To Christian Grauss and Marc Clifton re air flights [modified]
-
Dalek Dave wrote:
the water table is falling at a massive rate.
About as dramatically as the software development jobs available on the market.
-
Rage wrote:
About as dramatically as the software development jobs available on the market.
Don't worry the Indian bubble will burst soon.
-
-
Really .... move on! :)
Ali
-
Really .... move on! :)
Ali
-
'pot..kettle' is used to tell someone they are being hypocritical. Where have I been hypocritical?
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
What I meant was ..... You wrote: "Its funny how much the few hate this topic. They cannt ignore it" ..... but you can't ignore it either ..... Or put another way: The pot is calling the kettle black == you saying people can't ignore it, but you can't ignore it either .... that's all :)
Ali
-
What I meant was ..... You wrote: "Its funny how much the few hate this topic. They cannt ignore it" ..... but you can't ignore it either ..... Or put another way: The pot is calling the kettle black == you saying people can't ignore it, but you can't ignore it either .... that's all :)
Ali
Well, thats more a comment you should direct at my detractors since clearly THEY cant ignore it thought they feign disinterest in it. Of course I chose to 'not ignore' it since its a topic that I find relatively interesting. How that is hypocrisy I dont know.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
Rage wrote:
About as dramatically as the software development jobs available on the market.
Don't worry the Indian bubble will burst soon.
Norm .net wrote:
Don't worry the Indian bubble will burst soon.
Whenever your statement will become true for india then you would be next octopus for your country as you are from Germany and you will become sell-able item.... ;P
NMehta83 “We cannot fail until we fail to try”
-
Norm .net wrote:
Don't worry the Indian bubble will burst soon.
Whenever your statement will become true for india then you would be next octopus for your country as you are from Germany and you will become sell-able item.... ;P
NMehta83 “We cannot fail until we fail to try”
NMehta83 wrote:
Whenever your statement will become true for india then you would be next octopus for your country as you are from Germany and you will become sell-able item....
I've heard some nonsense in my life, but this sir, takes the biscuit. :wtf: are you talking about.
-
NMehta83 wrote:
Whenever your statement will become true for india then you would be next octopus for your country as you are from Germany and you will become sell-able item....
I've heard some nonsense in my life, but this sir, takes the biscuit. :wtf: are you talking about.
-
my mistake...i saw the wrong profile and that is why i have written the above statement.
NMehta83 “We cannot fail until we fail to try”
-
Christian, when you state "then catching a plane that was going to fly anyhow, in order to meet to discuss ways to control it, would make perfect sense." you obviously arent aware that planes use more fuel when more heavilly loaded. It's to do with angle of attack. And as for your question about offsetting, are you serious? Are you really happy that your tax money is being spent this way? Its your country after all. Marc "As the 64 flights, the article says 93 people. So, the per person cost of about 6000 seats comes out to about $160. First class? That's a heck of a lot cheaper than what I pay for coach on most Southwest flights. Seems like a good expenditure, frankly. If people would only do the math, it would be pretty easy to see through the BS media hype." It doesnt state that all 93 staff went to all 64 seminars (not flights by the way) so your sums are invalid. The srticel does clearly state "The trips cost taxpayers more than $2.74 million in airfares and $1.6 million for accommodation and meals. The Government's special envoy on climate change, Howard Bamsey, was the biggest spender, racking up $229,000 in travel costs during 2009-10."
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
moved on Tuesday, October 19, 2010 6:50 AM
I love seeing my name in lights. Even gray ones. ;) Marc
-
You were having this conversation several hours ago when he was awake, and you failed to mention it then. Presumably because the thought hadn't occured to you. That is fine, but to have a riposte 6 hours later is not showing you at the top of your game.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC League Table Link CCC Link[^]
Dalek Dave wrote:
Presumably because the thought hadn't occured to you.
fat_boy having a thought (i.e. thinking) is a big assumption on your part. ;) Marc
-
Christian, when you state "then catching a plane that was going to fly anyhow, in order to meet to discuss ways to control it, would make perfect sense." you obviously arent aware that planes use more fuel when more heavilly loaded. It's to do with angle of attack. And as for your question about offsetting, are you serious? Are you really happy that your tax money is being spent this way? Its your country after all. Marc "As the 64 flights, the article says 93 people. So, the per person cost of about 6000 seats comes out to about $160. First class? That's a heck of a lot cheaper than what I pay for coach on most Southwest flights. Seems like a good expenditure, frankly. If people would only do the math, it would be pretty easy to see through the BS media hype." It doesnt state that all 93 staff went to all 64 seminars (not flights by the way) so your sums are invalid. The srticel does clearly state "The trips cost taxpayers more than $2.74 million in airfares and $1.6 million for accommodation and meals. The Government's special envoy on climate change, Howard Bamsey, was the biggest spender, racking up $229,000 in travel costs during 2009-10."
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
moved on Tuesday, October 19, 2010 6:50 AM
Do I need to start asking politely again for you to respect my request to keep your GW diatribes out of the Lounge, or should I assume you don't really care and that simply deleting them will save us both a pointless conversation?
Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP
-
Do I need to start asking politely again for you to respect my request to keep your GW diatribes out of the Lounge, or should I assume you don't really care and that simply deleting them will save us both a pointless conversation?
Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP
-
Good point, just keep deleting them. See if you can keep up! :)
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
You're behaving just like CSS if you do. Do as you're asked or leave. It's his site not yours.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
-
You're behaving just like CSS if you do. Do as you're asked or leave. It's his site not yours.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
-
And what are you, his mouthpiece?
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
I know this is a new concept for you, but he's simply agreeing with the sentiment and expressing it.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
-
And what are you, his mouthpiece?
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
He is looking for a pat on the head and a treat from his dom.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
And what are you, his mouthpiece?
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
No. :rolleyes: That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_