32 bit IDE, 64 bit OS..,

[hairy_hats]

Even Google doesn't help with that. Any clues?

[peterchen]

The first convincingly Indian sounding name I could make up (convincingly for me, that is).

Agh! Reality! My Archnemesis![^]
| FoldWithUs! | sighist | µLaunch - program launcher for server core and hyper-v server.

[Bob1000]

Don't even think of VS2010 - buggy as hell (never been there but have used an early version of Vista !) VS2008 is now mature enough for real use - never before Service pack 1!

[Abrojus]

You having many issues with vs 2010? I migrated an asp.net project to vs2010 to test it out and quite happy with it actually, no bugs and the ui feels more responsive than 2008 but then again this is subjective.

[Marc Arbesman]

yeah, I think your problem may have been vista and not VS2010. VS2010 is fantastic on Windows 7 (64-bit). And you should be using the RTM version and not a Beta. Beta = buggy as hell + patience.

[Bob1000]

Lots of problems with 2010, basically very unstable and can't be relied on. Using it mainly for native C++/MFC. When even their sample projects crash the IDE - you know testing is not high on the list! Some of our C# code has faired better. Its not just me , other engineers in company have similar if not more colorful descriptions of its reliability! No one wants to use it....... VS 2008 is fine - but had similar reliability problems before service pack 1.

[Bob1000]

RTM is still buggy both in 32/64 bit Windows 7!

[djdanlib 0]

I've been using it for C# and WPF development on 32-bit 7 since RTM and it's been reliable and stable. Must be a different animal for C++ then...

[Bob1000]

Think that about sums it up - MS have concentrated on the .net and forgotten about the 'real' world, which is a pity considering the numbers still using native code, MFC etc (and will be for a long time - anyone for COBOL!)

[Theraot]

Sorry, it seems to be singleton.