Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Soapbox
  4. Zeno's Paradox

Zeno's Paradox

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Soapbox
comtoolsquestion
12 Posts 9 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    Keith Barrow
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Here is what prompted the re-telling of this vernerable joke: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3585456/Re-Inplement-a-precise-timer.aspx[^] A mathematician, a physicist and and a chemist are have been gathered in a room for an experiment. The scientist leading the experiment says, to the three "As you no doubt have noticed, there is a beautiful, naked women in the middle of the room. Your task is to walk half the distance to her, stop, then walk half the distance again. When you reach her, she is happy to do whatever you want." The mathematician looks at the floor, estimates the first step, the second, the third. He then leaves the room saying "I'm out, I can never reach the woman" The physicist sets off, takes the first step, then notes distance tavelled, doe same for the second third and fourth steps. At this point he says "Experimental evidence suggests that it will take an infinite amount of time to reach the women" and leaves. The chemist begins to walk. The experimenter says "You know the others were right, you can't ever reach the women?". The chemist replies "Yes, I know, but I can get close enough for experimental purposes."

    ragnaroknrol The Internet is For Porn[^]
    Pete o'Hanlon: If it wasn't insulting tools, I'd say you were dumber than a bag of spanners.

    _ L C 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • K Keith Barrow

      Here is what prompted the re-telling of this vernerable joke: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3585456/Re-Inplement-a-precise-timer.aspx[^] A mathematician, a physicist and and a chemist are have been gathered in a room for an experiment. The scientist leading the experiment says, to the three "As you no doubt have noticed, there is a beautiful, naked women in the middle of the room. Your task is to walk half the distance to her, stop, then walk half the distance again. When you reach her, she is happy to do whatever you want." The mathematician looks at the floor, estimates the first step, the second, the third. He then leaves the room saying "I'm out, I can never reach the woman" The physicist sets off, takes the first step, then notes distance tavelled, doe same for the second third and fourth steps. At this point he says "Experimental evidence suggests that it will take an infinite amount of time to reach the women" and leaves. The chemist begins to walk. The experimenter says "You know the others were right, you can't ever reach the women?". The chemist replies "Yes, I know, but I can get close enough for experimental purposes."

      ragnaroknrol The Internet is For Porn[^]
      Pete o'Hanlon: If it wasn't insulting tools, I'd say you were dumber than a bag of spanners.

      _ Offline
      _ Offline
      _Damian S_
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Hearty chortle... I figured it was going to be something about estimates or rounding... close!!

      I don't have ADHD, I have ADOS... Attention Deficit oooh SHINY!! If you like cars, check out the Booger Mobile blog | If you feel generous - make a donation to Camp Quality!!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K Keith Barrow

        Here is what prompted the re-telling of this vernerable joke: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3585456/Re-Inplement-a-precise-timer.aspx[^] A mathematician, a physicist and and a chemist are have been gathered in a room for an experiment. The scientist leading the experiment says, to the three "As you no doubt have noticed, there is a beautiful, naked women in the middle of the room. Your task is to walk half the distance to her, stop, then walk half the distance again. When you reach her, she is happy to do whatever you want." The mathematician looks at the floor, estimates the first step, the second, the third. He then leaves the room saying "I'm out, I can never reach the woman" The physicist sets off, takes the first step, then notes distance tavelled, doe same for the second third and fourth steps. At this point he says "Experimental evidence suggests that it will take an infinite amount of time to reach the women" and leaves. The chemist begins to walk. The experimenter says "You know the others were right, you can't ever reach the women?". The chemist replies "Yes, I know, but I can get close enough for experimental purposes."

        ragnaroknrol The Internet is For Porn[^]
        Pete o'Hanlon: If it wasn't insulting tools, I'd say you were dumber than a bag of spanners.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        That is getting forwarded! :laugh:

        Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Keith Barrow

          Here is what prompted the re-telling of this vernerable joke: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3585456/Re-Inplement-a-precise-timer.aspx[^] A mathematician, a physicist and and a chemist are have been gathered in a room for an experiment. The scientist leading the experiment says, to the three "As you no doubt have noticed, there is a beautiful, naked women in the middle of the room. Your task is to walk half the distance to her, stop, then walk half the distance again. When you reach her, she is happy to do whatever you want." The mathematician looks at the floor, estimates the first step, the second, the third. He then leaves the room saying "I'm out, I can never reach the woman" The physicist sets off, takes the first step, then notes distance tavelled, doe same for the second third and fourth steps. At this point he says "Experimental evidence suggests that it will take an infinite amount of time to reach the women" and leaves. The chemist begins to walk. The experimenter says "You know the others were right, you can't ever reach the women?". The chemist replies "Yes, I know, but I can get close enough for experimental purposes."

          ragnaroknrol The Internet is For Porn[^]
          Pete o'Hanlon: If it wasn't insulting tools, I'd say you were dumber than a bag of spanners.

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Corporal Agarn
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I almost did a search for this one last week but decided not to. Thanks. By the way I heard it with an engineer instead of chemist, in engineering school 30 years ago. :)

          T K H 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • C Corporal Agarn

            I almost did a search for this one last week but decided not to. Thanks. By the way I heard it with an engineer instead of chemist, in engineering school 30 years ago. :)

            T Offline
            T Offline
            Tim Craig
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Me, too. And surprisingly, it was validated by encounters with mathematicians and scientists later on. :laugh:

            Once you agree to clans, tribes, governments...you've opted for socialism. The rest is just details.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Corporal Agarn

              I almost did a search for this one last week but decided not to. Thanks. By the way I heard it with an engineer instead of chemist, in engineering school 30 years ago. :)

              K Offline
              K Offline
              Keith Barrow
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              I heard it in the Chemistry Dept of my old Uni 15 years, so the original might have been adapted.

              ragnaroknrol The Internet is For Porn[^]
              Pete o'Hanlon: If it wasn't insulting tools, I'd say you were dumber than a bag of spanners.

              T 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K Keith Barrow

                I heard it in the Chemistry Dept of my old Uni 15 years, so the original might have been adapted.

                ragnaroknrol The Internet is For Porn[^]
                Pete o'Hanlon: If it wasn't insulting tools, I'd say you were dumber than a bag of spanners.

                T Offline
                T Offline
                Tim Craig
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Nope, they adapted it if it was the chemistry dept. From the standpoint of the joke, there's no difference between physicist and chemist. Both pure scientists.

                Once you agree to clans, tribes, governments...you've opted for socialism. The rest is just details.

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T Tim Craig

                  Nope, they adapted it if it was the chemistry dept. From the standpoint of the joke, there's no difference between physicist and chemist. Both pure scientists.

                  Once you agree to clans, tribes, governments...you've opted for socialism. The rest is just details.

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  CPallini
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Tim Craig wrote:

                  physicist and chemist. Both pure scientists.

                  chemist?! Nah chemists are basically alchemists, i.e. charlatans. :)

                  If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                  This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
                  [My articles]

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C CPallini

                    Tim Craig wrote:

                    physicist and chemist. Both pure scientists.

                    chemist?! Nah chemists are basically alchemists, i.e. charlatans. :)

                    If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                    This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
                    [My articles]

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Stone Free
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    I heard a slightly ruder version where the punch line features an Engineer. Engineer: That's near enough F**k it!

                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Stone Free

                      I heard a slightly ruder version where the punch line features an Engineer. Engineer: That's near enough F**k it!

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      CPallini
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      The engineer works better for that joke. :)

                      If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                      This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
                      [My articles]

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C Corporal Agarn

                        I almost did a search for this one last week but decided not to. Thanks. By the way I heard it with an engineer instead of chemist, in engineering school 30 years ago. :)

                        H Offline
                        H Offline
                        hairy_hats
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Keith himself posted in the Lounge in March[^] this year...

                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • H hairy_hats

                          Keith himself posted in the Lounge in March[^] this year...

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          RichardM1
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          I don't know about Keith, but I'm getting to the age where, if the last time it was posted was March, it's a new joke.

                          Opacity, the new Transparency.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups