Harold would get along real well with these people.
-
http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/dpp/news/the_edge/dying-girl-taunted-by-neighbors-in-trenton[^] TRENTON, Mich. - Her family says 7-year-old Kathleen Edward is in the final stages of a degenerative brain disorder diagnosed as Huntington's Disease - the same disease which killed her mother, Laura, when she was only 24. Neighbors Jennifer and Scott Petkov, who have been feuding with the family, admitted to posting grim depictions of Laura and Kathleen on Facebook. One photo depicts Laura in the arms of the grim reaper, while the other features Kathleen's face above a set of crossbones. The couple also have a coffin hitched to a pick-up truck in front of the house, which they say is nothing more than a halloween decoration.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
They are enemies. Anything goes. The Edward side isn't that nice either, involving the media in a family dispute with the obvious purpose of discrediting the other side.
-
The implication that there could be a legitimate reason to mock a terminally ill child and her dead mother bothers me. You don't have credit to discredit at that point, you have made yourself into a sideshow.
-
harold aptroot wrote:
AFAIK they didn't do anything illegal.
True, but it was quite pretty cruel and that type of behavior really can't be condoned.
-
Doesn't have to be illegal to make yourself look like a complete moron, and society takes great interest in morons for some reason.
That's America for ya' and probably every other country as well.
modified on Wednesday, October 13, 2010 9:47 AM
-
harold aptroot wrote:
AFAIK they didn't do anything illegal.
True, but it was quite pretty cruel and that type of behavior really can't be condoned.
-
harold aptroot wrote:
Apparently it can, otherwise it would be illegal
Ethics and law have nothing to do with each other.
-
harold aptroot wrote:
Apparently it can, otherwise it would be illegal
Ethics and law have nothing to do with each other.
-
Then why is it illegal to rape and murder and steal? Seems to me that someone thought it was important enough to put in the law
harold aptroot wrote:
Seems to me that someone thought it was important enough to put in the law
Agreed, but the overlap between ethics and law does not make either complete. There are laws which aren't ethical, and there are ethical situations like this that do not fall under the law. They are exclusive and not dependent on each other.
-
harold aptroot wrote:
Seems to me that someone thought it was important enough to put in the law
Agreed, but the overlap between ethics and law does not make either complete. There are laws which aren't ethical, and there are ethical situations like this that do not fall under the law. They are exclusive and not dependent on each other.
-
Yea I guess, but if they'd make being unethical or being an ässhole illegal, the business world would die.
I believe we have reached complete agreement... :-\
-
They are enemies. Anything goes. The Edward side isn't that nice either, involving the media in a family dispute with the obvious purpose of discrediting the other side.
I'd be beating some heads in with a blunt weapon if those were my neighbors.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
The implication that there could be a legitimate reason to mock a terminally ill child and her dead mother bothers me. You don't have credit to discredit at that point, you have made yourself into a sideshow.
As harald would say, you'd be a "moralfag" for not mocking the terminally ill child during her last days alive. Moralfags are bad people because they are a threat to the pure scum and garbage of the earth.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
I'd be beating some heads in with a blunt weapon if those were my neighbors.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
No no. I wouldn't tolerate those neighbors, I'd set their truck on fire and break every window on their house and make them beg for mercy.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
No no. I wouldn't tolerate those neighbors, I'd set their truck on fire and break every window on their house and make them beg for mercy.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
No no. I wouldn't tolerate those neighbors, I'd set their truck on fire and break every window on their house and make them beg for mercy.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
No no. I wouldn't tolerate those neighbors, I'd set their truck on fire and break every window on their house and make them beg for mercy.
You wouldn't get the chance. They'd lynch you the moment they caught sight of your beautiful white robes and pointy hat.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
No no. I wouldn't tolerate those neighbors, I'd set their truck on fire and break every window on their house and make them beg for mercy.
You wouldn't get the chance. They'd lynch you the moment they caught sight of your beautiful white robes and pointy hat.
They even have a casket ready of the occasion :laugh: