Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Ah the irony of it

Ah the irony of it

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comquestion
66 Posts 11 Posters 7 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C CaptainSeeSharp

    Majerus wrote:

    It's not really suprising. The teabaggers don't have a principled stand against government programs and spending. They don't like spending on people that they have decided are undeserving.

    What a load of fucking horseshit. Cutting all government programs relating to welfare and unessential regulatory beurocracies and general waste and corruption is the core of the Tea Party. You are a bigoted lefty who's stupidity is being rejected nationwide and around the world, and that makes you a winy little thing.

    Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #16

    CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

    Cutting all government programs relating to welfare and unessential regulatory beurocracies and general waste and corruption is the core of the Tea Party.

    So who will decide which regulation is unessential? and what waste is general? What wil happen if people within this tiny govermment disagree about these?

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Majerus

      CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

      Cutting all government programs relating to welfare

      In other words - benefits to people they think are undeserving.

      CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

      unessential regulatory beurocracies and general waste and corruptio

      Meaningless buzz words.

      C Offline
      C Offline
      CaptainSeeSharp
      wrote on last edited by
      #17

      Majerus wrote:

      In other words - benefits to people they think are undeserving.

      Cutting all benefits in a responsible manner. Oh and by the way, not everybody gets benefits you know. They think those people are undeserving of them so they don't get any.

      Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

        Cutting all government programs relating to welfare and unessential regulatory beurocracies and general waste and corruption is the core of the Tea Party.

        So who will decide which regulation is unessential? and what waste is general? What wil happen if people within this tiny govermment disagree about these?

        C Offline
        C Offline
        CaptainSeeSharp
        wrote on last edited by
        #18

        Josh Gray wrote:

        So who will decide which regulation is unessential? and what waste is general? What wil happen if people within this tiny govermment disagree about these?

        The Constitution is the framework of the government. If they are not enumerated a certain power under the Constitution then they cannot do it. Disagreements with the constitution are irrelevant.

        Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C CaptainSeeSharp

          Josh Gray wrote:

          So who will decide which regulation is unessential? and what waste is general? What wil happen if people within this tiny govermment disagree about these?

          The Constitution is the framework of the government. If they are not enumerated a certain power under the Constitution then they cannot do it. Disagreements with the constitution are irrelevant.

          Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #19

          CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

          Disagreements with the constitution are irrelevant.

          What about disagreements reagarding the interpretation of the constitution?

          C J 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

            Disagreements with the constitution are irrelevant.

            What about disagreements reagarding the interpretation of the constitution?

            C Offline
            C Offline
            CaptainSeeSharp
            wrote on last edited by
            #20

            There are no disagreements regarding the interpretation between real conservatives and constitutionalists. Any disagreements are between the good guys vs. the lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians.

            Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C CaptainSeeSharp

              There are no disagreements regarding the interpretation between real conservatives and constitutionalists. Any disagreements are between the good guys vs. the lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians.

              Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #21

              CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

              There are no disagreements regarding the interpretation between real conservatives and constitutionalists. Any disagreements are between the good guys vs. the lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians.

              But there will be disagreements, under what power will the 'good guys' be able to dismiss others as 'lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians'?

              J C W 3 Replies Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                Disagreements with the constitution are irrelevant.

                What about disagreements reagarding the interpretation of the constitution?

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Joe Simes
                wrote on last edited by
                #22

                Like the bible? Good luck with that? ;)

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                  There are no disagreements regarding the interpretation between real conservatives and constitutionalists. Any disagreements are between the good guys vs. the lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians.

                  But there will be disagreements, under what power will the 'good guys' be able to dismiss others as 'lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians'?

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Joe Simes
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #23

                  If a person was robbing you at gun point don't you think the robber would think that the cop trying to arrest him was the 'bad guy'? :)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Joe Simes

                    Like the bible? Good luck with that? ;)

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #24

                    Joe Simes wrote:

                    Like the bible? Good luck with that?

                    Don't spoil my fun!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • W wolfbinary

                      http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=529AD458-F859-AAB8-4D74EDC0FFA2DD0D[^] A tea party candidate who ran on repeal of Obama Care because it's a government take over of health care wants to know why he has to wait a month for his. He goes on to say how he's never worked for any employer who doesn't cover you on day one. That's funny I've never worked for anyone who did. Nice, what a tosser.

                      That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #25

                      *Snigger*

                      Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]

                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                        There are no disagreements regarding the interpretation between real conservatives and constitutionalists. Any disagreements are between the good guys vs. the lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians.

                        But there will be disagreements, under what power will the 'good guys' be able to dismiss others as 'lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians'?

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        CaptainSeeSharp
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #26

                        Josh Gray wrote:

                        under what power will the 'good guys' be able to dismiss others as 'lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians'?

                        The law.

                        Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          *Snigger*

                          Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]

                          C Offline
                          C Offline
                          CaptainSeeSharp
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #27

                          Trollslayer wrote:

                          *Snigger*

                          Racist.

                          Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                          _ 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C CaptainSeeSharp

                            Josh Gray wrote:

                            under what power will the 'good guys' be able to dismiss others as 'lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians'?

                            The law.

                            Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #28

                            CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                            Josh Gray wrote: under what power will the 'good guys' be able to dismiss others as 'lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians'? The law.

                            So who will define that law and under what power?

                            C 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                              Josh Gray wrote: under what power will the 'good guys' be able to dismiss others as 'lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians'? The law.

                              So who will define that law and under what power?

                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              CaptainSeeSharp
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #29

                              Josh Gray wrote:

                              So who will define that law and under what power?

                              The Constitution is the law, and under the powers enumerated by the Constitution do they enforce the law.

                              Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C CaptainSeeSharp

                                Josh Gray wrote:

                                So who will define that law and under what power?

                                The Constitution is the law, and under the powers enumerated by the Constitution do they enforce the law.

                                Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Lost User
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #30

                                CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                                The Constitution is the law, and under the powers enumerated by the Constitution do they enforce the law.

                                And the circle of reasoning is complete!

                                C 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lost User

                                  CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                                  The Constitution is the law, and under the powers enumerated by the Constitution do they enforce the law.

                                  And the circle of reasoning is complete!

                                  C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  CaptainSeeSharp
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #31

                                  The Constitution is like the steel and concrete foundation of the entire country. It is the kernel, the lowest level of it. If it becomes corrupted by a rootkit or a virus (ie: liberal) things fall apart.

                                  Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • C CaptainSeeSharp

                                    The Constitution is like the steel and concrete foundation of the entire country. It is the kernel, the lowest level of it. If it becomes corrupted by a rootkit or a virus (ie: liberal) things fall apart.

                                    Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    Lost User
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #32

                                    CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                                    The Constitution is like the steel and concrete foundation of the entire country.

                                    Exactly, you can't live in a foundation. What I'm asking you is who decides what is built on top of that foundation? You need builders, contracors, someone to paint it (or do you want wallpaper?) etc. Then you need a project manager to coordinate those people. They need rules about how they interact, who decides what material you use for the roof? What about landscaping? What about furniture? Central heating? etc etc If you want a software analogy who decides how user mode applications interact with the kernal? Who writes the memory manager?

                                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                                      The Constitution is like the steel and concrete foundation of the entire country.

                                      Exactly, you can't live in a foundation. What I'm asking you is who decides what is built on top of that foundation? You need builders, contracors, someone to paint it (or do you want wallpaper?) etc. Then you need a project manager to coordinate those people. They need rules about how they interact, who decides what material you use for the roof? What about landscaping? What about furniture? Central heating? etc etc If you want a software analogy who decides how user mode applications interact with the kernal? Who writes the memory manager?

                                      C Offline
                                      C Offline
                                      CaptainSeeSharp
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #33

                                      Josh Gray wrote:

                                      What I'm asking you is who decides what is built on top of that foundation?

                                      Congress.

                                      Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C CaptainSeeSharp

                                        Josh Gray wrote:

                                        What I'm asking you is who decides what is built on top of that foundation?

                                        Congress.

                                        Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                                        L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        Lost User
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #34

                                        CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                                        Congress.

                                        Isn't that what you have now?

                                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • C CaptainSeeSharp

                                          Majerus wrote:

                                          In other words - benefits to people they think are undeserving.

                                          Cutting all benefits in a responsible manner. Oh and by the way, not everybody gets benefits you know. They think those people are undeserving of them so they don't get any.

                                          Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                                          M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Majerus
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #35

                                          Cutting all benefits that might accrue to the unemployed, the lower and middle classes so that the rich can have more tax cuts. That is what teabaggers are for.

                                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups