Microsoft asking for my hosting credentials?!?
-
Is this normal? I have a connect ticket open at Microsoft [^] for their WebMatrix product. There is a comment at the end asking for a temporary password to my hosting provider for a microsoft.com email address - really? I could set up a temporary user for him, but seems very odd to me that such a big company is asking for some credentials. Might as well give him my internet banking logon as well!
-
Is this normal? I have a connect ticket open at Microsoft [^] for their WebMatrix product. There is a comment at the end asking for a temporary password to my hosting provider for a microsoft.com email address - really? I could set up a temporary user for him, but seems very odd to me that such a big company is asking for some credentials. Might as well give him my internet banking logon as well!
Aaron, can you share your credentials with me so we can try this out? Please change them from your regular password to a temporary one, and let us know at baslam at microsoft.com. Thanks!
He wants to verify your settings and configuration. And has asked you to temporarily change your password so he can look into that (so your real password is not revealed). It's not unusual for technical support to ask for stuff like this - I have myself had to webex onto client machines, and have often had admin access on their primary data servers. He's also asked you to email it to him as opposed to posting it there. This is not at all uncommon in my experience.
Regards, Nish
Blog: blog.voidnish.com Most recent article: An MVVM friendly approach to adding system menu entries in a WPF application
-
Is this normal? I have a connect ticket open at Microsoft [^] for their WebMatrix product. There is a comment at the end asking for a temporary password to my hosting provider for a microsoft.com email address - really? I could set up a temporary user for him, but seems very odd to me that such a big company is asking for some credentials. Might as well give him my internet banking logon as well!
Don't do it! It's a trick! It's probably a google employee trying to further tighten their grip on everyone's personal information. Need a gun? I can help you hunt him down. :)
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
Don't do it! It's a trick! It's probably a google employee trying to further tighten their grip on everyone's personal information. Need a gun? I can help you hunt him down. :)
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001John, Did you get my Email I sent about an hour ago? Dave.
-
Aaron, can you share your credentials with me so we can try this out? Please change them from your regular password to a temporary one, and let us know at baslam at microsoft.com. Thanks!
He wants to verify your settings and configuration. And has asked you to temporarily change your password so he can look into that (so your real password is not revealed). It's not unusual for technical support to ask for stuff like this - I have myself had to webex onto client machines, and have often had admin access on their primary data servers. He's also asked you to email it to him as opposed to posting it there. This is not at all uncommon in my experience.
Regards, Nish
Blog: blog.voidnish.com Most recent article: An MVVM friendly approach to adding system menu entries in a WPF application
Understandable, but I would think Microsoft would have access into the worlds largest hosting company! I have a few free hosting accouts avialable via GoDaddy, so I will set one of them up for MS to do their testing, thus keeping them away from my live websites. Last thing I would want is to make a change to the web.config at the root and stuff up everything!
-
Understandable, but I would think Microsoft would have access into the worlds largest hosting company! I have a few free hosting accouts avialable via GoDaddy, so I will set one of them up for MS to do their testing, thus keeping them away from my live websites. Last thing I would want is to make a change to the web.config at the root and stuff up everything!
Yeah, they could have just asked you to send them your exact config details and they could then have reproduced that at their end.
Regards, Nish
Blog: blog.voidnish.com Most recent article: An MVVM friendly approach to adding system menu entries in a WPF application
-
John, Did you get my Email I sent about an hour ago? Dave.
Nope. The email account I use for CP is my home account and I just now got home and checked. Nothing.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
Yeah, they could have just asked you to send them your exact config details and they could then have reproduced that at their end.
Regards, Nish
Blog: blog.voidnish.com Most recent article: An MVVM friendly approach to adding system menu entries in a WPF application
Yes - and the thing with WebMatrix[^]is its a very 'next, next, finish' type product - ie I wouldnt have to ever know what a web.config file is if I didnt want to, or how to FTP my website up, it does the lot. I was quite interested in the stand alone SQL CE engine[^] but alas it didnt work....
-
Nope. The email account I use for CP is my home account and I just now got home and checked. Nothing.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001I guess I'll just post it here: If you have a gun, hopefully it isn't registered! Verified true on Snopes http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/blairholt.asp Gun owners.... Look what's on the 2010 tax return.... It begins... More Freedom gone.... The right to protect yourself and your family gone! Now ALL GUNS must be listed on your next (2010) tax return! Senate Bill SB-2099 will require us to put on our 2009 1040 federal tax form all guns that you have or own. It will require fingerprints and a tax of $50 per gun. This bill was introduced on February 24, 2009, by the Obama staff. BUT, this bill will only become public knowledge 30 days after the new law becomes effective! This is an amendment to the Internal Revenue Act of 1986. This means that the Finance Committee has passed this without the Senate voting on it at all. Trust Obama? You must be kidding! The full text of the IRS amendment is on the U.S. Senate homepage: www.senate.gov. You can find the bill by doing a search by the bill number, SB-2099. You know who to call; I strongly suggest you do. Please send a copy of this e-mail to every gun owner you know. Text of H.R.45 as Introduced in House: Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009: www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/text Obama's Congress is now starting on the firearms confiscation bill. If it passes, gun owners will become criminals if you don't fully comply. Very Important for you to be aware of a new bill HR 45 introduced into the House. This is the Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act of 2009. Even gun shop owners didn't know about this because the government is trying to fly it under the radar as a 'minor' IRS revision, and, as usual, the 'political' lawmakers did not read this bill before signing and approving it! To find out about this - go to any government website and type in HR 45 or Goggle HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of 2009. You will get all the information. Basically this would make it illegal to own a firearm - any rifle with a clip or ANY pistol unless: 1) It is registered 2) You are fingerprinted 3) You supply a current Driver's License 4) You supply your Social Security number 5) You will submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their choosing. Each update change or ownership through private or public sale must be reported and costs $25. Failure to do so you automatically lose the right to own a firearm and are subject
-
I guess I'll just post it here: If you have a gun, hopefully it isn't registered! Verified true on Snopes http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/blairholt.asp Gun owners.... Look what's on the 2010 tax return.... It begins... More Freedom gone.... The right to protect yourself and your family gone! Now ALL GUNS must be listed on your next (2010) tax return! Senate Bill SB-2099 will require us to put on our 2009 1040 federal tax form all guns that you have or own. It will require fingerprints and a tax of $50 per gun. This bill was introduced on February 24, 2009, by the Obama staff. BUT, this bill will only become public knowledge 30 days after the new law becomes effective! This is an amendment to the Internal Revenue Act of 1986. This means that the Finance Committee has passed this without the Senate voting on it at all. Trust Obama? You must be kidding! The full text of the IRS amendment is on the U.S. Senate homepage: www.senate.gov. You can find the bill by doing a search by the bill number, SB-2099. You know who to call; I strongly suggest you do. Please send a copy of this e-mail to every gun owner you know. Text of H.R.45 as Introduced in House: Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009: www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/text Obama's Congress is now starting on the firearms confiscation bill. If it passes, gun owners will become criminals if you don't fully comply. Very Important for you to be aware of a new bill HR 45 introduced into the House. This is the Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act of 2009. Even gun shop owners didn't know about this because the government is trying to fly it under the radar as a 'minor' IRS revision, and, as usual, the 'political' lawmakers did not read this bill before signing and approving it! To find out about this - go to any government website and type in HR 45 or Goggle HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of 2009. You will get all the information. Basically this would make it illegal to own a firearm - any rifle with a clip or ANY pistol unless: 1) It is registered 2) You are fingerprinted 3) You supply a current Driver's License 4) You supply your Social Security number 5) You will submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their choosing. Each update change or ownership through private or public sale must be reported and costs $25. Failure to do so you automatically lose the right to own a firearm and are subject
That bill has been floating around for years, and has no hope of being co-sponsored. Americans (me included) would rebel and refuse to declare their guns, and besides that it's already been established that it's unconstitutional for the government to "register" firearm owners. It won't get sponsored, much less passed, and everyone in the government knows it.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
That bill has been floating around for years, and has no hope of being co-sponsored. Americans (me included) would rebel and refuse to declare their guns, and besides that it's already been established that it's unconstitutional for the government to "register" firearm owners. It won't get sponsored, much less passed, and everyone in the government knows it.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001I'm waiting to see what the 2010 tax bill says. The bill may not have a chance, but Obama's end around may sneak through if the health care bill is any indication (i.e., no-one read it). Dave.
-
I'm waiting to see what the 2010 tax bill says. The bill may not have a chance, but Obama's end around may sneak through if the health care bill is any indication (i.e., no-one read it). Dave.
-
Member 4194593 wrote:
the health care bill is any indication (i.e., no-one read it).
Err... that one with all the arguments over what was in it?
Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]
The one that someone in the administration (I thing Pelosi) said "We won't know what is in it until we start implementing it".
-
I'm waiting to see what the 2010 tax bill says. The bill may not have a chance, but Obama's end around may sneak through if the health care bill is any indication (i.e., no-one read it). Dave.
Believe me, if it had been passed, or there was anything about it in the health care bill, that would have been a lead news story for WEEKS. Like I said, Americans would resist on a large scale.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001