Bacon again
-
I wanna try This[^] Too bad it's not available in Sweden :sigh: (and with the Swedish governments inhibited double standard morals towards alcohol, it's not likely it will ever be available here... :mad:)
1f y0u c4n r34d 7h15 y0u r3411y n33d 70 g37 14!d Gotta run; I've got people to do and things to see... Don't tell my folks I'm a computer programmer - They think I'm a piano player in a cat house... Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-
No it wasnt, it was settled by Vikings, AKA Norsemen, or Danes.
Media2r wrote:
As for the southern Britain remark - I have not found any significant difference between the two
Have you lived there or spent sufficient time there to see? There is a big difference. To generalise, a Northerners idea of a good night out is to get legless, then either have sex, or get into a fight. The Scots arent much better either. Southerners are not like this. And while you will see this behaviour in places in the south like Torquay, this is due to the vast influx of unemployed northerners who would rather claim benefit on the south coast of Britain rathern in some miserable red brick ex industrialised dump up north! :)
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
fat_boy wrote:
No it wasnt, it was settled by Vikings, AKA Norsemen, or Danes.
Having worked at the National Museum of Ireland, IN Dublin (Collins Barracks for the initiated), I beg to differ. Also, by claiming (paraphrased) "It wasn't Norwegians, it was Vikings" proves that you leave a little to be desired on the knowledge side of things in this discussion... ;) Further more, the original argument regarding norther Britain being the way you claim because of Norse settlements whereas the souther part was not is also invalid: Clickety[] //L
-
fat_boy wrote:
No it wasnt, it was settled by Vikings, AKA Norsemen, or Danes.
Having worked at the National Museum of Ireland, IN Dublin (Collins Barracks for the initiated), I beg to differ. Also, by claiming (paraphrased) "It wasn't Norwegians, it was Vikings" proves that you leave a little to be desired on the knowledge side of things in this discussion... ;) Further more, the original argument regarding norther Britain being the way you claim because of Norse settlements whereas the souther part was not is also invalid: Clickety[] //L
So you think the Vikings were all Norweigans? They werent, they were Danes for the most part. (Please note the 'moist part' and dont make this a simplistic argument) As for the history of Dublion, if you are so sure perhaps you shoul dedit wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dublin[^]
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
-
So you think the Vikings were all Norweigans? They werent, they were Danes for the most part. (Please note the 'moist part' and dont make this a simplistic argument) As for the history of Dublion, if you are so sure perhaps you shoul dedit wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dublin[^]
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
-
fat_boy wrote:
They werent, they were Danes for the most part.
Right. History got it wrong. Thank goodness we got you to set it straight. Key tip: Research before you make further factual errors. //L
Do you really still believe the childish myth that Vikings only came from Fjords? Really, please re read you so called history and dont pay so much attention to films with Kirk Douglas in them. The Normans, however, were descended from Danish Vikings [^] for example. And you might ask why Danish? Because they were the most active. In fact this is easilly attested to by the names of towns and villages in the part of the UK settled by the 'Vikings'. You might ask yourself why so many end with the same word for a Danish village: 'by' (Grimsby, Mumby (where I partly originate from) etc etc etc). Once again, if you are so sure please edit wiki.
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
-
Do you really still believe the childish myth that Vikings only came from Fjords? Really, please re read you so called history and dont pay so much attention to films with Kirk Douglas in them. The Normans, however, were descended from Danish Vikings [^] for example. And you might ask why Danish? Because they were the most active. In fact this is easilly attested to by the names of towns and villages in the part of the UK settled by the 'Vikings'. You might ask yourself why so many end with the same word for a Danish village: 'by' (Grimsby, Mumby (where I partly originate from) etc etc etc). Once again, if you are so sure please edit wiki.
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
-
Do you really still believe the childish myth that Vikings only came from Fjords? Really, please re read you so called history and dont pay so much attention to films with Kirk Douglas in them. The Normans, however, were descended from Danish Vikings [^] for example. And you might ask why Danish? Because they were the most active. In fact this is easilly attested to by the names of towns and villages in the part of the UK settled by the 'Vikings'. You might ask yourself why so many end with the same word for a Danish village: 'by' (Grimsby, Mumby (where I partly originate from) etc etc etc). Once again, if you are so sure please edit wiki.
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
Firstly, quoting from the article YOU linked to,
Wikipedia wrote:
Generally speaking, the Norwegians expanded to the north and west to places such as Ireland, Scotland, Iceland and Greenland; the Danes to England and France, settling in the Danelaw (northern/eastern England) and Normandy; and the Swedes to the east.
Secondly, I never claimed all vikings came from Norway. YOU claimed "most Vikings were Danes". Thirdly, if you want to drive this into the realm of slander,
fat_boy wrote:
Do you really still believe the childish myth that Vikings only came from Fjords?
...I will be more than happy to continue this in the Back Room where such behaviour is more the norm. //L
-
If Wiki is the definitive for history, what about this bit that says Dublin was founded by Norwegians who later repulsed the Danes? Facts, or are they[^]
Every man can tell how many goats or sheep he possesses, but not how many friends.
OK so some Norweigans founded the place that would later be called Dublin which 10 years later was taken by the Danes and remained under their control for centuries. DOnt see that that changes things overly much as to why some people in Ireland drink like Scandanavians. Oh, and I am serious, there is a big difference between the north and east and the south and west of the UK in this respect.
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
-
OK so some Norweigans founded the place that would later be called Dublin which 10 years later was taken by the Danes and remained under their control for centuries. DOnt see that that changes things overly much as to why some people in Ireland drink like Scandanavians. Oh, and I am serious, there is a big difference between the north and east and the south and west of the UK in this respect.
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
-
So you think the Vikings were all Norweigans? They werent, they were Danes for the most part. (Please note the 'moist part' and dont make this a simplistic argument) As for the history of Dublion, if you are so sure perhaps you shoul dedit wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dublin[^]
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
fat_boy wrote:
Please note the 'moist part'
Fnarrr! Fnarr! :laugh:
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
-
fat_boy wrote:
Please note the 'moist part'
Fnarrr! Fnarr! :laugh:
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Ooops, thats a typo and a half! (But I think I will leave it in place for posterity!) :laugh:
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
-
Do you really still believe the childish myth that Vikings only came from Fjords? Really, please re read you so called history and dont pay so much attention to films with Kirk Douglas in them. The Normans, however, were descended from Danish Vikings [^] for example. And you might ask why Danish? Because they were the most active. In fact this is easilly attested to by the names of towns and villages in the part of the UK settled by the 'Vikings'. You might ask yourself why so many end with the same word for a Danish village: 'by' (Grimsby, Mumby (where I partly originate from) etc etc etc). Once again, if you are so sure please edit wiki.
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
fat_boy wrote:
In fact this is easilly attested to by the names of towns and villages in the part of the UK settled by the 'Vikings'. You might ask yourself why so many end with the same word for a Swedish village: 'by' (Grimsby, Mumby (where I partly originate from) etc etc etc).
FTFY... :) Ljungby (where I originate from), Mjölby, etc, etc, etc...
-
I wanna try This[^] Too bad it's not available in Sweden :sigh: (and with the Swedish governments inhibited double standard morals towards alcohol, it's not likely it will ever be available here... :mad:)
1f y0u c4n r34d 7h15 y0u r3411y n33d 70 g37 14!d Gotta run; I've got people to do and things to see... Don't tell my folks I'm a computer programmer - They think I'm a piano player in a cat house... Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
It's supposed to be easy to make your own. The slow way involves (IIRC) 1 liter of vodka, 250g of bacon (cooked), a 2 liter jar with a lid and several weeks of waiting. The fast method is similar but includes 500g of bacon (cooked) and the grease from an additional kg of bacon. You combine the ingredients in the large jar and let it sit to absorb the flavor, and then put it in a freezer to force the grease to congeal for easy separation. FYI I've never done it, but did have a shot of express bacon vodka this spring. It was Baconriffic. :cool:
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
-
fat_boy wrote:
In fact this is easilly attested to by the names of towns and villages in the part of the UK settled by the 'Vikings'. You might ask yourself why so many end with the same word for a Swedish village: 'by' (Grimsby, Mumby (where I partly originate from) etc etc etc).
FTFY... :) Ljungby (where I originate from), Mjölby, etc, etc, etc...
Damn, I thouhgt there was a risk of that seeing as how the languages are related! :) Anyway, I have it on good authority that it was principly Danish Vikings that setteled the UK. And I am sticking to that. (In fact my surname comes from old scandaniavian for stream aparently. Probably explains why I drink so much! ;))
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
-
It's supposed to be easy to make your own. The slow way involves (IIRC) 1 liter of vodka, 250g of bacon (cooked), a 2 liter jar with a lid and several weeks of waiting. The fast method is similar but includes 500g of bacon (cooked) and the grease from an additional kg of bacon. You combine the ingredients in the large jar and let it sit to absorb the flavor, and then put it in a freezer to force the grease to congeal for easy separation. FYI I've never done it, but did have a shot of express bacon vodka this spring. It was Baconriffic. :cool:
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
Dan Neely wrote:
then put it in a freezer to force the grease to congeal for easy separation
Seems to me you'd want to filter it somehow in addition to this?!?!
1f y0u c4n r34d 7h15 y0u r3411y n33d 70 g37 14!d Gotta run; I've got people to do and things to see... Don't tell my folks I'm a computer programmer - They think I'm a piano player in a cat house... Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-
Dan Neely wrote:
then put it in a freezer to force the grease to congeal for easy separation
Seems to me you'd want to filter it somehow in addition to this?!?!
1f y0u c4n r34d 7h15 y0u r3411y n33d 70 g37 14!d Gotta run; I've got people to do and things to see... Don't tell my folks I'm a computer programmer - They think I'm a piano player in a cat house... Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-
Damn, I thouhgt there was a risk of that seeing as how the languages are related! :) Anyway, I have it on good authority that it was principly Danish Vikings that setteled the UK. And I am sticking to that. (In fact my surname comes from old scandaniavian for stream aparently. Probably explains why I drink so much! ;))
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
You are correct in stating it was predominantly Danish Vikings (Dubh-Gael) that settled in she suthern regions of England. The Norwegian Vikings (Finn-Gael) settled in the northern regions, as well as other countries. It is often misconstrued that the Danish Vikings made settlements in Ireland, and particularily in Dublin due to the similarity of the names. Dubh-Gael means (roughly) "dark hair" and Finn-Gael means (equally roughly) "light hair", whereas Dubh-Linn means "Black Pool". //L
-
Damn, I thouhgt there was a risk of that seeing as how the languages are related! :) Anyway, I have it on good authority that it was principly Danish Vikings that setteled the UK. And I am sticking to that. (In fact my surname comes from old scandaniavian for stream aparently. Probably explains why I drink so much! ;))
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
-
I wasn't that serious, couldn't help myself as I come from a "by" town. :) If I remember correctly there's also a difference in "by" between Sweden and Denmark. In Denmark it means town\city and in swedish it's smaller, like in village.
Oh, I always read it was Danish for village. Perhaps its any sized settlement. After all, it might start a villabe and become a town long after the meaning of the original language has gone. Such as Grimsby, which is a sizable place today. (But Mumby is alot smaller).
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
-
Oh, I always read it was Danish for village. Perhaps its any sized settlement. After all, it might start a villabe and become a town long after the meaning of the original language has gone. Such as Grimsby, which is a sizable place today. (But Mumby is alot smaller).
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
