Moved to soapbox
-
Repost ;P
leppie wrote:
Repost
I know...the temptation was too strong.
-
Why does your avatar look like two gay dancers that just got it on?
That's twice pompeyboy's avatar has been mentioned - but the guy on the right looks similar to the one in yesterday's picture. Is this actually pompeyboy??!
Sarchasm : The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
-
http://www.codeproject.com/Lounge.aspx?msg=3739597#xx3739597xx[^] Okay, so it wasn't exactly a "promise" by the strictest definition of the term, but threatening to act, and then doing nothing is the sign of a coward. You really gotta start revisiting the threads in which you participate. In all actuality, it's pointless to respond to your posts because you admitted yesterday that you don't look at responses, but when one considers the paradox that exists when you *do* respond, one wonders whether you were just begging off because simply didn't have a decent response to the response that you were wanting to respond to. The universe is about to collapse in on itself.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997modified on Thursday, January 20, 2011 6:09 AM
I do look at responses. Its just the post you were refering to yesterday was one which you posted in reply to someone else in that thread, so I didn't get notification. In general once a thread reaches page 3, I do not re-visit it unless I get notification that someone has responded directly to one of my posts. So fear not, the universe is not about to collapse. I didn't threaten, I just indicated I was debating to change it to 'Gay dancer with something stuck up his Bunghole' but decided not to as it would not fit in with the stated standards of this site.
-
I'd just like to point out the double standards on this site recently. A number of members were lambasted recently for their comments about a new member. PompeyBoy has attracted comments on his sexual orientation 2 days running and noone has jumped to his defence yet or even suggested these comments are inappropriate.
Pete
-
I'd just like to point out the double standards on this site recently. A number of members were lambasted recently for their comments about a new member. PompeyBoy has attracted comments on his sexual orientation 2 days running and noone has jumped to his defence yet or even suggested these comments are inappropriate.
Pete
Peter Mulholland wrote:
PompeyBoy has attracted comments on his sexual orientation
Who said anything about his sexual orientation? I merely commented on his avatars. If you read the threads in question, he has made no statement that I am aware of regarding him being offended by my posts. Inappropriate...maybe. Double standards...no. Welcome to the Lounge.
-
Peter Mulholland wrote:
PompeyBoy has attracted comments on his sexual orientation
Who said anything about his sexual orientation? I merely commented on his avatars. If you read the threads in question, he has made no statement that I am aware of regarding him being offended by my posts. Inappropriate...maybe. Double standards...no. Welcome to the Lounge.
I did add a joke icon, my comments were toungue in cheek. And I don't disagree with any comments you've made about his avatars :-D
Pete
-
I'd just like to point out the double standards on this site recently. A number of members were lambasted recently for their comments about a new member. PompeyBoy has attracted comments on his sexual orientation 2 days running and noone has jumped to his defence yet or even suggested these comments are inappropriate.
Pete
-
I did add a joke icon, my comments were toungue in cheek. And I don't disagree with any comments you've made about his avatars :-D
Pete
Sorry Peter. I didn't see that you were joking. My bad.
-
Sorry Peter. I didn't see that you were joking. My bad.
no worries, happens easily on the web.
Pete
-
I'd just like to point out the double standards on this site recently. A number of members were lambasted recently for their comments about a new member. PompeyBoy has attracted comments on his sexual orientation 2 days running and noone has jumped to his defence yet or even suggested these comments are inappropriate.
Pete
It's also been suggested that PompeyBoy takes it in the ash, and that particular message was 5 voted as well. To be more precise, the discussion is about his avatar, not him (or her). In the end (no pun intended), it's just a bit of sport we're having and anyone without an identifiable sense of humor should simply look away.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 -
Peter Mulholland wrote:
PompeyBoy has attracted comments on his sexual orientation
Who said anything about his sexual orientation? I merely commented on his avatars. If you read the threads in question, he has made no statement that I am aware of regarding him being offended by my posts. Inappropriate...maybe. Double standards...no. Welcome to the Lounge.