New Filter Option in Who's Who
-
That's just your first step on the ladder to greatness.
I have CDO, it's OCD with the letters in the right order; just as they ruddy well should be
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
That's just your first slip on the slide to the sewer.
ftfy
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
-
If we keep this up I can get to page 10 in about a week or two.
-
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
That's just your first slip on the slide to the sewer.
ftfy
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
Potayto, potahto.
I have CDO, it's OCD with the letters in the right order; just as they ruddy well should be
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
-
Excellent keep the up votes coming. If I can get to 2100 from my measly 1670's then I jump about 4-5 pages so I have some work to do.
Vote begging can get you into trouble you know.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
-
We can now filter on reputation. :)
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001I'm on page 4 ,putting me in the top 100 (just). I'm surprised at that, however it is marred slightly by being behing this guy[^]: 23,413 rep points of whch 23,076 are editororganiser points (one "technical" thing - a reply to someone else's article) all in only one year!
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^]modified on Wednesday, December 1, 2010 8:38 AM
-
I'm on page 4 ,putting me in the top 100 (just). I'm surprised at that, however it is marred slightly by being behing this guy[^]: 23,413 rep points of whch 23,076 are editororganiser points (one "technical" thing - a reply to someone else's article) all in only one year!
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^]modified on Wednesday, December 1, 2010 8:38 AM
That does sound a little off, maybe writing articles provides a greater amount of Rep points in one go than a regular forum post can. Perhaps that value is because of timing regarding his posting of that article. In any case it does seem a little weird. Anyway I have made some interesting calculations. If I post and get 5'd as I have been this morning then I will earn approx 150 points per hour, this means that in my usual 40 hour working week I can amass 30000 points. I imagine this is the upper and unlikely end of the scale of what is possible but hey, not bad going really. So I really don't see how we cannot get someone right on the heels of CG.
-
That does sound a little off, maybe writing articles provides a greater amount of Rep points in one go than a regular forum post can. Perhaps that value is because of timing regarding his posting of that article. In any case it does seem a little weird. Anyway I have made some interesting calculations. If I post and get 5'd as I have been this morning then I will earn approx 150 points per hour, this means that in my usual 40 hour working week I can amass 30000 points. I imagine this is the upper and unlikely end of the scale of what is possible but hey, not bad going really. So I really don't see how we cannot get someone right on the heels of CG.
He has hardly written anything, he commented on the article, he did not write even that. Almost all his points have been earned "Organising" other people's stuff i.e. 23k points from voting! Take a look at his rep-graph, veritical doesn't even desctibe it.
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^] -
We can now filter on reputation. :)
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
So you're doing it for the money alone?
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
just the expenses.
As barmey as a sack of badgers Dude, if I knew what I was doing in life, I'd be rich, retired, dating a supermodel and laughing at the rest of you from the sidelines.
-
On CP, it is fairly important. Elsewhere, not so much.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
On CP, it is fairly important. Elsewhere, not so much.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001Only someone who's gained no reputation in 3 years of membership thinks it's unimportant here.
I have CDO, it's OCD with the letters in the right order; just as they ruddy well should be
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
-
He has hardly written anything, he commented on the article, he did not write even that. Almost all his points have been earned "Organising" other people's stuff i.e. 23k points from voting! Take a look at his rep-graph, veritical doesn't even desctibe it.
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^]Keith Barrow wrote:
23k points from voting!
He is a kind organizer. :rolleyes:
thatraja |Chennai|India|
Brainbench certifications
Down-votes are like kid's kisses don't reject it :-)
Do what you want quickly because the Doomsday on 2012 :-) -
We can now filter on reputation. :)
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001Finally, I'm on the second page of one of those sorts. First page, here I come!
