Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. mosque in South Tower before and during 9-11

mosque in South Tower before and during 9-11

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcomhelpquestion
66 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C CaptainSeeSharp

    Islam is not a religion of peace. They will kill you deader than a hammer for drawing their prophet, or destroying their book. They have no tolerance for Jews or Christians, once they get the numbers like they have in the middle east, sharia law will be the supreme law of the land.

    Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

    G Offline
    G Offline
    Gonzoox
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    How little you know about other religions... I'm jewish and let me tell you again, you're wrong, you just keep failing, you will look more intelligent if you just leave this thread and say nothing else

    I want to die like my grandfather- asleep, not like the passengers in his car, screaming!

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G Gonzoox

      How little you know about other religions... I'm jewish and let me tell you again, you're wrong, you just keep failing, you will look more intelligent if you just leave this thread and say nothing else

      I want to die like my grandfather- asleep, not like the passengers in his car, screaming!

      C Offline
      C Offline
      CaptainSeeSharp
      wrote on last edited by
      #19

      You are an ignorant Jew. Ignorant Jews get beheaded by islamisists and get loaded up in concentration camps.

      Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

      G 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C CaptainSeeSharp

        You are an ignorant Jew. Ignorant Jews get beheaded by islamisists and get loaded up in concentration camps.

        Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

        G Offline
        G Offline
        Gonzoox
        wrote on last edited by
        #20

        Si this is how the intelligent, owner of the truth replies back... no arguments, just insulting when you can't say anything? yep, you call me ignorant when you only show your ignorance to others... GOOD JOB!!! now go and cash your welfare check

        I want to die like my grandfather- asleep, not like the passengers in his car, screaming!

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • W William Winner

          I saw the paper posted by Ravel, but I had heard something different. I had heard it was designed to withstand a 747 size impact (which that paper seems to suggest it wasn't). What I saw on the news afterwards was that it was designed properly, but not executed properly. The problem, as was reported, was with the insulation. Instead of using the insulation in the designs, it was constructed with spray-on insulation. The force of the impact caused a shockwave that literally blew all of the insulation off. This left the structural metal without any heat protection which lead to the weakening of the members and eventually the collapse of the building. But I'm sure there are other reports out there as to the cause of the collapse.

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #21

          Oh, hush. No-one wants the facts when they interfere with a good conspiracy fantasy. ;) :-D

          L u n a t i c F r i n g e

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G Gonzoox

            Si this is how the intelligent, owner of the truth replies back... no arguments, just insulting when you can't say anything? yep, you call me ignorant when you only show your ignorance to others... GOOD JOB!!! now go and cash your welfare check

            I want to die like my grandfather- asleep, not like the passengers in his car, screaming!

            C Offline
            C Offline
            CaptainSeeSharp
            wrote on last edited by
            #22

            You are not interested in real debate, so I just shoot BBs at your monkey ass and watch you jump up and down.

            Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Distind

              Facts are remarkably anti-American to some folks. I really thought the whole, 'Reality has a well-known liberal bias' thing was a joke, I'm starting to wonder these days. Another fun fact, Muslims existed before 9/11. I know people who don't realize that.

              W Offline
              W Offline
              wolfbinary
              wrote on last edited by
              #23

              Distind wrote:

              Another fun fact, Muslims existed before 9/11. I know people who don't realize that.

              That'd be really funny if it weren't so sad.

              That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S soap brain

                fat_boy wrote:

                I am waiting to find out just how the buildings came down so easilly.

                Yeah - if only there were some way of easily obtaining information... In the meantime, there's always something like this[^].

                W Offline
                W Offline
                wolfbinary
                wrote on last edited by
                #24

                Thanks that link was very illustrative. I'd understood the pancaking domino affect, but not engineering reasoning behind it.

                That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  I am waiting to find out just how the buildings came down so easilly. At the time I was shocked at how they just collapsed. An airplane is an insignificant thing to a building. Many buildings have been hit by planes, none to my knowledge have collapsed (Soon after 9 11 a plane in Italy hit a uilding, then there was the Dutch plane that crashed into a tower bock in Amsterdam years ago). And given the buildings were supposedly designed to withstand a plane crash. Well, its just very surprising that they came down so fast. I shudder to think that the US gov/big business had a hand in it, but I wouldnt put it past the Americans. Nothing is more important than profit to them.

                  Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #25

                  Riggggghhtt....... Go study civil engineering and come back in five years.

                  Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    I am waiting to find out just how the buildings came down so easilly. At the time I was shocked at how they just collapsed. An airplane is an insignificant thing to a building. Many buildings have been hit by planes, none to my knowledge have collapsed (Soon after 9 11 a plane in Italy hit a uilding, then there was the Dutch plane that crashed into a tower bock in Amsterdam years ago). And given the buildings were supposedly designed to withstand a plane crash. Well, its just very surprising that they came down so fast. I shudder to think that the US gov/big business had a hand in it, but I wouldnt put it past the Americans. Nothing is more important than profit to them.

                    Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #26

                    fat_boy wrote:

                    I shudder to think that the US gov/big business had a hand in it, but I wouldnt put it past the Americans. Nothing is more important than profit to them.

                    You're losing your touch. Surely you can come up with a more effective troll than this?

                    L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S soap brain

                      fat_boy wrote:

                      I am waiting to find out just how the buildings came down so easilly.

                      Yeah - if only there were some way of easily obtaining information... In the meantime, there's always something like this[^].

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Corporal Agarn
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #27

                      Having a degree in engineering and working in destructive testing for several years, the building collapse is as expected. Note that there are many reasons a building will or will not collapse, size of plane, where plane hits, type of construction, etc. Also note I have not done the calculations but have read reports on the collapse and talked to structural engineers.

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • W wolfbinary

                        http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/11/nyregion/11religion.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=mosque%20in%20south%20tower&st=cse[^] It's funny how over time more information about this whole issue comes out.

                        That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

                        I Offline
                        I Offline
                        Ian Shlasko
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #28

                        Yep, read about this last week. You know, at first I wasn't sure if the Park51 center was a good idea, but I'm pretty firmly in support of it. Especially if, as they say, it'll have those "prayer spaces" for different religions, not just one for Muslims. Sends a good message of cooperation. I may not subscribe to any religions, but I support the right to practice them, since the same right guarantees my ability NOT to practice any... As the Pagans say, "An it harms none, do what ye will."

                        Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                        Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C CaptainSeeSharp

                          Many people forget about building 7. The building was not hit by a plane, it just had a small fire in it and then suddenly free-fell perfectly without warning.

                          Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          LloydA111
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #29

                          And the building which apparently collapsed, and as the reporter was saying that it had collapsed it was actually visible and clearly standing in the background! And also the lack of any bits of the airplane that supposedly crashed into the pentagon, I googled it and found this pic: http://www.brasscheck.com/videos/911/pentagon-aerial.jpg[^] Certainly not a big enough hole for an airplane crash, looks more like a small explosion to me.


                          "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid."

                          C S 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • L LloydA111

                            And the building which apparently collapsed, and as the reporter was saying that it had collapsed it was actually visible and clearly standing in the background! And also the lack of any bits of the airplane that supposedly crashed into the pentagon, I googled it and found this pic: http://www.brasscheck.com/videos/911/pentagon-aerial.jpg[^] Certainly not a big enough hole for an airplane crash, looks more like a small explosion to me.


                            "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid."

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            CaptainSeeSharp
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #30

                            Lloyd Atkinson wrote:

                            And the building which apparently collapsed, and as the reporter was saying that it had collapsed it was actually visible and clearly standing in the background!

                            Yeah, I seen that. :doh:

                            Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                            L S 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • C CaptainSeeSharp

                              Lloyd Atkinson wrote:

                              And the building which apparently collapsed, and as the reporter was saying that it had collapsed it was actually visible and clearly standing in the background!

                              Yeah, I seen that. :doh:

                              Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              LloydA111
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #31

                              Of course, this footage is conveniently never on TV.


                              "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid."

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • W William Winner

                                I saw the paper posted by Ravel, but I had heard something different. I had heard it was designed to withstand a 747 size impact (which that paper seems to suggest it wasn't). What I saw on the news afterwards was that it was designed properly, but not executed properly. The problem, as was reported, was with the insulation. Instead of using the insulation in the designs, it was constructed with spray-on insulation. The force of the impact caused a shockwave that literally blew all of the insulation off. This left the structural metal without any heat protection which lead to the weakening of the members and eventually the collapse of the building. But I'm sure there are other reports out there as to the cause of the collapse.

                                T Offline
                                T Offline
                                Tim Craig
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #32

                                It was designed to withstand the impact of a 707 hitting it. Not a 767 and the fire resulting from it being fully laden with fuel. Contrary to what "super engineer" fat_boy might think, the tools to do that kind of analysis adequately when the Towers were designed did not exist. Considerable advancement has been made in finite element analysis in the intervening years, both from a structural standpoint but what is now becoming known as "multi-physics" where you can analyze many effects combined.

                                Once you agree to clans, tribes, governments...you've opted for socialism. The rest is just details.

                                L 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lost User

                                  Riggggghhtt....... Go study civil engineering and come back in five years.

                                  Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #33

                                  Trollslayer wrote:

                                  Go study civil engineering and come back in five years.

                                  You mean like Youngs modulus of elasticity and polar moments of inertia of I beams? You really are a typical internet fuckwit sometimes: I used to be a structural engineer and designed steel work for buildings in the stone cladding business, Some of the project I wored on included stanstead airport and the broadgate and moorgate developments in london. As I said, I would really like to know how those buldings came down so easilly.

                                  Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    fat_boy wrote:

                                    I shudder to think that the US gov/big business had a hand in it, but I wouldnt put it past the Americans. Nothing is more important than profit to them.

                                    You're losing your touch. Surely you can come up with a more effective troll than this?

                                    L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    Lost User
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #34

                                    Surely you can come up with a more interesting response?

                                    Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S soap brain

                                      fat_boy wrote:

                                      I am waiting to find out just how the buildings came down so easilly.

                                      Yeah - if only there were some way of easily obtaining information... In the meantime, there's always something like this[^].

                                      L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      Lost User
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #35

                                      This was proposed soon after 9/11 and it makes sense. It would explain why the floors pancaked down on each other. What I dont get is how the building, being designed to withstand an inpact by a 707 failed in this way. It shouldt have. I also think that having floor not joined to the skin makes for an immensely weak structure. Itrs a crap design IMO.

                                      Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C Corporal Agarn

                                        Having a degree in engineering and working in destructive testing for several years, the building collapse is as expected. Note that there are many reasons a building will or will not collapse, size of plane, where plane hits, type of construction, etc. Also note I have not done the calculations but have read reports on the collapse and talked to structural engineers.

                                        L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        Lost User
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #36

                                        The buildings were supposedly built to take an impact from a 707, a similar sized plane to those which hit the buildings. The design was poor. Not to tie the floors to the walls properly immensely weakens the structure. But how about WT7? How on earth did that collapse? It was almost untouched. A small fire, the impact of bulding debris. Many other buildings suffered similar fates that day without falling down.

                                        Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L Lost User

                                          Oh, hush. No-one wants the facts when they interfere with a good conspiracy fantasy. ;) :-D

                                          L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Lost User
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #37

                                          You imagine that I actually think there is a comspiracy? You are wrong. I want to know from an engineering point of view how the buildings collapsed.

                                          Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups