Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Movie age rating

Movie age rating

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comquestion
27 Posts 18 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P peterchen

    It's the american rating, right? semi-covered boobs: 17 shape nipples visible through semi-cover: R blood gore and violence: 12 anything else: who cares?

    Agh! Reality! My Archnemesis![^]
    | FoldWithUs! | sighist | WhoIncludes - Analyzing C++ include file hierarchy

    R Offline
    R Offline
    Russell Jones
    wrote on last edited by
    #16

    I still laugh at the furore when someone found a hidden and highly pixelated sex scene in one of the Grand Theft Auto games. All the people coming out of the woodwork to say they'd never have bought their son / grandson the game if they'd known about it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • V V 0

      Not long ago I was watching The Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call - New Orleans[^]. The movie started with an age rating like most modern movies: "12". :wtf: 12 ! Did the person rating this movie even see it? Imdb (or Cara[^]) rates it "R", which is better, but even then. I still can't believe that in todays society they don't have a better and more objective rating system. What's your opinion on this?

      V.

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #17

      Based on the trailer, it looks suitable for "me when I was 12" to me. I wouldn't have liked it, but that's not what the ratings are for. Reasons: - no nudity as far as I can see - no horror - no excessive gore - violence/drugs/references to sex/etc aren't going to scare many 12 year olds Here's the best rating system: have the parents watch the trailer and judge what their kid can handle, not all kids are the same. edit: of course if there is more nudity in the film then the trailer shows it would instantly have to be 18+.

      V D 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Based on the trailer, it looks suitable for "me when I was 12" to me. I wouldn't have liked it, but that's not what the ratings are for. Reasons: - no nudity as far as I can see - no horror - no excessive gore - violence/drugs/references to sex/etc aren't going to scare many 12 year olds Here's the best rating system: have the parents watch the trailer and judge what their kid can handle, not all kids are the same. edit: of course if there is more nudity in the film then the trailer shows it would instantly have to be 18+.

        V Offline
        V Offline
        V 0
        wrote on last edited by
        #18

        It's not about scaring, it's about education and what is appropriate.

        V.

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • V V 0

          Not long ago I was watching The Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call - New Orleans[^]. The movie started with an age rating like most modern movies: "12". :wtf: 12 ! Did the person rating this movie even see it? Imdb (or Cara[^]) rates it "R", which is better, but even then. I still can't believe that in todays society they don't have a better and more objective rating system. What's your opinion on this?

          V.

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Dave Parker
          wrote on last edited by
          #19

          *shrugs* I had parents who didn't even let me watch PG films. I wasn't allowed to watch titanic when I was something like 17. On the other hand nearly everyone I knew was allowed to watch whatever they wanted even at primary school.

          B 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • V V 0

            It's not about scaring, it's about education and what is appropriate.

            V.

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #20

            But movies are for entertainment, right?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Dave Parker

              *shrugs* I had parents who didn't even let me watch PG films. I wasn't allowed to watch titanic when I was something like 17. On the other hand nearly everyone I knew was allowed to watch whatever they wanted even at primary school.

              B Offline
              B Offline
              Brady Kelly
              wrote on last edited by
              #21

              Our primary school principal approved and promoted the showing of The Blue Lagoon at the school's weekly Saturday afternoon movie.  He did, however, send parents a circular first, explaining his motive that it was about love and not about nudity or sex.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Nish Nishant

                If I was 11 years old, I'd swap a dozen blood and gore movies for a 3 minute topless video. :-D

                Regards, Nish


                Blog: blog.voidnish.com

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Chris Meech
                wrote on last edited by
                #22

                For 11 year olds, I don't think a topless video even needs to be 3 minutes long. :)

                Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Dalek Dave

                  A bare bottom is an abomination against god, but it is ok to see 300 murders a day on TV. I don't get american censorship.

                  ------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC League Table Link CCC Link[^]

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Roger Wright
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #23

                  Neither do we... :sigh:

                  Will Rogers never met me.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • V V 0

                    Not long ago I was watching The Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call - New Orleans[^]. The movie started with an age rating like most modern movies: "12". :wtf: 12 ! Did the person rating this movie even see it? Imdb (or Cara[^]) rates it "R", which is better, but even then. I still can't believe that in todays society they don't have a better and more objective rating system. What's your opinion on this?

                    V.

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Roger Wright
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #24

                    There were no ratings when I was growing up, at least until the movie "Bonnie and Clyde" hit the theaters. Parents then were expected to do this thing called "parenting." But as I recall, "B&C" was completely over the top, and led to the first ratings. I know my mom didn't make it through the first reel - she had to leave the theater to hurl in the lobby. :laugh:

                    Will Rogers never met me.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Based on the trailer, it looks suitable for "me when I was 12" to me. I wouldn't have liked it, but that's not what the ratings are for. Reasons: - no nudity as far as I can see - no horror - no excessive gore - violence/drugs/references to sex/etc aren't going to scare many 12 year olds Here's the best rating system: have the parents watch the trailer and judge what their kid can handle, not all kids are the same. edit: of course if there is more nudity in the film then the trailer shows it would instantly have to be 18+.

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Dan Neely
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #25

                      harold aptroot wrote:

                      Here's the best rating system: have the parents watch the trailer and judge what their kid can handle, not all kids are the same.

                      A lot of R movies have G or PG trailers; so I'm not sure how well that'd work.

                      3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Dan Neely

                        harold aptroot wrote:

                        Here's the best rating system: have the parents watch the trailer and judge what their kid can handle, not all kids are the same.

                        A lot of R movies have G or PG trailers; so I'm not sure how well that'd work.

                        3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #26

                        Watch the whole movie then w/e point is, ratings are broken by design

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D Dalek Dave

                          A bare bottom is an abomination against god, but it is ok to see 300 murders a day on TV. I don't get american censorship.

                          ------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC League Table Link CCC Link[^]

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          LloydA111
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #27

                          Dalek Dave wrote:

                          A bare bottom is an abomination against god, but it is ok to see 300 murders a day on TV.

                          Probably has something to do with their creationist theory crap!


                          "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid."

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups