Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. HTML and Outlook 2010 [modified]

HTML and Outlook 2010 [modified]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
htmldesignquestionannouncement
9 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E Offline
    E Offline
    Eaverae
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    So, Big news. Just recieved an e-mail that Office 2010 hit the shelves.. Has anyone already had the pleasure to see if the guys from fixoutlook.org[^] had any impact? I'm suspecting not.. Anyway, does anyone have any tips or tricks regarding writing multi-mailclient-compatible e-mails? My design skills are pretty much over-tested when it comes to making cool and fashionable newsletters. Anyway, let Outlook 2010's e-mail rendering capability-bashing commence!

    modified on Thursday, July 15, 2010 7:12 AM

    R H 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • E Eaverae

      So, Big news. Just recieved an e-mail that Office 2010 hit the shelves.. Has anyone already had the pleasure to see if the guys from fixoutlook.org[^] had any impact? I'm suspecting not.. Anyway, does anyone have any tips or tricks regarding writing multi-mailclient-compatible e-mails? My design skills are pretty much over-tested when it comes to making cool and fashionable newsletters. Anyway, let Outlook 2010's e-mail rendering capability-bashing commence!

      modified on Thursday, July 15, 2010 7:12 AM

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Rage
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Eaverae wrote:

      fixoutlook.org[^]

      They can bash about Outlook, with such a poor site design that takes an eternity to load, they won't see me again.

      P E 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • R Rage

        Eaverae wrote:

        fixoutlook.org[^]

        They can bash about Outlook, with such a poor site design that takes an eternity to load, they won't see me again.

        P Offline
        P Offline
        phannon86
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Agreed, that site looks terrible. Was the influence for the design a car crash?

        He who makes a beast out of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man.

        R 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P phannon86

          Agreed, that site looks terrible. Was the influence for the design a car crash?

          He who makes a beast out of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man.

          R Offline
          R Offline
          Rage
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Lucy in the sky with diamonds.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Rage

            Eaverae wrote:

            fixoutlook.org[^]

            They can bash about Outlook, with such a poor site design that takes an eternity to load, they won't see me again.

            E Offline
            E Offline
            Eaverae
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Yeah they might have wanted to alter that beforehand.. :P Anyway, they do make a point though, e-mail rendering in outlook is a b*tch. Being a Microsoft fanboy myself, I think they could at least have considered putting parallel rendering options in Outlook 2010 after the thrash-talk the 2007 release has endured on this particular topic. Shouldn't development of e-mail move forward instead of backwards in time?

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E Eaverae

              So, Big news. Just recieved an e-mail that Office 2010 hit the shelves.. Has anyone already had the pleasure to see if the guys from fixoutlook.org[^] had any impact? I'm suspecting not.. Anyway, does anyone have any tips or tricks regarding writing multi-mailclient-compatible e-mails? My design skills are pretty much over-tested when it comes to making cool and fashionable newsletters. Anyway, let Outlook 2010's e-mail rendering capability-bashing commence!

              modified on Thursday, July 15, 2010 7:12 AM

              H Offline
              H Offline
              hairy_hats
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Eaverae wrote:

              does anyone have any tips or tricks regarding writing multi-mailclient-compatible e-mails

              Yes: plain text. Why send a background image with an e-mail? Utter waste of storage and bandwidth.

              E 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • H hairy_hats

                Eaverae wrote:

                does anyone have any tips or tricks regarding writing multi-mailclient-compatible e-mails

                Yes: plain text. Why send a background image with an e-mail? Utter waste of storage and bandwidth.

                E Offline
                E Offline
                Eaverae
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Well if I would be sending e-mail to 1993 I agree. ;)

                H 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • E Eaverae

                  Well if I would be sending e-mail to 1993 I agree. ;)

                  H Offline
                  H Offline
                  hairy_hats
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  If you've got a company with many employees, the additional burden on your infrastructure will not be insignificant.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • E Eaverae

                    Yeah they might have wanted to alter that beforehand.. :P Anyway, they do make a point though, e-mail rendering in outlook is a b*tch. Being a Microsoft fanboy myself, I think they could at least have considered putting parallel rendering options in Outlook 2010 after the thrash-talk the 2007 release has endured on this particular topic. Shouldn't development of e-mail move forward instead of backwards in time?

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mark_Wallace
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Eaverae wrote:

                    Shouldn't development of e-mail move forward instead of backwards in time?

                    How exactly is HTML/CSS rendering of e-mail "moving forward"? It's e-mail, not web pages. Making it more like web pages is moving in the wrong direction. But, of course, it's The Only Way To Go because Microsofts not doing it that way.

                    I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • World
                    • Users
                    • Groups