskard Reventlov
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  It's the question that is wrong, not the answer: his answer was perfect. The question should have been: Q: Identify and define the C++ casting operators. If you can't even pose a question correctly how do you expect to be able to carry out a fair and balanced interview?

                  "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                  A R W L D 6 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • J Johnny J

                    OK, I'm at a loss again:

                    Dalek Dave wrote:

                    cromulent

                    Why can't you guys just use words that are in the dictionary? ;P

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    Gary Wheeler
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    Ook. Ook. Ook ook.

                    Software Zen: delete this;

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Rajesh R Subramanian

                      So, my lead was correcting these written test papers and he burst out in laughter suddenly. I went there to see what was it about and found this answer written by a candidate:

                      Q: Can you identify and define the C++ casting operators?
                      A: yes.

                      :laugh: :laugh: Yes?! I also reckon a telephonic interview in which a candidate defined function overloading as "stuffing in too much of code in any given function". I muted the phone and laughed like mad before telling him I'm done with the call. :laugh: Have you ever been given such funny answers by any candidates? :)

                      It's time for a new sig. Seriously.

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      CPallini
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      I have to say it is a valid answer, a bit conservative, but still valid. (and it is hard to agree with digital man...) :)

                      If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                      This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
                      [My articles]

                      R R 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • R R Giskard Reventlov

                        It's the question that is wrong, not the answer: his answer was perfect. The question should have been: Q: Identify and define the C++ casting operators. If you can't even pose a question correctly how do you expect to be able to carry out a fair and balanced interview?

                        "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                        A Offline
                        A Offline
                        Arun Jacob
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        You said it. :laugh: 5 from me

                        Arun Jacob My Technical Blog : Code.NET

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R R Giskard Reventlov

                          It's the question that is wrong, not the answer: his answer was perfect. The question should have been: Q: Identify and define the C++ casting operators. If you can't even pose a question correctly how do you expect to be able to carry out a fair and balanced interview?

                          "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Rajesh R Subramanian
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          Well, I do agree it was a "valid" answer, but no marks were given. The guy anyways plonked the exam with several wrong answers and bad code, but the point was that I enjoyed his sense of humour and I was merely asking if people have had similar experiences. Instead of which, you were trying to assess the fairness and balance of our interview process. Hot air. :rolleyes: But thanks for responding - it was humorous anyways. :)

                          It's time for a new sig. Seriously.

                          R L 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • C CPallini

                            I have to say it is a valid answer, a bit conservative, but still valid. (and it is hard to agree with digital man...) :)

                            If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                            This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
                            [My articles]

                            R Offline
                            R Offline
                            Rajesh R Subramanian
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            CPallini wrote:

                            (and it is hard to agree with digital man...)

                            Indeed. :)

                            It's time for a new sig. Seriously.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Dalek Dave

                              You work with computers and do not recognise a perfectly acceptable answer? Shame on you.

                              Q: Would you like tea or coffee?

                              A: Yes

                              Is also perfectly cromulent.

                              ------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Mark_Wallace
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              Or stick with Harry Worth:

                              Q: Would you like your coffee black?

                              A: As black as you like, as long as you leave room for the milk!

                              I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R Rajesh R Subramanian

                                So, my lead was correcting these written test papers and he burst out in laughter suddenly. I went there to see what was it about and found this answer written by a candidate:

                                Q: Can you identify and define the C++ casting operators?
                                A: yes.

                                :laugh: :laugh: Yes?! I also reckon a telephonic interview in which a candidate defined function overloading as "stuffing in too much of code in any given function". I muted the phone and laughed like mad before telling him I'm done with the call. :laugh: Have you ever been given such funny answers by any candidates? :)

                                It's time for a new sig. Seriously.

                                T Offline
                                T Offline
                                Tomz_KV
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                Logically, the answer is correct, although the question expects more.

                                TOMZ_KV

                                P 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R Rajesh R Subramanian

                                  So, my lead was correcting these written test papers and he burst out in laughter suddenly. I went there to see what was it about and found this answer written by a candidate:

                                  Q: Can you identify and define the C++ casting operators?
                                  A: yes.

                                  :laugh: :laugh: Yes?! I also reckon a telephonic interview in which a candidate defined function overloading as "stuffing in too much of code in any given function". I muted the phone and laughed like mad before telling him I'm done with the call. :laugh: Have you ever been given such funny answers by any candidates? :)

                                  It's time for a new sig. Seriously.

                                  M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mark_Wallace
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #18

                                  It's also the correct answer to "Do you have the time?"

                                  I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • P PSK_

                                    Q: How do you handle change?
                                    A: I deal with it every day, unless I'm out of clean underwear.

                                    WWW, WCF, WWF, WPF, WFC .... WTF

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mark_Wallace
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    It appears that mention of your underwear is hidden from the compiler. Lucky compiler.

                                    I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R R Giskard Reventlov

                                      It's the question that is wrong, not the answer: his answer was perfect. The question should have been: Q: Identify and define the C++ casting operators. If you can't even pose a question correctly how do you expect to be able to carry out a fair and balanced interview?

                                      "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                                      W Offline
                                      W Offline
                                      Wjousts
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #20

                                      I disagree, I think the intent of the question was clear to anybody with half a brain. We already have something that will follow the literal instructions given, their called computers. We need people who can do the fuzzy reasoning to translate a slight vague question into something definite and precise. Kinda like what you just did.

                                      R C 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R Rajesh R Subramanian

                                        Well, I do agree it was a "valid" answer, but no marks were given. The guy anyways plonked the exam with several wrong answers and bad code, but the point was that I enjoyed his sense of humour and I was merely asking if people have had similar experiences. Instead of which, you were trying to assess the fairness and balance of our interview process. Hot air. :rolleyes: But thanks for responding - it was humorous anyways. :)

                                        It's time for a new sig. Seriously.

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        R Giskard Reventlov
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #21

                                        Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:

                                        Instead of which, you were trying to assess the fairness and balance of our interview process. Hot air.

                                        The fact that you laughed at his perfectly good response reflects on you, not him! (Even if was plank :-))

                                        Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:

                                        But thanks for responding - it was humorous anyways.

                                        You should be taking it seriously!!! I don't joke!!! Ever!!! :mad::mad::mad:

                                        "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • W Wjousts

                                          I disagree, I think the intent of the question was clear to anybody with half a brain. We already have something that will follow the literal instructions given, their called computers. We need people who can do the fuzzy reasoning to translate a slight vague question into something definite and precise. Kinda like what you just did.

                                          R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          R Giskard Reventlov
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #22

                                          Wjousts wrote:

                                          anybody with half a brain

                                          and therein lies the rub...

                                          "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups