Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Recommendations - Online storage/backup

Recommendations - Online storage/backup

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
linuxhostingcloudbusinessquestion
17 Posts 7 Posters 2 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Simon P Stevens

    Looks good, but no Linux support. I might give it a try in virtualbox. Thanks.

    Simon

    A Offline
    A Offline
    Anna Jayne Metcalfe
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    I must admit I didn't check the OS requirements. :-O

    Anna :rose: Tech Blog | Visual Lint "Why would anyone prefer to wield a weapon that takes both hands at once, when they could use a lighter (and obviously superior) weapon that allows you to wield multiple ones at a time, and thus supports multi-paradigm carnage?"

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R realJSOP

      I think a NAS would be a better choice. You can always buy some backup software like Acronis and schedule it to do a backup of just that folder every night. A 1TB NAS would do nicely for a long time, and it would certainly cost less than the same amount of time you'd be renting on online backup service. Of course, you could do like I did and just build your own NAS that is infinitely expandable (much more cost effective in the longer run).

      .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
      -----
      "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
      -----
      "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Simon P Stevens
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      Is it really though? Lets say your NAS sucks 150 watts. That's 3.6kwh per day. 108kwh per month. I don't know exactly what my tariff is, but from the British gas website, 10p per kwh seems around average. That's £10.80 per month (£129 per year) in additional electricity bills. Carbonite charge £42.95 a year for unlimited storage. Don't forget to add to that an initial outlay. Say £200 to buy/build a NAS plus costs to increase the capacity every time you need more storage space. Plus build time and support time when the OS needs updating etc. Have I got anything wrong?

      Simon

      E D 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • S Simon P Stevens

        Is it really though? Lets say your NAS sucks 150 watts. That's 3.6kwh per day. 108kwh per month. I don't know exactly what my tariff is, but from the British gas website, 10p per kwh seems around average. That's £10.80 per month (£129 per year) in additional electricity bills. Carbonite charge £42.95 a year for unlimited storage. Don't forget to add to that an initial outlay. Say £200 to buy/build a NAS plus costs to increase the capacity every time you need more storage space. Plus build time and support time when the OS needs updating etc. Have I got anything wrong?

        Simon

        E Offline
        E Offline
        Electron Shepherd
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        Simon P Stevens wrote:

        Have I got anything wrong?

        Simon P Stevens wrote:

        Lets say your NAS sucks 150 watts.

        An Iomega StorCenter (not a recommendation, just a random Google hit), has a power consumption between 5 and 19 watts according to the spec sheet, and provides up to 4TB of storage.

        Simon P Stevens wrote:

        That's 3.6kwh per day. 108kwh per month.

        Does it need to be powered up 24/7?

        Server and Network Monitoring

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Simon P Stevens

          Is it really though? Lets say your NAS sucks 150 watts. That's 3.6kwh per day. 108kwh per month. I don't know exactly what my tariff is, but from the British gas website, 10p per kwh seems around average. That's £10.80 per month (£129 per year) in additional electricity bills. Carbonite charge £42.95 a year for unlimited storage. Don't forget to add to that an initial outlay. Say £200 to buy/build a NAS plus costs to increase the capacity every time you need more storage space. Plus build time and support time when the OS needs updating etc. Have I got anything wrong?

          Simon

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Dan Neely
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          Unless you're repurposing an old desktop you're probably 2.5-4x high on the power consumption. Dedicated NAS boxes will use an arm/atom/celeron class CPU to keep power use low.

          3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • E Electron Shepherd

            Simon P Stevens wrote:

            Have I got anything wrong?

            Simon P Stevens wrote:

            Lets say your NAS sucks 150 watts.

            An Iomega StorCenter (not a recommendation, just a random Google hit), has a power consumption between 5 and 19 watts according to the spec sheet, and provides up to 4TB of storage.

            Simon P Stevens wrote:

            That's 3.6kwh per day. 108kwh per month.

            Does it need to be powered up 24/7?

            Server and Network Monitoring

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Simon P Stevens
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            Electron Shepherd wrote:

            5 and 19 watts

            That's better. Although I was more thinking about Johns suggestion of building one.

            Electron Shepherd wrote:

            An Iomega StorCenter

            Costs £159 from Amazon (1tb). That's still 3 years of unlimited Carbonite hosting. (And actually they have bulk buy offers so you'd get 4 years for that price if you paid upfront). Don't get me wrong. NAS devices are great. I would have a lot of uses for one, like media storage and access. But for my current purposes of wanting backups of my photo's. I'm happy to pay to have it taken offsite and the extra redundancy that brings.

            Simon

            E D 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • S Simon P Stevens

              Electron Shepherd wrote:

              5 and 19 watts

              That's better. Although I was more thinking about Johns suggestion of building one.

              Electron Shepherd wrote:

              An Iomega StorCenter

              Costs £159 from Amazon (1tb). That's still 3 years of unlimited Carbonite hosting. (And actually they have bulk buy offers so you'd get 4 years for that price if you paid upfront). Don't get me wrong. NAS devices are great. I would have a lot of uses for one, like media storage and access. But for my current purposes of wanting backups of my photo's. I'm happy to pay to have it taken offsite and the extra redundancy that brings.

              Simon

              E Offline
              E Offline
              Electron Shepherd
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              You might also have to factor in the bandwidth usage charges from your ISP: How much will each month's upload cost? How much will they charge to download everything in one go to restore it all in the event of a critical failure?

              Server and Network Monitoring

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E Electron Shepherd

                You might also have to factor in the bandwidth usage charges from your ISP: How much will each month's upload cost? How much will they charge to download everything in one go to restore it all in the event of a critical failure?

                Server and Network Monitoring

                S Offline
                S Offline
                Simon P Stevens
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                Nothing. I'm on an unlimited plan. (In reality I suspect they'll start to throttle at some unpublished limit, but aside from the initial upload which only happens once, and a recovery which hopefully will be rare, I doubt I'll be hitting that)

                Simon

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Simon P Stevens

                  Electron Shepherd wrote:

                  5 and 19 watts

                  That's better. Although I was more thinking about Johns suggestion of building one.

                  Electron Shepherd wrote:

                  An Iomega StorCenter

                  Costs £159 from Amazon (1tb). That's still 3 years of unlimited Carbonite hosting. (And actually they have bulk buy offers so you'd get 4 years for that price if you paid upfront). Don't get me wrong. NAS devices are great. I would have a lot of uses for one, like media storage and access. But for my current purposes of wanting backups of my photo's. I'm happy to pay to have it taken offsite and the extra redundancy that brings.

                  Simon

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Dan Neely
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Simon P Stevens wrote:

                  That's better. Although I was more thinking about Johns suggestion of building one.

                  If you don't need to do live video trans-coding build your own around an atom. $130, 6 sata ports.[^] or $100, 4 sata ports.[^]. The screwholes are a subset of what's used in a standard mini/ATX mobo so you can use a standard case. Small form factor ones are available as well but you'll pay a price for the smaller size... If you need more CPU power go with a 45W AMD desktop cpu.

                  3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Simon P Stevens

                    I'm in need of an cloud backup/storage service. I've googled and there are dozens. I'm looking for some recommendations of services that have worked well for others. (If you have referrer links that you get a bonus for, post them and I'll use them) Here's my situation - I have around 75gb of photos. I'm generating new photos at the rate of around 2-5gb per month. I currently backup periodically to an external hard drive. Sometimes a few weeks can go by without me doing a backup. I don't want to risk losing these photos. I've been a long time user of Dropbox (free account). I like the seamless sync app and the way it just integrates nicely with explorer/nautilus. But I think I would quickly outgrow the 100gb limit on the pro account. I also use Dropbox to sync files/docs with lots of PC's including at work. I don't really want my work PC to sync all my photos - I don't think Dropbox allows selective syncing. Requirements: - Scalable storage/payments. (Or unlimited at a sensible price) - Windows & Linux (Ubuntu) support. (Although Linux is my main OS, so I can probably live without windows support) - Auto sync/backup. (If it's manual I'll forget too often) - Not restricted to just photo's. Vids and docs too. But the bulk of the data is photos. I'm happy to pay a sensible amount. Any recommendations?

                    Simon

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    JoeSox
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    If this is a personal thing, which sounds like it. I would just purchase a USB drive because you get more GB per $. Use Microsoft SyncToy via a .bat, works great or I also like NTI Shadow, or Seagate USB drives comes with Sync software. I have recently heard about http://b5.crashplan.com/consumer/store.vtl[^] I use http://www.zumodrive.com/[^] but I think they max out at 500GB

                    Later, JoeSox CPMCv1.0 - Last.fm - MyFriendfeed - Joesox.com

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Simon P Stevens

                      I'm in need of an cloud backup/storage service. I've googled and there are dozens. I'm looking for some recommendations of services that have worked well for others. (If you have referrer links that you get a bonus for, post them and I'll use them) Here's my situation - I have around 75gb of photos. I'm generating new photos at the rate of around 2-5gb per month. I currently backup periodically to an external hard drive. Sometimes a few weeks can go by without me doing a backup. I don't want to risk losing these photos. I've been a long time user of Dropbox (free account). I like the seamless sync app and the way it just integrates nicely with explorer/nautilus. But I think I would quickly outgrow the 100gb limit on the pro account. I also use Dropbox to sync files/docs with lots of PC's including at work. I don't really want my work PC to sync all my photos - I don't think Dropbox allows selective syncing. Requirements: - Scalable storage/payments. (Or unlimited at a sensible price) - Windows & Linux (Ubuntu) support. (Although Linux is my main OS, so I can probably live without windows support) - Auto sync/backup. (If it's manual I'll forget too often) - Not restricted to just photo's. Vids and docs too. But the bulk of the data is photos. I'm happy to pay a sensible amount. Any recommendations?

                      Simon

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      David Wong
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      Haave you tried Flickr? They have unlimited storage for photos. Especially if u r generating 2gb per month.

                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D David Wong

                        Haave you tried Flickr? They have unlimited storage for photos. Especially if u r generating 2gb per month.

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Simon P Stevens
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        Oh, no, I hadn't. I've got a flickr account that I currently don't use very much. I'll look into upgrading it to a paid account. Thanks.

                        Simon

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups