NET NEUTRALITY - The Google & Verizon Proposal as listed in todays CODE PROJECT newsletter - Are You Buying This?
-
YSLGuru wrote:
The government will use their fondness for ‘interpreting’ to radically change what is considered legal and what is not, thereby limiting free speech on the internet.
against my better judgment, i'm going to ask: what are you talking about ? "the government" is not only allowed to decide what is legal and what isn't (by virtue of it's legislating function), it is also responsible for interpreting those laws (by virtue of the fact that "interpretation" is how one decides if a law applies in a certain situation and that's why courts and judges exist). that's how the US government is designed. legislation, regulation, and interpretation are among its intended functions.
So you really believe that the government can do whatever it wants because its the government. You are a worthless fucking piece of shit. A pitiful scumbag that does nothing but support degeneracy and destruction of everything good and right. A piece of slime, a rotten sack of vomit. Go have sex with your stuffed animals and lick boot.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
So you really believe that the government can do whatever it wants because its the government. You are a worthless fucking piece of shit. A pitiful scumbag that does nothing but support degeneracy and destruction of everything good and right. A piece of slime, a rotten sack of vomit. Go have sex with your stuffed animals and lick boot.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
Wow you really did crawl out from under you rock. Take your vitriol back to your pit - begone foul beast!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
-
So you really believe that the government can do whatever it wants because its the government. You are a worthless fucking piece of shit. A pitiful scumbag that does nothing but support degeneracy and destruction of everything good and right. A piece of slime, a rotten sack of vomit. Go have sex with your stuffed animals and lick boot.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
are you really that fucking stupid? really?
-
So you really believe that the government can do whatever it wants because its the government. You are a worthless fucking piece of shit. A pitiful scumbag that does nothing but support degeneracy and destruction of everything good and right. A piece of slime, a rotten sack of vomit. Go have sex with your stuffed animals and lick boot.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
So your Dad has taken a break from fucking you up the arse and you have taken the opportunity to post drivel. Fuck off moron.
Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
-
So your Dad has taken a break from fucking you up the arse and you have taken the opportunity to post drivel. Fuck off moron.
Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
Didn't your dad do something like that to you?
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
Didn't your dad do something like that to you?
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Didn't your dad do something like that to you?
Close, but no cigar knobhead. My Dad was a paedophile and molested other kids, I was molested at 9-10 years old by his partner. I eventually went to court and put both of them in gaol. Since then I have grown up, manned up and become a productive member of society. Married (19th anniversary next week) had 2 kids and have a job. You meanwhile dribble around, take drugs and talk shit on a web site. Have half a cup of harden up, set some goals, stop being scared of your own shadow, stop listening to your Dad's retarded ideas and make something of your life.
Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
-
YSLGuru wrote:
The government will use their fondness for ‘interpreting’ to radically change what is considered legal and what is not, thereby limiting free speech on the internet.
against my better judgment, i'm going to ask: what are you talking about ? "the government" is not only allowed to decide what is legal and what isn't (by virtue of it's legislating function), it is also responsible for interpreting those laws (by virtue of the fact that "interpretation" is how one decides if a law applies in a certain situation and that's why courts and judges exist). that's how the US government is designed. legislation, regulation, and interpretation are among its intended functions.
Actually the governement is allowed to effect legal actions, the pasisng of laws as well as the repealing of them, within a defined set of parameters spelled out in the documents that founded this nation. So NO the governement does not have the legal right to decide anything it desires. It is this mindset that you have spelled out in your post that has lead to this misunderstanding of what power the governement has that has allowed them to act outside their defined role. The growing number of those from all walks of life (and not simply the supposed dumb mountain folks that elitist and supposed enlightened ones like to label everyone as) who have had enough with what the federal governement does is an undeniable fact that more and not less are more in agreement with what I have outlined. You can make cheap shots and insults all you like but the days of keeping people down who believe in Constitutionalyl prescribed actions by a smaller governement are coming to and end.
-
Actually the governement is allowed to effect legal actions, the pasisng of laws as well as the repealing of them, within a defined set of parameters spelled out in the documents that founded this nation. So NO the governement does not have the legal right to decide anything it desires. It is this mindset that you have spelled out in your post that has lead to this misunderstanding of what power the governement has that has allowed them to act outside their defined role. The growing number of those from all walks of life (and not simply the supposed dumb mountain folks that elitist and supposed enlightened ones like to label everyone as) who have had enough with what the federal governement does is an undeniable fact that more and not less are more in agreement with what I have outlined. You can make cheap shots and insults all you like but the days of keeping people down who believe in Constitutionalyl prescribed actions by a smaller governement are coming to and end.
YSLGuru wrote:
So NO the governement does not have the legal right to decide anything it desires.
good thing i didn't claim otherwise. but it does have the power to write laws, interpret them and to change "the documents that founded this nation", by a process described in those very documents.
YSLGuru wrote:
You can make cheap shots and insults all you like but the days of keeping people down who believe in Constitutionalyl prescribed actions by a smaller governement are coming to and end.
Wolverines!
-
YSLGuru wrote:
So NO the governement does not have the legal right to decide anything it desires.
good thing i didn't claim otherwise. but it does have the power to write laws, interpret them and to change "the documents that founded this nation", by a process described in those very documents.
YSLGuru wrote:
You can make cheap shots and insults all you like but the days of keeping people down who believe in Constitutionalyl prescribed actions by a smaller governement are coming to and end.
Wolverines!
Actually you did. If you re-read your first reply you'll see that you cliamed the government is allowed to decide what is legal and what isn;t and did so without any qualifications (scope or limit of that ability) except to say by their legislative function whcih means thru the use of passing lesgislation. The Federal Governement has passed many pieces of legislation that range from being highly questionable to out right unconstitutional. Go wolverines
-
Actually you did. If you re-read your first reply you'll see that you cliamed the government is allowed to decide what is legal and what isn;t and did so without any qualifications (scope or limit of that ability) except to say by their legislative function whcih means thru the use of passing lesgislation. The Federal Governement has passed many pieces of legislation that range from being highly questionable to out right unconstitutional. Go wolverines
YSLGuru wrote:
If you re-read your first reply you'll see that you cliamed the government is allowed to decide what is legal and what isn;t and did so without any qualifications
you're right. i didn't provide qualifications, because those qualifications weren't pertinent to what you were complaining about:
YSLGuru wrote:
The government will use their fondness for ‘interpreting’ to radically change what is considered legal and what is not, thereby limiting free speech on the internet.
in this situation, the government is perfectly within its authority to interpret the laws it has written. if you're talking about Net Neutrality, you're talking about the FCC which has the authority (given to it by Congress) to interpret and define the way the internet works in the US. if you don't like the authority the FCC has to regulate electronic communications (an authority it has had since 1934), you can persuade your representatives to change the laws. but to say the government (via the FCC) is somehow out of bounds in regulating the internet is absolutely loony.